Palin's eyes

[Creepn]

lol I did not photoshop this photo in anyway. You can go to the source and see it for yourself http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/06/palins-husband-takes-written-questions-in-trooper-probe/





http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/10/06/art.todd.palin.2.jpg

[hater]

Someone call her pastor!!

she is being possesed by evil witchcrafts again!

[Creepn]

:lmao

[Man of Steel]

I look into Palin's eyes.

I see...

Sheer lunacy...

[Anti.Hero]

http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q26/cmartinez3179/301971587v3_240x240_Front.jpg

Man you libtards are goofy as shit.

[Obstructed_View]

lol I did not photoshop this photo in anyway.
You didn't, but somebody did.

It continues to amaze me how a skinny 40 year old woman can scare you idiots so bad.

[JoeChalupa]

You didn't, but somebody did.

It continues to amaze me how a skinny 40 year old woman can scare you idiots so bad.

Or a 40 something year old black man can scare you numbskulls so bad.

[Obstructed_View]

Or a 40 something year old black man can scare you numbskulls so bad.

To what numbskulls do you refer?

[JoeChalupa]

To what numbskulls do you refer?

To which idiots do you refer?

[Bigzax]

Or a 40 something year old black man can scare you numbskulls so bad.



dude...michael jackson is blacker than obama...:lol

[Obstructed_View]

To which idiots do you refer?

If you aren't able to just look at the threads in this forum, then I don't know what to tell you, but it pretty much puts you in the camp you jumped in here to defend.

Pointing out that Obama is trying to portray himself far differently than his history, voting record, and personal and political associations would indicate is a far cry from starting posts suggesting she has devil eyes, wouldn't you agree?

[BacktoBasics]

This is actually a rare genetic disorder passed down by her ancestors who walked with dinosaurs.

[Anti.Hero]

I fear the current breed of libtards are far more dangerous to our survival than the dinosaurs.

[Obstructed_View]

No, I really want to know what they are thinking. I really liked Obama 18 months ago. He's very presidential, and speaks and carries himself well. He's an excellent representative for America if he doesn't wield any actual power. As time has passed, what he says and portrays doesn't line up with what little is known about him, including his voting record and associations, and many other things about him are mysterious. If I point out a genuine reservation I have about the man, I'm usually attacked with some suggestion that I'm too much of a bigot to vote for a black man, etc. It's not like I'm in here starting a thread saying, "Jeebuz look at his nappy liberal hair LOL".

As an undecided voter who was luke-warm at best for John McCain, having any of my requests for details about Obama rebuffed with insults and rhetoric just gives evidence that there's no substance to that side. Combine it with the completely insane and desperate attacks against the one person the Republicans have come up with in the last 30 years that's interesting, and said lack of substance is pretty much confirmed.

[RandomGuy]

dude...michael jackson is blacker than obama...:lol

I beg to differ.

Only in America can a poor black boy grow up to be a rich white woman.

[RandomGuy]

No, I really want to know what they are thinking. I really liked Obama 18 months ago. He's very presidential, and speaks and carries himself well. He's an excellent representative for America if he doesn't wield any actual power. As time has passed, what he says and portrays doesn't line up with what little is known about him, including his voting record and associations, and many other things about him are mysterious. If I point out a genuine reservation I have about the man, I'm usually attacked with some suggestion that I'm too much of a bigot to vote for a black man, etc. It's not like I'm in here starting a thread saying, "Jeebuz look at his nappy liberal hair LOL".

As an undecided voter who was luke-warm at best for John McCain, having any of my requests for details about Obama rebuffed with insults and rhetoric just gives evidence that there's no substance to that side. Combine it with the completely insane and desperate attacks against the one person the Republicans have come up with in the last 30 years that's interesting, and said lack of substance is pretty much confirmed.

What would you like to know?

I am more than willing to be honest about the man, warts and all.

I support him and, contrary to what a lot of right-wingers seem to like to believe/say about his supporters, don't think he is some kind of Messiah.

[ElNono]

No, I really want to know what they are thinking. I really liked Obama 18 months ago. He's very presidential, and speaks and carries himself well. He's an excellent representative for America if he doesn't wield any actual power. As time has passed, what he says and portrays doesn't line up with what little is known about him, including his voting record and associations, and many other things about him are mysterious. If I point out a genuine reservation I have about the man, I'm usually attacked with some suggestion that I'm too much of a bigot to vote for a black man, etc. It's not like I'm in here starting a thread saying, "Jeebuz look at his nappy liberal hair LOL".

As an undecided voter who was luke-warm at best for John McCain, having any of my requests for details about Obama rebuffed with insults and rhetoric just gives evidence that there's no substance to that side. Combine it with the completely insane and desperate attacks against the one person the Republicans have come up with in the last 30 years that's interesting, and said lack of substance is pretty much confirmed.

You call Obama mysterious, and think Pallin is interesting?
That's... interesting.
Obama has a public voting record on many issues that matter, such as economics, foreign policy, health care, national security, etc. You might agree or not on how he voted, but it's out there for all to see.
What do you know about Pallin? What makes her 'interesting'?
This is not an attack, just honest questions.
I think Pallin is the more mysterious one, in the sense that there are many topics she just simply haven't had to deal with as governor. And I think it really shows when she's been asked about it.

And please, I definitely won't call you a bigot, nor pretend to change your voting preference. We can simply talk about this.

[Obstructed_View]

And please, I definitely won't call you a bigot, nor pretend to change your voting preference. We can simply talk about this.
Fair enough. As someone that didn't really like McCain, I qualified as one of the undecided voters during much of the season. I like the veep pick.


You call Obama mysterious, and think Pallin is interesting?
That's... interesting.
First of all, comparing the VP candidate on one side to the head of the ticket on the other side is a trap. I don't know anything more about Palin than I do about Obama, but what I don't know doesn't concern me as much, for the same reason I'm not talking about what I don't know about Joe Biden. Palin balances out a relatively liberal candidate in order to shore up the right on the ticket.

As for her appeal, compare Sarah Palin to George Bush, Dick Cheney, Bob Dole, Jack Kemp, George Bush Sr, Dan Quayle, Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, Charlie Crist, or even John McCain and tell me she isn't interesting or energetic, particularly for a Republican party that's been rolling out fuddy duddies ever since Newt Gingrich was vilified and run out of town on a rail. I'd suggest that the huge backlash against her is motivated by people that are scared shitless of an energized Republican party. I'd imagine Bobby Jindal would have gotten much of the same because he would have generated similar enthusiasm from the conservatives.


Obama has a public voting record on many issues that matter, such as economics, foreign policy, health care, national security, etc. You might agree or not on how he voted, but it's out there for all to see.

Obama served two years, and seems to have a huge abstention rate, even on "issues that matter"

Budget, Spending and Taxes 76%
Education 80%
Health Issues 90%

And rhetoric aside, when he does vote it's pretty far to the left. Again, I wouldn't have a huge problem with it but the attempt to deny it concerns me. Is he going to be like Clinton, where he promises the left-wing groups things and then doesn't follow through knowing they'll forgive him, or is he going to be something new, where he claims to be a moderate until he's given a Democrat controlled congress and a pen?


What do you know about Pallin? What makes her 'interesting'?
This is not an attack, just honest questions.
I think Pallin is the more mysterious one, in the sense that there are many topics she just simply haven't had to deal with as governor. And I think it really shows when she's been asked about it.
Again, that she's arguably more mysterious than Obama isn't the issue. If we're having this discussion, the issue should probably be why Obama isn't the VP on the ticket. As for her part, I'm quite certain the ongoing investigations into Sarah Palin's entire life currently being undertaken by her opponents will find anything that we need concern ourselves with about her, and probably many things we need not before election day. So far she seems to be what she claims to be. If you don't like conservatives, you won't like her. I have disagreements with many conservative positions, but at least I know clearly what those positions are. I also know what the positions I agree with are, and know that decisions will be influenced by her input in the administration.

There are plenty of topics she doesn't deal with as governor of a state. In fact, you could make a case that she's less qualified to be vice president than she is to be president because she's never cast a vote in the senate. She seems to have a pretty good grasp of topics, even if she isn't a polished politician.


That said, I'm not sure what you are referring to. Charlie Gibson asked her a stupid question, and acted like he caught her in some moment of ignorance. People trying to catch her in a gotcha moment isn't surprising, though.

The debate was kind of a back and forth of rhetoric, and if I had to listen to "country first" or "maverick" without refexively rolling my eyes I don't know if I could do it. Despite Joe Biden being on the wrong side of many debates, I expected him to clean her clock. That he won isn't surprising, that she held her own is.

[clambake]

OV, palins importance cannot be avoided, and neither can her lack of knowledge.

mccain is "one loose handrail away from death".

[Obstructed_View]

OV, palins importance cannot be avoided, and neither can her lack of knowledge.

Well, you're half right.

[Shastafarian]

Well, you're half right.

Which half?

[Obstructed_View]

Which half?

So you aren't sure if either statement you made is true? :lol

[Shastafarian]

So you aren't sure if either statement you made is true? :lol

I didn't say it...

[clambake]

I didn't say it...

his view is obstructed.

[Obstructed_View]

I didn't say it...

:lol


his view is obstructed.

Yes, I must admit that it was. :lol