PDA

View Full Version : Palin Admits Voters Irritated By Campaign Robocalls



LakeShow
10-20-2008, 12:12 AM
McCain's Robocalls Have Parents Worried About Their Kids (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/20/mccains-robocalls-have-pa_n_136044.html)

One of the more noteworthy responses to John McCain's massive robocall campaign tying Barack Obama to Bill Ayers has been from parents whose children have been on the receiving end of the incendiary calls.

Many have contacted the Huffngton Post detailing concerns that their kids were being told, in essence, that the possible next president of the United States associates with terrorist figures.

"My daughter answered the phone today and began listening to the most disturbing call regarding bombing and terrorists. She ran with the phone to get me, I heard just the end snippet of the call and immediately called the number cited as responsible," wrote a reader from North Carolina. "I was so angry and let them have it. I had to explain to my 7-year-old daughter that no one was bombing anyone else. This was a horrific experience."
So it was more than just a bit ironic to be reminded that during the Republican South Carolina primary in 2000 it was a distraught mother who thrust the issue of the anti-McCain robocall campaign into the national spotlight.

A reader sends over a clip from the film company (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFPddnQOhME) "Journeyman Pictures," that replays some notable news footage from those heady political days. In it is a shot of a woman, addressing McCain at a South Carolina rally, with word of the behind-the-scenes effort to paint him as "a cheat and a liar and a fraud."

"He was so upset," she said of her 14-year-old son who had received the call. "He was almost in tears. I was so mad. I was so livid last night I couldn't sleep."

McCain, visibly shaken by the woman's testimony, denounced the tactic entirely and would later unilaterally pull all of his negative advertising.
"I really hope that people that are doing these things could have heard and seen your statement because we don't need to do this to young people," said the Senator. Outside the hall, he was even more direct: "I'm calling on my good friend George Bush to stop this now, to stop this now. I can't believe that a person from a good family such as George Bush wouldn't stop this. But if he doesn't then I will call him or I will write him or I will do whatever I can."

Story continues below http://www.huffingtonpost.com/images/v/darr.gif

Eight years later, the role, in many ways, is reversed (though, to be fair, the Obama campaign has not denied that it is running negative robocalls itself). Only this time, it seems, there is a stark difference: the robocalls don't seem to be working. On Sunday, McCain's own running mate said the tactic had "irritated" people who were "just being inundated."

"If I called all the shots, and if I could wave a magic wand," said Gov. Sarah Palin (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/19/palin-says-voters-irritated-by-robocalls/), "I would be sitting at a kitchen table with more and more Americans, talking to them about our plan to get the economy back on track and winning the war and not having to rely on the old conventional ways of campaigning that includes those robocalls and includes spending so much money on the television ads that, I think, is kind of draining out there in terms of Americans' attention span."

Meanwhile, an ABC News/Washington Post poll showed that sixty percent of voters thought Obama's relationship with Ayers was "not a legitimate issue in the presidential campaign." Thirty-seven percent said it was.

And yet, despite the criticism and evidence, McCain has stuck by the strategy that once undermined his presidential ambitions.

"These are legitimate and truthful and they are far different than the phone calls that were made about my family and about certain aspects that -- things that this is -- this is dramatically different and either you haven't -- didn't see those things in 2000," he told Fox News' Chris Wallace (http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/McCain_defends_robocalls.html?showall).

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/politics/

Tully365
10-20-2008, 12:16 AM
Robocalls are annoying as hell, regardless of which party is behind them.

RandomGuy
10-20-2008, 10:22 AM
The Robocalls simply show that despite McCain's maverick-y-ness, he is still mired in the slime that is the radical, win-at-all costs portion of the Republican party that is actually running things.

Republicans can't claim that this is some "rogue" operation, given their much vaunted discipline. This kind of shady stuff is AT THE VERY LEAST tacitly approved of by the RNC, if not outright funded. Given that Rove is on the case, you can bet that they aren't so stupid as to do the latter, though.

boutons_
10-20-2008, 10:46 AM
pitbull bitch is already distancing herself from the losing McNasty campaign, and starting her next campaign. Senator-R, Rep-R pitbull bitch?

LakeShow
10-20-2008, 12:55 PM
pitbull bitch is already distancing herself from the losing McNasty campaign, and starting her next campaign. Senator-R, Rep-R pitbull bitch?

Looks like every man(woman) for themselves at this point.

October 20, 2008
Palin and McCain disagree on federal gay marriage ban (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/20/palin-and-mccain-disagree-on-federal-gay-marriage-ban/)
Posted: 09:35 AM ET

From CNN Political Producer Peter Hamby (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/tag/cnn-political-producer-peter-hamby/)
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/10/20/art.mccain.palin.vp.jpg Palin and McCain disagree on a federal gay marriage ban.

http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/.element/img/2.0/mosaic/base_skins/baseplate/corner_wire_BL.gif

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado (CNN) — Add one more policy item to the list of things John McCain and Sarah Palin disagree on.
Palin told CBN’s David Brody over the weekend that she supports a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, a proposal John McCain voted against in 2004. McCain believes the matter should be left to the states.
Brody asked Palin if she supports “something like” an amendment banning gay marriage.
“I am,” Palin said. “In my own, state, I have voted along with the vast majority of Alaskans who had the opportunity to vote to amend our Constitution defining marriage as between one man and one woman. I wish on a federal level that that's where we would go because I don't support gay marriage.
“I'm not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can't do, should and should not do,” she said. “But I certainly can express my own opinion here and take actions that I believe would be best for traditional marriage and that's casting my votes and speaking up for traditional marriage that, that instrument that it's the foundation of our society is that strong family and that's based on that traditional definition of marriage, so I do support that.”

McCain and Palin disagree on a number of issues, including stem cell research, whether or not global warming is man-made, and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve.
In the past, McCain has joked away any policy differences between the two running mates.
“By the way, you may figure out from time to time, Sarah and I don’t agree on every issue,” McCain said at a joint town hall last month in Michigan. “What do you expect of two mavericks, to agree on everything? Eh?”

Filed under: John McCain (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/category/presidential-candidates/john-mccain/) • Sarah Palin (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/category/sarah-palin/)

ElNono
10-20-2008, 01:04 PM
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado (CNN) — Add one more policy item to the list of things John McCain and Sarah Palin disagree on.
Palin told CBN’s David Brody over the weekend that she supports a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, a proposal John McCain voted against in 2004. McCain believes the matter should be left to the states.
Brody asked Palin if she supports “something like” an amendment banning gay marriage.
“I am,” Palin said. “In my own, state, I have voted along with the vast majority of Alaskans who had the opportunity to vote to amend our Constitution defining marriage as between one man and one woman. I wish on a federal level that that's where we would go because I don't support gay marriage.
“I'm not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can't do, should and should not do,” she said. “But I certainly can express my own opinion here and take actions that I believe would be best for traditional marriage and that's casting my votes and speaking up for traditional marriage that, that instrument that it's the foundation of our society is that strong family and that's based on that traditional definition of marriage, so I do support that.”

McCain and Palin disagree on a number of issues, including stem cell research, whether or not global warming is man-made, and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve.
In the past, McCain has joked away any policy differences between the two running mates.
“By the way, you may figure out from time to time, Sarah and I don’t agree on every issue,” McCain said at a joint town hall last month in Michigan. “What do you expect of two mavericks, to agree on everything? Eh?”


How's that not contradictory? She wants to have a federal law that bans gay marriages, which basically will tell gay couples what they can or cannot do, but then she says she doesn't want tell people what they can or cannot do?

Looks like a whottt argument.

ratm1221
10-20-2008, 01:04 PM
“I'm not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can't do, should and should not do,” she said. “But I certainly can express my own opinion here and take actions that I believe would be best for traditional marriage and that's casting my votes and speaking up for traditional marriage that, that instrument that it's the foundation of our society is that strong family and that's based on that traditional definition of marriage, so I do support that.”

WTF? In the same breath she says it's not her right to tell people what they can and can't do, but it's her right to vote against what people can and can't do?

She amazes more and more everyday. :toast

ploto
10-20-2008, 02:36 PM
Marriage laws are a state issue. Shouldn't a Republican want the federal government to stay out of the state's business?

Spur-Addict
10-20-2008, 02:53 PM
Looks like every man(woman) for themselves at this point.

October 20, 2008
Palin and McCain disagree on federal gay marriage ban (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/20/palin-and-mccain-disagree-on-federal-gay-marriage-ban/)
Posted: 09:35 AM ET

From CNN Political Producer Peter Hamby (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/tag/cnn-political-producer-peter-hamby/)
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/10/20/art.mccain.palin.vp.jpg Palin and McCain disagree on a federal gay marriage ban.

http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/.element/img/2.0/mosaic/base_skins/baseplate/corner_wire_BL.gif

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado (CNN) — Add one more policy item to the list of things John McCain and Sarah Palin disagree on.
Palin told CBN’s David Brody over the weekend that she supports a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, a proposal John McCain voted against in 2004. McCain believes the matter should be left to the states.
Brody asked Palin if she supports “something like” an amendment banning gay marriage.
“I am,” Palin said. “In my own, state, I have voted along with the vast majority of Alaskans who had the opportunity to vote to amend our Constitution defining marriage as between one man and one woman. I wish on a federal level that that's where we would go because I don't support gay marriage.
“I'm not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can't do, should and should not do,” she said. “But I certainly can express my own opinion here and take actions that I believe would be best for traditional marriage and that's casting my votes and speaking up for traditional marriage that, that instrument that it's the foundation of our society is that strong family and that's based on that traditional definition of marriage, so I do support that.”

McCain and Palin disagree on a number of issues, including stem cell research, whether or not global warming is man-made, and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve.
In the past, McCain has joked away any policy differences between the two running mates.
“By the way, you may figure out from time to time, Sarah and I don’t agree on every issue,” McCain said at a joint town hall last month in Michigan. “What do you expect of two mavericks, to agree on everything? Eh?”

Filed under: John McCain (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/category/presidential-candidates/john-mccain/) • Sarah Palin (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/category/sarah-palin/)

So, the gay population shouldn't be permitted to have a Strong Family, is that what you are saying Sarah?

Gay people are apart of this society, so you really don't support having a strong society if you deny making a section of this society strong. So you want to intentionally make others weak, and by doing so making the whole weaker, sounds like a great plan.