PDA

View Full Version : October Surprise! Barrett's 9/11 Theory Proved Correct!



Galileo
11-03-2008, 04:03 PM
October Surprise! Barrett's 9/11 Theory Proved Correct!



Previously Unreleased Footage of the WTC proves it was destroyed by Explosives.




WTC7



Previously Unreleased Footage of WTC Building 7



http://www.veoh.com/videos/v16415017FADebtjf?jsonParams=%257B%2522user%2522%2 53A%2522GldBr%2522%252C%2522veohOnly%2522%253Atrue %252C%2522order%2522%253A%2522mr%2522%257D&context=CHANNEL&viewType=user



North Tower Collapse



Previously unreleased footage of the North Tower collapse



http://www.veoh.com/videos/v16415132HnA38zEp?jsonParams=%257B%2522rlmin%2522% 253A0%252C%2522user%2522%253A%2522GldBr%2522%252C% 2522country%2522%253A%2522%2522%252C%2522rlmax%252 2%253A0%252C%2522veohOnly%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522r egion%2522%253A%2522%2522%252C%2522seasonNumber%25 22%253A0%252C%2522order%2522%253A%2522mr%2522%252C %2522episodeNumber%2522%253A0%257D&context=CHANNEL&viewType=user



Kevin Barrett for Congress



Independent Minded Libertarian for Wisconsin's Third District



http://www.barrettforcongress.us/

LnGrrrR
11-03-2008, 04:04 PM
I can't get to this at work. Can I assume it's just another 9/11 truther nut video?

Shastafarian
11-03-2008, 04:05 PM
Where's the proof exactly Mr. Crazy Person?

Shastafarian
11-03-2008, 04:06 PM
I can't get to this at work. Can I assume it's just another 9/11 truther nut video?

It's just a different angle of the north tower collapsing. I didn't even bother to watch the other one.

doobs
11-03-2008, 04:06 PM
Does this mean Ron Paul will win tomorrow?

smeagol
11-03-2008, 04:10 PM
Here we go . . . again . . . :vomit:

Galileo
11-03-2008, 04:16 PM
I can't get to this at work. Can I assume it's just another 9/11 truther nut video?

The link works.

The Power Hour
11-03-2008, 04:16 PM
Thanks for the links.

Shastafarian
11-03-2008, 04:19 PM
The link works.

He's not saying it doesn't.

Galileo
11-03-2008, 04:27 PM
Where's the proof exactly Mr. Crazy Person?

The proof is in the pudding.

doobs
11-03-2008, 04:27 PM
The proof is in the pudding.

I like pudding.

Galileo
11-03-2008, 04:27 PM
Thanks for the links.

Is that you, Big Dave? This is Rolf from Wisconsin.

ChumpDumper
11-03-2008, 04:34 PM
Good videos.

Too bad they do nothing to prove explosive were used. In fact the second one goes a long way to disprove it. Great view of the part of the core that remained standing after the initial collapse. You really get a sense of just how tall it was.

ChumpDumper
11-03-2008, 04:36 PM
Oh, and it's November.

Spurminator
11-03-2008, 04:41 PM
lol

Galileo
11-03-2008, 04:43 PM
Oh, and it's November.

The October Revolution was in November.

Oh, Gee!!
11-03-2008, 04:44 PM
november is the new october

Spurminator
11-03-2008, 04:52 PM
There's no proof that it is actually November and not still October. I looked at the sky this morning and it looked the same as it did in "October."

Shastafarian
11-03-2008, 04:52 PM
Maybe this is Febtober.

Galileo
11-03-2008, 05:21 PM
New Building 7 Collapse Video Clearly Shows Demolition

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
November 3, 2008

A new video has surfaced clearly showing the demolition of WTC Building 7.


In its latest report, the National Institute of Standards and Technology attempted to once and for all put to rest the evidence that the building was taken down via demolition by explaining that fires had caused the collapse. Specifically, NIST claimed “thermal expansion” had brought about the collapse. As Trish Stevens notes, the NIST report “is contrary to all historical, visual, and physical evidence, according to an independent worldwide organization composed of more than 470 engineers and architects. WTC-7 was a 47-story skyscraper located more than a football field away from the North Tower and was not hit by any airplane, yet completely collapsed hours after the Twin Towers fell in a similar manner.”

Dr. Steven Jones says there is “an abundance of evidence which NIST refuses to look at or even account for that clearly points to controlled demolition as the source that destroyed these buildings.”

As the new video clearly reveals, the center supporting columns of the 47-story building were taken out, allowing the building to collapse into its footprint in a symmetrical, straight down fashion. “This is controlled demolition,” averred demolitions expert Danny Jowenko in 2006. “A team of experts did this. This is professional work, without any doubt.”

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

In 2007, a 9/11 first responder went on the record to describe how he heard a demolition-style countdown precede the collapse of WTC 7. “Earlier this year, we reported on the testimony of an anonymous EMT named Mike who told Loose Change producer Dylan Avery that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper adjacent the twin towers that was not hit by a plane yet imploded symmetrically later in the afternoon on 9/11, was about to be ‘pulled’ and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse,” writes Paul Joseph Watson. “That account was backed up by another ground zero rescue worker who went on the record with her full name. Volunteer EMT Indira Singh described to a radio show how she learned that WTC 7 was going to be ‘brought down’ and the context was clear that it was to be deliberately demolished.”

“The whole time you’re hearing boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. I think I know an explosion when I hear it,” NYPD officer Craig Bartmer revealed last year. Bartmer stated his incredulity at how fast the Building 7 site was cleaned up compared to the rest of ground zero.

In addition, other ground zero emergency workers have gone on record as stating they were told Building 7 was to be “pulled.” An anonymous source, identified simply as “Mike,” told Loose Change producer Dylan Avery that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7 was to be brought down.

An yet, if we are to believe NIST and FEMA, fires are responsible for the classical demolition of the building. Now that we have a video that clearly and irrefutably shows that Building 7 was indeed brought down by demolition, the response of NIST and FEMA will be interesting.


Social bookmarks Email this article Print this page

25 Responses to “New Building 7 Collapse Video Clearly Shows Demolition”

http://www.infowars.com/?p=5721

BushDynasty
11-03-2008, 05:21 PM
You convinced me, and I'm not easy to convince.

baseline bum
11-03-2008, 05:31 PM
9/11 Truthers Get Curbstomped - Pt 1

X1Gc_Wyotzw

baseline bum
11-03-2008, 05:31 PM
9/11 Truthers Get Curbstomped - Pt 2

6SpADWOCqCs

baseline bum
11-03-2008, 05:31 PM
9/11 Truthers Get Curbstomped - Pt 3

yHZ4w8feL1g

baseline bum
11-03-2008, 05:32 PM
9/11 Truthers Get Curbstomped - Pt 4

cxa5dLSIWrM

baseline bum
11-03-2008, 05:32 PM
pt 5 is missing :(

baseline bum
11-03-2008, 05:32 PM
9/11 Truthers Get Curbstomped - Pt 6

8B3BBD6_g6U

baseline bum
11-03-2008, 05:32 PM
9/11 Truthers Get Curbstomped - Pt 7

yiSaZRmzCm8

baseline bum
11-03-2008, 05:32 PM
9/11 Truthers Get Curbstomped - Pt 8

u7MIQtPklzs

baseline bum
11-03-2008, 05:32 PM
9/11 Truthers Get Curbstomped - Pt 9

ikovKyhWGcE

Galileo
11-03-2008, 05:33 PM
9/11 Truthers Get Curbstomped - Pt 1

X1Gc_Wyotzw

STOMP THIS!

http://www.spontaneouscreation.org/SC/images/wtc-7.gif

sabar
11-03-2008, 05:56 PM
I forgot airplanes were a prerequisite to structural failure.

Galileo
11-03-2008, 06:10 PM
I forgot airplanes were a prerequisite to structural failure.

No airplane hit WTC 7.

(unless you are talking about the mystery third plane)

SnakeBoy
11-03-2008, 07:31 PM
No airplane hit WTC 7.



That's only because the batteries for the magic airplane hologram machine died. Fuckin EverReady!

Galileo
11-04-2008, 03:49 PM
Google Hits

Results 1 - 10 of about 24,200 for "kevin barrett" wisconsin.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22kevin%20barrett%22%20wisconsin&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=iw

Results 1 - 20 of about 3,320 for "kevin barrett" wisconsin.
http://images.google.com/images?q=%22kevin%20barrett%22%20wisconsin&ie=UTF-8&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi

Results 1 - 10 of about 27 for kevin-barrett wisconsin.
http://news.google.com/news?q=%22kevin%20barrett%22%20wisconsin&ie=UTF-8&um=1&sa=N&tab=in

Results 1 - 10 of about 6,510 for "paul stark" wisconsin.
http://www.google.com/search?sa=N&tab=nw&q=%22paul%20stark%22%20wisconsin

Results 1 - 20 of about 308 for "paul stark" wisconsin.
http://images.google.com/images?q=%22paul%20stark%22%20wisconsin&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

Results 1 - 10 of about 27 for paul-stark wisconsin.
http://news.google.com/news?q=%22paul%20stark%22%20wisconsin&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=in

Results 1 - 10 of about 59,500 for "ron kind" wisconsin.
http://www.google.com/search?sa=N&tab=nw&q=%22ron%20kind%22%20wisconsin

Results 1 - 20 of about 666 for "ron kind" wisconsin.http://images.google.com/images?q=%22ron%20kind%22%20wisconsin&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

Results 1 - 10 of about 44 for ron-kind wisconsin.
http://news.google.com/news?q=%22ron%20kind%22%20wisconsin&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=in

PERCENT OF VOTE

Google Web Hits

Kind 66.0%
Barrett 26.8%
Stark 7.2%

Google Image Hits

Barrett 77.3%
Kind 15.5%
Stark 7.2%

Google News Hits

Kind 44.9%
Barrett 27.6%
Stark 27.6%

Voting Machines Elect One Of Their Own As Presidenthttp://www.theonion.com/content/video/voting_machines_elect_one_of

ChumpDumper
11-04-2008, 03:55 PM
He's going to lose, no matter how much you personally stuff the Google stats.

doobs
11-04-2008, 04:06 PM
pt 5 is missing :(

You just lost all credibility.

Galileo
11-04-2008, 04:22 PM
He's going to lose, no matter how much you personally stuff the Google stats.

I agree, republican Paul Stark is going down!

ChumpDumper
11-04-2008, 04:25 PM
Barrett is going to lose badly.

Galileo
11-04-2008, 04:32 PM
Barrett is going to lose badly.

You worded your grammer badly.

ChumpDumper
11-04-2008, 04:34 PM
You worded your grammer badly.:lmao

Galileo
11-04-2008, 04:37 PM
:lmao

You got me, I will vote for Kind.

Stacie
11-04-2008, 05:45 PM
The only thing that could collapse faster than Building 7 is the GOP tonight.