PDA

View Full Version : This is 1996-97 all over again



dknights411
11-08-2008, 01:06 AM
Anyone else here think so too?

koopa
11-08-2008, 01:09 AM
we might suck like that year but to bad there isn't a player that is gonna make an impact in the draft like we got that season

Bigzax
11-08-2008, 01:17 AM
except with a title at the end! all the spurs need is health in may and the 8th seed! :smokin

AFBlue
11-08-2008, 09:58 AM
#1 - Parker is out for two weeks and Manu for a month or so....nothing season-ending at this point

#2 - Do the Spurs even have a first round pick this year?

Indazone
11-08-2008, 10:10 AM
My friend and I talked about that. Without Ginobili and Parker, the Spurs do not have a backcourt. Mason and Hill? c'mon.

This is very much like 96-97.

DROB4EVER
11-08-2008, 11:41 AM
To many guys are missing the point, Mason and Hill are not a bad starting combo, the point is we are getting nothing from our vets, and our shot blocking and rebounding is non existant. Anyone realize we are giving up 102 ppg?

Thats the problem.

m33p0
11-08-2008, 12:29 PM
My friend and I talked about that. Without Ginobili and Parker, the Spurs do not have a backcourt. Mason and Hill? c'mon.

This is very much like 96-97.
Mason and Hill are good. Not great, but good.

Indazone
11-08-2008, 12:35 PM
Two All-Star calibur players in Manu and Parker for a career bench player and a rookie?? I rest my case.

m33p0
11-08-2008, 12:37 PM
Two All-Star calibur players in Manu and Parker for a career bench player and a rookie?? I rest my case.
what are you talking about?