PDA

View Full Version : Harvey: Spurs Face Arrogance Of Winning



duncan228
11-10-2008, 11:17 PM
Spurs face arrogance of winning (http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/spurs/Spurs_face_arrogance_of_winning.html)
Buck Harvey

There’s a framed comic strip on Gregg Popovich’s desk, and it depicts an athlete sitting in a plush office. In Popovich’s world, Tim Duncan is the athlete.

Outside the office, standing in front of a receptionist, is a scraggly-looking character. Popovich is the scraggly-looking character.

The caption on the comic: “The Franchise will see you now, Coach.”

A year ago, when Duncan signed an extension, Popovich laughed and showed this comic to the media. He’s often joked, too, that his greatest accomplishment with Duncan is “not screwing this up.”

It’s been the theme of the franchise, which is why a report on a Web site says a lot about how people are affected by winning.

And by not winning.

The article appeared on Bulls.com, but it’s by a former newspaper writer who has sources around the league. The piece starts:

“It’s not like anyone specifically is rooting for the San Antonio Spurs to suffer and any players to be injured. But there’s been some knowing smiles around the NBA lately with the misfortunes of the Spurs.”

The Germans have a word for this — schadenfreude — meaning shameful joy. “Schaden” is German for harm or damage, and “freude” means “better you have the sprained ankle than me.”

It’s not an admirable trait in life, but schadenfreude is a lot of fun in sports. Do you think the Aggies, for example, didn’t enjoy seeing the Longhorns lose in Lubbock?

Or, as Groucho Marx once said, “There is no sweeter sound than the crumbling of one’s fellow man.”

Still, there’s an extra layer to Spur-enfreude. The online article said there was an “I-told-you-so” attitude in the league because of “the way some in the Spurs organization have carried themselves with success.”

From the article: “NBA people say you don’t see it with coach Gregg Popovich, but several of the staffers who’ve left the Spurs organization, like Mike Brown in Cleveland and Sam Presti in Oklahoma City, have often acted dismissive of others around the NBA to reiterate it must be done ‘the San Antonio way.’”

It’s hard to imagine, in a league that includes Phil Jackson, that Brown and Presti have become the icons of arrogance. More than likely, what really bothers some of their peers are their promotions at such young ages.

Still, the article focuses on those currently with the Spurs, too. “It’s like with the rest of us,” one general manager told the writer. “You lose your best players, it’s not easy. You’d think they’d know that better than anyone with losing (David) Robinson and they come up with Duncan (in the draft lottery).”

Popovich was asked about this article Monday, and he could have said a few things. He could have argued, “Okay, we got Duncan in a lottery. But how did we win our last three titles? With the two guys, one taken at the bottom of the first round, the other at the bottom of the second, who we don’t have now.”

But when has Popovich ever said anything like that? He and R.C Buford have never suggested they were smarter than everyone else when they drafted Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. When Popovich isn’t passing around his comic strip, he’s saying he will retire when Duncan does.

Instead, Popovich said, “I guess anybody can say anything about anybody else. But that would be the last way I would characterize how these guys have been over the last decade.”

Even his defense wasn’t about himself. He waved his arm toward the floor, where his players were still practicing, and said “these guys.”

But there really is no defense, because none of this is about anything tangible. The Spurs weren’t arrogant when they won. Their crime was winning. They went to podiums and talked, and they smiled, and they held trophies.

They did this often enough that their peers tired of it, and one is in town tonight. Does Mike D’Antoni mind that his former conference rivals are struggling?

Mark Cuban might feel the same, along with others. But that’s the essence of Spur-enfreude.

Championships, not injuries, caused it.

m33p0
11-10-2008, 11:18 PM
i'd really like to get a copy of that cartoon.

tp2021
11-10-2008, 11:20 PM
They're all just jealous.

tlongII
11-10-2008, 11:23 PM
Dumbest. Article. Ever.

Spur-Addict
11-10-2008, 11:24 PM
Spurs face arrogance of winning (http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/spurs/Spurs_face_arrogance_of_winning.html)
Buck Harvey

But there really is no defense, because none of this is about anything tangible. The Spurs weren’t arrogant when they won. Their crime was winning.

Very much to the contrary of other teams.

benefactor
11-10-2008, 11:54 PM
Dumbest. Article. Ever.
A response like this from you about an article like this automatically makes everyone think the same thing. I'll let you figure out what that is.

ploto
11-11-2008, 12:03 AM
I think this article would have merit if the Spurs had won last year, but they did not even make it to the NBA Finals and are not viewed as the favorite this season either. It is hard to claim jealousy when you are not the one at the top.

Spur-Addict
11-11-2008, 12:31 AM
I think this article would have merit if the Spurs had won last year, but they did not even make it to the NBA Finals and are not viewed as the favorite this season either. It is hard to claim jealousy when you are not the one at the top.

It's the threat of, and we haven't won back to back.

vy65
11-11-2008, 12:41 AM
I don't think I've ever seen anyone rape the English language as bad as Buck does here.

Spur-enfreude? My ears are bleeding.

SequSpur
11-11-2008, 12:41 AM
Buck Harvey is frickin amusing...

braeden0613
11-11-2008, 12:51 AM
I don't think I've ever seen anyone rape the English language as bad as Buck does here.

Spur-enfreude? My ears are bleeding.
wouldn't that be raping the German language?

mytespurs
11-11-2008, 01:00 AM
Very much to the contrary of other teams.

[B]But there really is no defense, because none of this is about anything tangible. The Spurs weren’t arrogant when they won. Their crime was winning. They went to podiums and talked, and they smiled, and they held trophies.B]

This is one of many reasons why I've became a Spurs fan.
To many, they are dull and boring but they are winners and they win with dignity (at least in my book). :toast

vy65
11-11-2008, 01:06 AM
wouldn't that be raping the German language?

Eh, 1/2 of it is in English. You get the point.

Mr. Body
11-11-2008, 01:15 AM
The analogy to the Aggies is apt. Their moves are akin to firing R.C. Slocum. Okay, so Luis Scola wasn't the savior, but they didn't need a savior, he was a pretty good coach, and the program has been on the downslide ever since. They out-thought themselves, the geniuses.

m33p0
11-11-2008, 01:17 AM
A response like this from you about an article like this automatically makes everyone think the same thing. I'll let you figure out what that is.
i had to resist. :lol

angelbelow
11-11-2008, 01:47 AM
weak article.

Manufan909
11-11-2008, 01:56 AM
Solid take.

JamStone
11-11-2008, 02:05 AM
Any team and organization that has had the success and fortune the Spurs have had over the last decade is going to have detractors and haters. But, that doesn't mean that the Spurs and their decision makers aren't beyond reproach when it comes to showing at least some subtle signs of arrogance.

I do think basically giving away Scola to a division rival and not seeing how that could detrimentally affect them had a tinge of arrogance. I think the overdosage of international drafting has a faint hint of arrogance, although I do understand that Holt's tight wallet makes for innovative ways to save money. I do think the front office's failure in getting a quality big on this team for the last two seasons is close to unforgivable. It's certainly unacceptable as Tim Duncan should be getting more help as he gets older, not getting more responsibility to carry the load for the entire front court at both ends.

There are subtle things. Overall, the Spurs are a great organization with great coaches, players, and fans. But, it's hard not to have a little bit of arrogance when you have the success the Spurs have had.

WildcardManu
11-11-2008, 02:15 AM
A response like this from you about an article like this automatically makes everyone think the same thing. I'll let you figure out what that is.

pwnd

tlongII
11-11-2008, 02:26 AM
[B]But there really is no defense, because none of this is about anything tangible. The Spurs weren’t arrogant when they won. Their crime was winning. They went to podiums and talked, and they smiled, and they held trophies.B]

This is one of many reasons why I've became a Spurs fan.
To many, they are dull and boring but they are winners and they win with dignity (at least in my book). :toast

Really? And I thought it was because you're from San Antonio?

Manufan909
11-11-2008, 03:12 AM
If he's not even from Tejas I will laugh my ass off. Hope he's a Portlandtonian!!!
:lmao

mountainballer
11-11-2008, 04:09 AM
I don't think I've ever seen anyone rape the English language as bad as Buck does here.

Spur-enfreude? My ears are bleeding.




wouldn't that be raping the German language?

it does both at once. :downspin: in German it would be Sporen-freude, which still doesn't make much sense (maybe a masochistic horse, that feels joy when roweld?) but would be grammatically almost right, Spuren-freude is possible, but might mean something like trace-joy, whatever this could be.
he could call it Spurs-freude, but this would definitely mean joy about the Spurs, in other words something Spurs fans got quite a lot in the last decade, but unfortunately not right now, and I think he didn't want to say this.
I would say Harvey's try to look witty looks like a bit like Bonner trying to play basketball.

polandprzem
11-11-2008, 04:18 AM
I've eaten better scrubbled eggs, but I will eat that one.

polandprzem
11-11-2008, 04:24 AM
I've eaten better scrubbled eggs, but I will eat that one.

It was mailny because of that new pan I used and the meat I was "forced" to use.

SenorSpur
11-11-2008, 09:03 AM
Any team and organization that has had the success and fortune the Spurs have had over the last decade is going to have detractors and haters. But, that doesn't mean that the Spurs and their decision makers aren't beyond reproach when it comes to showing at least some subtle signs of arrogance.

I do think basically giving away Scola to a division rival and not seeing how that could detrimentally affect them had a tinge of arrogance. I think the overdosage of international drafting has a faint hint of arrogance, although I do understand that Holt's tight wallet makes for innovative ways to save money. I do think the front office's failure in getting a quality big on this team for the last two seasons is close to unforgivable. It's certainly unacceptable as Tim Duncan should be getting more help as he gets older, not getting more responsibility to carry the load for the entire front court at both ends.

There are subtle things. Overall, the Spurs are a great organization with great coaches, players, and fans. But, it's hard not to have a little bit of arrogance when you have the success the Spurs have had.

Big :tu to you Jamstone. Agree on all points. Points that I've made at one time or another.

The FO totally went to the "international well" too often over a the past decade. Had it not been for the Splitter debacle, they probably still would be utlizing their all-Euro strategy, at the expense of domestic talent.

The lack of another productive big, in lieu of non-productive bigs is totally unforgivable. They've done TD an incredible disservice. Unfortunately, it's also not a new deficiency either. This has been an issue for the past couple of seasons. Anyone can see how TD is wearing down on the defensive end, as a result.

I would also add the FO's failure to identify, develop and integrate a young, defensive-minded, backup SF via the draft. Instead preferring to repeatedly gamble on over-the-hill veterans, who were rapidly approaching their "expiration dates" as productive players in this league. They gambled on the fact that Bowen would play forever and remain injury-free. Granted, he's been an iron man, yet his productivity is starting to wane. As such, and like Duncan, his level of responsiblity should be reduced. To date, there is no suitable contingency player at his position, on this roster.

The Spurs are unquestionably, a first-class, model organization - not just in the NBA, but in all of professional sports. However, that doesn't mean that they are above constructive criticism regarding some of their decision-making.

spursfan09
11-11-2008, 09:17 AM
I think this article would have merit if the Spurs had won last year, but they did not even make it to the NBA Finals and are not viewed as the favorite this season either. It is hard to claim jealousy when you are not the one at the top.

ok?

I think other teams and other players are secretly happy that the injury bug has hit us and we are losing. Just because we didn't win last year, doesn't matter. It still leaves no one feeling sorry for us.

kace
11-11-2008, 10:13 AM
so what ?

like if someone was sad here for LA when they lost Bynum last year. or for Houston when they lost Yao.

You feel sorry for a player when he is injured if you're not an asshole.

but to feel sorry for the team where he plays if you're another team's fan is another thing. especially if this team is a great one having a good chance to win it all.

mountainballer
11-11-2008, 10:41 AM
I do think basically giving away Scola to a division rival and not seeing how that could detrimentally affect them had a tinge of arrogance. I think the overdosage of international drafting has a faint hint of arrogance, although I do understand that Holt's tight wallet makes for innovative ways to save money.


I would think this is the major point. after ring #3 Holt was somehow satisfied I guess and the policy was like: let's try to keep winning but only if we stay under the tax etc. in other words, a 4th or 5th ring wasn't worth some additional bucks if necessary.
people always look at the 2007 title as a result of the still well working team. but it cover a lot of the history of the problems and maybe explains the reason for the mentioned "arrogance". IMO the 2006 team was much better then the 2007 team, but then they didn't have a bit of the luck they had in 2007, when everything fell in place for the Spurs perfectly. it was a window of luck, the Mavs eliminated themself, the Suns were our perfect match up and helped us big time, the Jazz were just not there yet, nor were the Cavs, who (like the Warriors) removed the for us much tougher match up. and we didn't have a single injury for the whole POs. not even a bleeding nose.
in 2006 they made a truly insane "cost saving" move, when they decided to sign Elson plus Butler as the future center cast to go with Oberto.
the problem was, they got away with this and won 2007. this was IMO the point when they said like: hey, why look for (and pay for) quality bigs, when we can also win with a bunch of 3rd stringers alongside the big 3.

ploto
11-11-2008, 11:29 AM
^I totally agree. I said at the time that the worst thing for the Spurs long term was the 2007 Championship because it lulled them into thinking they could keep winning that way. The players for the most part and Pop are pretty humble, but the FO and ownership isn't so much. Sorry to burst the bubble. Holt is happy just to be competitive and make money.