PDA

View Full Version : Alleged hijacker can't keep a straight face in martyr video



Galileo
11-26-2008, 03:11 PM
Alleged hijacker can't keep a straight face in martyr video

WATCH THE VIDEO AND READ THE ANALYSIS!

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4698

FACT:

Ziad Jarrah was supposed to get married on September 25, 2001, and his fiancee said he had nothing to do with anything illegal.

Complete 911 Timeline
Ziad Jarrah
http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?the_alleged_9/11_hijackers=ziadJarrah&timeline=complete_911_timeline

FACT:

"Terrorist sleeper cell" member Ziad Jarrah's email address was the very clever [email protected], with www.ab.com being registered to a large defense contractor.

[email protected]
patsies
http://www.911blogger.com/node/9654#comment

FACT:

Ziad Jarrah's family offered DNA samples to prove Ziad was really a hijacker, but the FBI refused to cooperate.

Ziad Jarrah
Possible mistaken identity
http://www.onpedia.com/encyclopedia/ziad-jarrah

BacktoBasics
11-26-2008, 03:36 PM
I predict this thread not going well for you

ChumpDumper
11-26-2008, 03:38 PM
So where is Ziad?

Galileo
11-26-2008, 03:43 PM
So where is Ziad?

Ask the FBI. That's their job to solve crime.

DarrinS
11-26-2008, 04:36 PM
From dumb dickhead wiki:


dumb dickhead: 911 twoofers, i.e. Galileo, Nbadan, etc.

Galileo
11-26-2008, 04:51 PM
I fixed the link to www.ab.com

ChumpDumper
11-26-2008, 04:55 PM
Ask the FBI. That's their job to solve crime.They say he died crashing United 93 into the ground.

Crime solved.

Galileo
11-26-2008, 04:58 PM
They say he died crashing United 93 into the ground.

Crime solved.

His DNA was never matched with his family to prove it. The FBI knows this.

ChumpDumper
11-26-2008, 05:11 PM
FACT:

Ziad Jarrah was supposed to get married on September 25, 2001, and his fiancee said he had nothing to do with anything illegal.FACT:

There were many things Jarrah's fiance did not know about him.


FACT:

"Terrorist sleeper cell" member Ziad Jarrah's email address was the very clever [email protected], with www.ab.com being registered to a large defense contractor.There was nothing sleepy about Jarrah's terror cell. It was quite active from the time he was recruited to learn to fly.

Rockwell Automation is not a defense contractor. It's a common mistake for stupid people and the insane to make.


[email protected] is not a defense contractor either.


FACT:

Ziad Jarrah's family offered DNA samples to prove Ziad was really a hijacker, but the FBI refused to cooperate.They didn't need them.

Galileo
11-26-2008, 05:30 PM
FACT:

There were many things Jarrah's fiance did not know about him.

There was nothing sleepy about Jarrah's terror cell. It was quite active from the time he was recruited to learn to fly.

Rockwell Automation is not a defense contractor. It's a common mistake for stupid people and the insane to make.

hotmail is not a defense contractor either.

They didn't need them.

did you notice there was no plane at the "plane crash" site?

ChumpDumper
11-26-2008, 05:32 PM
did you notice there was no plane at the "plane crash" site?It smashed into quite small pieces, which were all over the plane crash site. That is what happens when a plane dives into the ground at 580 miles per hour.

Galileo
11-26-2008, 05:35 PM
It smashed into quite small pieces, which were all over the plane crash site. That is what happens when a plane dives into the ground at 580 miles per hour.

I didn't see the small pieces in the video, can you point them out to us?

clambake
11-26-2008, 05:46 PM
I didn't see the small pieces in the video, can you point them out to us?

yeah chump! for instance, what happened to the propellers?

ChumpDumper
11-26-2008, 05:47 PM
You didn't see the small pieces from hundreds of feet away on a degraded YouTube video.

Shocking.

Galileo
11-26-2008, 05:57 PM
You didn't see the small pieces from hundreds of feet away on a degraded YouTube video.

Shocking.

There aren't any small pieces of an airplane.

ChumpDumper
11-26-2008, 06:07 PM
There aren't any small pieces of an airplane.Sure there are.

Even some large ones.

http://www.debunk911myths.org/t/images/thumb/8/89/P200060.jpg/300px-P200060.jpg

http://www.debunk911myths.org/t/images/thumb/6/68/P200062.jpg/300px-P200062.jpg

http://www.debunk911myths.org/t/images/thumb/1/13/P200061.jpg/300px-P200061.jpg

http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/Shanksvillefinalsweep2.jpg/Shanksvillefinalsweep2-large.jpg

The last picture is the total of what 300 volunteers found searching a half-mile area around the crash site. You must think they are all in on it as well.

Galileo
11-26-2008, 06:26 PM
Sure there are.

Even some large ones.

http://www.debunk911myths.org/t/images/thumb/8/89/P200060.jpg/300px-P200060.jpg

http://www.debunk911myths.org/t/images/thumb/6/68/P200062.jpg/300px-P200062.jpg

http://www.debunk911myths.org/t/images/thumb/1/13/P200061.jpg/300px-P200061.jpg

http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/Shanksvillefinalsweep2.jpg/Shanksvillefinalsweep2-large.jpg

The last picture is the total of what 300 volunteers found searching a half-mile area around the crash site. You must think they are all in on it as well.

looks like stuff someone found in a dumpster.

ChumpDumper
11-26-2008, 06:27 PM
looks like stuff someone found in a dumpster.Nice to know how little respect you have for the remains of United 93.

LnGrrrR
11-26-2008, 06:39 PM
looks like stuff someone found in a dumpster.

I love how obvious it is when conspiracy theorists spin. Their burden of proof to disprove their insane theories is about as strong as mine to believe in God.

Galileo, what proof would be necessary for you to believe 9/11 WASN'T a setup?

spurs_fan_in_exile
11-26-2008, 06:50 PM
So the guy can't keep a straight face. If a pro like Mary Tyler Moore couldn't keep it together at a somber event like a funeral then what chance does some weekend jihadist have?

FromWayDowntown
11-26-2008, 06:52 PM
I'm pretty sure that all of the eyewitnesses who saw a commercial plane crash headfirst into a field in Western Pennsylvania were fooled into believing that's what they saw; and all of those phone calls and the CVR tapes are clear forgeries.

Galileo
11-26-2008, 06:52 PM
I love how obvious it is when conspiracy theorists spin. Their burden of proof to disprove their insane theories is about as strong as mine to believe in God.

Galileo, what proof would be necessary for you to believe 9/11 WASN'T a setup?

I used to believe the governent version.

exstatic
11-26-2008, 07:08 PM
http://cr4.globalspec.com/PostImages/200709/TinFoil_DB52B2F1-0E7F-A983-F0F9D799A20B06C8.jpg

Tully365
11-26-2008, 07:30 PM
Ziad Jarrah was supposed to get married on September 25, 2001, and his fiancee said he had nothing to do with anything illegal.

She should get together with Larry Craig's wife, Eliott Spitzer's wife, Jim McGreevey's wife, and Newt Gingrich's wives, and talk about how it's close to impossible for married or engaged men to do anything without their women knowing about it.

CubanMustGo.
11-26-2008, 08:05 PM
Alleged hijacker can't keep a straight face in martyr video

WATCH THE VIDEO AND READ THE ANALYSIS!

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4698

FACT:

Ziad Jarrah was supposed to get married on September 25, 2001, and his fiancee said he had nothing to do with anything illegal.

Complete 911 Timeline
Ziad Jarrah
http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?the_alleged_9/11_hijackers=ziadJarrah&timeline=complete_911_timeline

FACT:

"Terrorist sleeper cell" member Ziad Jarrah's email address was the very clever [email protected], with www.ab.com (http://www.ab.com) being registered to a large defense contractor.

[email protected]
patsies
http://www.911blogger.com/node/9654#comment

FACT:

Ziad Jarrah's family offered DNA samples to prove Ziad was really a hijacker, but the FBI refused to cooperate.

Ziad Jarrah
Possible mistaken identity
http://www.onpedia.com/encyclopedia/ziad-jarrah


This dude ^ is my second favorite poster in this forum.

Nbadan
11-27-2008, 06:07 AM
I'm pretty sure that all of the eyewitnesses who saw a commercial plane crash headfirst into a field in Western Pennsylvania were fooled into believing that's what they saw; and all of those phone calls and the CVR tapes are clear forgeries.

Pffffff........put a TV camera in front of some people's grill and they'll say they saw the Space Shuttle crash into a field if that's what you suggest happened...

:rollin

Nbadan
11-27-2008, 06:18 AM
I love how obvious it is when conspiracy theorists spin. Their burden of proof to disprove their insane theories is about as strong as mine to believe in God.

Galileo, what proof would be necessary for you to believe 9/11 WASN'T a setup?

...I can't speak for Galileo but a vetted, independent study by engineers and scientists (not that NIST bullshit that took them 6 years to match the hypothesis with the theory either) explaining how WTC7 collapsed from fire in the manner it did with no severe structural damage from either the WTC1 and WTC2 collapses....would be a good start...

Wild Cobra
11-27-2008, 09:34 AM
I predict this thread not going well for you

I finally just started reading this thread, because it's been slow here and read the ones I wanted to.

Galileo posts too many threads that most others, including me, think are utter nonesense. He has a track record as a conspiracy theorist.

Wild Cobra
11-27-2008, 09:36 AM
did you notice there was no plane at the "plane crash" site?

Not this again.

Yes there was.

Go fly a kite, in a thunderstorm please.

Wild Cobra
11-27-2008, 09:43 AM
...I can't speak for Galileo but a vetted, independent study by engineers and scientists (not that NIST bullshit that took them 6 years to match the hypothesis with the theory either) explaining how WTC7 collapsed from fire in the manner it did with no severe structural damage from either the WTC1 and WTC2 collapses....would be a good start...
Maybe you would believe the official explanations if you learned more about materials, physics, and chemistry.

It only takes a 1940's 8th grade education, or a 1970's 12th grade education to understand these things. Anyone who's been indoctrinated by the Department of Education need to learn about topics never taught in their schools.

ChumpDumper
11-27-2008, 03:16 PM
...I can't speak for Galileo but a vetted, independent study by engineers and scientists (not that NIST bullshit that took them 6 years to match the hypothesis with the theory either) explaining how WTC7 collapsed from fire in the manner it did with no severe structural damage from either the WTC1 and WTC2 collapses....would be a good start...There. is much fail in this post.

So you're saying the NIST is in on it, right?

RandomGuy
12-01-2008, 05:52 PM
looks like stuff someone found in a dumpster.
Translation:

"I got nothing."

:sleep

You can't really keep buying this crap anymore, can you?

Every single little bit of crap you dredge up has long ago been debunked.

Extra Stout
12-01-2008, 06:25 PM
The purpose of Galileo's persistent 9/11 trolling is exactly the same as that of the guy who sends all the spam to your e-mail account.