PDA

View Full Version : Ding: The Lakers Have Been Exposed



duncan228
12-11-2008, 08:29 PM
The Lakers have been exposed (http://www.ocregister.com/articles/lakers-bynum-defense-2253576-one-sacramento)
Ding column: Opponents have figured out how to beat them.
Kevin Ding

LOS ANGELES The way to play the Lakers has been unveiled, and it has left the Lakers with largely the same not-so-hot defense that failed them at the end of last season.

Andrew Bynum, injured and conspicuously absent during Boston’s layup line in the NBA Finals, was supposed to be the answer for the Lakers’ defense this season: a 7-foot, 285-pound goalie to protect the paint and deny the rim to all opposing players.

So what happens to the Lakers’ defense if the opposing team forces the Lakers to pull their goalie?

Well, to put it simply: more goals. You’ve seen it in recent Lakers games. Now let’s explain it.

Even before he wound up going to his great-grandmother’s funeral, Shaquille O’Neal wasn’t going to play against the Lakers on Wednesday night. The Suns are only using O’Neal in one game in back-to-back sets, yet they broke from their tradition of playing him against the tougher team when they decided to rest him against the Lakers instead of against Milwaukee.

Why?

The Suns got drilled by the Lakers in Phoenix last month playing the usual post-up game, so they wanted to try the only thing that has worked for everyone else against the Lakers: spreading the floor, drawing Bynum and Pau Gasol out and making the paint a nice little driveway.

So Phoenix attacked often with Amare Stoudemire standing out near the 3-point line, where he would set a pick and then take his pick: shoot a 20-footer when left all alone, drive by the slower Gasol or Bynum, or just watch Steve Nash dribble in to create offense.

When Stoudemire camped way out there, the Suns’ other big guy – Robin Lopez or Louis Amundson – would be careful to keep out of the paint, too.

(Yes, you can play zone defense in the NBA now, but you can’t stand in the paint unless you are within arm’s length of someone you are guarding. So Bynum, Gasol and Lamar Odom can’t just lurk in the lane without piling up defensive 3-second violations.)

And let Bynum tell you, it’s no fun at all for him when teams use this open alignment.

“I hate being outside, because it just takes me totally away from the basket and opens up the lane for layups,” he said. “And it’s tougher to rebound from out there. Guys get more running starts.”

It was the worst against Sacramento, which ran everything high on the floor with both big men up there, meaning Bynum was almost always stranded by the extended foul line. That’s how the pop-gun Kings implausibly fired off 113 points and beat the Lakers on Tuesday night.

Bynum said he’d much rather be chasing little point guards around while trying to show on pick-and-rolls than always be left out there against a team that is lifting both big men that far away from the basket.

This whole thing is Rasheed Wallace’s fault, really. He was the trend-setter back on Nov. 14, standing out there next to Allen Iverson, getting passes off simple picks and lobbing in 3-pointers over a reluctant-to-close-out Gasol.

No team had reached 100 points against the Lakers in their 7-0 start. With Wallace’s long-range help, Detroit scored 106 and won. That was the start of the Lakers’ defensive slide, with opponents averaging 103.1 points over the past 14 games – twice as big a statistical sampling as those first seven games that had the Lakers’ newly aggressive and double-teaming defense looking like the key to locking up the next NBA title.

We’ve mentioned the losses to Detroit and Sacramento; the Lakers’ other one came in Indiana.

The Pacers got 16 points apiece from jump-shooting big men Rasho Nesterovic and Troy Murphy, who combined to shoot 15 for 25 from the field, and dropped 118 points on the Lakers.

Bynum did not block a shot in that game. He didn’t block one in Sacramento, either. He has at least one block in 18 of the Lakers’ other 19 games. It would seem to make sense to pull him out of the way, if you can, eh?

The Lakers know what they have to do in response: get consistent perimeter pressure on the ball, keeping the dribbler from driving so easily, and shore up what have been very sketchy defensive rotations to open shooters.

They didn’t do it back on Nov. 23 at Staples Center, letting Sacramento hang around in what was a 118-108 Lakers victory.

After the latest Sacramento debacle the Lakers made a change Wednesday to commit to full rotations on defense, meaning each defender is also responsible for the next man. But without a full practice they weren’t quite ready to execute, leaving Suns shooters open in the corner for 3-pointers time after time.

“It’s just one more rotation, and I think once we start making that one, we’ll be all right,” Bynum said.

The Lakers get to practice it today. Then they get to apply what they’ve learned when they face Sacramento and that tricky bigs-out-high alignment again Friday night.

It won’t just be a revenge game. It will be a statement game for the Lakers to show they have the wherewithal to achieve their foremost goal of this regular season – becoming a dominant defense – one way or another.

td4mvp21
12-11-2008, 08:37 PM
Well the Lakers still won so I'm not sure how much they were exposed. Maybe Bonner will come in handy against them afterall, at least on offense. On defense he'd get torn apart by either Gasol or Bynum.

jack sommerset
12-11-2008, 08:41 PM
I'm not even going to read that gayass story

Dex
12-11-2008, 08:50 PM
Sounds like a game plan.

Put Bonner on the perimeter, let Tim play high elbow, and watch the lanes open up for Manu, Tony, and Hill.

xtremesteven33
12-11-2008, 08:55 PM
Bonner has the potential to be a Lakers nightmare when it comes to offense. The Lakers have 2 7 footers in the lane and with another big who cant shoot wouldnt really spread the court for the spurs offense.

With Bonner in the starting lineup, he would drag out Bynum or Gasol out further from the basket forcing them to guard him or he will bury the 3 all night long.

hopefully this would work.


I named Bonner the Lakers nightmare already..

td4mvp21
12-11-2008, 09:00 PM
He could only be a problem on offense. On defense it wouldn't even be funny...

xtremesteven33
12-11-2008, 09:05 PM
He could only be a problem on offense. On defense it wouldn't even be funny...



Bonner could be a pesky defender if he learns how to piss off the players hes defending. He has the ability and the hustle but i know hell get scored on but id much rather have Gasol scoring on Bonner and leading the Lakers to a potential victory than Kobe.

Armando
12-11-2008, 10:53 PM
I still say that if a certain Argentinian were healthy in the WCF we might have had a Spurs/Celtics Finals. I still consider the Lakers the favorites to win the West since they are the defending Western Conference Champs but by no means is a done deal.

Reck
12-11-2008, 11:09 PM
I'm not even going to read that gayass story

Same here. :lol

Ghazi
12-11-2008, 11:21 PM
I still say that if a certain Argentinian were healthy in the WCF we might have had a Spurs/Celtics Finals. I still consider the Lakers the favorites to win the West since they are the defending Western Conference Champs but by no means is a done deal.


Please, can't use the injury excuse when the Lakers were without Bynum. Manu played well in a few games that series anyway. The Spurs had exhibited trends in that series that they had displayed ALL year, offensive droughts.

Anti.Hero
12-11-2008, 11:25 PM
I think the Spurs outperformed themselves last year by beating the Hornets.

With the horrendous scoring droughts they had, they did not deserve to reach the WCF.

By the time they reached the Lakers, they had been too spread out. Add in an injured Manu and some ridiculous officiating on that one game, and they had no chance.

Allanon
12-11-2008, 11:27 PM
I think Bonner will give the Lakers fits on offense with his ability to stretch the floor.

But on Deffense, no way can he guard either Bynum or Pau.

Pau and Bynum have been eating up teams without a 7 footer badly.

balli
12-11-2008, 11:28 PM
Well the Lakers still won so I'm not sure how much they were exposed.
+1. It's one thing to have a blueprint for stopping them, it's another thing to execute it.

td4mvp21
12-12-2008, 12:47 AM
I still say that if a certain Argentinian were healthy in the WCF we might have had a Spurs/Celtics Finals. I still consider the Lakers the favorites to win the West since they are the defending Western Conference Champs but by no means is a done deal.

Maybe but they didn't have Bynum so...yeah. Our role players sans Barry were nearly non-existant that series. Or at least they didn't produce as much as the Lakers' role players did.

Spur-Addict
12-12-2008, 12:58 AM
I'm not even going to read that gayass story

:lmao

Capt Bringdown
12-12-2008, 02:13 AM
The Spurs had exhibited trends in that series that they had displayed ALL year, offensive droughts.

This is not only last year's trend, it's a trend of Pop's Spurs in general. And when we blew the big lead in game one by not being able to score, it set the tone for the entire series.

Bob Lanier
12-12-2008, 02:16 AM
I love this new "7 footer" talking point.

silk
12-12-2008, 08:42 AM
Bonner's defense could suprise a lot, he actually hold his own now

sonic21
12-12-2008, 08:50 AM
Please, can't use the injury excuse when the Lakers were without Bynum. Manu played well in a few games that series anyway. The Spurs had exhibited trends in that series that they had displayed ALL year, offensive droughts.

Manu played well only in game 3 (only win for the spurs)