Spurs lost to the Bucks

[SequSpur]

that just fucking sucks.

[BlackSwordsMan]

yup

[Chieflion]

yup

Thanks, Kenpachi.

On topic: Ya it sucks, but the Spurs can't help it.

[Sigz]

We always lose to the fucking deer.

[BlackSwordsMan]

Thanks, Kenpachi.

On topic: Ya it sucks, but the Spurs can't help it.

glad ya like it

[T Park]

Afraid to break it to you, but they will lose more games.

[Dex]

Spurs lost to the Bucks,
And that really fucking sucks,
Sequ is really short.

[nil.ball]

if this makes you feel any better, rockets almost lost to bucks as well.


can we just get along and pretend bucks is like the best team in the north?

[Rogue]

WTF had the bucks eaten before that game. I mean, what kind of stimulus had they taken?
I didn't see the live game but I have watched the vedio twice afterwards. The bucks really made the spurs look like Rockets. The only reason they lost to Rockets tonight is just that they were too arrogan after they beat the spurs. Rockets are not as good as the spurs but the bucks just ignored the condition that this game was they b2b game while the rockets had fully got outta fertigue and well prepared for them. The bucks were so confident that they stepped onto the toyota center's floor without taking the stimulus.
For sure I don't have evidence to prove that, and there's no need to do that because the bucks have no chance to bring us 3 loses in the regular season, and I don't think they are enough to face us in the finals even if they brided the referees.

[Solid D]

Today's Limerick

There was a young man named SequSpur
Who was adept at nothing in particular
His thoughts are quite shallow
He's as soft as marshmallow
Poor Psuedofan, I just feel sorry for her. :)

[Solid D]

There's a man who complains dusk and dawn
who looks like the gnome in my lawn
He eats corn and pie
and has a jaundiced eye
But secretly owns the only Fathead of Jacque Vaughn.

[duncan228]

:lol Fun stuff Solid.

[RashoFan]

:lmao Solid

[SequSpur]

Solid, smb, you're a dick

[Findog]

The Bucks were just beating a team they were supposed to beat, no surprises there. I don't even understand why you would even make a thread about it, the Spurs passed some passes and made some lucky fluke shots just to keep it close.

[Solid D]

Happy New Year :)
I love you man.

[SequSpur]

I love you too bro! :)

:toast

[Rogue]

"spurs lost to bucks who just lost to rockets tonight, then rockets can beat the spurs reasonably." = bullshit

[Austin_Toros]

its because of andrew bogut once again
it might have been last season or so when he hit the gamewinner against us

[mrspurs]

its because of andrew bogut once again
it might have been last season or so when he hit the gamewinner against us

Yup Andrew finally owns Timmy. They went to Timmy in the end to save his face. But it simply didnt work out.

[watertorture]

Anyone have record on our recent games against the Bucks the last few years?

[NFGIII]

Anyone have record on our recent games against the Bucks the last few years?


Wed, Nov 12, 2008 (http://www.spurstalk.com/boxscores/200811120MIL.html) San Antonio Spurs (http://www.spurstalk.com/teams/SAS/2009.html) W - Tm. 82 Opp. 78
Tue, Dec 30, 2008 (http://www.spurstalk.com/boxscores/200812300SAS.html) @ San Antonio Spurs (http://www.spurstalk.com/teams/SAS/2009.html) W - Tm. 100 Opp. 98
Sun, Nov 11, 2007 (http://www.spurstalk.com/boxscores/200711110SAS.html) @ San Antonio Spurs (http://www.spurstalk.com/teams/SAS/2008.html) L - Tm. 88 Opp. 113
Sat, Mar 1, 2008 (http://www.spurstalk.com/boxscores/200803010MIL.html) San Antonio Spurs (http://www.spurstalk.com/teams/SAS/2008.html) L - Tm. 94 Opp. 96
Tue, Dec 26, 2006 (http://www.spurstalk.com/boxscores/200612260SAS.html) @ San Antonio Spurs (http://www.spurstalk.com/teams/SAS/2007.html) W - Tm. 114 Opp. 107
Thu, Mar 15, 2007 (http://www.spurstalk.com/boxscores/200703150MIL.html) San Antonio Spurs (http://www.spurstalk.com/teams/SAS/2007.html) W - Tm. 101 Opp. 90
Tue, Dec 20, 2005 (http://www.spurstalk.com/boxscores/200512200MIL.html) San Antonio Spurs (http://www.spurstalk.com/teams/SAS/2006.html) W - Tm. 109 Opp. 107 - OT
Wed, Jan 18, 2006 (http://www.spurstalk.com/boxscores/200601180SAS.html) @ San Antonio Spurs (http://www.spurstalk.com/teams/SAS/2006.html) L - Tm. 92 Opp. 95
Sat, Dec 4, 2004 (http://www.spurstalk.com/boxscores/200412040MIL.html) San Antonio Spurs (http://www.spurstalk.com/teams/SAS/2005.html) L - Tm. 83 Opp. 104
Wed, Jan 12, 2005 (http://www.spurstalk.com/boxscores/200501120SAS.html) @ San Antonio Spurs (http://www.spurstalk.com/teams/SAS/2005.html) L - Tm. 79 Opp. 94

Tm. = Milwaukee
Opp. = San Antonio
Bucks/Spurs: W - 5 L - 5
This covers the 2003 - 2004 thru this year. Total of 10 games in 5 seasons and we split them.

We play .500 ball agianst them but the feelings are that we should dominate this team. I agree but in sports for not explicable reason there seems to be teams that play very well agianst some and not others. This obviously is the case for the Bucks against us. If anyone can figure out why this particular phenomenon in sports occurs then you could become a very rich person. :hat

[ClingingMars]

We play .500 ball agianst them but the feelings are that we should dominate this team. I agree but in sports for not explicable reason there seems to be teams that play very well agianst some and not others. This obviously is the case for the Bucks against us. If anyone can figure out why this particular phenomenon in sports occurs then you could become a very rich person. :hat

it's pretty simple. our defensive philosophy is to guard the paint and the 3 point line, and to give up open mid-range jumpers. The Bucks live off those shots, so they tend to beat us.

-Mars