PDA

View Full Version : McDonald: Spurs Pull Past Ailing Clippers



duncan228
01-09-2009, 12:04 AM
Updated.

Spurs pull past ailing Clippers (http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/spurs/Spurs_pull_past_ailing_Clippers.html)
Jeff McDonald

The way Spurs guard Michael Finley sees it, L.A. Clippers coach Mike Dunleavy could have been coaching 1,400 miles away in the BCS national championship football game Thursday night, instead of at the AT&T Center.

Faced with the task of finding a way to defend Spurs star Tim Duncan, Dunleavy opted for a strategy straight off of the gridiron.

“It was like (Duncan) was a wide receiver, and they were double-teaming him and letting everyone else beat them,” Finley said. “They were playing a bump-and-run double team on Tim and a ‘Cover 2’ zone on everybody else.”

For those without a master’s degree in Football Terminology 101 — or at least, without a Madden-addicted teenager in the house — what Finley means is this: When it came time for Dunleavy to pick his poison against the Spurs, he reached for the vial marked “Anybody but Duncan.”

The result was a slow death for the short-handed Clippers. The Spurs overcame a disjointed first half, ratcheting up their defense in the second half to — finally — come away with a 106-84 victory.

Tony Parker had 19 points and Roger Mason Jr. added 18 for the Spurs, who outscored the Clippers 31-15 in the fourth quarter to transform the game into a rout.

Content to lay back and play quarterback through a blitz of double teams, Duncan finished with eight points, marking the first time this season he’s finished with fewer than 11. On the other hand, he led the Spurs (24-11) with nine assists.

“Tonight, they just didn’t want Tim to beat them,” Finley said. “So he was distributing the ball and letting his teammates pick up the slack.”

The best example of somebody else beating the Clippers (8-27) came during the decisive fourth quarter. Then, he rested on the bench for the full 12 minutes while his teammates blew the game apart.

This wasn’t supposed to be much of a test for the surging Spurs, who have won nine of their last 10 and are 15-3 since a Dec. 4 loss at home to Detroit.

The Clippers, meanwhile, arrived on the heels of an eight-game losing skid, with only nine players healthy and with three starters — Baron Davis, Chris Kaman and Zach Randolph — out with injuries. Rumor has it they were one strained hammy away from squeezing Dunleavy back into uniform.

“Any time you play a team that, on paper, is less than you, and they have three or four injured players, it’s hard,” Spurs guard Manu Ginobili said. “Maybe you are not as motivated. It usually becomes a tougher game than expected.”

After two quarters, the Clippers JV led the Spurs 44-43.

The Spurs opened by making just 6 of 23 shots in the first quarter, sending coach Gregg Popovich to the index cards he keeps in his shirt pocket, in search of some magic spell to remove the lid from the basket.

Dunleavy’s strategy of forcing anybody but Duncan beat the Clippers had worked. Then, the second half started.

Duncan made a short jumper 17 seconds into the third quarter to put the Spurs ahead 45-44. It would be Duncan’s final basket of the night. It would also be the final lead the Spurs would need.

That kick-started a 10-0 run to start the second half, after which the Spurs began making stops and pushed their lead into double digits.

“Early on, we were missing wide-open shots,” Mason said. “The thing we wanted to do was to keep playing defense, and our defense got better as the game went along. You go through stretches sometimes when you’re not making shots. The constant always has to be defense.”

Before the night was over, the Spurs had topped 100 points, which was a pretty good indicator of where this game was heading. They have won 26 consecutive games when eclipsing the century mark, the longest such streak in the league.

The Clippers had dared anybody but Duncan to beat them. Anybody but Duncan did.

duncan228
01-09-2009, 02:44 AM
Parker, Spurs continue mastery of struggling Clippers (http://www.sportsnetwork.com/merge/tsnform.aspx?c=sportsnetwork&page=nba/news/news.aspx?id=4202312)

San Antonio, TX (Sports Network) - Tony Parker scored 19 points as part of a balanced attack, and the San Antonio Spurs continued their domination of the Los Angeles Clippers with a 106-84 win at AT&T Center.

The Spurs have now beaten the Clippers 10 straight times, dating back to 2006, and have not dropped a game to LA at AT&T Center (12-0). San Antonio also holds a remarkable 59-8 mark against the Clips all-time at home.

Roger Mason added 18 points for the Spurs, who have won nine of 10. Michael Finley chipped in with 15 points, while Manu Ginobili added 13 in the win.

"The defense got better as the game went on, and that fueled the offense," Spurs head coach Gregg Popovich said. "We got out and got a lead. The defense was really good. A lot of guys played well, especially in the second half."

Matt Bonner had 11 points, and Tim Duncan had eight points and nine assists for San Antonio.

Eric Gordon scored 21 points for the Clippers, who have now lost nine in a row. Al Thornton also provided 21 points, and Mardy Collins posted 16 in the loss.

"We have to change the way we play our game like playing better on defense," Gordon said. "We can't foul, and (we need to) play better zone defense. It's tough for guys to play a lot of minutes, and it shows in games. We are playing good; we just need to be better in close games."

Fred Jones had 11 points, and Marcus Camby posted nine points and nine rebounds for LA.

Leading by six to start the fourth, the Spurs opened the final quarter on a 9-0 run to take an 84-69 lead on Kurt Thomas' basket with 10 minutes left.

Thomas' jumper midway through the period gave San Antonio a 20-point cushion, and the hosts cruised from that point.

Collins led the Clippers with eight points in the first, as the visitors held a 22-16 advantage after the opening quarter.

The Spurs closed the gap toward the end of the second quarter and trailed only 44-43 at halftime.

San Antonio scored the first 10 points of the third quarter to take a nine- point lead, and the hosts took a 75-69 lead into the fourth quarter.

Game Notes

The Spurs have won 38 of the last 42 meetings with the Clippers...LA was without Zach Randolph (knee), Baron Davis (tailbone), Chris Kaman (foot) and Ricky Davis (suspension)...San Antonio outscored the Clippers, 31-15, in the fourth quarter, as LA made only four field goals in the frame.

TDMVPDPOY
01-09-2009, 03:22 AM
38-4 record against the toe clippers? PWNED

duncan228
01-09-2009, 04:25 AM
San Antonio 106 - Clippers 84 (http://www.clipsnation.com/2009/1/8/715136/san-antonio-106-clippers-8)
by ClipperSteve

Inexplicably, the Clippers led at halftime, and even managed to withstand a 10-0 start to the second half and still hang with 6 points after three quarters. I say inexplicably, but I guess some hot shooting from Al Thornton and the unlikely Mardy Collins and Fred Jones goes a long way towards explic-ing it. That and some disinterested defense and cold shooting from the Spurs.

But as of halftime, the Clippers were outshooting the Spurs by a wide margin, and outrebounding them by a wide margin - yet LA only enjoyed a 1 point lead. Talk about inexplicable. How is that even possible? Ten turnovers had a lot to do with it, but it still seems like either the halftime stats or the halftime score was wrong. They just didn't make sense.

The second half the game returned to normal. By the end, it was the Spurs who enjoyed big advantages in both shooting and rebounding. A big Spurs run to start the fourth quarter broke the game open, and then the Spurs scrubs proceeded to dominate the Clippers scrubs (although in fairness, the Clippers are starting a couple of their scrubs, so when they are forced to play their scrubs it's like playing double scrubs).

There's not a lot to talk about in this game. The Clippers were outplayed by a far superior team, though they did make a game of it for three quarters.

This was my first extended look at the matchup zone, and it seemed like a disaster. Of course, as I mentioned in my preview, the Spurs may be the worst possible team to zone up on (up on whom to zone? Zhiv - help me here). They have shooters everywhere you look, they have perhaps the best penetrator in the NBA in Tony Parker, and they can flash Tim Duncan to the high post where he can score or pass. I actually think the zone is underutilized in the NBA - I think teams can be successful mixing up defenses, with a lot more zone thrown in that any teams currently use. But there are weaknesses, and the Spurs are the perfect team to exploit them.

With a matchup, you're kind of hoping that the offense will get rushed into a bad decision. You try to be in the passing lanes, and get deflections, and disrupt the offense. A great example was Manu's turnover in the second quarter. He caught the ball on the baseline, and he was wide open and should have shot the ball. But he was surprised to be so open, and thought Duncan was open in the lane as well, and instead of shooting a wide open 12 footer he threw a pass that got stolen.

But in the NBA, that's the exception, not the rule. It's really, really hard to be effective in a defense that's handing cutters off as the move around the court. NBA players do not need a lot of space to make shots, and there's going to be some space against a zone. The offense floods one side of the court, there are 2 defenders guarding 3 shooters - somebody is open. Again, I'm intrigued by the matchup, and think it could be effective in small doses. But all NBA teams are going to exploit it eventually, and the Spurs will do so better than most.

One wonders why MDsr is using so much zone lately. Certainly it can help keep people out of foul trouble, which is obviously important with the team so shorthanded. And even though they were up to a luxurious ten healthy bodies for this game, the simple fact of the matter is that if Gordon, Thornton or Camby gets into foul trouble, it's a disaster for the current team. I think there are some other reasons as well. It lets Camby stay near the basket, to block shots and rebound, rather than defending the likes of Matt Bonner at the three point line. It also lets the team play a less traditional group on the floor. This was more important when Hart and Jones were unavailable, since Collins and Gordon were the only guards. When one of them went to the bench for a brief rest, zone was pretty much the only option since neither Steve Novak nor Al Thornton is going to have much success defending the shooting guard.

It all makes me wonder if he's not contemplating using the zone when he gets everyone healthy as a way to get a different non-traditional group - Camby, Kaman and Randolph - on the floor together. Could they play at least a few minutes of 1-2-2, with Kaman and Camby low, and Randolph taking a wing? Zach would have the toughest assignment there, and would have to cover a lot of ground. But at some level it seems strange to put this much effort into the matchup zone just as a stopgap defense for a makeshift roster. Does it figure into the Clippers longer term plans? I'm a big believer in getting your best players on the floor, regardless of position. So I'm in favor of finding a way to play Camby, Kaman and Randolph together when they're healthy. Just a thought.

Camby's streak of 21 consecutive games of double digit rebounds was snapped tonight. Fortunately, he did get some extra rest, playing only 30 minutes. Tim Duncan was held to single digit scoring for the first time this season, for what that's worth. The teams combined to shoot a mere 20 free throws; the game was over pretty fast.

mrspurs
01-09-2009, 07:47 AM
Put another W in the win column. But letting the Clippers get away with 11 offensive rebounds while Baron(decent rebounding guard like Kidd) and Cayman didnt even suit up isnt great team play. Then again hitting over 10 3's is the reason why getting outhustled in the paint doesnt seem to bother the Spurs FO. And I heard Timmy say. We are going with what we have for the remainder of the season. I wonder if he might change those words now?