PDA

View Full Version : michael redd



jdev82
01-25-2009, 02:54 PM
as a spurs fan, i would love to have a less egotistical version of michael redd. i've heard multiple rumors about him going to portland, san antone, and i think dallas, but i was wondering, what could the spurs give the bucks that they's want?
growing up in milwaukee, i've watched my fair share of bucks games this year, and i've seen that they play better without him (this is the second time he's been hurt this year) he's shown that he can step it up defensively, and is obviously a very capable scorer and a knock-em-down three point shooter. but i'm still wondering what we could give them,
any thoughts? comments?
anybody know anything else about this possibility of a trade?

timvp
01-25-2009, 02:56 PM
Bidding would start with a trade including Mason and Hill. Even then, the Spurs probably don't have enough to offer.

jdev82
01-25-2009, 03:00 PM
Bidding would start with a trade including Mason and Hill. Even then, the Spurs probably don't have enough to offer.

would pop really be willing to give up mason and hill for him?
and keep in mind, the bucks are waaaay to deep at the 1 to need a point guard, much less one with little trade value.

dbestpro
01-25-2009, 03:09 PM
If you look at the stats you already have your Redd in Mason.

jdev82
01-25-2009, 03:13 PM
out for the season. just heard.

http://my.journaltimes.com/post/woelfel-world-of-sports/bucks_lose_redd_for_the_season.html

NFGIII
01-25-2009, 03:13 PM
Bidding would start with a trade including Mason and Hill. Even then, the Spurs probably don't have enough to offer.

My feelings, too. Redd is making approx. $15.7M this year. What do we have to offer to make it happen? Way too much IMO. We would either trade one of the Big 3 or gut the team. The Bucks could simple dangle this guy in front of the league and see what comes back to them.

DynastyBuilder
01-25-2009, 03:17 PM
Redd does not solve our problem of still needing another big...

galvatron3000
01-25-2009, 03:21 PM
we don't need Redd and he's injured again right? We are good on the wing we need a big, no big then why trade. Udoka is the odd man out he maybe moved along with someone else and perhaps Rights to Splitter. Who knows but more than likely it will have to be an East team who needs Udoka on their bench for depth at that spot and a big to spare, lol.

Kindergarten Cop
01-25-2009, 03:22 PM
Redd does not solve our problem of still needing another big...

Especially if he is out for the remainder of the season due to injury.:lol

Mr.Bottomtooth
01-25-2009, 03:23 PM
Especially if he is out for the remainder of the season due to injury.:lol

This guy should start a thread on how we should trade for Kobe.

Austin_Toros
01-25-2009, 06:00 PM
he's worthless at this stage because of his season ending injury.
he wont be going anywhere soon.

Spursone
01-25-2009, 07:52 PM
:lobt2:To get Redd I would give up Bonner, Hill, and Udoka.:hat

exstatic
01-25-2009, 07:56 PM
:lobt2:To get Redd I would give up Bonner, Hill, and Udoka.:hat

Can you
FUCKING READ?

REDD IS OUT FOR THE YEAR.

REDD IS OUT FOR THE YEAR

Spur-Addict
01-25-2009, 08:01 PM
I had to drop this fool in fantasy.

Rogue
01-25-2009, 09:51 PM
as a spurs fan, i would love to have a less egotistical version of michael redd. i've heard multiple rumors about him going to portland, san antone, and i think dallas, but i was wondering, what could the spurs give the bucks that they's want?
growing up in milwaukee, i've watched my fair share of bucks games this year, and i've seen that they play better without him (this is the second time he's been hurt this year) he's shown that he can step it up defensively, and is obviously a very capable scorer and a knock-em-down three point shooter. but i'm still wondering what we could give them,
any thoughts? comments?
anybody know anything else about this possibility of a trade?
thanks son, but michael redd is not worth the money he earns. Only the bucks could give redd such a contract and draft an yidiot with the 6th pick.