PDA

View Full Version : wade or amare


Memorial-Day-99
03-03-2005, 11:40 PM
yeah this should be in the nba forum, but consider these two players are on two good teams who will play the Spurs in the playoffs and then in the finals...
exstatic
03-03-2005, 11:45 PM
So if you KNOW it belongs in the NBA forum, why do you put it here?
Memorial-Day-99
03-03-2005, 11:48 PM
cuz no one ever goes there....99 percent of us are spurs fans and only look in this forum...but i think it is a good question....so STFU
Jdspur20
03-03-2005, 11:58 PM
amare, without a doubt
xcoriate
03-04-2005, 12:16 AM
amare = shit

it wiil be wade

amare has nothing but athletics, without someone spoon feedin him he cant win games

ex. see suns prior to nash

wade has athletics, as well as bball iq he can create for himself and others

Amare is over rated,

Suns are as follows:
Nash > Marion > Amare > JJ > Q Rich

Hmmm now thats off my chest.....
Dre_7
03-04-2005, 01:28 AM
Wade, just barely.
TwoHandJam
03-04-2005, 09:37 AM
amare = shit

it wiil be wade

amare has nothing but athletics, without someone spoon feedin him he cant win games

ex. see suns prior to nash

wade has athletics, as well as bball iq he can create for himself and others

Amare is over rated,

Suns are as follows:
Nash > Marion > Amare > JJ > Q Rich

Hmmm now thats off my chest.....Yup.
Sec24Row7
03-04-2005, 09:43 AM
Karl Malone didn't have a jumpshot when he came in the league.

Big men are just inherently more valuable than guards...

Gotta go with Amare
Jimcs50
03-04-2005, 09:47 AM
Both will be stars, but is is proven that both need another stud(Nash for Amare, Shaq for Wade) in order to be great.

So whichever team commits itself to giving their young star a great set up man will continue to have a superstar for years to come.
bigzak25
03-04-2005, 09:53 AM
i'll go with wade, he's takes over 4th qtrs.....and he was good last year before 34 arrived.
BronxCowboy
03-04-2005, 10:39 AM
Wade in a landslide. Amare's numbers are pretty mediocre (for a big man who gets the kind of minutes he does) except for his scoring, and he has Nash and the Phoenix "all offense, all the time" system to thank for that.
Sec24Row7
03-04-2005, 10:48 AM
Both will be stars, but is is proven that both need another stud(Nash for Amare, Shaq for Wade) in order to be great.

So whichever team commits itself to giving their young star a great set up man will continue to have a superstar for years to come.


I picked Amare, but damn Jim that's stupid as shit.

Wade Took over in the playoffs last year for Miami getting almost no help from Butler and Odom.

He doesn't NEED Shaq to be a great player, he IS a great player. Shaq makes things easier, true but just because he is THERE doesn't mean he NEEDS him to be great.

WTF bullshit is that.
tlongII
03-04-2005, 12:22 PM
I can't give an edge to either one right now. They are both special players.
waly.mg
03-04-2005, 01:14 PM
Wade better twice
Rummpd
03-04-2005, 01:52 PM
Wade = 2 inches more and he would be Jordan again. Special kid, just shows up and does his thing. The real queston is have the talking heads annointed the wrong one in James > Wade = could be tough call in 5-10 years.

Amare is a great,great talent but still immature. He could be great or he could easily go Kemp on us.

Hard choice as bigs are so hard to come by but
I would go with Wade.