PDA

View Full Version : AMERICAN Rancher getting sued by ILLEGALS in this Great Country.



FreeMason
02-09-2009, 09:58 AM
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/09/16-illegals-sue-arizona-rancher/


An Arizona man who has waged a 10-year campaign to stop a flood of illegal immigrants from crossing his property is being sued by 16 Mexican nationals who accuse him of conspiring to violate their civil rights when he stopped them at gunpoint on his ranch on the U.S.-Mexico border.
Roger Barnett (http://www.washingtontimes.com/themes/?Theme=Roger+Barnett), 64, began rounding up illegal immigrants in 1998 and turning them over to the U.S. Border Patrol, he said, after they destroyed his property, killed his calves and broke into his home.
His Cross Rail Ranch near Douglas, Ariz., is known by federal and county law enforcement authorities as "the avenue of choice" for immigrants seeking to enter the United States illegally.
Trial continues Monday in the federal lawsuit, which seeks $32 million in actual and punitive damages for civil rights violations, the infliction of emotional distress and other crimes. Also named are Mr. Barnett's wife, Barbara, his brother, Donald, and Larry Dever, sheriff in Cochise County, Ariz., where the Barnetts live. The civil trial is expected to continue until Friday.
The lawsuit is based on a March 7, 2004, incident in a dry wash on the 22,000-acre ranch, when he approached a group of illegal immigrants while carrying a gun and accompanied by a large dog.
Attorneys for the immigrants - five women and 11 men who were trying to cross illegally into the United States - have accused Mr. Barnett of holding the group captive at gunpoint, threatening to turn his dog loose on them and saying he would shoot anyone who tried to escape.
The immigrants are represented at trial by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), which also charged that Sheriff Dever did nothing to prevent Mr. Barnett from holding their clients at "gunpoint, yelling obscenities at them and kicking one of the women."
In the lawsuit, MALDEF said Mr. Barnett approached the group as the immigrants moved through his property, and that he was carrying a pistol and threatening them in English and Spanish. At one point, it said, Mr. Barnett's dog barked at several of the women and he yelled at them in Spanish, "My dog is hungry and he's hungry for buttocks."
The lawsuit said he then called his wife and two Border Patrol agents arrived at the site. It also said Mr. Barnett acknowledged that he had turned over 12,000 illegal immigrants to the Border Patrol since 1998.
In March, U.S. District Judge John Roll rejected a motion by Mr. Barnett to have the charges dropped, ruling there was sufficient evidence to allow the matter to be presented to a jury. Mr. Barnett's attorney, David Hardy, had argued that illegal immigrants did not have the same rights as U.S. citizens.
Mr. Barnett told The Washington Times in a 2002 interview that he began rounding up illegal immigrants after they started to vandalize his property, northeast of Douglas along Arizona Highway 80. He said the immigrants tore up water pumps, killed calves, destroyed fences and gates, stole trucks and broke into his home.
Some of his cattle died from ingesting the plastic bottles left behind by the immigrants, he said, adding that he installed a faucet on an 8,000-gallon water tank so the immigrants would stop damaging the tank to get water.
Mr. Barnett said some of the ranch´s established immigrant trails were littered with trash 10 inches deep, including human waste, used toilet paper, soiled diapers, cigarette packs, clothes, backpacks, empty 1-gallon water bottles, chewing-gum wrappers and aluminum foil - which supposedly is used to pack the drugs the immigrant smugglers give their "clients" to keep them running.
He said he carried a pistol during his searches for the immigrants and had a rifle in his truck "for protection" against immigrant and drug smugglers, who often are armed.
ASSOCIATED PRESS DEFENDANT: Roger Barnett said he had turned over 12,000 illegal immigrants to the Border Patrol since 1998.

A former Cochise County sheriff´s deputy who later was successful in the towing and propane business, Mr. Barnett spent $30,000 on electronic sensors, which he has hidden along established trails on his ranch. He searches the ranch for illegal immigrants in a pickup truck, dressed in a green shirt and camouflage hat, with his handgun and rifle, high-powered binoculars and a walkie-talkie.
His sprawling ranch became an illegal-immigration highway when the Border Patrol diverted its attention to several border towns in an effort to take control of the established ports of entry. That effort moved the illegal immigrants to the remote areas of the border, including the Cross Rail Ranch.
"This is my land. I´m the victim here," Mr. Barnett said. "When someone´s home and loved ones are in jeopardy and the government seemingly can´t do anything about it, I feel justified in taking matters into my own hands. And I always watch my back."

MaNuMaNiAc
02-09-2009, 10:11 AM
Bullshit law suit. I hope the guy come out on top. Some people really don't have an ounce of shame.

ploto
02-09-2009, 10:42 AM
They are trespassing on HIS property. it is not like he did this in the middle of nowhere.

DarrinS
02-09-2009, 10:53 AM
Fuck this rancher. Those illegals have rights.


Sincerely,


Joe six-pack Liberal

Wild Cobra
02-09-2009, 11:21 AM
Bullshit law suit. I hope the guy come out on top. Some people really don't have an ounce of shame.
I agree, but illegals already won such a case in the past.

Oh, Gee!!
02-09-2009, 01:07 PM
"My dog is hungry and he's hungry for buttocks."

sigworthy:lol

The Reckoning
02-09-2009, 02:04 PM
i wouldnt have turned them in. i wouldve shot them in the face right then and there.

Oh, Gee!!
02-09-2009, 02:12 PM
i wouldnt have turned them in. i wouldve shot them in the face right then and there.

he woulda saved thousands in attorney fees.

smeagol
02-09-2009, 03:40 PM
he woulda saved thousands in attorney fees.

And be dammed for all time . . .

jack sommerset
02-09-2009, 04:49 PM
Unreal. Lawyers and Politicians have ruined our country.

The Reckoning
02-09-2009, 04:52 PM
And be dammed for all time . . .


Exodus

movement of yo' people

Obstructed_View
02-09-2009, 05:11 PM
i wouldnt have turned them in. i wouldve shot them in the face right then and there.

Just make sure you don't shoot them in the back. There are two border patrol agents in jail for that.

Blake
02-09-2009, 05:12 PM
In March, U.S. District Judge John Roll rejected a motion by Mr. Barnett to have the charges dropped, ruling there was sufficient evidence to allow the matter to be presented to a jury.

I'd like to know what evidence the judge is talking about

Sec24Row7
02-09-2009, 05:54 PM
Just make sure you don't shoot them in the back. There are two border patrol agents in jail for that.

Not anymore...

FreeMason
02-09-2009, 06:01 PM
You can shoot them in the buttocks, you just can't cover it up.

angrydude
02-09-2009, 06:04 PM
I just don't see how these mexicans can win this. They're trespassing on his property and he was doing what the law required him to do to keep them off. If he let them keep using the land he'd probably legally never be able to stop them.

ChumpDumper
02-09-2009, 06:06 PM
They're trespassing on his property and he was doing what the law required him to do to keep them off.I'm not familiar with that particular law. I do believe it is a frivolous suit, but I don't know of any law that requires a land owner to take the steps the defendant has here.

DarrinS
02-09-2009, 06:49 PM
The real question remains, why has that rancher's dog acquired a taste for buttocks?

ElNono
02-09-2009, 08:18 PM
This is Arizona. The rancher will win, and his dog will eat buttocks...

Aggie Hoopsfan
02-09-2009, 08:27 PM
In March, U.S. District Judge John Roll rejected a motion by Mr. Barnett to have the charges dropped, ruling there was sufficient evidence to allow the matter to be presented to a jury.

You've got to be kidding me.

angrydude
02-09-2009, 09:22 PM
I'm not familiar with that particular law. I do believe it is a frivolous suit, but I don't know of any law that requires a land owner to take the steps the defendant has here.

well, obviously not with a gun, but you have to take some action to let the people know they aren't welcome. A sign, or sue them, or something.

ChumpDumper
02-09-2009, 09:23 PM
A wall?

Obstructed_View
02-09-2009, 09:34 PM
A wall?

:lol We're not even allowed to have a wall to keep people out of the country or a law keeping their lawyers from filing suit in our courts on their behalf.

Obstructed_View
02-09-2009, 09:36 PM
Not anymore...

They're still in jail for another month. They got a commutation, not a pardon.

td4mvp21
02-09-2009, 09:57 PM
Fucking bullshit lawsuit. I hope the rancher wins.

Oh, Gee!!
02-09-2009, 10:01 PM
The real question remains, why has that rancher's dog acquired a taste for buttocks?

you can't sue a dog!

Drachen
02-10-2009, 04:40 PM
you little taints will be embracing the new world order when it's imposed upon your foreclosed reagan high school going asses

Um what? I dont understand.

As far as the subject goes, I am pretty socially liberal, but even I can't believe this. Honestly, what is his recourse if he can't hold them until the authorities get there? I can only think of one thing, he could shoot the trespassers so that they won't be held against their will. Shoot that would even provide buttocks as far as the dog's eye could see. Would that be better?