View Full Version : For you photography-minded posters
I did a lot of photography back in the day. I got a new camera this week to get back into it.
http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/pics.html
Kori Ellis
03-06-2005, 01:01 AM
http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/pics-Images/29.jpg
This one is great!
Kori Ellis
03-06-2005, 01:04 AM
And this one ...
http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/pics-Images/102.jpg
http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/pics-Images/16.jpg
http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/pics-Images/26.jpg
http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/pics-Images/115.jpg
http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/pics-Images/64.jpg
These are some of my favorites too. I am going to frame a couple.
ZStomp
03-06-2005, 05:03 AM
I could post some pictures but I don't think most of the posters in here would like my pictures. :fro
Jekka
03-06-2005, 04:05 PM
What kind of camera did you get? The photos are nice.
JoeChalupa
03-07-2005, 01:10 PM
I like photography too.
I use an old Cannon Rebel.
I'm not really into the digital camera thing but I'm going to break down and get one.
Is 3.1 pixels good enough?
exstatic
03-07-2005, 01:35 PM
3.1 pixels will make everything look like a block or cube. I recommend at least 3.1 megapixels. ;)
I like photography too.
I use an old Cannon Rebel.
I'm not really into the digital camera thing but I'm going to break down and get one.
Is 3.1 pixels good enough?
I would never use a point-n-shoot for photography.
The new Digital Rebel is like 8 MP and will cost around 900. Its nice, but 6MP will get you a 20x24 picture.
JoeChalupa
03-07-2005, 02:39 PM
I love my Rebel and have gotten some great pics.
But I mostly experiment and see what I get.
3.1 megapixels it is.
Thanks
Jekka
03-07-2005, 02:40 PM
I like photography too.
I use an old Cannon Rebel.
I'm not really into the digital camera thing but I'm going to break down and get one.
Is 3.1 pixels good enough?
Canons are the best - great lenses. I hate that mine is a APS, but eh. I have an old Nikon, too though, that's about thirty years old that takes awesome pictures. I will always maintain that digital cameras are great for some things, but for pictures you're really going to care about a regular film camera is always the best - you can always get a photo CD if you want stuff for the computer.
JoeChalupa
03-07-2005, 02:47 PM
I agree. I used to have a nice Pentax with a nice zoom lens but it got stolen.
I'm currently into trying different filters and effects. I like black & white photos too.
Jekka
03-07-2005, 03:08 PM
I agree. I used to have a nice Pentax with a nice zoom lens but it got stolen.
I'm currently into trying different filters and effects. I like black & white photos too.
If you process your own film there are some cool effects you can use - one I found by accident is partially solarizing the negatives. If you're printing your own photos there are some fun tints to use, especially on black and white. I know there are a couple of companies that make a tint for B&W to metallicize the black portions of the print.
Canons are the best - great lenses. I hate that mine is a APS, but eh. I have an old Nikon, too though, that's about thirty years old that takes awesome pictures. I will always maintain that digital cameras are great for some things, but for pictures you're really going to care about a regular film camera is always the best - you can always get a photo CD if you want stuff for the computer.
Now that I have a 6+ MP SLR, there is no reason to want film.
JoeChalupa
03-07-2005, 09:28 PM
Wow, that rocks.
To be honest, I don't know enough about the digital camera technology to really compare to film but I personally, enjoy working with film.
Can you get the same effects on digital such as time elapse pics and dual images? Do you have the same ability such as filters?
ALVAREZ6
03-07-2005, 09:33 PM
A guy who's a photographer but has his username as 2pac....interesting..:)
JoeChalupa
03-07-2005, 09:38 PM
Yeah, kind of hard to picture.
Wow, that rocks.
To be honest, I don't know enough about the digital camera technology to really compare to film but I personally, enjoy working with film.
Can you get the same effects on digital such as time elapse pics and dual images? Do you have the same ability such as filters?
All the same filters, all the same time-elapse, although the process is a little different. I plan on trying to take some of the highway and seeing how it works.
MannyIsGod
03-08-2005, 01:08 AM
2pac is about as cracka as they come.
Very Cool Pic's
Thanks for the link
Jekka
03-08-2005, 03:36 PM
Now that I have a 6+ MP SLR, there is no reason to want film.
I know I'm a purist, but there's just something about the actual light imprint of the real image that I love. It's like the difference between digital and analog recording - one really captures the event and the other does the best impression that it can.
I worked in the [digital] darkroom tonight.
Enhanced Photos (http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/favorite/pics.html)
JoeChalupa
03-16-2005, 08:38 AM
Nice. I bought a inexpensive Kodak digital camera just to fool around with.
Haven't downloaded them yet.
But have some great 35M shots developing now....at Wal-Mart.
JoeChalupa
03-16-2005, 10:27 AM
I just got a Sam's card so I'll do that.
My first venture into skylines. Here is Houston last night.
http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/skyline/pics-Images/4.jpg
http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/skyline/pics-Images/3.jpg
Thats a plane flying by downtown and a car on the far street.
http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/skyline/pics-Images/8.jpg
All taken with at 30" and F/11
all nine pics (http://www.houstonopinions.com/pics/skyline/pics.html)
Unedited (other than he BW)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.