View Full Version : Hill Vs. Vaughn
Shastafarian
02-19-2009, 12:49 AM
How much better is Hill would you say? Would it be too risky to have Vaughn as a backup?
Austin_Toros
02-19-2009, 01:39 AM
I say Hill should be backup PG with Vaughn as the third string. Hopefully this will be Vaugh's last season as a spur (at least as a player).
BUT, we can't forget that Vaughn did show leadership and ability when TP was out injured and that Hill made some rookie mistakes.
All in all, Hill is more is probably more valuable right now. Most definitely for the future.
Shastafarian
02-19-2009, 02:13 AM
I say Hill should be backup PG with Vaughn as the third string. Hopefully this will be Vaugh's last season as a spur (at least as a player).
BUT, we can't forget that Vaughn did show leadership and ability when TP was out injured and that Hill made some rookie mistakes.
All in all, Hill is more is probably more valuable right now. Most definitely for the future.
Would you say Hill is slightly better or a fair amount better?
bigdog
02-19-2009, 02:29 AM
Would you say Hill is slightly better or a fair amount better?
As far as talent, he's a fair amount better. Although, Vaughn most likely has the higher basketball IQ at this point.
Manufan909
02-19-2009, 02:59 AM
Hill makes JV irrelevant this year, imo. Manu/Mason can play PG in a pinch. But for a 3rd-string PG, JV is ok with me.
bigdog
02-19-2009, 03:15 AM
Hill makes JV irrelevant this year, imo. Manu/Mason can play PG in a pinch. But for a 3rd-string PG, JV is ok with me.
IMO, I don't think Mason is a very good PG.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.