PDA

View Full Version : Cavs Vs Lakers in a 7 game series..who wins?



The_Game
03-04-2009, 01:45 AM
they may well meet in the finals

who you got if bynum is heathly? cavs adding joe smith was a good move...

RedsLakers24
03-04-2009, 01:48 AM
if bynum healthy is say lakers, Gasol moves to PF and Drew at Center its going to be hard for Lebron to get easy layups when you got two seven footers in the paint

Lars
03-04-2009, 03:23 AM
Lakers, Cavs are too one dimensional.

Rogue
03-04-2009, 04:01 AM
Lakers, Cavs are too one dimensional.
I can't agree more. they even don't know how to leap over a shit.

instead of leaping over the shit, they just stepped onto it and provoked a big fly that had been enjoying the shit. otherwise they wouldn't have been shitted by that fly. :lol

Ghazi
03-04-2009, 04:05 AM
Lakers, Cavs are too one dimensional.

What do you mean by "one dimensional"?

They're good defensively, good offensively, solid on the glass, solid from behind the arc, get to the line, have good depth... really their only flaw is interior scoring. I should probably throw in interior defense as well given the evidence from the Lakers games and Yao just recently going off on them.

But overcome able deficiencies when you have the King.

Lars
03-04-2009, 04:31 AM
What do you mean by "one dimensional"?

They're good defensively, good offensively, solid on the glass, solid from behind the arc, get to the line, have good depth... really their only flaw is interior scoring. I should probably throw in interior defense as well given the evidence from the Lakers games and Yao just recently going off on them.

But overcome able deficiencies when you have the King.

I guess I havent seen them play enough, only the nationaly televised + Rox games. We shut down Lebron and they couldn't do anything, no real second or third options. All I saw was a alot of give the ball to Lebron and see what happens.

Spursfan092120
03-04-2009, 05:12 AM
:flag:

tlongII
03-04-2009, 09:31 AM
Lakers with Bynum. Cavs without.

stretch
03-04-2009, 09:42 AM
Cavs in 6

hater
03-04-2009, 09:49 AM
Spurs

DUNCANownsKOBE2
03-04-2009, 11:30 AM
Lakers.

Kobe > Lebron
Kobe's supporting cast >>>>>> Lebron's supporting cast
Phil Jackson >>>> Mike Brown

The_Game
03-04-2009, 12:12 PM
Not going to happen so it isn't even worth discussing.

Why won't it happen? both teams are favourites to get out of their conferences. Guess Boston should be favoured but without homecourt the cavs should be the favourites.

Lakers are the clear favourites in the west, if bynum is healthly there should be no way anybody beats them.

Thunder Dan
03-04-2009, 12:14 PM
Why won't it happen? both teams are favourites to get out of their conferences. Guess Boston should be favoured but without homecourt the cavs should be the favourites.

Lakers are the clear favourites in the west, if bynum is healthly there should be no way anybody beats them.

are you European or something?

Michi_Germany
03-04-2009, 12:16 PM
Lakers in 6

JamStone
03-04-2009, 12:17 PM
Probably Lakers, but I think it would be a pretty competitive series that could possibly go the full 7. And, even if it didn't, I imagine most of the games would be pretty close.

DrHouse
03-04-2009, 02:06 PM
The fact that the Lakers traded Mihm for nothing and didn't pickup a FA bigman makes me hopeful Bynum will come back.

Thunder Dan
03-04-2009, 02:08 PM
Yeah he must of shoppe at the shoppe

I bet he watches movies at the cinema and tours the english countryside while eating crumpets and tea

JamStone
03-04-2009, 02:11 PM
The fact that the Lakers traded Mihm for nothing and didn't pickup a FA bigman makes me hopeful Bynum will come back.

Except for the fact that the Lakers were legitimately trying to sign Joe Smith and that's probably why they traded Mihm. They just didn't get the player or players they targeted.

SpursDynasty
03-04-2009, 02:11 PM
Cavs

JoeTait75
03-04-2009, 02:11 PM
are you European or something?

He saw the name "SpursTalk" and thought it was Tottenham Hotspur, not San Antonio Spurs. :toast

BlackSwordsMan
03-04-2009, 02:45 PM
spurs

Spursmania
03-04-2009, 03:11 PM
Spurs in 6.