PDA

View Full Version : Web site raising $$$ for O.J. Simpson appeal



Galileo
03-15-2009, 05:51 PM
Web site raising $$$ for O.J. Simpson appeal

ASSOCIATED PRESS

LAS VEGAS — Claiming O.J. Simpson was dealt an injustice, an effort is under way to solicit money for the former football star’s appeal of his Nevada conviction and prison sentence on kidnapping and armed robbery charges.

Barrett Prody, the brother of Simpson’s former girlfriend, has created a nonprofit corporation and an Internet Web site, the Society Against Legal Injustice Inc., to raise money for Simpson.

“I hope to help out someone who has gotten to be a good friend,” Prody said by telephone from his home in Fargo, N.D. “I want to leverage his name in an effort to right an injustice out there in Las Vegas.”

Simpson lawyers Yale Galanter in Miami and Gabriel Grasso in Las Vegas said they aren’t connected to Prody’s effort and don’t think the fund is needed.

“It seems that Barrett has the best of intentions,” Galanter said. “But whatever he’s doing is on a separate track with what we’re doing.”

The lawyers said they expected to file an appeal in the next six weeks with the Nevada Supreme Court of Simpson’s Oct. 3 conviction for the armed robbery and kidnapping of two sports memorabilia dealers in a Las Vegas casino hotel room.

Galanter, who said he never met or spoke with Prody, said Simpson’s trial fees and costs were fully paid and his appellate fees and costs were “basically paid.” He declined to provide dollar amounts, citing attorney-client confidentiality.

Prody’s effort has the backing of Simpson’s daughter, Arnelle Simpson, and a close Simpson friend, Tom Scotto.

Arnelle Simpson and Scotto, both of Miami, told The Associated Press that they expected any money Prody raises would help pay the 61-year-old former football star and television actor’s legal bills.

“It’s legit,” Arnelle Simpson said of Prody’s effort. “It was established and created for my dad. Of course I approve of it and will support it.”

Scotto said he also agreed to be a board member of the Society Against Legal Injustice.

“I know Barrett. I know his sister. I’ve worked with him to get this thing done,” Scotto said.

Prody’s younger sister, Christine Prody, was Simpson’s girlfriend for more than a decade after the NFL Hall of Famer was acquitted in the 1994 slaying of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ron Goldman, in Los Angeles.

Simpson has huge financial obligations after being found liable for the deaths in a Los Angeles civil lawsuit. He was ordered to pay $33.5 million in compensatory and punitive damages to the Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson estates.

Christine Prody stood by Simpson when he was arraigned in Las Vegas in September 2007, less than a week after he led five other men into a hotel room in an ill-fated bid to retrieve what he said were personal items and family mementos from two sports collectibles dealers.

But Christine Prody and Simpson are no longer a couple, Simpson’s daughter and friends said.

Christine Prody, now 33, moved out of Simpson’s house in Miami last year and lives in Fergus Falls, Minn. Barrett Prody said his sister had no connection with the Web fundraising effort.

Barrett Prody, 35, runs an automobile marketing company in North Dakota, and visits Las Vegas frequently. He said he talks several times a week by telephone with O.J. Simpson, who is serving nine to 33 years at Lovelock State Prison, a medium-security facility in northern Nevada.

Simpson and co-defendant Clarence “C.J.” Stewart were convicted on all 12 charges, and Stewart was sentenced to 7½ years to 27 years. The four other men who accompanied Simpson were sentenced to probation after they took plea deals and testified for the prosecution.

Prody’s Web site blames the hotel room confrontation on Thomas Riccio, the memorabilia dealer who arranged the meeting, and criticizes prosecutors and Judge Jackie Glass for their handling of the case.

Prody estimated he spent about $6,000 filing incorporation papers in North Dakota and applying to the Internal Revenue Service for tax-exempt status as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

He said he did not intend to take a salary from donations, at least at the start, and intended to use any money not needed for Simpson’s case to fund other causes he deemed unjust.

http://www.kansascity.com/116/story/1086524.html

Appeal Grounds for O.J. Simpson
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/10/4/174539/306

OJ is Guilty, but not of Murder
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DFCEymCFy4

Blake
03-15-2009, 06:20 PM
what a great way to spend time and money.

it's also always good to have friends in Fargo, ND.

Galileo
03-18-2009, 03:34 PM
The Society Against Legal Injustice Goes To Bat For a Fallen American Hero: OJ Simpson


USC Running Back No matter what your opinion of OJ Simpson, his case in Las Vegas is the epitome of social injustice. This case was originated by motives of greed by the instigator of the incident, Thomas Riccio. From there, political opportunity was created for the District Attorney, Judge and Jury to right what some in our society consider to be a wrong from OJ Simpson's 1995 acquittal in Los Angeles . Everyone deserves to be treated fairly based on current circumstances, and the fact is this is far from what happened to OJ Simpson in Las Vegas .

Thomas Riccio worked very aggressively to set the meeting in Palace Station up by calling the Simpson home daily for approximately three months prior. He then taped the episode and sold it to TMZ.com for a six figure profit and eventually wrote a book about the meeting to realize further profit. It was not OJ Simpson's idea to set up the 6 minute meeting at Palace Station in Las Vegas – Thomas Riccio promoted and facilitated the meeting through the eyes of greed and exploitation of OJ Simpson.

From there, political opportunism was in the air. Las Vegas police detectives, the District Attorney David Roger, and Judge Jackie Glass put a full scale kangaroo court into action. One detective was recorded on tape stating “This is great. California can't get him. Now we'll be able to.”. OJ was then charged by District Attorney David Roger with a myriad of robbery charges as well as kidnapping while cutting deals with the co-defendents in the case in exchange for testimony against OJ. Meanwhile, the co-defendents all had checkered legal pasts and criminal records. Additionally, two of the co-defendents that had plea bargain deals cut were the ones that allegedly possessed weapons, while OJ had no weapon in his possession and no knowledge of any of the co-defendents having one. On December 5, 2008, Judge Glass sentenced OJ Simpson to anywhere between 9 and 33 years in prison. On the following Tuesday, December 9, 2008, Judge Glass sentenced all four accomplishes to nothing more than probation and fines. The mere act of cutting the plea bargains with the two that possessed weapons in exchange for testimony against OJ Simpson is evidence of the Las Vegas legal system unfairly targeting OJ. From a logical standpoint, if OJ knew weapons were involved, why would he want and need 5 people with him in the room? It doesn't take much logical reasoning to know that a person intending to hold someone against their will with a deadly weapon would want a minimal amount of witnesses.

Buffalo Bills Running Back

The head detective, Andy Caldwell, stated that OJ should have notified police about his stolen memorabilia. That argument would stand up under normal circumstances. However, this is OJ Simpson and by the comment made by one of the Las Vegas detectives on tape it is not hard to fault OJ for knowing he would get little or no help from police. Furthermore, and most significantly, Bruce Fromong and Alfred Beardsley, the “victims” that had OJ sports memorabilia, were long time acquaintances of OJ and two people whom OJ regarded as casual friends. OJ did not want to call law enforcement on two people he had considered friends for many years – he wanted to confront them and call them out on their actions instead of turning friends over to police.


Judge Jackie Glass District Attorney David Roger recognized this as an opportunity to make himself world famous and proceeded to charge OJ with everything that he possibly could no matter how thin a legal thread it was based upon. People go into banks, rob them at gunpoint, and do not face a charge such as kidnapping. Furthermore, who is OJ Simpson going to kidnap and how is he going to do it? Where is he going to take them and hold them against his will and not be recognized? And what would OJ Simpson have gained by kidnapping the two alleged victims?


The jury selection process overseen by Judge Jackie Glass was the next step in the process. Judge Glass allowed the prosecution to strike the last two African American jurors and allowed the seating of the jury foreman that had previously been dismissed at his job at a local beverage plant for racially disparaging comments. Additionally, Judge Glass would not allow defense attorneys to probe prospective jurors opinions about OJ Simpson and his prior Los Angeles case in depth because “it would take too long”. Judge Glass stated “if we start going into the whys and hows of everything we will be here for three weeks and we're not going to do that”. When charging someone with crimes like armed robbery and kidnapping, wouldn't a reasonable mind deem it to be fair to be as thorough as possible in assembling an unbiased and just jury? Meanwhile, Judge Glass defends and stands by her role in the jury selection process and maintains a just jury was assembled.

The unfairness levied against OJ Simpson in Las Vegas is something no citizen deserves. Should have OJ Simpson, considering his celebrity and notoriety from his Los Angeles case, allowed himself to be put in this situation? No. However, OJ Simpson's act of letting his guard down and making himself vulnerable to people that want to profit off of him in no way makes him deserving of the legal injustice imposed on him by less than professional and competent Las Vegas detectives, prosecutors, judge and jury.

The appeal of OJ Simpson's conviction of all “charges” in Las Vegas is being estimated to eventually cost over $1,000,000 and take a year or longer. OJ Simpson is not a wealthy man anymore and is therefore largely at the mercy of the Las Vegas legal system. Therefore, the Society Against Legal Injustice asks you, as a fan, friend or admirer of OJ Simpson to make a modest contribution to the Society's Trust Fund via the secure link shown CLICK HERE. No contribution is too small: $5, $10, $20, $50, whatever you are comfortable with would be welcomed by the Society. Everyone deserves to be treated fairly by the law, and OJ Simpson is no exception.

http://societyagainstlegalinjustice.com/causes.php

Welcome to the Society Against Legal Injustice, Inc.

We are a Non Profit Corporation and our Goal is to educate, promote and advocate against judicial discrimination and abuse of process based on social, gender and racial discrimination. The Society Against Legal Injustice aids in the defense of persons unjustly accused and tried of crimes.


View our Current Legal Injustices we are supporting.


View our State and Federal Corporate Documents.
You may Donate any amount of money that you feel comfortable with, these donations and all your information is keep Private and Secure.

Thank you for Participating in the Society Against Legal Injustice.

http://societyagainstlegalinjustice.com/index.php

sook
03-18-2009, 03:47 PM
lol i should ddos that website

Viva Las Espuelas
03-18-2009, 03:59 PM
ddos?

sook
03-18-2009, 04:09 PM
ddos?

shhhhh lol not so loud!:nope and Google is your friend.

Viva Las Espuelas
03-18-2009, 04:17 PM
shhhhh lol not so loud!:nope and Google is your friend.
touche :toast

LnGrrrR
03-18-2009, 05:10 PM
Sook, if you infect me with a zombie bot I will send AFOSI on your ass :D

Galileo
03-20-2009, 01:25 PM
here are some tidbits on OJ's murder trial you may NOT have seen on TV:

O.J. Simpson: Ron Goldman, was he a protected snitch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itbSHYJAZEo

O.J. Simpson: Why did LAPD conceal this man's identity from the public? (more on drugs)
http://www.webtrendsnetwork.com/ojcoverup/main.html

O.J. Simpson: Serpents Rising-Hidden Phone Records! (regards exculpatory timeline)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWSyMQb-reg&feature=related

O.J.Simpson: Did Johnnie Cochran betray OJ Simpson? (with Judge Napolitano)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZfbCRZvoyo&feature=related

F. LEE BAILEY -- CROSS-EXAMINATION of a witness (Bailey is the man who proved OJ innocent)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9L4tbAhuwg&feature=related

OJ's son Jason ... is HE the guilty one? (summarizes the evidence)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUg_wzuWAJw&feature=related

OJ is Guilty, but not of Murder
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DFCEymCFy4&feature=related

OJ = INNOCENT

JASON SIMPSON = GUILTY

Nbadan
03-21-2009, 02:25 PM
OJ = INNOCENT

JASON SIMPSON = GUILTY

You maybe right, I mean, after all, if you've seen pics of the crime scene before the bodies were removed (avail. on the internet) there's no debating that Ron Goldman and his assailant got into a life-or-death struggle, but all O.J. got was a cut on his finger? GMAB......It's also pretty obvious (to me anyway) that Goldman came over to Nichol's house to drop off sunglasses, now I'm not saying that there may not have been a prior relationship between them....but that isn't what was going on that night...

Nbadan
03-21-2009, 02:29 PM
OJ is Guilty, but not of Murder
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DFCE...eature=related

....this asks some very intriguing question about why Jason was never questioned.....It seems that once the ball got rolling on O.J., for the LAPD go back and question Jason would have been viewed by the M$M as a big fuck-up...OJ may be guilty all right, he may of been guilty of being a father...

sook
03-21-2009, 06:45 PM
Sook, if you infect me with a zombie bot I will send AFOSI on your ass :D

:lol

Galileo
03-21-2009, 06:54 PM
You maybe right, I mean, after all, if you've seen pics of the crime scene before the bodies were removed (avail. on the internet) there's no debating that Ron Goldman and his assailant got into a life-or-death struggle, but all O.J. got was a cut on his finger? GMAB......It's also pretty obvious (to me anyway) that Goldman came over to Nichol's house to drop off sunglasses, now I'm not saying that there may not have been a prior relationship between them....but that isn't what was going on that night...

Its funny. OJ was convicted by the media, but acquitted by the jury.

Recall these facts:

-Ron Goldman put up a bitter struggle with his attacker,
yet no bruises or cuts (other than the cut on his finger) were ever
found on O.J. Simpson.

-Investigators found blood and skin under Nicole's fingernails, along with drops
of blood on her back that didn't match those of O.J. Simpson or Ron Goldman.

-The LAPD found 15 unidentified fingerprints at the crime scene,
none matched O.J. Simpson.

-There was an unidentified shoeprint found in blood at the Bundy crime scene,
as well as, other footprints that did not match the Bruno Magli shoes.

-Blood found in O.J.'s Bronco totaled less than one drop.

-The day after the murders, and prior to his arrest, O.J. Simpson hired a
defense attorney for the overlooked suspect, and not for himself.

-LAPD focused on one major suspect, O.J. Simpson, and quickly
eliminated other possible suspects, including our overlooked suspect.

What do these facts point to?
O.J. WAS AT THE CRIME SCENE,
BUT AFTER THE MURDERS.
Find out who O.J. was willing to stand trial for in the murders
of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman as you walk step-by-step
through William C. Dear's 14 year investigation.


View compelling NEW evidence that has never been made public.

http://www.theoverlookedsuspect.com/

Galileo
03-21-2009, 06:57 PM
....this asks some very intriguing question about why Jason was never questioned.....It seems that once the ball got rolling on O.J., for the LAPD go back and question Jason would have been viewed by the M$M as a big fuck-up...OJ may be guilty all right, he may of been guilty of being a father...

O.J. Simpson conspiracy 1: Serpents Rising, Did the L.A. Coroner lie on the witness stand?
http://it.truveo.com/OJ-Simpson-conspiracy-1-Serpents-Rising-Did-the-LA/id/3182054035

Another interesting video. Reminds me of the JFK case.

F. LEE BAILEY - in action (crosses Mark Fuhrman)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLY9uHIMaaQ&feature=related

The footprints are mentioned again.