LOL Beastforum.com

[CosmicCowboy]

I read this post on another thread and out of curiosity it stimulated a google search...


how many Americans are there? 200+ million?

how many of those do you think will be begging for animal marriage rights when gay/les marriage becomes legal?
maybe 100 people from Arkansas, Missouri and Montana......not enough to change up the system.

if science ever can prove it's purely a genetic trait that determines our orientation, then maybe those 100 animal lovers might have a slight gripe.


Holy Shit! Did I get a surprise...This place is bigger than spurstalk!

http://www.beastforum.com/

[CosmicCowboy]

:wow

607,000+ members???????

[Bukefal]

O my god, this is sick! How is it possible such sites are not forbidden? This is really really sick, and those people really earn some torturing!!!!

[Phase-T]

They post like animals over there!

[unibrow]

:wow

607,000+ members???????

608,000 now. :smokin

[ChumpDumper]

So cc is bestial-curious.

[balli]

608,000 now. :smokin
:lol You mean 607,001?

[ChumpDumper]

It's not a math forum -- let him have his fun.

Besides, if mouse just joined there probably are a thousand new screen names.

[z0sa]

these people didn't choose their sexual preference...

:lmao

[balli]

It's not a math forum -- let him have his fun.
Sorry, I was just having my fun too. No hard feelings Uni. :toast

[IronMexican]

I was about to make a account to see the pics, but got scared.

[z0sa]

I was about to make a account to see the pics, but got scared.

you don't like dog titties or goat ass?

[Bukefal]

you are all making fun, but this is really sick, how can you make jokes on this? All those people deserve torturing and jail big time. How can such websites be legal? Instead of focusing on fur and bitching celebrities who wear fur all the time, the Animal welfare organisations should fight this!!!

[Laker Lanny]

:lol You mean 607,001?

:lmao

[Brandon Fraser]

So cc is bestial-curious.

:lol

[ChumpDumper]

Sorry, I was just having my fun too. No hard feelings Uni. :toastI was just giving you shit too, it was an entertaining mistake. Maybe being linked to SpursTalk spiked the membership that much....

[Tree hugger]

you are all making fun, but this is really sick, how can you make jokes on this? All those people deserve torturing and jail big time. How can such websites be legal? Instead of focusing on fur and bitching celebrities who wear fur all the time, the Animal welfare organisations should fight this!!!


Geesh! I thought I was the only tree hugger around here!

[CosmicCowboy]

OMG LOL.

The "how to" section is fucking hilarious!

[DarrinS]

how many Americans are there? 200+ million?

how many of those do you think will be begging for animal marriage rights when gay/les marriage becomes legal?
maybe 100 people from Arkansas, Missouri and Montana......not enough to change up the system.

if science ever can prove it's purely a genetic trait that determines our orientation, then maybe those 100 animal lovers might have a slight gripe.








Every month we don't have an economic recovery package, 500 million Americans lose their jobs.

[LnGrrrR]

O my god, this is sick! How is it possible such sites are not forbidden? This is really really sick, and those people really earn some torturing!!!!

Well, I haven't been to the site, but... freedom of speech? As long as they're not showing pictures of it.

Assuming they do show pictures, well, they should probably be prosecuted. But honestly, I think that police have more important shit to be worried about than some chick sucking off her dog.

[LockBeard]

It is not our place to judge, my fellow Americans.

In fact, a little less than a year ago one of our brave judges in California's 9th district court of appeals proved just that!

:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:wow

[MannyIsGod]

Wow, just wow.

[DarrinS]

That is a sick fuckin website.

[CosmicCowboy]

Well, I haven't been to the site, but... freedom of speech? As long as they're not showing pictures of it.

Assuming they do show pictures, well, they should probably be prosecuted. But honestly, I think that police have more important shit to be worried about than some chick sucking off her dog.

pictures, videos, "how to" primers to fuck and get fucked by your dog, etc. Those guys got it all...

[MannyIsGod]

That is a sick fuckin website.

Pun intended?

[jcrod]

pictures, videos, "how to" primers to fuck and get fucked by your dog, etc. Those guys got it all...

Thats scary.

[Yonivore]

you are all making fun, but this is really sick, how can you make jokes on this? All those people deserve torturing and jail big time. How can such websites be legal? Instead of focusing on fur and bitching celebrities who wear fur all the time, the Animal welfare organisations should fight this!!!
It wasn't too long ago, a man butt-fucking another man was considered sick (still is by some of us). I think the original topic had to do with slippery slope stuff, didn't it?

I actually believe the pedophiles will beat the animal lovers to the punch on normalizing their behavior. NAMBLA is a lot more organized.

[LnGrrrR]

pictures, videos, "how to" primers to fuck and get fucked by your dog, etc. Those guys got it all...

Yeah, it's gross. But so are multiple deaths in Iraq, AIDS in Africa, starvation... I can't work up the energy to be too offended. (Then again, I haven't looked at the website yet.)

[CosmicCowboy]

Yeah, it's gross. But so are multiple deaths in Iraq, AIDS in Africa, starvation... I can't work up the energy to be too offended. (Then again, I haven't looked at the website yet.)

I think it's too hilarious to be offended...

[jack sommerset]

Top banner says "Hardcore Farm Fucking only $1" A naked lady in front of a horse.
:lmao

[jack sommerset]

Hopefully no one has to look through our computers background. It will be hard to explain why we went to a beastality site.

[MannyIsGod]

Shit, some of us haven't clicked on that link and won't.

:lol I'm surprised no one gave CC shit for his weak excuse on how he found the site. The richer does own horses, after all.

[CosmicCowboy]

Sorry, but it wasn't like I didn't warn you.

[CosmicCowboy]

Shit, some of us haven't clicked on that link and won't.

:lol I'm surprised no one gave CC shit for his weak excuse on how he found the site. The richer does own horses, after all.

Maalox already did.

[MaNuMaNiAc]

Seriously who gives a fuck what people do in the privacy of their own farms :lol

[CosmicCowboy]

Speaking of horses, here's another one...





Disciple of the board
Group Icon

Group: VIP Members
Posts: 8075
Member No.: 235745
Joined: 10-February 06


Rate Member:


How My Mare & I Became StableMates


Part One of Five


Week One: Objective for the first week was to establish myself as a provider, And show her that no one was going to hurt her.


Week One, Day One


Morning, Her arrival. As she was being lead off the trailer, I admired her from the top of her ears to the bottom of her hooves. From the tip of her nose to the end of her tail. She was by far the most beautiful mare I had ever seen. She was going on two years of age. She was perfect in every way, and she was mine. The question was weather I would be hers. Would she accept me as her lover. Only time would tell, and time was something that I had plenty of.

The man who sold her to me, told me that she had not had much human contact. That she had not been worked with since she was weaned. This told me that she may not trust humans completely.

When the driver brought her up to me. He removed her halter as I put on her new one. I had a catch rope hanging from the bottom.

Note: A catch rope is a small rope about 12 inches long, not too long where she could get it hung up on something, but long enough to catch her when need be. Hence the name Catch Rope.

I lead her though the gate into the pasture. Before letting her go I padded her forehead, told her that everything was going to be fine and that no one was going to hurt her. Then I let her go and when I did she went her way, out into the field to check out her new home, and I went mine, back to the house closing the gate behind me.


Evening, after getting home from work, I went out to the feed room and got her a couple scoops of sweat feed and a few flakes of hey, then I went out to the pasture and poured the feed into the feed troff and threw the hay into the hay rack. After she came up, I stood there leaning on the fence next to the troff. She was hesitant about coming up and eating with me being that close. So I moved down the fence line about ten feet, it was then that she went to the troff and ate. While she ate I talked to her. I told her how beautiful she was, and I told her that no one was going to hurt her. After she was done eating her feed, I left going back to the house to turn in.

[mogrovejo]

O my god, this is sick! How is it possible such sites are not forbidden? This is really really sick, and those people really earn some torturing!!!!


you are all making fun, but this is really sick, how can you make jokes on this? All those people deserve torturing and jail big time. How can such websites be legal? Instead of focusing on fur and bitching celebrities who wear fur all the time, the Animal welfare organisations should fight this!!!


Well, I haven't been to the site, but... freedom of speech? As long as they're not showing pictures of it.

Assuming they do show pictures, well, they should probably be prosecuted. But honestly, I think that police have more important shit to be worried about than some chick sucking off her dog.

Why should zoophilia be criminalized? As long as they own the animals and don't hurt or exercise cruelty over them, I don't think it should be illegal.

[balli]

exercise cruelty over them, I don't think it should be illegal.
Welp, we found our first poster who actually belongs to that site? You don't consider it cruel to dick a dog?

Unbelievable that Yoni and this joker would defend bestiality. You republican fucks never cease to amaze me. :depressed

[mogrovejo]

Welp, we found our first poster who actually belongs to that site? You don't consider it cruel to dick a dog?

Unbelievable that Yoni and this joker would defend bestiality. You republican fucks never cease to amaze me. :depressed

Have I defended bestiality? I don't think so. I'm not a "republican" either, leave me out of your childish name-calling.

[<Beast>]

I am shocked at the lack of sensitivity in this thread. I for one have dabbled in amor equistrianus. I find comfort wrapped up with a Bull Mastiff bitch. Maybe you should think twice before opening your mouths and being so discriminating.

[DarrinS]

It's quite sad that this had to actually be written into law in Oklahoma.

"It is illegal to have the hind legs of farm animals in your boots."


It's probably also in the Texas A&M student orientation guide.

[Shelly]

Speaking of horses, here's another one...

PentHorse forums?

[Blake]

Welp, we found our first poster who actually belongs to that site? You don't consider it cruel to dick a dog?



what if the dog pays for a bj?

[sook]

LMAO :rollin

[Nbadan]

How is this political?

[PixelPusher]

I need to update my eye prescription - I though the title of this tread was "LOL Breastforum.com"

[E20]

I can't believe I just read how some dude had sex with his horse.

[baseline bum]

It wasn't too long ago, a man butt-fucking another man was considered sick (still is by some of us). I think the original topic had to do with slippery slope stuff, didn't it?

I actually believe the pedophiles will beat the animal lovers to the punch on normalizing their behavior. NAMBLA is a lot more organized.

Ah, the slippery slope argument; the only form of argument where strawmen are the preferred logic. When a man fucks a man, there's consent. There's no such thing with animals and kids.

[rolled up $20]

How is this political?


Because the tax payers are getting fucked like dogs!

http://i.pbase.com/o4/98/583898/1/63713939.VPwOC7GO.rimshot.gif

[balli]

I'm not a "republican" either, leave me out of your childish name-calling.
:lol

[baseline bum]

:lol

He's actually not lying, unlike Wild Cobra, since he's not an American.

[sabar]

At first I figured, "well if someones dog humps their leg and they like it, who cares", but those people go above and beyond. After looking around there,those people are nut jobs. They seem to get "pleasure" in all morally corrupt ways:

1. trick the animal into "mounting" a person with conditioning training
2. force the animal onto a person
3. force yourself onto the animal

There's no way this can be defended. They are abusing the simple mind of the dogs.

Its the same as child abuse. The animal/kid doesn't know better, it can't consent. It doesn't matter if the animal or child initiates it too. They all either train their dogs to rape them, or rape their dogs.

By the way some of those confession threads on there are hilarious. A kid's girlfriend walked in on him looking at zoophiliaic porn and asking for advice :lmao

This has nothing to do with sexual orientation by the way, but with sexual fetishes. As sad as it is, most of the disturbed individuals on that forum seem to be married to someone that shares their tastes.

[Bukefal]

Why should zoophilia be criminalized? As long as they own the animals and don't hurt or exercise cruelty over them, I don't think it should be illegal.

How can you say that! Isnt it sick to use poor animals for peoples own sick fucked up minds, to fulfill their sick needs? Thats cruel my friend. If the animal could speak and tell, that he wants the same thing, is a different story. but they cant, at least i never saw a speaking animal before, maybe you did. Or maybe you did in one of your dreams :nope

[CosmicCowboy]

PentHorse forums?

:lmao

[Blake]

Ah, the slippery slope argument; the only form of argument where strawmen are the preferred logic. When a man fucks a man, there's consent. There's no such thing with animals and kids.

of course, when a man eats a cow, there's really no consent there either.......just sayin...

[ThomasGranger]

Back in the old days, when Puritans were calling all the shots, they executed the offender and the animals he violated.

[mogrovejo]

Ah, the slippery slope argument; the only form of argument where strawmen are the preferred logic. When a man fucks a man, there's consent. There's no such thing with animals and kids.



There's no way this can be defended. They are abusing the simple mind of the dogs.

Its the same as child abuse. The animal/kid doesn't know better, it can't consent. It doesn't matter if the animal or child initiates it too. They all either train their dogs to rape them, or rape their dogs.


How can you say that! Isnt it sick to use poor animals for peoples own sick fucked up minds, to fulfill their sick needs? Thats cruel my friend. If the animal could speak and tell, that he wants the same thing, is a different story. but they cant, at least i never saw a speaking animal before, maybe you did. Or maybe you did in one of your dreams :nope

First of all, one has to differentiate things: the law doesn't exist to promote particular morals per se. No matter how morally repugnant some act is to me - like, say, zoophilia - the law has no business imposing or protecting my views as long as that act doesn't affect my rights or those of another person. So, not everything that is immoral should be illegal - and what is immoral is frequently highly subjective. The liberty to make moral choices is, or ought to be, sacred and an essential part of human freedom.

So, the fact that you find zoophilia repugnant or sick is not an argument. We can't just start to make illegal what x or z consider "sick" and "fucked up".

The consent argument isn't appropriate, I think.

First, it's obvious animals can't give their consent by speaking or writing, in a conventional way. However, one could argue that they are able to offer tacit consent on their own way, I suppose. For example, should we illegalize the use of artificial insemniation in the breeding of cattle, dogs, etc.? Many times the methods to collect semen are somewhat arcaic; the only difference is that the breeder doesn't take any kind of sexual satisfaction from the act. Do the animal give consent here? I think it's perfectly plausible that this kind of act can be neutral or even pleasurable to animals.

Second, there's a clearly double-standard. Do you go to the circus? Aren't the minds of circus animals "conditioned" as well? Aren't they trained by individuals who abuse "their simple minds"? And what about, say, castration? People castrate their pets all the time. Or perform scientific experiences. Do animals give consent in those cases? Is it okay to castrate an animal without consent but people should be arrested for sexually pleasuring them?

Third, consent it's simply a concept not applicable to animals. Do any of you own a pet? Do you keep it in your house? If so, has it consented? If not, should you be prosecuted for kidnapping? What about the hunters, should they be charged with 3rd degree murder? I mean, it's okay to kill an animal for our convenience or mere pleasure, but those that merelly jack them off should be arrested and tortured?

Again, I can think of plenty of arguments contra zoophilia. One can defend it's morally repugnant and a violation of our moral duty towards animals. However, as long as there is no pain or harm to the animal and the beast is not property of another person, there's no reason to make it an illegal activity.

Finanlly, it's truly amazing that people discredit the homossexualism/zoophilia slippery slope and simultaneously equate animals to children. Say it slowly: children are not animals. Quite disturbing, to say the least. Be assured that I don't defend you should be arrested though.

[LnGrrrR]

Why should zoophilia be criminalized? As long as they own the animals and don't hurt or exercise cruelty over them, I don't think it should be illegal.

Eh, I'm kinda against it due to the fact that the animals can't very well show consent. But it's VERY low on my list of cares. lol I mean, as long as they're not performing S&M with them, I don't care very much :D

[LnGrrrR]

of course, when a man eats a cow, there's really no consent there either.......just sayin...

Touche!

[LnGrrrR]

First of all, one has to differentiate things: the law doesn't exist to promote particular morals per se. No matter how morally repugnant some act is to me - like, say, zoophilia - the law has no business imposing or protecting my views as long as that act doesn't affect my rights or those of another person. So, not everything that is immoral should be illegal - and what is immoral is frequently highly subjective. The liberty to make moral choices is, or ought to be, sacred and an essential part of human freedom.

So, the fact that you find zoophilia repugnant or sick is not an argument. We can't just start to make illegal what x or z consider "sick" and "fucked up".

The consent argument isn't appropriate, I think.

First, it's obvious animals can't give their consent by speaking or writing, in a conventional way. However, one could argue that they are able to offer tacit consent on their own way, I suppose. For example, should we illegalize the use of artificial insemniation in the breeding of cattle, dogs, etc.? Many times the methods to collect semen are somewhat arcaic; the only difference is that the breeder doesn't take any kind of sexual satisfaction from the act. Do the animal give consent here? I think it's perfectly plausible that this kind of act can be neutral or even pleasurable to animals.

Second, there's a clearly double-standard. Do you go to the circus? Aren't the minds of circus animals "conditioned" as well? Aren't they trained by individuals who abuse "their simple minds"? And what about, say, castration? People castrate their pets all the time. Or perform scientific experiences. Do animals give consent in those cases? Is it okay to castrate an animal without consent but people should be arrested for sexually pleasuring them?

Third, consent it's simply a concept not applicable to animals. Do any of you own a pet? Do you keep it in your house? If so, has it consented? If not, should you be prosecuted for kidnapping? What about the hunters, should they be charged with 3rd degree murder? I mean, it's okay to kill an animal for our convenience or mere pleasure, but those that merelly jack them off should be arrested and tortured?

Again, I can think of plenty of arguments contra zoophilia. One can defend it's morally repugnant and a violation of our moral duty towards animals. However, as long as there is no pain or harm to the animal and the beast is not property of another person, there's no reason to make it an illegal activity.

Finanlly, it's truly amazing that people discredit the homossexualism/zoophilia slippery slope and simultaneously equate animals to children. Say it slowly: children are not animals. Quite disturbing, to say the least. Be assured that I don't defend you should be arrested though.


All good points. I won't take the time to rebut them, because I don't really care :D

[mogrovejo]

I care. Individuals are being or under the threat of being arrested and deprived of their liberty for no good reason, as they don't commit any acts that violate the rights of their fellow citizens. People are empowering the government to pursuit and shut down individuals merely because they consider their private behaviour as morally repugnant.

I think it's a duty of every good man to care about such an issue.

[DarrinS]

PETA -- People for the Erotic Treatment of Animals

[jack sommerset]

PETA -- People for the Erotic Treatment of Animals

That does not surprise me.

[LockBeard]

It is kind of funny to think you can EAT something, but not screw it. :lol

[Blake]

It is kind of funny to think you can EAT something, but not screw it. :lol

shooting a deer and sticking it's head on your wall is ok.

sticking your dick in it is cruel.

[E20]

Damn I feel nasty after visiting that site. Sort of like from Chapelle show when he was making fun of the internet and Ron Jeremy showed him some animal porn. That's how I feel.

[Nbadan]

...some things can not be unseen...

[jack sommerset]

shooting a deer and sticking it's head on your wall is ok.

sticking your dick in it is cruel.

:lol Its fucking nasty!