Log in

View Full Version : GM CEO Rick Wagoner to step down at White House request



ducks
03-29-2009, 05:13 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/gm_wagoner

ChumpDumper
03-29-2009, 05:23 PM
Does he get a bonus?

ducks
03-29-2009, 06:02 PM
Salary US$ 1,558,330 (2007)
otal: US$ 14,415,900 (2007)[1]
US $1 (2009)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Wagoner

TDMVPDPOY
03-29-2009, 06:08 PM
seems like someone is going to get pwned

LockBeard
03-30-2009, 08:20 AM
Government Model.

Let the takeover become complete.

Bartleby
03-30-2009, 08:37 AM
Government Model.

Let the takeover become complete.

This should be the first item on the agenda at the next tea party.

Crookshanks
03-30-2009, 10:33 AM
This is what happens when you let Government into Private Business. CEO's of large corporations across the United States are probably getting ulcers about now.

clambake
03-30-2009, 10:39 AM
which CEO's are those?

LockBeard
03-30-2009, 10:57 AM
This should be the first item on the agenda at the next tea party.

lol I don't take part in that stupid shit.

Great post though :lol:toast

ChumpDumper
03-30-2009, 02:57 PM
This is what happens when you let Government into Private Business. CEO's of large corporations across the United States are probably getting ulcers about now.Should he have kept his job after losing $70 billion in the past two years and destroying 90% of the company's stock value in the past year?

Yes or no.

If yes, please explain.

Viva Las Espuelas
03-30-2009, 03:00 PM
Should he have kept his job after losing $70 billion in the past two years and destroying 90% of the company's stock value in the past year?

Yes or no.

If yes, please explain.
i really don't think he was saying that because he should've kept his job.

Blake
03-30-2009, 03:00 PM
Should he have kept his job after losing $70 billion in the past two years and destroying 90% of the company's stock value in the past year?

Yes or no.

If yes, please explain.

no....

too bad it was the White House that had to be the one to tell him to go.

Crookshanks
03-30-2009, 03:02 PM
There were changes that needed to be made years ago and they should've stopped bowing down to the Unions LONG ago. I'm not saying that maybe he should've resigned, I'm saying it's very disturbing that the POTUS just steps up and fires the CEO of a MAJOR corporation. NO President should have that kind of power!

And many of the problems with the auto industry stem from burdensome gov't regulations and the heavy foot of the UAW.

ChumpDumper
03-30-2009, 03:02 PM
no....

too bad it was the White House that had to be the one to tell him to go.I would think that if the board at GM had a clue, they would have fired him after the first $30 billion annual loss, instead of keeping him on after two.

ChumpDumper
03-30-2009, 03:04 PM
There were changes that needed to be made years agoIncluding the firing of the CEO?

If GM didn't want the government to have control over them, they shouldn't have asked the government for any money.

Crookshanks
03-30-2009, 03:06 PM
Including the firing of the CEO?

If GM didn't want the government to have control over them, they shouldn't have asked the government for any money.
I agree! I was against the bailout from the very beginning!

ChumpDumper
03-30-2009, 03:07 PM
I agree! I was against the bailout from the very beginning!Too bad GM is for it.

ChumpDumper
03-30-2009, 03:11 PM
It's not like this hasn't happened before. When Chrysler was bailed out, they had a new CEO and a plan. Why exactly should GM have neither?

Viva Las Espuelas
03-30-2009, 03:12 PM
no....

too bad it was the White House that had to be the one to tell him to go.
yeah. i really don't know the in's and out's of this bailout, but i found it pretty odd that the president of the united states recommends that someone steps down in the private sector and makes it very public.

ChumpDumper
03-30-2009, 03:14 PM
Really, what reason was there to keep him on?

Blake
03-30-2009, 03:18 PM
I would think that if the board at GM had a clue, they would have fired him after the first $30 billion annual loss, instead of keeping him on after two.

since they are obviously clueless, I would hope that a clean sweep of the board would be upcoming, though I doubt it....

ChumpDumper
03-30-2009, 03:21 PM
since they are obviously clueless, I would hope that a clean sweep of the board would be upcoming, though I doubt it....From the linked article above:

GM board member Kent Kresa, a former chairman and CEO of Northrop Grumman Corp., was named interim chairman and said new directors will make up the majority of GM's board when a new slate is nominated for election at the company's annual meeting in August.

They should probably push the board appointments up before someone does it for them.

LnGrrrR
03-30-2009, 03:39 PM
There were changes that needed to be made years ago and they should've stopped bowing down to the Unions LONG ago. I'm not saying that maybe he should've resigned, I'm saying it's very disturbing that the POTUS just steps up and fires the CEO of a MAJOR corporation. NO President should have that kind of power!

And many of the problems with the auto industry stem from burdensome gov't regulations and the heavy foot of the UAW.

He didn't. He requested that the CEO resign. He did.

There's a difference.

Blake
03-30-2009, 04:25 PM
From the linked article above:

GM board member Kent Kresa, a former chairman and CEO of Northrop Grumman Corp., was named interim chairman and said new directors will make up the majority of GM's board when a new slate is nominated for election at the company's annual meeting in August.

They should probably push the board appointments up before someone does it for them.

I didn't read the link.

Good to know.

Two days ago might have been a good day to buy a few shares of GM stock.

ChumpDumper
03-30-2009, 04:32 PM
It dropped 25% today, so it still may be a buying opportunity if there is ANY good news in the future.

Viva Las Espuelas
03-30-2009, 04:42 PM
Two days ago might have been a good day to buy a few shares of GM stock.
oh no. obama said it was good to get in the market a few weeks ago.

ChumpDumper
03-30-2009, 04:44 PM
oh no. obama said it was good to get in the market a few weeks ago.Do you have a quote to that effect?

Anyway, for a long-term investor I can't see how it could be a bad time to get in.

Blake
03-30-2009, 04:55 PM
It dropped 25% today, so it still may be a buying opportunity if there is ANY good news in the future.

interesting.

There's no doubt it will jump up in my mind after a CEO is put in place.