Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastr

[Galileo]

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

pp.7-31 (25)

Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen

doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007

Abstract

We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.

Keywords: JScanning electron microscopy, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, Differential scanning calorimetry, DSC analysis, World Trade Center, WTC dust, 9/11, Iron-rich microspheres, Thermite, Super-thermite, Energetic nanocomposites, Nano-thermite
Affiliation: Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

MORE DETAILS:

"Formally published in a peer-reviewed Chemical Physics journal, today:"

http://www.911blogger.com/node/19761

[sook]

Phuck You

[Galileo]

Phuck You

Sorry, the joke is on you and the mental pygmies.

You lose.

[sook]

Sorry, the joke is on you and the mental pygmies.

You lose.

I actually agree with your theory by the way. The biggest joke of all though is Israel convincing the tools in this country that their interests coincide with ours as they molest our image around the world.

[ChumpDumper]

Rust and aluminum? Yeah, that could only come from thermite.

http://www.bakabanashi.com/icons/rollbarf3hz.gif

[sook]

Rust and aluminum? Yeah, that could only come from thermite.

http://www.bakabanashi.com/icons/rollbarf3hz.gif

Holyshit i love that GIF. Thanks bud, i will save it.

[Cant_Be_Faded]

No doubt in my mind Dumper would go out of his way to comment as soon as possible. He would rip his chode open rick rickertt style if the 9/11 commission report were disproved.

[ChumpDumper]

I would be surprised, to say the least. Nonetheless, twoofers are still currently failing, so I'm not too concerned about its actually happeneing.

[smeagol]

I actually agree with your theory by the way. The biggest joke of all though is Israel convincing the tools in this country that their interests coincide with ours as they molest our image around the world.

:rolleyes x 1000000000

[France B-boy]

ChodeChomper is always asking for proof of explosives during 9/11 and when someone finally post some he calls it a lie?

Why bother?

[Wild Cobra]

Rust and aluminum? Yeah, that could only come from thermite.

http://www.bakabanashi.com/icons/rollbarf3hz.gif

Yep, show how really dumb these conspiracy theorists really are.

Lets see... Iron oxide is rust... Doesn't steel rust under one of several conditions, including being expose to oxygen and heat.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it was a steel building. I guess these guys think it was made of titanium.

What is the primary metal that airplanes are made of? Isn't it aluminum?

Apparently, the likes of Galileo don't know these elemental truths.

[Wild Cobra]

ChodeChomper is always asking for proof of explosives during 9/11 and when someone finally post some he calls it a lie?

Why bother?
Don't you get it?

Anyone with an ounce of intelligence would expect iron oxide and aluminum to be found together in the aftermath. It's expected when you combime aluminum, steel, and heat!

Absolutely ZERO proof of thermite.

[ChumpDumper]

What is the primary metal that airplanes are made of? Isn't it aluminum?The cladding on the facade of the towers was also aluminum.


Apparently, the likes of Galileo don't know these elemental truths.Nice pun.

[Aggie Hoopsfan]

Don't you get it?

Anyone with an ounce of intelligence would expect iron oxide and aluminum to be found together in the aftermath. It's expected when you combime aluminum, steel, and heat!

Absolutely ZERO proof of thermite.

Game, set, match.

[Winehole23]

Game, set, match.XAg5KjnAhuU

[PixelPusher]

Active Thermitic Material Discovered...
If it were "active", wouldn't that mean it was still burning?

[Obstructed_View]

Guys, you can go pick up the gravel in your back yard and find "thermitic material" in it.

By the way, Galileo, what exactly is your theory of what happened on 9/11? A jumbo jet loaded with fuel is more than sufficient to cause the building to collapse exactly the way it did. What's the need for anything extra?

[Galileo]

Guys, you can go pick up the gravel in your back yard and find "thermitic material" in it.

By the way, Galileo, what exactly is your theory of what happened on 9/11? A jumbo jet loaded with fuel is more than sufficient to cause the building to collapse exactly the way it did. What's the need for anything extra?

maybe the hijackers brough super thermite or supern thermate onto the planes, along with their box-cutters?

[Obstructed_View]

maybe the hijackers brough super thermite or supern thermate onto the planes, along with their box-cutters?

Possible. Maybe they sneaked it in their laptop bags. Surely a 150 ton airplane travelling 600 miles an hour, twenty thousand gallons of burning jet fuel and several acres of office equipment burning for two hours couldn't have brought down the building by themselves.

[Galileo]

Scientists find active 'super-thermite' in WTC dust

A team of nine scientists have released a startling new report on the events of 9/11, using data from dust gathered in the days and weeks after the towers came down. They discovered that scattered throughout the dust samples were red and gray chips of 'active thermitic material', or an un-reacted pyrotechnic explosive.

Thermite is used in steel welding, fireworks shows, and hand grenades. It is the combination of a metal powder and a metal oxide which produce a reaction known for extremely high temperatures focused in a very small area for a short period of time. The 'active thermitic material' discovered in the World Trade Center dust was a combination of elemental aluminum and iron oxide, and is a form of thermite known as 'nano-structured super-thermite'.

“These observations reminded us of nano-thermite fabricated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and elsewhere; available papers describe this material as an intimate mixture of UFG[Ultra-fine grain] aluminum and iron oxide in nano-thermite composites to form pyrotechnics or explosives. Commercially available thermite behaves as an incendiary when ignited, but when the ingredients are ultra-fine grain and are intimately mixed, this 'nano-thermite' reacts very rapidly, even explosively, and is sometimes referred to as 'super-thermite',” the report explains.

The full article in The Open Chemical Physics Journal can be found here.

Some of the authors of the paper have lost their jobs at universities and chemistry labs for their outspoken breakdown of what happened at the World Trade Center on 9/11. Kevin Ryan lost his job as a lab director after writing a letter to the National Institute for Standards and Technology(NIST was conducting an investigation into 9/11 at the time) challenging the common theory that burning jet fuel weakened the steel supports holding up the 110-story skyscrapers. Ryan claims that the owner of his laboratory subsidiary "was the company that certified the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings,” according to the South Bend Tribune. Dr. Steven E. Jones, a physicist at Brigham Young University, presented a paper in 2005 discussing alternative theories to the commonly accepted 'jet fuel' reasoning. In September 2006 he was placed on paid administrative leave and his paper was removed from the BYU database.

Jones has told Visibility911.com, "In short, the paper explodes the official story that 'no evidence' exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings."

It remains to be seen if this study will encourage further investigation into the events of 9/11, or if anyone will come forth with a legitimate reason as to why nano-structured super-thermite can be found in dust produced by the collapse of the World Trade Centers.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.h tml

[Galileo]

Wake Up and Smell the Aluminothermic Nanocomposite Explosives

As Documentation of Thermitic Materials
in the WTC Twin Towers Grows,
Official Story Backers Ignore, Deny, Evade, and Dissemble

by
Jim Hoffman
Version 1.0, April 3, 2009

Introduction

The obliteration of the Twin Towers was the centerpiece of the event that launched the 'War on Terror'. Shocking on multiple levels, the events were especially traumatic for Americans, being the first bombing on the US mainland in modern history that killed thousands of people -- civilians -- in one day. Given the collective psychological trauma of the attack, it is not surprising that public discourse would remain free of observations that the destruction of the Twin Towers bore obvious features of controlled demolitions. Early candid public remarks by reporters and demolition experts where quickly retracted or forgotten. Passage of the USA PATRIOT Act and the invasion of Afghanistan would proceed apace.

By 2003 the United States had two occupations, and an international reputation as a rogue state all resting on a shaky-at-best collapse theory whose principle alternative hypothesis -- controlled demolition with pre-planted pyrotechnics -- had not even been tested by the straightforward forensic analysis of debris for residues of such materials.

By early 2009, the residue testing that NIST refused to do had been done by independent researchers, and published in a chemistry journal. Small bi-layered chips, found consistently in dust samples, have layers of red nano-engineered material that is clearly aluminothermic: it has sub-micron-diameter particles of largely of elemental aluminum, and smaller crystalline grains of primarily Fe2O3. On ignition, the chips produce temperatures above the melting point of iron, leaving tiny iron droplets matching the residues of commercial thermite pyrotechnics.

The publication of these results should be astounding to anyone who uncritically accepted the collapse explanations in TV documentaries and never looked seriously at any of the several bodies of evidence for controlled demolition.

The NIST investigation, having posted its Final Report with its absurd Building 7 joint-breaking-thermal-expansion theory in late 2008 and FAQ by Christmas, closed its doors before the independent researchers published their findings of active aluminothermic materials in WTC dust in a mainstream scientific journal; but not before they publicized findings of aluminothermic residues in the same dust samples; and not before they extracted from NIST a series of public statements, in press conferences and in written responses to requests for corrections (RFCs), about the conduct of their inquiry into the cause of the skyscrapers' total destruction.

ABEL: ... what about that letter where NIST said it didn’t look for evidence of explosives?

NEUMAN: Right, because there was no evidence of that.

ABEL: But how can you know there’s no evidence if you don’t look for it first?

NEUMAN: If you’re looking for something that isn’t there, you’re wasting your time....

--Conversation between a reporter and a NIST spokesperson. source

As a result, NIST spokespersons are on the record saying they did not test for pyrotechnics, and offering rationale for failing to test. Those rationale -- or rationalizations -- summarized toward the end of this essay, include the assertion that testing for pyrotechnics "would not necessarily have been conclusive". That is partially true: failing to find pyrotechnic residues wouldn't rule out demolition, since demolition might have been implemented using an untraceable fuel such as hydrogen gas. But finding abundant and distributed pyrotechnic explosive residues would conclusively favor demolition -- particularly given the persuasive deductive arguments showing that the features of the buildings' destruction are incompatable with a purely gravity-driven collapse.

The following timeline is narrowly focused on the emergence of public evidence indicating the use of aluminothermic pyrotechnics -- ranging from incendiaries to high-explosives -- in the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7, and on the response of official investigations -- particular NIST's -- to that evidence.

Contents

Introduction
Timeline

READ MORE

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosives_evidence_timeline.html

[Obstructed_View]

Gee, if it comes out that the world trade towers were constructed without welding, this could be a huge story! :lol

[Cant_Be_Faded]

ChodeChomper is always asking for proof of explosives during 9/11 and when someone finally post some he calls it a lie?

Why bother?
:lmao

RickRickerrter

[Cant_Be_Faded]

XAg5KjnAhuU

holy shit

funniest political forum thread ever

[ChumpDumper]

"Scientists find evidence of welding in steel skyscrapers."

[ClingingMars]

Pk7-XfE7KcU

fuck yeah, bill clinton. preach it.

[Galileo]

New Scientific Study: Smoking Gun Evidence of 9/11 Explosives in WTC Dust

by Josh Mitteldorf

www.opednews.com

A new article in the Open Chemical Physics Journal details chemical evidence from the 9/11 dust of thermite cutting charges.

One of the strongest pieces of evidence that the Government's account of 9/11 is flawed has always been the way in which the Twin Towers fell. They fell straight down, not to the side.

Therre was the sound of explosions in the basement reported by firefighters. And most crucially: the speed of the fall was so rapid that there could not have been any resistance.

In other words, the "legs" of the building must have been pulled out from underneath long before the weight of the falling top part came crashing down upon them. In fact, the buildings fell in "free-fall" time, the same time it would have taken a baseball dropped from the top of the buildings to hit the ground.

Physicists and engineers point out thata building cannot fall straight down 'by accident'. The way the buildings fell was characteristic of controlled demolition, in which carefully-timed cutter charges sever the supporting members at just the right times to make the building fall inward and not topple to the side. The science of controlled demolition involves some very critical timing, and even small mistakes can lead to the building falling over sideways instead of straight down.

Direct evidence in the past for controlled demolition has included photos of neatly-severed beams in the demolition clean-up. The beams did not appear to be twisted or melted, but rather cut in neat, diagonal straight lines.

Neatly-severed beams at WTC demolition site

Also compelling is the fact that a third WTC tower, known as Building 7, came down in the same fashion, falling straight down in free-fall time, landing in its own footprint. Building 7 came down late in the afternoon, hours after the Twin Towers, and Building 7 was never hit by an airplane. Building 7 was nowhere mentioned in the official report of the 9/11 Commission, and there are (besides controlled demolition) there are no 'official' theories how it fell so suddenly and symmetrically.

In this context, the new journal article provides corroboratory evidence that dust collected locally the afternoon of 9/11 and the following day contains microscopic traces of thermite.

Thermite is a very hot-burning mixture of finely-powdered aluminum and finally powdered iron oxide. As hot as an oxy-acetylene torch, it is used to melt iron beams and cut through them. Fires burning paper, building materials, or even jet fuel do not burn nearly hot enough to melt steel. The authors note that the particles were milled to an extremely fine dust and intermingled so that they burn much hotter and more rapidly even than conventional thermite.

Josh Mitteldorf, a senior editor at OpEdNews, was educated to be an astrophysicist, and has branched out from there to mathematical modeling in a variety of areas. He has taught mathematics, statistics, and physics at several universities.

Comments:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/New-Scientific-Study-Smok-by-Josh-Mitteldorf-090404-371.html

[Galileo]

Study: Scientists Discover Active Thermitic Material in WTC Dust

Berkeley, CA, April 3, 2009 -- A new study by independent scientists and researchers suggests the cause behind the catastrophic destruction of World Trade Center Towers on September 11th can be seen in the dust itself: active thermitic material, a highly engineered explosive.

The study, published today in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, describes a finding of "red/gray bi-layered chips" in samples of dust taken from vicinity of the World Trade Center following its destruction. Using tools such as a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and x-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS) to analyze the material, the study authors concluded that, "the red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic."

The study's finding lends new support to the demolition theory put forth by critics of the official reports.

At a time when the American public is finding it difficult to understand the full story behind the current economic crisis, findings of a demolition raise new questions about how the 'War on Terror' -- an enormous source of recent American spending -- was started.

Officials with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), charged with establishing the cause of the buildings' destruction, have stated that they "did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel," and that thermite, "or another incendiary compound," would be too difficult to have placed in the buildings without notice.

NIST has stated that such difficulties make demolition unlikely. They concluded that aircraft impacts and the subsequent fires led to the building failures.

Dr. Steven Jones, physicist and author on the paper, says that NIST has refused to test the dust for thermite, super-thermite, or any other accelerant or explosive.

"We've repeatedly asked them to follow standard investigative procedure, to perform these tests and release the results. They haven't."

Jones says such tests may be required by fire protection codes.

Kevin Ryan, chemist and co-author on the paper, explained why he thinks NIST is wrong.

"What we've discovered is not conventional thermite -- which is what NIST continues to refer to -- but a highly engineered thermitic material, or 'super thermite', probably designed for just this type of application."

Pre-planned demolition, supporters say, is the 'best-fit' model for the many unusual and unexplained characteristics of the building failures, such as the speed and symmetry of the collapses, and the extreme pulverization of the materials leading to clouds of micron-sized dust particles, described in one insurance report as behaving similar to a "volcanic eruption".

"One of the unusual features that piqued my interest," Jones said, "was the pools of molten metal seen in all three rubble piles, WTC 1, 2 & 7."

NIST officials have published a response stating that the condition of the steel was "irrelevant to the investigation of the collapse."

Jones, formerly a Professor of Physics with Brigham Young University and known for his work in muon-catalyzed fusion, published in Nature, Scientific American, and the Journal of Physical Chemistry, began researching the 9/11/01 attacks in 2005.

Jones discovered the curious thermitic material in 2007, when he ran a magnet over a dust sample given to him by a Manhattan resident survivor of the attack, and found that some particles were attracted to the magnet.

"That was very odd to me," he said.

Those particles turned out to be iron-rich microspheres, partially described in a 2001 USGS study of the dust.

But to fully analyze, describe and report on the thermitic material would take longer.

Jones was joined in that effort by several others including Dr. Niels Harrit, a chemistry professor with the University of Copenhagen for over 30 years and author of numerous research papers in journals such as Nano Letters, the Journal of the American Chemistry Society, and the Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Harrit says that he is frequently asked why he researches the September 11th attack. and says has two answers.

"First, I am opposed to crime, and second, when my 6 grandchildren ask me, 'Grandfather, which side were you on?' I will be able to answer them, 'I was on your side'."

Co-author Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, a materials scientist and Director of the TEM (Transmition Electron Microscopy) laboratory at BYU, says he hopes the paper will "change the way the 9/11 truth movement is viewed by the mainstream public and media."

And chemist and co-author Kevin Ryan, a former Underwriters Laboratories manager, challenged the NIST report in public statements in 2004, and was consequently fired.

"This finding really goes beyond anything that has previously been shown," says Jones.

"We had to use sophisticated tools to analyze the dust because this isn't just a typical explosive, RDX or CD4 or something -- this is a highly engineered material not readily available to just anyone."

In a 2006 interview with Deseret News, Jones noted that commercial explosives must contain tag elements for traceability, but that no law requires tagging of advanced forms of thermitics.

In 2008, several of these authors published three articles challenging the official reports in US scientific journals, The Open Civil Engineering Journal, The Environmentalist, and The Journal of Engineering Mechanics Dozens of other papers making similar challenges have been published in the sister publication of the Scholars group, The Journal of 9/11 Studies

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization of over 700 independent researchers analyzing the September 11, 2001 attacks with a strong emphasis on the scientific method.

For information: http://www.stj911.com or
Contact: [email protected]

Phone: 510-769-5109

# # #

http://stj911.org/press_releases/ActiveThermiticMaterial.html

[ChumpDumper]

there are no 'official' theories how it fell so suddenly and symmetrically.See, here's where so called "truthers" cut themselves off at the knees by flat-out lying. Of course there is an official theory about how WTC7 fell.

If you guys stopped lying, you might have some credibility, but then again you wouldn't have anything to post.

[MiamiHeat]

See, here's where so called "truthers" cut themselves off at the knees by flat-out lying. Of course there is an official theory about how WTC7 fell.

If you guys stopped lying, you might have some credibility, but then again you wouldn't have anything to post.

Do you believe the US government has ever, or is capable of, doing something like this to accomplish US policy?

Just answer the question. Do you believe it's possible for governments to allow situations to happen so that they can pass policies they want to pass?

[ChumpDumper]

Do you believe the US government has ever, or is capable of, doing something like this to accomplish US policy?

Just answer the question. Do you believe it's possible for governments to allow situations to happen so that they can pass policies they want to pass?In a very general sense ("governments" -- "like this" -- "capable of"), sure.

There is zero evidence this is the case for 9/11.

[Cry Havoc]

Do you believe the US government has ever, or is capable of, doing something like this to accomplish US policy?

Just answer the question. Do you believe it's possible for governments to allow situations to happen so that they can pass policies they want to pass?

Of course it's possible. It's possible that Taro Aso could be playing poker tomorrow with Kim-Jong Il. Stating something is possible does not validate your argument what-so-ever, at all, in any way.

[MiamiHeat]

It has been done before here in the USA and it has been done countless times around the world.

I for one, am NOT a 9/11 'inside job' guy. I personally believe Osama Bin Laden DID attack.

but here is the twist. Bush knew about it before hand and LET IT HAPPEN.

That's what I believe. Same thing FDR did in WW2 with Pearl harbor. Provoke the enemy, let the enemy attack us, then claim self-defense and instill all your policies that the country will happily accept.

Osama Bin Laden DID attack us, but Bush govt allowed it to happen so they could do what they wanted. The signs are all there. That's what really happened, imo.

Here is a nice bit of information for you :

1) During the morning of September 11, 2001, the US was running military exercises simulating a terrorist attack using planes. Operation VIGILANT GUARDIAN was an exercise run by NORAD and the military during the week of Sept. 11, 2001. We have numerous accounts and records that while the REAL planes were hijacked, military personnel in NORAD thought "This is just part of the exercise?" and didn't believe it was a real hijacking. This is the perfect way to create confusion to ensure success for Osama Bin Laden

Most of our air defense was performing this exercise and didn't believe the hijackers were real until it was too late.


2) The 1990 "Internal Look" exercise simulated Iraq's invasion of Kuwait at the exact moment that Iraq invaded Kuwait (Dick Cheney was Secretary of Defense).

3) OPERATION NORTHWOODS - was a false-flag conspiracy plan, proposed within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for CIA or other operatives to commit apparent acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Castro-led Cuba. One plan was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington".

This operation is especially notable in that it included plans for hijackings and bombings followed by the use of phony evidence that would blame the terrorist acts on a foreign government, namely Cuba.

Operation Northwoods was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and signed by then-Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer, and sent to the Secretary of Defense.

Several other proposals were listed, including the real or simulated actions against various U.S military and civilian targets. Operation Northwoods was part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project (Operation Mongoose) anti-Castro initiative. It was never officially accepted or executed.

-----------------------

4) In WW2, President FDR allowed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor to have an excuse to get into the war and save Europe. We have mountains of evidence of this. Internal memo's, the President of Peru warning us, the fact that FDR intentionally sent all of our old WW1 ships over to Pearl Harbor and saved all of our new ships, the fact that he ordered Admiral Richardson to berth in Hawaii which caused Admiral Richardson to TWICE disobey him because he knew the fleet had no protection, the fact that FDR was given an 8 point 'situational analysis' which detailed 8 situations that would force Japan into war -which FDR EXECUTED ALL 8 TO PROVOKE THE JAPANESE, etc...



This is not new. What the "Inside Job" people are doing is getting it confused. Osama Bin Laden DID attack us. What happened was Bush and his bastard regime let it happen so they could invade Iraq and pass their policies.

1) Bush went 'on vacation' during the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

2) Bush was given a memo "Osama Bin Laden determined to attack the United States using hijacked airplanes" A FEW DAYS BEFORE SEPT. 11 !!!

3) On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, Bush was reading books to children. After the first plane hit, one of Bush's men whispered into the President's ear "Sir, America is under attack"

What did Bush do? He sat there for another 7 minutes. Why do you think he did this? Easy. To allow the rest of the planes to hit.

If I come to you, and I say "Your house is under attack" while you are working at your job, do you sit there quietly? Nope, you will get up and yell "WHAT?!?!?"

But here we have PRESIDENT Bush. We could be in a nuclear war for all he knows. It could have been a nuclear attack, anything. and he just sits there.

Isn't it obvious?

[MiamiHeat]

Inside job people got it wrong.

It wasn't an inside job. It was Osama Bin Laden that attacked us.

The conspiracy part is that Bush and his cronies knew about it and allowed it to happen so they could invade Iraq and pass their policies.

Weapons of Mass destruction, lol.


This is an old strategy for world leaders, it's not new.

[ChumpDumper]

There is no evidence for that either. Bush and company were willfully ignorant of the terrorist threat, not hoping AQ would launch 9/11 attacks so they could fuck up the occupation of Iraq.

[MiamiHeat]

did you read my post?

I just gave you a few situations where the US government has done this or tried to do this before.


and I gave you the signs that Bush knew what was going on and let it happen.

I didn't even mention other things Bush did, like ignore Richard Clarke counter-terrorism expert, who kept pleading with Bush about the imminent danger.


It's quite obvious what happened. It's been done by world leaders for centuries. Provoke the enemy, let them attack, then claim self-defense and go to war and instill your policies.

[ChumpDumper]

did you read my post?

I just gave you a few situations where the US government has done this or tried to do this before.


and I gave you the signs that Bush knew what was going on and let it happen.Yeah, Northwoods is a great example since we went to war with Cuba.

There was testimony that the military exercises actually enhanced the military's ability to respond to the attacks. Guess you never heard of that.


As for Bush's sitting there -- a few minutes wasn't going to make any difference. Due to the communication difficulties between civilian and military aviation authorities and the general confusion of the day, even when planes were sent up (that were always available and not part of any exercise) they didn't know where to go.

[MiamiHeat]

ChumpDumper

Your dismissals are non-satisfactory. Not the least bit convincing. Looks more like absolute denial and refusal to admit the possibility, on your part.


Such ridiculous examples like this :

MiamiHeat : The US govt has done or tried to do some of X things before

ChumpDumper : Yeah that example sux since we never went to war with cuba!


Laugh out loud.

[ChumpDumper]

Here is the testimony I mentioned above, an exchange between Congressman Tim Roemer and Air Force General and NORAD commander Ralph E. Eberhart:


MR. ROEMER: General Eberhart, a question about our training posture on the day of 9/11. On page five of our Staff Statement, the FAA says at 8:38 in the morning, "Hi, Boston Center, TMU, we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York and we need you guys to -- we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there. Help us out." NEADS says, "Is this real world or an exercise?"

My question is, you were postured for an exercise against the former Soviet Union. Did that help or hurt? Did that help in terms of were more people prepared? Did you have more people ready? Were more fighters fueled with more fuel? Or did this hurt in terms of people thinking, "No, there's no possibility that this is real world; we're engaged in an exercise," and delay things? Or did it have both impacts?

GEN. EBERHART: Sir, my belief is that it helped because of the manning, because of the focus, because the crews -- they have to be airborne in 15 minutes. And that morning, because of the exercise, they were airborne in six or eight minutes. And so I believe that focus helped.

The situation that you're referring to, I think, at most cost us 30 seconds -- 30 seconds.

MR. ROEMER: That's what we have recorded. I just wondered if there was more of that down the line.

GEN. EBERHART: No, it became painfully clear, Commissioner, that this was not an exercise.

http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/archive/hearing12/9-11Commission_Hearing_2004-06-17.htm

[ChumpDumper]

Your dismissals are non-satisfactory. Not the least bit convincing. Looks more like absolute denial and refusal to admit the possibility, on your part.I admitted the possibility above, so quit beating up that straw man. I even entertained the possibility in the past.

The more I learned about 9/11 though, the less probable that theory turned out to be.

Sorry, I've seen your argument before -- I dug up the above quote from a post of mine in another 9/11 thread. It's really easy to dismiss this theory given the actual facts.

[MiamiHeat]

At one time on 9/11, as many as 22 aircraft appeared to be hijacked. Suddenly, the virtue, now verging on necessity, of switching off the transponders becomes evident. With loss of transponder signals the planes became bogies, and discriminating real from simulated hijackings became next to impossible.

-------------

"When they told me there was a hijack, my first reaction was 'Somebody started the exercise early,'" Nasypany later told me. The day's exercise was designed to run a range of scenarios, including a "traditional" simulated hijack in which politically motivated perpetrators commandeer an aircraft, land on a Cuba-like island, and seek asylum. "I actually said out loud, 'The hijack's not supposed to be for another hour,'" Nasypany recalled.

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/08/norad200608?currentPage=2

---------------------

In order to find a hijacked airliner—or any airplane—military controllers need either the plane's beacon code (broadcast from an electronic transponder on board) or the plane's exact coordinates. When the hijackers on American 11 turned the beacon off, intentionally losing themselves in the dense sea of airplanes already flying over the U.S. that morning (a tactic that would be repeated, with some variations, on all the hijacked flights), the neads controllers were at a loss.

"You would see thousands of green blips on your scope," Nasypany told me, "and now you have to pick and choose. Which is the bad guy out there? Which is the hijacked aircraft? And without that information from F.A.A., it's a needle in a haystack."

-----------------------------------


But of course, having all of this confusion HELPED them! Sureeee. I mean, it can all be one huge coincidence, but look at all the other signs. Look at what Bush and company did after the fact. Look at the whole picture.


One thing we can agree on is that the US did not actually do the dirty work.

IF YOU WANTED to ensure that Obama Bin Laden succeeds, isn't this what you would do? Have the military plan these exercises on the same days of the attacks?

[MiamiHeat]

now, look at what Bush and company had to gain.

Cheney was CEO and Chairman of the Board at Haliburton until Bush tapped him on the shoulder to run with him in 2000. Guess who got really rich and stood to profit from a war with Iraq? Guess which company got many no-bid contracts?

Guess who had a history of wanting a war with Iraq?

[ChumpDumper]

At one time on 9/11, as many as 22 aircraft appeared to be hijacked. Suddenly, the virtue, now verging on necessity, of switching off the transponders becomes evident. With loss of transponder signals the planes became bogies, and discriminating real from simulated hijackings became next to impossible.

-------------

"When they told me there was a hijack, my first reaction was 'Somebody started the exercise early,'" Nasypany later told me. The day's exercise was designed to run a range of scenarios, including a "traditional" simulated hijack in which politically motivated perpetrators commandeer an aircraft, land on a Cuba-like island, and seek asylum. "I actually said out loud, 'The hijack's not supposed to be for another hour,'" Nasypany recalled.

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/08/norad200608?currentPage=2

From the same article:

08:37:52
BOSTON CENTER: Hi. Boston Center T.M.U. [Traffic Management Unit], we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York, and we need you guys to, we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there, help us out.
POWELL: Is this real-world or exercise?
BOSTON CENTER: No, this is not an exercise, not a test.

08:37:56
WATSON: What?
DOOLEY: Whoa!
WATSON: What was that?
ROUNTREE: Is that real-world?
DOOLEY: Real-world hijack.

So the confusion of the tests is resolved with a simple question and answer -- an exchange that takes a few seconds.


In order to find a hijacked airliner—or any airplane—military controllers need either the plane's beacon code (broadcast from an electronic transponder on board) or the plane's exact coordinates. When the hijackers on American 11 turned the beacon off, intentionally losing themselves in the dense sea of airplanes already flying over the U.S. that morning (a tactic that would be repeated, with some variations, on all the hijacked flights), the neads controllers were at a loss.

"You would see thousands of green blips on your scope," Nasypany told me, "and now you have to pick and choose. Which is the bad guy out there? Which is the hijacked aircraft? And without that information from F.A.A., it's a needle in a haystack."What does that have to do with Bush's letting it happen? Nothing at all.

But of course, having all of this confusion HELPED them! Sureeee. I mean, it can all be one huge coincidence, but look at all the other signs. Look at what Bush and company did after the fact. Look at the whole picture.



IF YOU WANTED to ensure that Obama Bin Laden succeeds, isn't this what you would do? Have the military plan these exercises on the same days of the attacks?Too bad the exercises that morning had nothing to do with the planes that actually respond to east coast hijackings. Again, i've looked into this and can quote my own response from an earlier thread:


And NEADS, which responds to hijackings in that area, was not running an exercise since the hijackings occurred before their participation was to begin. Oops, why couldn't those pesky hired suicide hijackers have taken a later flight and screw up all the plans? What was their hurry to kill themselves?

So, IF YOU WANTED to ensure that Obama Bin Laden succeeds, wouldn't you make sure the actual fighters charged with intercepting hijacked planes in the US northeast wouldn't be available to, you know, intercept the hijacked planes?

[ChumpDumper]

now, look at what Bush and company had to gain.

Cheney was CEO and Chairman of the Board at Haliburton until Bush tapped him on the shoulder to run with him in 2000. Guess who got really rich and stood to profit from a war with Iraq? Guess which company got many no-bid contracts?

Guess who had a history of wanting a war with Iraq?So a vice-president allowed an attack from Afghanistan to start a war with Iraq so he could build showers that electrocute US soldiers.

[MiamiHeat]

1) On the morning of the attack, a large-scale military training exercise called Global Guardian was "in full swing." Global Guardian is an annual exercise involving Stratcom (the US Strategic Command), the US Space Command, and NORAD. 5

There is evidence that the date of the 2001 Global Guardian exercise was changed to correspond with the the terrorist attack. NBC News military analyst William Arkin, in his book Code Names, gives the date of the exercise as October 22-31, 2001. 6 Also, a military newspaper, the Space Observer, reported in an article dated 3/23/01 that the exercise was scheduled for October of that year.

Stratcon directed the exercise, which included all the US strategic forces, from Offutt Air Force Base.

2) The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) "provides our nation its eyes and ears in space." It operates a system of reconnaissance satellites to provide real-time monitoring of objects in the skies. On 9/11/01 the NRO headquarters in Chantilly, VA, were evacuated as part of a "plane into building" drill. The scenario involved a small corporate jet crashing into one of the campus' four towers

3) Conducted from September 9-11, this exercise redeployed jets that normally patrolled the northeast sector to northern Canada and Alaska. It echoed a Russian exercise scheduled from September 10-14 in which long-range bombers were dispatched to their northern territory.

Only 8 fighters were left to patrol the skies in that area due to the exercise.

[MiamiHeat]

I understand it's hard to believe anyone would allow Bin Laden to attack us, but Bush and Cheney are just the men to do it.

FDR did it in WW2, we planned to do it but never actually did it in 1962, etc.

[ChumpDumper]

Again:


And NEADS, which responds to hijackings in that area, was not running an exercise since the hijackings occurred before their participation was to begin. Oops, why couldn't those pesky hired suicide hijackers have taken a later flight and screw up all the plans? What was their hurry to kill themselves?

So, IF YOU WANTED to ensure that Obama Bin Laden succeeds, wouldn't you make sure the actual fighters charged with intercepting hijacked planes in the US northeast wouldn't be available to, you know, intercept the hijacked planes?

[ChumpDumper]

I understand it's hard to believe anyone would allow Bin Laden to attack us, but Bush and Cheney are just the men to do it.I understand many people want to believe they let it happen or made it happen, but that doesn't make it true.

[MiamiHeat]

Again:



So, IF YOU WANTED to ensure that Obama Bin Laden succeeds, wouldn't you make sure the actual fighters charged with intercepting hijacked planes in the US northeast wouldn't be available to, you know, intercept the hijacked planes?

You aren't reading my posts.

I responded to this already

3) Conducted from September 9-11, this exercise redeployed jets that normally patrolled the northeast sector to northern Canada and Alaska. It echoed a Russian exercise scheduled from September 10-14 in which long-range bombers were dispatched to their northern territory.

Only 8 fighters were left to patrol the skies in that area due to the exercise.

[MiamiHeat]

Here is more lying and coverup :

“ WE NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT THIS”
Acting air defense commander General Richard Myers later said: "You hate to admit it, but we hadn't thought about this."

But they had.

Just 11 months before - between October 24 and 26, 2000 - NORAD had trained “for a passenger plane crashing into the Pentagon".

On 911 - as Flight 77 took off from Dulles International - the super-secret National Reconnaissance Office operating all U.S. spy satellites was about to conduct an emergency drill in which a simulated plane from Dulles International dives into their building.

[ChumpDumper]

You aren't reading my posts.

I responded to this already

3) Conducted from September 9-11, this exercise redeployed jets that normally patrolled the northeast sector to northern Canada and Alaska. It echoed a Russian exercise scheduled from September 10-14 in which long-range bombers were dispatched to their northern territory.

Only 8 fighters were left to patrol the skies in that area due to the exercise.You aren't reading my posts.

There were fighters available.

Fighters were dispatched to intercept hijacked planes, but they didn't know where to go.

Why pretend they weren't?

[MiamiHeat]

Are you ok? Go drink some coffee. Reading comprehension is falling.

It's becoming difficult to understand exactly what you are trying to prove.

[ChumpDumper]

Here is more lying and coverup :

“ WE NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT THIS”
Acting air defense commander General Richard Myers later said: "You hate to admit it, but we hadn't thought about this."

But they had.

Just 11 months before - between October 24 and 26, 2000 - NORAD had trained “for a passenger plane crashing into the Pentagon".

On 911 - as Flight 77 took off from Dulles International - the super-secret National Reconnaissance Office operating all U.S. spy satellites was about to conduct an emergency drill in which a simulated plane from Dulles International dives into their building.More cherry picking and lying.

A plane had crashed into the White House in 1994. Of course people thought about planes crashing into other federal buildings.

[ChumpDumper]

Are you ok? Go drink some coffee. Reading comprehension is falling.

It's becoming difficult to understand exactly what you are trying to prove.It's clear to see what you are lying about.

[MiamiHeat]

So we agree on something?

Are you calling me a liar or Air defense commander General Richard Myers?

stop trolling please

[ChumpDumper]

So we agree on something?

Are you calling me a liar or Air defense commander General Richard Myers?

stop trolling pleaseI am calling you a liar.

Stop lying please.

[MiamiHeat]

So I am lying that General Richard Myers said

"You hate to admit it, but we hadn't thought about this." when asked about 9/11 ?

?

stop trolling.... go play a video game if you are bored. there are lots of fun ones.

[smeagol]

MH using the same tactics as in the God thread. He comes up with lose pieces of info and passes them as facts. Then he ties everything up with a very thin thread and says "Viola! An evident conspiracy is going on here . . . ".

[mookie2001]

dam hard times for chumpdumper

guess he'll just ask someone to post what really happened on 9/11

then claim victory

[MiamiHeat]

What part did I try to pass off as fact, smeagol?

I am pretty sure you won't respond. You just throw mud and run away without supporting your claims.

[smeagol]

stop trolling please

You are a fucking moron. CD has been responding to every 9/11 thrread fr the last five years. He is no troll and he certainly does not troll these kind of threads.

You are again using the same tactics you used in the God thread when yo accused Joe of trolling.

I had forgotten what an enormous douche you are.

Thanks for reminding me . . .

[mookie2001]

smeagol has a lot invested in his 9/11 faith, hes foreign and because he loves his own country so much he had to move up here and drop knowledge

[ChumpDumper]

So I am lying that General Richard Myers said

"You hate to admit it, but we hadn't thought about this."

?Let's see some context.

"I didn't know what to believe at the time," he said. "We had these events, and then subsequently the airplane went down in Pennsylvania. We were trying to tie this together."

NORAD had by this time put fighter jets in the air in case other hijacked planes posed threats. "It was initially pretty confusing," Myers said. "You hate to admit it, but we hadn't thought about this."

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44621

Did anybody think of four planes being hijacked at once and hitting targets in different cities?

You are cherry picking here -- or just regurgitating the cherry picking of some truther site.

[smeagol]

dam hard times for chumpdumper

guess he'll just ask someone to post what really happened on 9/11

then claim victory

Hey pussy, how's it going?

Never had the balls to tell us what really happened on 9/11, huh?

[smeagol]

smeagol has a lot invested in his 9/11 faith, hes foreign and because he loves his own country so much he had to move up here and drop knowledge

I moved back to Argentina in 2007. Get on with the program . . .

[MiamiHeat]

Let's see some context.

"I didn't know what to believe at the time," he said. "We had these events, and then subsequently the airplane went down in Pennsylvania. We were trying to tie this together."

NORAD had by this time put fighter jets in the air in case other hijacked planes posed threats. "It was initially pretty confusing," Myers said. "You hate to admit it, but we hadn't thought about this."

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44621

Did anybody think of four planes being hijacked at once and hitting targets in different cities?

You are cherry picking here -- or just regurgitating the cherry picking of some truther site.

Looks like you are the one cherry picking.

They HAD thought about hijacked planes crashing into buildings.

They even thought about hijacked planes crashing into government buildings like the Pentagon.

They even had EXERCISES TO PRACTICE them.

So to you, because they never thought of -4- hijacked at one time, that means everything is ok?

Do you know how ridiculous that sounds?

So they could have practiced 4 hijacked planes crashing into Disney world at 9pm, but because the hijackers used 5 planes instead of 4 while crashing into Disney at 9pm, they 'never thought of this' ?

Seriously, you are not being honest in this discussion.

[MiamiHeat]

What part did I try to pass off as fact, smeagol?

I am pretty sure you won't respond. You just throw mud and run away without supporting your claims.

Yep, I was right.

[ChumpDumper]

Looks like you are the one cherry picking.

They HAD thought about hijacked planes crashing into buildings.

They even thought about hijacked planes crashing into government buildings like the Pentagon.

They even had EXERCISES TO PRACTICE them.

So to you, because they never thought of -4- hijacked at one time, that means everything is ok?No, it means they never thought of 4 hijacked at one time, so at the time, the General said he was trying to figure out what was happeneing. Why do you have trouble understanding this?

[smeagol]

Here is more lying and coverup :

“ WE NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT THIS”
Acting air defense commander General Richard Myers later said: "You hate to admit it, but we hadn't thought about this."

But they had.

Just 11 months before - between October 24 and 26, 2000 - NORAD had trained “for a passenger plane crashing into the Pentagon".

On 911 - as Flight 77 took off from Dulles International - the super-secret National Reconnaissance Office operating all U.S. spy satellites was about to conduct an emergency drill in which a simulated plane from Dulles International dives into their building.

Just because you cut and paste crap from websites such as William Thomas' does not make this statement true . . .

[smeagol]

Yep, I was right.

You were wrong . . . just like in that other thread . . .

[mookie2001]

yeah its not like williamthomas.com is the 9/11 Commission

[ChumpDumper]

Seriously, why would Myers lie to Armed Forces Radio that the military never ever ever ever thought a plane might crash into a federal building when it already happened seven years earlier?

You are being willfully stupid to believe this.

[smeagol]

Inside job people got it wrong.

It wasn't an inside job. It was Osama Bin Laden that attacked us.

The conspiracy part is that Bush and his cronies knew about it and allowed it to happen so they could invade Iraq and pass their policies.

Weapons of Mass destruction, lol.


This is an old strategy for world leaders, it's not new.

And you think you've proved this with the "infamous seven minute wait"? :lmao

Oh, I forgot, you are the one who believes Chrstianity is the refined version of the Sun God worshiping . . .

[smeagol]

yeah its not like williamthomas.com is the 9/11 Commission

What really happened on 9/11?

At least MH has a theory.

[MiamiHeat]

No, it means they never thought of 4 hijacked at one time, so at the time, the General said he was trying to figure out what was happeneing. Why do you have trouble understanding this?

The day of 9/11 had up to 22 simulated hijackings

What do you mean they never thought of 4 at one time?

He is just trying to save his ass like everyone else. Nobody wants to be blamed.

[ChumpDumper]

The day of 9/11 had up to 22 simulated hijackings

What do you mean they never thought of 4 at one time?They thought of 22 simultaneous hijackings?

Prove it.

[MiamiHeat]

All smeagol does is throw mud like a little child and never support any claims.

Welcome to ignore.

[ChumpDumper]

He is just trying to save his ass like everyone else. Nobody wants to be blamed.So why would he say anything at all? There would be no reason to if all he wanted to do was save his ass. You are saying he purposely incriminated himself.

Why would he purposely incriminate himself?

[smeagol]

All smeagol does is throw mud like a little child and never support any claims.

Welcome to ignore.

As opposed to your claims, which are all substantiated. :lol

Look dude, again, you tie unconnected events and try to pass them as doctrine.

No different than any of the other loonies out there who call themselves Truthers.

When you are so out there that even Bill Mahr calls you a loon, well, you should rethink your strategy . . .

[Cant_Be_Faded]

smeagol, chumpdumper has been posting in 9/11 threads for five years, but in each post he pretty much says "Hey, theres this 700 page report out there, backed by a shitload of money, that provides a logical and scientific basis for the towers falling, and until you provide that kind of evidence to support your theory, I claim ownage over you."

Then he blabs on about girders.

[ChumpDumper]

smeagol, chumpdumper has been posting in 9/11 threads for five years, but in each post he pretty much says "Hey, theres this 700 page report out there, backed by a shitload of money, that provides a logical and scientific basis for the towers falling, and until you provide that kind of evidence to support your theory, I claim ownage over you."What theory?

[Cant_Be_Faded]

What theory?

Wow, you're so good at playing chumpdumper.

See, when you post that, you aren't asking "What theory has anyone mentioned in this forum?" because people have told you shit from the start of what they think happened. What you are really asking is

"What theory can you provide me that is as dense and detailed as the 9/11 commission report, because until you post a detailed theory that is comparable to this report, I'm claiming strict ownage rights over you"

Which is totally totally gay.

[ChumpDumper]

Wow, you're so good at playing chumpdumper.

See, when you post that, you aren't asking "What theory has anyone mentioned in this forum?" because people have told you shit from the start of what they think happened. What you are really asking is

"What theory can you provide me that is as dense and detailed as the 9/11 commission report, because until you post a detailed theory that is comparable to this report, I'm claiming strict ownage rights over you"

Which is totally totally gay.Honestly, only one person has even tried to post an actual theory, and that was Galileo's "three individuals pulled off 9/11 by themselves" theory.

As you might imagine, he didn't elaborate much on it.

I can bump the alternative theory thread and you can see how many takers I had. That might be fun.

[Cant_Be_Faded]

Actually yes go ahead and bump it, because I include myself among others who list ideas of what happened that don't conform strictly to the 9/11 commission report. But seeing as how you're chumpdumper, you will wait for someone else to acknowledge them, then post a question or statement that pretty much says "But this isn't as detailed as the 9/11 commission report, I call bull shit, and I am right because the 9/11 commission report is flawless and free of error"

But don't expect me to post in it, because we'll start a near infinite loop of your CDisms all over again.

[ChumpDumper]

Have you ever personally posted what you thought happened on 9/11?

I'd like to see a link to it.

Most of the little theorlets posted on this board are pretty easily discounted by actual facts. It's not my fault truthers get so butthurt when they are challenged or proven wrong. Now all you're saying is you are preemptively butthurt, so you won't post what you think.

[Cant_Be_Faded]

Have you ever personally posted what you thought happened on 9/11?

I'd like to see a link to it.

Most of the little theorlets posted on this board are pretty easily discounted by actual facts. It's not my fault truthers get so butthurt when they are challenged or proven wrong. Now all you're saying is you are preemptively butthurt, so you won't post what you think.

Yes I did. Many times, before you created a trap of a thread that is your "alternative" theory thread as well, because you said this exact thing in that thread, to goad me into your infinite CD loops. And my personal opinion of what happened is in that thread. You took every sentence I posted, and posted some version of "But that isn't as airtight as the 9/11 commission report" in response, and like i said, infinite loop.

[ChumpDumper]

Yes I did. Many times.Where?

I don't remember anything more than a few abstractions.

[Wild Cobra]

but here is the twist. Bush knew about it before hand and LET IT HAPPEN.

That's what I believe. Same thing FDR did in WW2 with Pearl harbor. Provoke the enemy, let the enemy attack us, then claim self-defense and instill all your policies that the country will happily accept.

You can listen to the propaganda all you want. The way I see it, the previous administartion said they knew and gave president Bush the information. If it was such credible information, why didn't they do anything?


1) During the morning of September 11, 2001, the US was running military exercises simulating a terrorist attack using planes. Operation VIGILANT GUARDIAN was an exercise run by NORAD and the military during the week of Sept. 11, 2001. We have numerous accounts and records that while the REAL planes were hijacked, military personnel in NORAD thought "This is just part of the exercise?" and didn't believe it was a real hijacking. This is the perfect way to create confusion to ensure success for Osama Bin Laden

Or maybe one of the several rats that kept leaking secrets out told Obama that exercise was happening and would be a good day.

Make up everything you want, and look the fool. No proof. Just conjecture.


3) OPERATION NORTHWOODS - was a false-flag conspiracy plan, proposed within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for CIA or other operatives to commit apparent acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Castro-led Cuba. One plan was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington".

This operation is especially notable in that it included plans for hijackings and bombings followed by the use of phony evidence that would blame the terrorist acts on a foreign government, namely Cuba.

Operation Northwoods was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and signed by then-Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer, and sent to the Secretary of Defense.

Several other proposals were listed, including the real or simulated actions against various U.S military and civilian targets. Operation Northwoods was part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project (Operation Mongoose) anti-Castro initiative. It was never officially accepted or executed.

Duh... No shit.

Think this wasn't hashed over years ago? That doesn't mean such a plot was crafted today, and Northwood wasn't planned with casualties, but a swap of planes.


4) In WW2, President FDR allowed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor to have an excuse to get into the war and save Europe. We have mountains of evidence of this. Internal memo's, the President of Peru warning us, the fact that FDR intentionally sent all of our old WW1 ships over to Pearl Harbor and saved all of our new ships, the fact that he ordered Admiral Richardson to berth in Hawaii which caused Admiral Richardson to TWICE disobey him because he knew the fleet had no protection, the fact that FDR was given an 8 point 'situational analysis' which detailed 8 situations that would force Japan into war -which FDR EXECUTED ALL 8 TO PROVOKE THE JAPANESE, etc...

Conjecture, no proof. Now I agree the intelligence they had was poorly used, but that doesn't mean there was a sinister plot.


1) Bush went 'on vacation' during the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

What? Then why was he at the school?


2) Bush was given a memo "Osama Bin Laden determined to attack the United States using hijacked airplanes" A FEW DAYS BEFORE SEPT. 11 !!!

With what credibility level? Far less I bet than the credibility of Saddam having weapons.


3) On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, Bush was reading books to children. After the first plane hit, one of Bush's men whispered into the President's ear "Sir, America is under attack"

Bullshit. Would you please get the facts strait. That was after the second plane hit. The first was undetermined why it hit. The second showed a pattern.


What did Bush do? He sat there for another 7 minutes. Why do you think he did this? Easy. To allow the rest of the planes to hit.

That time line is also false. Please stop quoting Michael Moron. He's a proven "Big Fat Liar." You should watch Fahrenhype 9-11. The teacher/principle tells what happened.


If I come to you, and I say "Your house is under attack" while you are working at your job, do you sit there quietly? Nope, you will get up and yell "WHAT?!?!?"

What's he going to do? Isn't it best to ponder the situation for a few minutes before reacting?


But here we have PRESIDENT Bush. We could be in a nuclear war for all he knows. It could have been a nuclear attack, anything. and he just sits there.

Isn't it obvious?
That you're a fool? Yes.


It's quite obvious what happened. It's been done by world leaders for centuries. Provoke the enemy, let them attack, then claim self-defense and go to war and instill your policies.
You know, one thing about the heart of America that you clearly lack is that we have a burden of proof. You would have been a great 18th century Englishman, being jury, judge, and executioner. Now I could agree that such things can happen, but there simple is no credible evidence.

[Wild Cobra]

“ WE NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT THIS”
Acting air defense commander General Richard Myers later said: "You hate to admit it, but we hadn't thought about this."

But they had.

Just 11 months before - between October 24 and 26, 2000 - NORAD had trained “for a passenger plane crashing into the Pentagon".

Wow. So they never though of a professional pilot hitting a building like that, or that terrorists would do it with large jets. That's a far cry different that a passenger plane, which a steel or concrete building would smash like a bug.

All smeagol does is throw mud like a little child and never support any claims.

Welcome to ignore.
Actually, Smeagol usually doesn't say something without some rather good thoughts around it. Chump, Smeagol, and I often don't agree, but neither are fools. I would say they are both far above average intelligence, and actually do more fact checking than most people. Obviously more than you, by the material you source.

[Galileo]

Unexploded Nanothermite Found In WTC Dust

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE_tuWKsBko

[Galileo]

Here are the three best 9/11 Movies on the WTC (in order of complexity):

September 11 Revisited: Were Explosives Used?

by Dustin Mugford

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4194796183168750014&ei=-2DaSfKDMYH4-wGkkZydBQ&q=September+11+revisited

9/11 Mysteries

by Sophia

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3944047011450313064&ei=z2HaSba4CZzc-gGW0-ygBQ&q=9%2F11+mysteries&emb=1

Improbable Collapse: The Demolition of Our Republic

by Steven Jones, Jim Hoffman, and Kevin Ryan

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782&ei=l2LaSfn0CY6m-QGNy8H8BQ&q=improbable+collapse&emb=1

These films, of course, were made before this new scientific paper was published. The new paper is consistent with these films.

[Blake]

"What theory can you provide me that is as dense and detailed as the 9/11 commission report, because until you post a detailed theory that is comparable to this report, I'm claiming strict ownage rights over you"

Which is totally totally gay.

actually, one dude tried to claim ownage over CD because he was an engineering student.

[Blake]

Actually yes go ahead and bump it, because I include myself among others who list ideas of what happened that don't conform strictly to the 9/11 commission report.

what are your list of ideas of what happened?

[Blake]

Here are the three best 9/11 Movies on the WTC (in order of complexity):

September 11 Revisited: Were Explosives Used?

by Dustin Mugford

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4194796183168750014&ei=-2DaSfKDMYH4-wGkkZydBQ&q=September+11+revisited

9/11 Mysteries

by Sophia

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3944047011450313064&ei=z2HaSba4CZzc-gGW0-ygBQ&q=9%2F11+mysteries&emb=1

Improbable Collapse: The Demolition of Our Republic

by Steven Jones, Jim Hoffman, and Kevin Ryan

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782&ei=l2LaSfn0CY6m-QGNy8H8BQ&q=improbable+collapse&emb=1

These films, of course, were made before this new scientific paper was published. The new paper is consistent with these films.

who planted the explosives? when were they planted? why did they need to use airplanes? who triggered the detonation device(s)? from where? why are you still using Steven Jones as a reliable source?

[Galileo]

Best 9/11 Movies

9/11: Press For Truth

by the Jersey Girls

Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime

by John Albanese

Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut

by Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas, and Korey Rowe

Loose Change Final Cut

by Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas, and Korey Rowe

Zeitgeist

[warning - contains controversial material]

http://www.barrettforcongress.us/libertarian.htm#9/11_Movies

[Suns Fan]

smeagol, chumpdumper has been posting in 9/11 threads for five years, but in each post he pretty much says "Hey, theres this 700 page report out there, backed by a shitload of money, that provides a logical and scientific basis for the towers falling, and until you provide that kind of evidence to support your theory, I claim ownage over you."

Then he blabs on about girders.


Has Chump finally met his match?

:corn:

[911]

Best 9/11 Movies

9/11: Press For Truth

by the Jersey Girls

Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime

by John Albanese

Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut

by Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas, and Korey Rowe

Loose Change Final Cut

by Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas, and Korey Rowe

Zeitgeist

[warning - contains controversial material]

http://www.barrettforcongress.us/libertarian.htm#9/11_Movies

:tu

[RandomGuy]

thermite
noun
(chemistry) a mixture of aluminium metal and ferric oxide; used in incendiary devices

So let me see if I get this right:

A building made out of aluminum and iron collapses, and the geniuses in the 9-11 movment find aluminum and iron dust in the debris?

:lmao

[RandomGuy]

Seriously though.

Read the whole paper.

The authors attribute the dust to "super-thermite" or "nano-thermite", that is thermite that has been powderized or put into a gel-suspension. The supposition is that such a material was sprayed all over the building.

The FAIL is that the authors have taken a fairly quiet exothermic reaction, and then shoehorned their data to change normal thermite into a conventional explosive.

One of the graphs in the paper indicates that the amount of energy in the chips they examined had more energy per gram than HMX, a commercially available high-explosive.

So we are left with:


Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.


The 9-11 guys have taken the first steps towards using some actual science.

Honest skeptical questions:

Did the study consider alternate means of formation of the redish chips they studied, and compared those alternate means of formation to what was observed?

The confounding thing about their theory is that the formation of thermitic compounds in an aluminum and steel builiding during a conventional fire would be expected.

To be able to conclusively prove their theory, they would have to show that the chips they observed could NOT have been formed by other means, and MUST have been ONLY formed by unexploded "nano-thermite".

There is no evidence that this normal control-type examination was done. That makes it bad science, as I am sure someone else will point out.

Lastly, the problem remains for the "explosive" theory:

Since this paper posits really energetic explosives being used, this implies debris speeds in the range of thousands of feet per second.

Why was glass and small debris not scattered for miles around?
--The towers' upper floors were high enough off of the ground for the glass and small debris on those floors to have been propelled upwards of 2+ miles. Give me ONE instance of such debris hitting any one of the millions of people within that radius who came out to watch.

If this really was massively energetic explosives, why was this not clearly heard for tens of miles?
--I was within two blocks of a VERY small building demolition, and it was deafening, and extremely distinct. If two 100+ story buildings were demolished it would have to have been MUCH louder.


I do give you guys kudos for actually trying the science route, even if the paper had its flaws.

[Laker Lanny]

I think the truth movement gained ground today!

[Blake]

I think the truth movement gained ground today!

by "gained ground" if you mean we saw the same tired videos, failed attempts at debunking NIST reports and multiple mouse trolls popping in to play cheerleader, then yeah, you truthers "gained ground"

[Galileo]

UPDATE!



I'm glad to see the discussion here.



Please, if you are indecided, watch this:



WTC 7 - This is an Orange (2-minute mini-video)

by Anthony Lawson

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3898962504721899003&q=wtc+7+this+is+an+orange&ei=gWkzSPSyA5qi4ALArYXoCQ&hl=en



Now is the time to dig deeper. I urge everyone to watch these three films, they are the three best 9/11 Movies that deal exclusively with WTC (in order of complexity):



September 11 Revisited: Were Explosives Used?

by Dustin Mugford

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4194796183168750014&ei=-2DaSfKDMYH4-wGkkZydBQ&q=September+11+revisited



9/11 Mysteries

by Sophia

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3944047011450313064&ei=z2HaSba4CZzc-gGW0-ygBQ&q=9%2F11+mysteries&emb=1



Improbable Collapse: The Demolition of Our Republic

by Steven Jones, Jim Hoffman, and Kevin Ryan

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782&ei=l2LaSfn0CY6m-QGNy8H8BQ&q=improbable+collapse&emb=1



These films, of course, were made before this new scientific paper was published. The new paper is consistent with these films.



Here are the best "big picture" films on 9/11:



ZERO: An Investigation Into 9/11

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2296490368603788739



9/11: Press For Truth

by the Jersey Girls

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3979568779414136481



Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime

by John Albanese

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9007079754355711945



Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut

by Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas, and Korey Rowe

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501



Loose Change Final Cut

by Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas, and Korey Rowe

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3719259008768610598



Zeitgeist [warning - contains controversial material]

by Peter Josepeh

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-594683847743189197



Fabled Enemies

by Jason Berams

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2144933190875239407



Everyone here needs to watch ALL of these films. All of them. Everyone has heard the war propaganda, now it is time to hear the other side of the story.



PS



Most of these films are linked here:

http://www.barrettforcongress.us/libertarian.htm#9/11_Mini

[Wild Cobra]

What's funny, is a Toofer would be able to find thermite in every General Motors 3rd generation LS series aluminum engine. I'd like their theory of why GM is making Termite engines!

[Galileo]

What you need to know about "Peer-review"

Submitted by ProfJones on Tue, 04/07/2009 - 12:07pm.

Since the days of Sir Isaac Newton, Science has proceeded through the publication of peer-reviewed papers. Peer-review means a thorough reading, commentary and even challenge before publication by "peers", that is, other PhD's and professors. This paper was thoroughly peer-reviewed with several pages of tough comments that required of our team MONTHS of additional experiments and studies. It was the toughest peer-review I've ever had, including THREE papers for which I was first author in NATURE.

(Please note that Prof. Harrit is first author on this paper.) We sought an established journal that would allow us a LONG paper (this paper is 25 pages long) with MANY COLOR IMAGES AND GRAPHS. Such a scientific journal is not easy to find. Page charges are common for scientific journals these days, and are typically paid by the University of the first or second author (as is the case with this paper) or by an external grant.

A peer-reviewed journal is also called a "refereed" journal. Peer-reviewers are almost always anonymous for scientific publications like this -- that is standard in the scientific world. While authors commonly recommend potential peer-reviewers, editors choose the referees and usually pick at least one or two reviewers that the authors did NOT mention -- and that is almost certainly the case with this paper (based on commentary we received from the reviewers). In the end, all the reviewers -- who were selected by the editor(s) -- approved publication. Thus, the paper was subjected to peer review by the editor or editors, and it passed the peer-review process.

Debunkers may raise all sorts of objections on forums, such as "Oh, it's just paint" or "the aluminum is bound up in kaolin." We have answered those questions in the paper, and shown them to be nonsense, but you have to read to find the answers. I may also provide answers here and in emails, often quoting from the paper to show that the answers are already in it.

Here's what you need to know (especially if you are not a scientist): UNLESS AN OBJECTOR ACTUALLY PUBLISHES HIS OR HER OBJECTION IN A PEER-REVIEWED ESTABLISHED JOURNAL (yes that would include Bentham Scientific journals), THEN THE OBJECTION IS NOT CONSIDERED SERIOUS IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY. YOU SHOULD NOT WORRY ABOUT NON-PUBLISHED OBJECTIONS EITHER.

So how do you, as a non-scientist, discern whether the arguments are valid or not? You should first ask, "is the objection PUBLISHED in an ESTABLISHED PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL?" If not, you can and should say -- "I will wait to see this formally published in a refereed scientific journal. Until then, the published peer-reviewed work by Harrit et al. stands. "

BTW, there also has been no PUBLISHED REFEREED paper yet that counters either the "Fourteen Points" paper or the "Environmental Anomalies" papers we published last year.

IF it is so easy to publish in Bentham Scientific journals, or if these are "vanity publications" (note: there is no factual basis for these charges) -- then why don't the objectors write up their objections and get them peer-reviewed and published?? The fact is, it is not easy, as serious objectors will find out.

Our results have passed the gauntlet of peer-review (including in this case, review at BYU consistent with the fact that there are two authors from BYU).

We say that this paper has the "imprimatur of peer-review". That is a significant breakthrough. You cannot say that of big-foot or Elvis sightings... We are now in a different world from such things, the world of the published scientific community. CAN YOU APPRECIATE THE DIFFERENCE? I hope so. And this is what has our opponents so worried IMO...

http://www.911blogger.com/node/19780

This is the science organization that published the paper. They are obviously legitimate, they publish papers by Nobel laureates:

http://www.bentham.org/index.htm

[ChumpDumper]

A PEER-REVIEWED ESTABLISHED JOURNAL (yes that would include Bentham Scientific journals)No, it wouldn't.

[Chubyrama]

As a physics student I have gotten a glimpse of the peer-reviewing world, and I must say it is not as respectable as I once thought. Every once in a shit comparable to this one gets published. Sometimes the reviewers are lazy, ignorant or ill-prepared to judge the work, some other times they approve it as a favor (i.e. if the know the author) or in exchange for getting quoted in future papers. Getting quoted in the very paper you are reviewing is a common practice, your corrections must include for a couple of "missing" quotes, and your anonymity will protect you from being questioned.

Besides, I don't understand why has this been published in a biomedical journal. Maybe because that is were the author had the most friends working. It would most certainly not get published in a specific journal. As a matter of fact, odds are it was sent and rejected in lots of places, so the had to settle for this. If there was any chance it was published in a better place, it would be there, not here.

In conclusion: the towers came down because big, fast, fuel carrying planes crashed into them. They took down the buildings they were supposed to, nothing to see here.

[Dude]

In conclusion: the towers came down because big, fast, fuel carrying planes crashed into them. They took down the buildings they were supposed to, nothing to see here.



http://www.n-sider.com/media/hearts18stoned.jpg

[Wild Cobra]

As a physics student I have gotten a glimpse of the peer-reviewing world, and I must say it is not as respectable as I once thought. Every once in a shit comparable to this one gets published. Sometimes the reviewers are lazy, ignorant or ill-prepared to judge the work, some other times they approve it as a favor (i.e. if the know the author) or in exchange for getting quoted in future papers. Getting quoted in the very paper you are reviewing is a common practice, your corrections must include for a couple of "missing" quotes, and your anonymity will protect you from being questioned.

Yep, I haven't trusted peer reviews ever since I learned the truth about Global Warming. The established elite in any field can control the process by fear. In the realm of Global Warming, some good Climatologists who disagree with the political view of Global Warming have lost their jobs. Quick list:

Oregon:

Oregon's State Climatologist George Taylor to Be Fired For Choosing Science Over Moonbattery (http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2007/02/oregons_state_c.html)

Oregon Governor Set to Fire State Climatologist Over Global Warming (http://newsbusters.org/node/10665)

Washington:

CLIMATOLOGIST FIRED FOR EXPOSING WARMING MYTHS (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1834118/posts)

Delaware:

Global Warming Skepticism Bites Another State Climatologist (http://newsbusters.org/node/11019)

[Galileo]

Nobel Laureates Have Endorsed Bentham Science Journals

Richard R. Ernst
Swiss Federal
Inst. of Technology,
Switzerland

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1991
For his contributions to the development of the methodology of high resolution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.

"Current Medicinal Chemistry has established itself as an important review journal in the field of medicinal chemistry. It provides research scientists in the field with comprehensive review articles written by eminent experts. It allows them to keep abreast with the latest relevant developments. The journal is highly recommended to all scientists active in the field of medicinal chemistry."

Sir James W. Black
London University,
King's College Hospital
London, U.K.

The Nobel Prize in Physiology 1988
For the discoveries of important principles for drug treatment.

"Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry provides medicinal chemists and scientists in allied disciplines an invaluable resource for thematic coverage of keen new developments in their field of study."

Robert Huber
Max-Planck-Institut
für Biochemie Martinsried,
Martinsried, Germany

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1988
For the determination of the three-dimensional structure of a photosynthetic reaction centre.

"Current Medicinal Chemistry is a frontier review journal, which contains comprehensive reviews written by leading scientists in their respective fields. The journal presents the latest developments in various areas of medicinal chemistry. I strongly recommend it to scientists working in the field."

"Current Genomics represents a frontier review journal, which contains comprehensive reviews written by leading scientists in the respective fields. This journal presents the latest developments in the area of genomics. This is strongly recommended."

"The 4 new journals Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery, Recent Patents on Cardiovascular Drug Discovery, Recent Patents on CNS Drug Discovery, Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery are important patents journals in the field of Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery, Cardiovascular Drug Discovery, CNS Drug Discovery and Anti-Infective Drug Discovery, which should provide research scientists in the fields with recent developments in various frontier areas. These journals are strongly recommended to the scientific community".

Jean-Marie Lehn
Université Louis Pasteur Strasbourg, France

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1987
For the development and use of molecules with structure-specific interactions of high selectivity.

"In view of the growing volume of literature, the role of a high quality review journal has become increasingly important.
Current Medicinal Chemistry presents expert overviews in the field of medicinal chemistry of general interest to the scientific community."

"In view of the growing volume of literature, the role of high quality review journals has become increasingly important.
Current Drug Targets is an important journal in the field of medicinal chemistry and drug design, which is strongly recommended to the scientific community."

"Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry represents an important review journal of great value to pharmaceutical scientists."

"Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry is recommended as a forum for the publication and review of important aspects of medicinal chemistry including the design and synthesis of compound libraries for bioactivity testing."

Herbert C. Brown † (1912 - 2004)
Purdue University
West Lafayette, USA

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1979
For the development of the use of boron- and phosphorus-containing compounds, respectively, into important reagents in organic synthesis.

"Current Medicinal Chemistry has established itself as an important review journal in the field of medicinal chemistry. It provides research scientists in the field with comprehensive review articles written by eminent experts. It allows them to keep abreast with the latest relevant developments. The journal is highly recommended to all scientists active in the field of medicinal chemistry."

"Current Organic Chemistry is an important review journal, which should prove to be of wide interest to organic chemists and provide them with a convenient means of keeping up with the current flood of advances in the field."

Sir Derek H. R. Barton † (1918 - 1998)
Imperial College
London, U.K.

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1969
For the development of the concept of conformation and its application in chemistry.

"Current Medicinal Chemistry represents an important review journal of great value to medicinal chemists in universities and pharmaceutical industries."

"Current Organic Chemistry is an important chemistry review journal, which will present frontier reviews in organic chemistry. The journal will prove to be a very useful source of up-to-date information. The eminent international stature of the Guest Editors will guarantee the high standards expected of an international journal."

http://www.bentham.org/Nobel.htm

[Blake]

were any of these nobel laureates structural engineers?

if only the conspiracy theories were endorsed by popular mechanics........then we might really have something to talk about.

[Galileo]

were any of these nobel laureates structural engineers?

if only the conspiracy theories were endorsed by popular mechanics........then we might really have something to talk about.

stupid, these aren't the referees. They are testing for thermite. Once again, you're stupid, the lead author is the head of the chemistry department at the University of Copenhagen.

[Blake]

stupid, these aren't the referees. They are testing for thermite. Once again, you're stupid, the lead author is the head of the chemistry department at the University of Copenhagen.

:lol

you have no idea about anything you are copying and pasting.

you are officially an idiot.

[Galileo]

:lol

you have no idea about anything you are copying and pasting.

you are officially an idiot.

moron! This is a peer reviewed science jounal, endorsed by many winners of the Nobel Science Prize!

[Chubyrama]

moron! This is a peer reviewed science jounal, endorsed by many winners of the Nobel Science Prize!

Yes, endorsed as a biomedical journal, because that's what it is. The thermite article has no place there whatsoever, the fact that it is there is nothing but a proof of the editor's bias.

[Blake]

stupid, these aren't the referees. They are testing for thermite. Once again, you're stupid, the lead author is the head of the chemistry department at the University of Copenhagen.

I don't see Mikael Bols name as being one of the authors.

Bols would be the head of the chemistry department at the University of Copenhagen.

http://nano.ku.dk/english/NSC/Bestyrelsen/

I'll go ahead and assume you meant Neils H Harrit, associate professor of chemistry.

Tell me you know who Nils O. Anderson is.

Tell me I'm stupid again while posting some more ignorant, moronic shit.

this is fun! :downspin:

[911]

tQ2JMbScMhg

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/front.jpg

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/back.jpg

[Blake]

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/back.jpg

that dvd costs $20?

:lol

there's a 9/11 sucker born every minute

[Wild Cobra]

that dvd costs $20?

:lol

there's a 9/11 sucker born every minute
No kidding.

I have thought about becoming a conspiracy propaganderer just to sell such materials to the ignorant fools who will send me money.

I wonder how rich I could get?

[Alex Jones]

that dvd costs $20?

:lolthere's a 9/11 sucker born every minute

Instead of trying to prove the DVD is bogus you attack the price? You guys were never really interested in what really took place on 9/11 your just here to argue with anyone to help cure your boredom.

I actually thought you all believed the buildings fell due to collapses and you wanted to defend your beliefs but now I am convinced you all just want to disagree to see how many posters you can piss off.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-54190.png
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-741643.png

[Blake]

Instead of trying to prove the DVD is bogus you attack the price? You guys were never really interested in what really took place on 9/11 your just here to argue with anyone to help cure your boredom.

:lol

Why would I want to pay $20 for a DVD full of lies when I can just come in here and get the same lies for FREE from you?

[Galileo]

Here is a short list of peer reviewed scientific articles published by Bentham:

Recent Articles
Spectrometric Studies and Semi-Empirical Calculations of Some Thiomorpholides
(07 April, 2009) Open Physical Chemistry Journal
Relational Agents: A Critical Review
(07 April, 2009) Open Virtual Reality Journal
Quantifying Uncertainties for Prostate Image-Guided Radiotherapy:A 3D Organ Reconstruction and Registration Method
(07 April, 2009) Open Medical Imaging Journal
Topographical Organization of the Pyramidal Fiber System - Diffusion Tensor MRI of the Human and Rhesus Monkey Brain
(07 April, 2009) Open Medical Imaging Journal
Ginsenoside Rg1 Modulates Spontaneous Synchronous Ca2+ Oscillations of Cultured Hippocampal Neurons
(07 April, 2009) Open Physiology Journal
Gene Expression Profiling of Human Adipocyte Responses to Insulin and IGF-I Signalling
(07 April, 2009) Open Diabetes Journal
The Epidemiologic Transition of Diabetes Mellitus in Taiwan: Implications for Reversal of Female Preponderance from a National Cohort
(07 April, 2009) Open Diabetes Journal
Educational Attainment is Associated with Health Care Utilization and Self-Care Behavior by Individuals with Diabetes
(07 April, 2009) Open Diabetes Journal
A Simple Method of Determining Pre-Diabetes
(07 April, 2009) Open Diabetes Journal
XPS Analysis of Passive Film on Stainless Steel
(07 April, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality after Acute Ischemic Stroke in Subjects with and without Diabetes Mellitus
(07 April, 2009) Open General & Internal Medicine Journal
Error Estimates of a Computational Method for Generalised Connecting Orbits
(07 April, 2009) Open Numerical Methods Journal
Redescription of Monticellius indicum Mehra, 1939 (Digenea: Spirorchiidae)from the Heart of Green Sea Turtles (Chelonia mydas) in Costa Rica
(07 April, 2009) Open Parasitology Journal
Effects of Nutraceuticals on Genetic Expressions
(07 April, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
Toxicity Testing of Two Medicinal Plants, Bridelia micrantha and Antidesma venosum
(07 April, 2009) Open Toxicology Journal
Analysis of the Schmidt, Cohen & Margon (1980) Features in the Red Rectangle Nebula
(06 April, 2009) Open Astronomy Journal
A Nonlinear Strategy to Control Unstable Underactuated Mechanical Systems with Underactuation > 1. Applications to Control Augmentations
(06 April, 2009) Open Automation and Control Systems Journal
Standard Moment Method in the Problems on Ion Kinetics in Neutral Gas
(06 April, 2009) Open Plasma Physics Journal
Lung Cancer: Optimal Treatment Strategies
(03 April, 2009) Open Lung Cancer Journal
Molecular Prognostic and Predictive Markers in Lung Cancer
(03 April, 2009) Open Lung Cancer Journal
Smiles Rearrangement in the Synthesis of Di- and Triiodinated 5-(Acylamino)-1,3-Benzenedicarboxamides
(03 April, 2009) Open Organic Chemistry Journal
Supaeromaculata Lines in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Obtained Following Mutagenesis
(03 April, 2009) Open Horticulture Journal
Changes in Photosynthetic Rate, Specific Leaf Weight and Sugar Contents in Mango (Mangifera indica L.)
(03 April, 2009) Open Horticulture Journal
The Relationships between Two Different Drinking Water Fluoride Levels, Dental Fluorosis and Bone Mineral Density of Children
(03 April, 2009) Open Dentistry Journal
Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Cortical Responses to Speech Production
(03 April, 2009) Open Neuroimaging Journal
A Pictorial Technique for Mass Screening of Sorghum Germplasm for Anthracnose (Colletotrichum sublineolum) Resistance
(03 April, 2009) Open Agriculture Journal
An Approach to Formative Research in HPV Vaccine Introduction Planning in Low-Resource Settings
(03 April, 2009) Open Vaccine Journal
Machinalibilty of Ti-6Al-4V Under Dry and Near Dry Condition Using Carbide Tools
(03 April, 2009) Open Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Journal
The Toll-like Receptor 2/6 Ligand MALP-2 Reduces the Viability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Murine Macrophages
(03 April, 2009) Open Microbiology Journal
The Anomalous Stock Market Behavior of Big and Low Book-to-Market Equity Firms in April: New Evidence from Japan
(03 April, 2009) Open Business Journal
Postconditioning Does Not Improve Renal Function or Attenuate Tubular Damage in Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Mice
(03 April, 2009) Open Pathology Journal
On Thermodynamic Aspects of the Efficient Power Engineering
(03 April, 2009) Open Fuels & Energy Science Journal
Estimation of In Vivo Water Content of the Stratum Corneum from Electrical Measurements
(03 April, 2009) Open Biomedical Engineering Journal
Undergraduate Nurses` and Midwives` Participation and Satisfaction with Live Interactive Webcasts
(03 April, 2009) Open Nursing Journal
Study on the Effectiveness of Single Lightning Rods by a Fractal Approach
(03 April, 2009) Journal of Lightning Research
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
(03 April, 2009) Open Chemical Physics Journal
Cerebral Palsy In Adults Consequences of Non Progressive Pathology
(02 April, 2009) Open Neurology Journal
Experimental and Modeling Study of Galactosyl-Oligosaccharides Formation in Continuous Recycle Membrane Reactors (CRMR)
(02 April, 2009) Open Food Science Journal
Increasing the Production of Nattokinase and Vitamin K2 in Natto with Dipicolinic Acid
(02 April, 2009) Open Food Science Journal
The Influence of Rootstock Selection on Fruit Quality Attributes of Watermelon
(02 April, 2009) Open Food Science Journal
Characterization of Lipids and Their Oxidation Products in Baked or Fried Breaded Shrimp Products
(02 April, 2009) Open Food Science Journal
Impact of Pre and Postnatal Protein Energy Deprivation on Structure of the Trigeminal Ganglion of Weanling Rats
(02 April, 2009) Open Nutrition Journal
Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Prevalence and Management of Childhood Diarrhoea: Potential Health Gains to be Achieved
(02 April, 2009) Open Infectious Diseases Journal
A Pilot Study in Normal Volunteers of the Effects of the Renuva™ System on Growth Hormone and Insulin-Dependent Growth Factor-1
(02 April, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
Exploring the Likely Effect of the Introduction of Drug Eluting Stents on Requirements for Coronary Artery Revascularisation Procedures in Western Australia: A Use of the CHD/CARP Markov Simulation Model
(02 April, 2009) Open Epidemiology Journal
Effects of Tetracycline, EDTA and Citric Acid Application on Fluorosed Dentin and Cementum Surfaces: An In Vitro Study
(02 April, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
About the Formation of Basic Silver Carbonate on Silver Surfaces – An In Situ IRRAS Study
(02 April, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Corrosion and Protection of Electronic Components in Different Environmental Conditions - An Overview
(02 April, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Towards Exact Quantum Loop Results in the Theory of General Relativity
(02 April, 2009) Open Nuclear & Particle Physics Journal
Immunization with Recombinant Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Heat-Shock Protein (Hsp)-60 is Able to Induce an Immune Response in Mice, But Fails to Confer Protection Against Infection
(02 April, 2009) Open Veterinary Science Journal
Does Body Mass Index Influence the Outcomes After Surgery for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer?
(02 April, 2009) Open Prostate Cancer Journal
Prostate Cancer Lymph Node Metastasis
(02 April, 2009) Open Prostate Cancer Journal
Pharmacological Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: Is it Progressing Adequately?
(02 April, 2009) Open Neurology Journal
Inheritance of Shoulder Spotting in the Tetra, Hyphessobrycon bentosi Characidae
(02 April, 2009) Open Fish Science Journal
Factors Affecting the Production of Elsinochrome Phytotoxin by the Citrus Scab Pathogen, Elsinoe fawcettii
(02 April, 2009) Open Mycology Journal
Do Hummingbirds See in Ultraviolet?
(02 April, 2009) Open Medical Informatics Journal
Performance of Principal Component Analysis and Independent Component Analysis with Respect to Signal Extraction from Noisy Positron Emission Tomography Data - a Study on Computer Simulated Images
(01 April, 2009) Open Neuroimaging Journal
Methods for Dichoptic Stimulus Presentation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging - A Review
(01 April, 2009) Open Neuroimaging Journal
Postoperative Results of Off-Pump Coronary By-pass Grafting in Elderly Patients: A Single Center Experience
(01 April, 2009) Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal
“Biodiversity and International Tourism: A Story of Comparative Advantage”#
(01 April, 2009) Open Political Science Journal
Nest Site Characteristics and Factors Affecting Nest Success of Greater Sage-grouse
(01 April, 2009) Open Ornithology Journal
The Determinants of Capital Structure in the Service Industry:Evidence from United States
(01 April, 2009) Open Business Journal
Implications of Couple Therapy Profession on Therapists'Spousal Relations
(01 April, 2009) Open Family Studies Journal
Daycare Experiences and Long-Term Behavioral Outcomes:A Retrospective Self-Report
(01 April, 2009) Open Family Studies Journal
Long Term Genetic Modification of Neurons, Astrocytes and Ependymocytes In Vivo using a High Capacity Adenovirus Vector
(01 April, 2009) Open Gene Therapy Journal
Electrochemical Study of Some Substituted Chromene Derivatives in Nonaqueous Media at Pt, Au and Glassy Carbon Electrodes
(01 April, 2009) Open Electrochemistry Journal
L-Dopa as Corrosion Inhibitor for Mild Steel in Mineral Acid Medium
(01 April, 2009) Open Electrochemistry Journal
Impact, Perception, Role and Expectations of Sleep Partners of Patients Suffering from Sleep Apnea Syndrome and Treated at Home by CPAP: Results of a Large Scale Study of More than 900 Patientss
(01 April, 2009) Open Sleep Journal
Chemopreventive Mechanisms of Natural Products in Oral, Mammary and Skin Carcinogenesis: An Overview
(01 April, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
Rapid Flow Cytometric Method for Measuring Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, Respiratory Burst Activity, and Intracellular Thiols of Human Whole Blood Leukocytes
(01 April, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
The Influence of Author Gender, National Language and Number of Authors on Citation Rate in Ecology
(01 April, 2009) Open Ecology Journal
Effect of Growth Temperature and Culture Medium on the Cryotolerance of Permafrost Exiguobacterium Sibiricum 255-15 by Proteome-Wide Mass Mapping
(01 April, 2009) Open Proteomics Journal
Analysis of Proteins Associated with Chinch Bug (Blissus leucopterus leucopterus Say)-Infested Corn (Zea mays L.) Seedlings
(01 April, 2009) Open Proteomics Journal
CD4 T Cells Treated with gp120 Acquire a CD45R0+/CD45RA+ Phenotype
(01 April, 2009) Open Virology Journal
A Proposed Solution to the Historic Puzzle of Chargaff's Second Parity Rule
(01 April, 2009) Open Genomics Journal
Indexing Tools for Indian Citrus Ringspot Virus (ICRSV)
(01 April, 2009) Open Biology Journal
Prognostic Significance of the Double Pressure Reserve in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
(01 April, 2009) Open Heart Failure Journal
Establishing Equivalence of Exercise Intensities
(01 April, 2009) Open Sports Medicine Journal
Editorial [Allergenic Metals in Consumer Products and Food:Development of Quantification Methods and Cases of Sensitization]
(27 March, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
The Epidemiology of Contact Allergy to Metals in the General Population: Prevalence and New Evidences
(27 March, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
The X-Ray and SF-ICP-MS Analysis of Content and Release of Allergenic Metals from Body Piercing
(27 March, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
Quantification of Sensitizing Metals in Tattooing Pigments by SF-ICP-MS Technique
(27 March, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
SF-ICP-MS Analysis of Palladium in Fluids of Patients Sensitized to Metal-Based Dental Restorations
(27 March, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
Role of Diet in Nickel Dermatitis
(27 March, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
Diagnostic Methods for Contact Allergy to Metals
(27 March, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
Meet The Guest Editor
(27 March, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
Do You Know Who is Calling? Experiments on Anomalous Cognition in Phone Call Receivers
(27 March, 2009) Open Psychology Journal
Evaluation of Oral Mucosal Lesions in 598 Referred Iranian Patients
(27 March, 2009) Open Dentistry Journal
Advantage of Vacuum Assisted Closure on Healing of Wound After Perineal Trauma: Image of Trauma
(27 March, 2009) Open Surgery Journal
Re-Classification of the Alleged Quasar Q0045-3337
(27 March, 2009) Open Astronomy Journal
Is there a BMI Threshold Value Associated with a Lower Physical Capacity in Well-Functioning Older Adults? The Quebec Longitudinal Study
(27 March, 2009) Open Obesity Journal
CloudSat and A-Train Observations of Tropical Cyclones
(27 March, 2009) Open Atmospheric Science Journal
Plasma-Detonation Technology for Modification of the Surface Layer of Metal Parts
(27 March, 2009) Open Surface Science Journal
Decrements Encountered when Wearing Hazardous Materials Gloves
(27 March, 2009) Ergonomics Open Journal
Generation of Double Pulses in the Extreme Ultraviolet Spectral Range Using a Laser Combined Pinch Plasma Source
(27 March, 2009) Open Plasma Physics Journal
Carcinogens in Food: Opportunities and Challenges for Regulatory Toxicology
(27 March, 2009) Open Toxicology Journal
Application of Actinobacterial and Fungal Morphology on the Design of Operating Strategies in Bioprocess Development
(27 March, 2009) Open Biotechnology Journal
Subgrouping in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Based on Actigraphy and Illness Severity
(27 March, 2009) Open Biology Journal
Theoretical Study of the Linear Short-Chain Phosphazene-Na+ Complexes
(27 March, 2009) Open Structural Biology Journal
Study of Effect of Spinning Process Variables on Fibre Length Parameters Using Taguchi Method
(27 March, 2009) Open Textile Journal
Optimisation of a Textile Process Using Taguchi Method
(27 March, 2009) Open Textile Journal
Computational Model of a Novel, Two-Cup Horizontal Wind-Turbine System
(27 March, 2009) Open Mechanical Engineering Journal
Design and Economic Analysis of a Stand-Alone PV System to Electrify a Remote Area Household in Egypt
(27 March, 2009) Open Renewable Energy Journal
The Effects of Reading Racetracks on the Sight Word Fluency and Acquisition for Two Elementary Students with Disabilities: A Further Replication and Analysis
(27 March, 2009) Open Social Science Journal
Employer Subsidies for Health Insurance Premiums:Massachusetts' Unique Experiment
(27 March, 2009) Open Health Services and Policy Journal
A Qualitative and Quantitative Review of Equine Facilitated Psychotherapy (EFP) with Children and Adolescents
(27 March, 2009) Open Complementary Medicine Journal
Sequential Combination Therapy Leading to Sustained Remission in a Patient with SAPHO Syndrome
(27 March, 2009) Open Rheumatology Journal
HLA Genes in Afro-American Colombians (San Basilio de Palenque):The First Free Africans in America
(27 March, 2009) Open Immunology Journal
Fucoidan Protects Human Skin Fibroblast Cell Line HS68 Against ? - Radiation-Induced Damage
(27 March, 2009) Open Natural Products Journal
Resolution Enhancement for Tomographical Images of a Full-Field OCT System
(27 March, 2009) Open Optics Journal
Comparative Mechanical Dynamic Analysis of Permanent Magnet Generator Using Finite Element and Fuzzy Methods
(27 March, 2009) Open Automation and Control Systems Journal
How Football Players Determine where to Run to Tackle other Players:A Mathematical and Psychological Description and Analysis
(25 March, 2009) Open Sports Sciences Journal
Effects of Exercise Duration and Number of Players in Heart Rate Responses and Technical Skills During Futsal Small-sided Games
(25 March, 2009) Open Sports Sciences Journal
The Addition of a Video Game to Stationary Cycling: The Impact on Energy Expenditure in Overweight Children
(25 March, 2009) Open Sports Sciences Journal
Migration of Organic Contaminants from Landfill: Minimum Thickness of Barriers
(25 March, 2009) Open Environmental Pollution & Toxicology Journal
The Gastrointestinal Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus:A Survey of the Literature
(25 March, 2009) Open Autoimmunity Journal
In Vivo Localization of Fas-Associated Death Domain Protein in the Nucleus and Cytoplasm of Normal Thyroid and Liver Cells
(25 March, 2009) Open Autoimmunity Journal
New Method to Generate Reversible Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Surfaces
(25 March, 2009) Open Surface Science Journal
If Papillomavirus Found Universally in Epidermal Tissues, what does that Mean if a PCR Pap Test is Positive?
(25 March, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
Cardiovascular Risk During the Menopause
(25 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
The Need to Scale-Up Research for Prevention and Control of Cardiovascular Diseases
(25 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
American Ginseng Modifies 137Cs-Induced DNA Damage and Oxidative Stress in Human Lymphocytes
(25 March, 2009) Open Nuclear Medicine Journal
Optimization of Conditions for Charantin Extraction in PEG/Salt Aqueous Two-Phase Systems Using Response Surface Methodology
(25 March, 2009) Open Complementary Medicine Journal
Forensic DNA Typing: Quo Vadis?
(24 March, 2009) Open Forensic Science Journal
Immune Response and Possible Causes of CD4+T-cell Depletion in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) - 1 Infection
(24 March, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
The Distribution and Valuation of Corporate Control
(24 March, 2009) Open Business Journal
The Determinants of Chief Financial Officer's Compensation in the Service Industry
(24 March, 2009) Open Business Journal
Phenotypic Fingerprinting of Small Molecule Cell Cycle Kinase Inhibitors for Drug Discovery
(24 March, 2009) Current Chemical Genomics
Similarity Hypotheses for the Atmospheric Surface Layer Expressed by Non-Dimensional Characteristic Invariants – A Review
(24 March, 2009) Open Atmospheric Science Journal
Fibrillar Templating of Hydrotalcites
(24 March, 2009) Open Process Chemistry Journal
Reduction of Complications and Associated Costs with Flexitouch® Therapy for Lymphedema
(24 March, 2009) Open Rehabilitation Journal
Using the Speed-Accuracy Operating Characteristic to Visualize Performance with Pointing Devices
(24 March, 2009) Open Rehabilitation Journal
Influence of Fecal Sample Storage on Bacterial Community Diversity
(24 March, 2009) Open Microbiology Journal
Causes of Decline and Potential for Recovery of Atlantic Cod Populations
(24 March, 2009) Open Fish Science Journal
Frequency Doubling Technology vs Standard Automated Perimetry in Ocular Hypertensive Patients
(24 March, 2009) Open Ophthalmology Journal
The Spectrum of Clinical Research with Medications in A Spanish University Hospital. Review of 1.000 Clinical Trials Evaluated by the Research Ethics Committee
(24 March, 2009) Open Ethics Journal
C-fiber-Selective Peripheral Nerve Blockade
(24 March, 2009) Open Pain Journal
FPGA-Based Image Processor for Sensor Nodes in a Sensor Network
(24 March, 2009) Open Signal Processing Journal
A Retrospective Assessment of 741 Patients with Sudden Hearing Loss
(24 March, 2009) Open Otorhinolaryngology Journal
Unsustainable Paradoxes Inherent in the International Legislation of Electronic Waste Disposal
(24 March, 2009) Open Environmental Sciences
Alternative Fuels for Spark Ignition Engines
(20 March, 2009) Open Fuels & Energy Science Journal
A Nonredundant Near-Field to Far-Field Transformation with Spherical Spiral Scanning for Nonspherical Antennas
(20 March, 2009) Open Electrical & Electronic Engineering Journal
Correlation of Electronic Structure of Some Nitrogen Sulfur Derivatives with Corrosion Inhibition Performance
(20 March, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
New Insights into the Anthracnose Resistance of Common Bean Landrace G 2333
(20 March, 2009) Open Horticulture Journal
Vascular Toxicity of Cocaine
(20 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
Mitochondria-Targeted Vitamin E Antioxidant: An Agent for Cardiovascular Protection
(20 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
Percutaneous Endovascular Repair and Savage of Vascular Stream After Spontaneous and/or Iatrogenic Complications of Kidney Transplantation
(20 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
Auditory Brainstem Responses & Nerve Conduction Velocity in Essential Hypertension
(20 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
The GNAS 393 T > C Polymorphism and the Blood Pressure Response Immediately Following Aerobic Exercise Among Men with Elevated Blood Pressure
(20 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System as a Therapeutic Target for Endothelial Dysfunction
(20 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
Novel Strategies in Anti-Platelet Treatment for Coronary Artery Disease
(20 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
Vascular Effects of Diabetes Mellitus
(20 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
Anti-CD105 Inhibits Primary Cancer Growth and Secondary Hematogenous Metastasis in a Xenograft Model
(20 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
Epigenetic Effects of Nutrients and the Promise for Refined Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
(20 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
Importance of Extracellular Matrix Protein 1 (ECM1) in Maintaining the Functional Integrity of the Human Skin
(20 March, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
Reversion to the Neurovilurent Genome Sequence of Polio Vaccine Virus Isolated from Community-Acquired Meningitis
(20 March, 2009) Open Pediatric Medicine Journal
Early Results of Combined and Staged Coronary Bypass and Carotid Endarterectomy in Advanced Age Patients in Single Centre
(20 March, 2009) Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal
Proteomic Analyses of Contrast Media – Treated Mesangial Cell
(19 March, 2009) Open Proteomics Journal
The Evolution of Viruses in Multi-Host Fitness Landscapes
(19 March, 2009) Open Virology Journal
A Microarray Based Approach for the Identification of Common Foodborne Viruses
(19 March, 2009) Open Virology Journal
Effects of Preparation Conditions on Surface and Catalytic Properties of Copper and Zinc Mixed Oxides System
(19 March, 2009) Open Catalysis Journal
Field Evaluation of Calypte's AWARE™ Blood Serum Plasma (BSP) and Oral Mucosal Transudate (OMT) Rapid Tests for Detecting Antibodies to HIV-1 and 2 in Plasma and Oral Fluid
(19 March, 2009) Open AIDS Journal
Theoretical Verification Necessity of Leakage Currents Using Sm Doped Ceria Electrolytes in SOFCs
(19 March, 2009) Open Materials Science Journal
Design of Peptide Nanoparticles Using Simple Protein Oligomerization Domains
(19 March, 2009) Open Nanomedicine Journal
Sub-Chronic Toxicity Study of Fixed Dose Combination of Ofloxacin-Ornidazole in Mus Musculus Mice
(19 March, 2009) Open Toxicology Journal
Cashew Tree Bark Secretion – Persectives for its Use in Protein Isolation Strategies
(18 March, 2009) Open Glycoscience
Therapeutic Application of Botulinum Toxin in Clinical Practice
(18 March, 2009) Open General & Internal Medicine Journal
The Effects of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis are Sustained Over Time
(18 March, 2009) Open General & Internal Medicine Journal
Metabolic Syndrome and Incidence of Stroke
(18 March, 2009) Open General & Internal Medicine Journal
Is Medical Concern about Hookah Environmental Tobacco Smoke Hazards Warranted ?
(18 March, 2009) Open General & Internal Medicine Journal
Growth of Six Begonia Species Under Shading
(18 March, 2009) Open Horticulture Journal
Continuous and Short Fiber Reinforced Composite in Root Post-Core System of Severely Damaged Incisors
(18 March, 2009) Open Dentistry Journal
Gastroenteroviruses Infection in Taiwan
(18 March, 2009) Open Infectious Diseases Journal
An Application of Latent Class Analysis in the Measurement of Falling Among a Community Elderly Population
(18 March, 2009) Open Geriatric Medicine Journal
A Review of the Value Relevance Literature
(18 March, 2009) Open Business Journal
Estimation of the Abundance and Population Structure of the Purple Snail Plicopurpura pansa (Gould, 1853) Comparing Two Methods
(18 March, 2009) Open Marine Biology Journal
Globalization of Dietary Wild Foods Protect against Cardiovascular Disease and all Cause Mortalities? A Scientific Satement from the International College of Cardiology, Columbus Paradigm Institute and the International College of Nutrition
(18 March, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
Reliability of Passive Hip Extension Mechanical Parameters in Healthy Subjects
(18 March, 2009) Open Rehabilitation Journal
Temporomandibular Joint Remodeling for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - A Clinical Case Study
(18 March, 2009) Open Rehabilitation Journal
Somatosensory Evoked Magnetic Fields in Patients with ‘Complete’ Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
(18 March, 2009) Open Rehabilitation Journal
The Effects of Motivational/Reward System and a Spelling Racetrack on Spelling Performance in General Education: A Case Report
(18 March, 2009) Open Education Journal
The Quest for a Fundamental Algorithm in X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis and Calibration
(18 March, 2009) Open Spectroscopy Journal
Temperature-Dependent Excited State Absorption in DNA and LNA Oligomers Supports an Emerging Model of Excited State Dynamics in DNA
(18 March, 2009) Open Spectroscopy Journal
Perceived Benefits of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Whole Systems Research Perspective
(18 March, 2009) Open Complementary Medicine Journal
A Cell-Based β-Lactamase Reporter Gene Assay for the CREB Signaling Pathway
(17 March, 2009) Current Chemical Genomics
The Gate Distribution
(17 March, 2009) Open Mathematics Journal
Short-Term Analysis of Human Dental Pulps After Direct Capping with Portland Cement
(17 March, 2009) Open Dentistry Journal
Regulation of clpQ+Y+ (hslV+U+) Gene Expression in Escherichia coli
(17 March, 2009) Open Microbiology Journal
Effect of Effluents From Warri Refinery Petrochemical Company WRPC on Water and Soil Qualities of "Contiguous Host" and "Impacted on Communities" of Delta State, Nigeria
(17 March, 2009) Open Environmental Pollution & Toxicology Journal
One-Pot Synthesis of Substituted Coumarins Catalyzed by Silica Gel Supported Sulfuric Acid Under Solvent-Free Conditions
(17 March, 2009) Open Catalysis Journal
Polytungstozincate Acid: A New and Efficient Catalyst for the Synthesis of Xanthenes Under Solvent-Free Conditions
(17 March, 2009) Open Catalysis Journal
Increase of Taxol Production in Taxus globosa Shoot Callus by Chlorocholine Chloride
(17 March, 2009) Open Natural Products Journal
The Use of Claims Data in Healthcare Research
(17 March, 2009) Open Public Health Journal
Co-Infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis in Symptomatic South African Men with Urethritis:Implications for Syndromic Management
(17 March, 2009) Open Tropical Medicine Journal
Mitochondrial Superoxide Dismutase Activity in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
(17 March, 2009) Open Spine Journal
Breast Feeding Pattern may be Associated with Persistent Low Back Pain and Pelvic Pain Half a Year Postpartum
(17 March, 2009) Open Epidemiology Journal
A Theoretical Approach to the Deposition of Cancer-Inducing Asbestos Fibers in the Human Respiratory Tract
(17 March, 2009) Open Lung Cancer Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Nickel Complexes Containing Tetrathiafulvalene Units
(13 March, 2009) Open Textile Journal
On-Line Determination of Cyclophosphamide in Blood Samples Utilizing Microextraction by Packed Sorbent and Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MEPS-LC-MS/MS)
(13 March, 2009) Open Spectroscopy Journal
Comparative Research on Urban Political Conflict: Policy Amidst Polarization
(13 March, 2009) Open Urban Studies Journal
Straddle Injury in Girls. A Pilot Study Testing Potential for an Injury Surveillance Registry
(13 March, 2009) Open Pediatric Medicine Journal
The Relationship Between Body Weight and Objective Measures of Airway Obstruction in Children
(13 March, 2009) Open Pediatric Medicine Journal
Hypertension in Hemodialysis. An Overview on Physiopathology and Therapeutic Approach in Adults and Children
(13 March, 2009) Open Urology & Nephrology Journal
Deregulated Aiolos Expression in Common Variable Immunodeficiency
(13 March, 2009) Open Immunology Journal
Diethylphthalate, Possible Interactions in Fetal Brain Development
(13 March, 2009) Open Toxicology Journal
Thermogravimetric Study of Oxide Spallation for Chromium-Rich Cast Cobalt-Based and Iron-Based Alloys Oxidized at High Temperature
(13 March, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Corrosion Behavior of Copper in Chloride Media
(13 March, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Eosin as Corrosion Inhibitor for Carbon Steel in Well Water
(13 March, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Oxygenogenesis, a Defence Mechanism of the Newt for Surviving Anoxic Stress
(13 March, 2009) Open Zoology Journal
Single Particle Schrodinger Fluid and Moments of Inertia of the Even-Even Uranium Isotopes
(13 March, 2009) Open Applied Mathematics Journal
Controllability of Damped Second Order Semi-linear Neutral Functional Differential Inclusions in Banach Spaces
(13 March, 2009) Open Automation and Control Systems Journal
The Use of Molecular Markers (p16, Ki-67 and E-Cadherin) in Uterine Cervical Biopsies
(13 March, 2009) Open Pathology Journal
The Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene (DRD4) is Associated with Attentional Bias in Heroin Abusers and Cigarette Smokers
(13 March, 2009) Open Addiction Journal
Melatonin Ameliorates Cadmium-Induced Oxidative Damage and Morphological Changes in the Kidney of Rat
(13 March, 2009) Open Neuroendocrinology Journal
Quantitative Analysis of the Expression of Human N-myristoyltransferase 1 (hNMT-1) in Cancers
(13 March, 2009) Open Biomarkers Journal
Different Meta-Analysis Methods, Different Answers: The Case of Exercise for Older Acute Medical Patients
(13 March, 2009) Open Geriatric Medicine Journal
Constructed Wetlands for the Pre-Treatment of Drinking Water Obtained from Coal Mines
(12 March, 2009) Open Environmental Engineering Journal
Assessing Social Concerns Over the Impact of Popular Music and Music Video:A Review of Scholarly Research
(12 March, 2009) Open Social Science Journal
The Assessment and Selection of Potential Rehabilitation Patients in Acute Hospitals: A Literature Review and Commentary
(12 March, 2009) Open Rehabilitation Journal
A Community Based Study of Sport and Recreation-Related Injuries Treated in Hospital Emergency Department in Finland
(12 March, 2009) Open Sports Medicine Journal
Increased Willingness to Undergo Colorectal Cancer Screening When Offered a Paid Day Off from Work Among Inner City Hospital Employees
(12 March, 2009) Open Gastroenterology Journal
Usefulness of a Diluted Prothrombin Time for Accurately Diagnosing Antiphospholipid Syndrome
(12 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
The Antioxidant Phytochemicals of Nutraceutical Importance
(12 March, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
The Modifying Effects of A Calcium-rich Whey Protein Supplement (OsoLean™ Powder) on Weight Loss and Waist Circumference in Overweight Subjects: A Preliminary Study
(12 March, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
Birth Order, Traits and Emotions in the Sibling System as Predictive Factors of Couple Relationships
(12 March, 2009) Open Family Studies Journal
Telemedicine in Critical Care
(12 March, 2009) Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Monitoring Patient/Ventilator Interactions: Manufacturer`s Perspective
(12 March, 2009) Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Indacaterol, A Novel Once Daily Inhaled ß2-Adrenoreceptor Agonist
(12 March, 2009) Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
New Concepts in the Invasive and Non Invasive Evaluation of Remodelling of the Right Ventricle and Pulmonary Vasculature in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
(12 March, 2009) Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
New Pharmacologic Perspectives in Pneumology: Beclomethasone-Formoterol Extrafine
(12 March, 2009) Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Triacylglycerol Metabolization during Germination of Sea Buckthorn Seeds
(11 March, 2009) Open Plant Science Journal
Assessment of Photosynthesis Tolerance to Herbicides, Heat and High Illumination by Fluorescence Imaging
(11 March, 2009) Open Plant Science Journal
Oxidation of Valine by N-Bromophthalimide in Presence of Chloro-Complex of Pd(II) as Homogenous Catalyst: A Kinetic and Mechanistic Study
(11 March, 2009) Open Catalysis Journal
Determination of Rate Parameters of Complex Reactions by POLYMATH
(11 March, 2009) Open Catalysis Journal
Applications of Zinc Oxide Nanorods as Photocatalyst for the Decontamination of Imidacloprid and Spirotetramat Residues in Water
(11 March, 2009) Open Catalysis Journal
Wind Wave Effects on Hydrodynamic Modeling of Ocean Circulation in the South China Sea
(11 March, 2009) Open Civil Engineering Journal
The WMS Assistant: A Windows Program to Aid in Writing WMS-III Reports
(11 March, 2009) Open Psychology Journal
Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition Enhances Activation of T Helper Type 1 Responses During Salmonella Infection
(11 March, 2009) Open Microbiology Journal
A Practioner Guide To The Unfair Competition Law In Jordan
(11 March, 2009) Open Law Journal
Crimes Against Humanity in Iraq: The Case Against Iran
(11 March, 2009) Open Law Journal
Physical Fitness and Anthropometric Characteristics in Different Levels of Young Team Handball Players
(11 March, 2009) Open Sports Sciences Journal
Examination of the Utility of the High Throughput In Vitro Metabolic Stability Assay to Estimate In Vivo Clearance in the Mouse
(11 March, 2009) Open Drug Metabolism Journal
Energy Use and Environmental Impact of New Alternative Fuel Mix in Electricity Generation in Malaysia
(11 March, 2009) Open Renewable Energy Journal
Pairs of Creatine Kinase Serum Activity
(11 March, 2009) Open Clinical Chemistry Journal
The Chemical Investigations of the Mangrove Plant Avicennia marina and its Endophytes
(11 March, 2009) Open Natural Products Journal
Scale and Corrosion Prevention in Cooling Water Systems Part I: Calcium Carbonate
(11 March, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Scale and Corrosion Prevention in Cooling Water Systems Part II: Calcium Sulphate
(11 March, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Green Approach to Corrosion Inhibition by Black Pepper Extract in Hydrochloric Acid Solution
(11 March, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
An Exceptional Case of Aortic Dissection Resulting Left Ventricular Dysfunction Related to Dynamic Obstruction of Left Main Coronary Artery
(11 March, 2009) Open Cardiovascular Imaging Journal
NSM CFRP Strips for Shear Strengthening of RC Beams: Tests and Mechanical Model
(09 March, 2009) Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
The Role of Interface Domain Interactions on Thermal Stability of DNA polymerase I ITB-1
(09 March, 2009) Open Structural Biology Journal
Rotationally Variant Grating Writing in Photonic Crystal Fibres
(09 March, 2009) Open Optics Journal
Family Illness History, Obstetric Complications and Age of Onset in Bipolar Patients
(09 March, 2009) Open Neuropsychopharmacology Journal
Development of Improved Models for Imputing Missing Traffic Counts
(09 March, 2009) Open Transportation Journal
TLR Cross-Talk Mechanism of Hemorrhagic Shock-Primed Pulmonary Neutrophil Infiltration
(06 March, 2009) Open Critical Care Medicine Journal
Hyperammonemia from a Urea Cycle Disorder Presenting in Adulthood
(06 March, 2009) Open Critical Care Medicine Journal
Molecular Genetics of Human Personality Traits for Psychiatric, Behavioral,and Substance-Related Disorders
(06 March, 2009) Open Translational Medicine Journal
Alterations in Aggregation Parameters of Erythrocytes Due to Hyper Cholesterol in Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus
(06 March, 2009) Open Circulation & Vascular Journal
The Ethical Dimension of the German Federal Constitutional Court's Decision Concerning Data Retention
(06 March, 2009) Open Ethics Journal
Measuring the Ethical Levels of Special Education Teachers
(06 March, 2009) Open Ethics Journal
An Assessment of Time Dependence of Defibrillator Benefit After Coronary Revascularization
(06 March, 2009) Open Pacing, Electrophysiology & Therapy Journal
Gender Differences in the Management of Diabetic Patients with Hypertension and Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease
(06 March, 2009) Open Diabetes Journal
Cerebrovascular Disease and its Relationship to Other Vascular Beds: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
(06 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
Cardiovascular Risk by Gender in an Italian Pilot Study
(06 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
Promoting Women`s Heart Health by Screening for Vascular Risk Factors Among Middle-Aged Women: Methods and Baseline Results from a Preventive Trial
(06 March, 2009) Vascular Disease Prevention
Update of Food-Cobalamin Malabsorption and Oral Cobalamin Therapy
(06 March, 2009) Open General & Internal Medicine Journal
Pseudoaneurysm of the Femoral Artery – An Unusual Presentation of Behcet's Disease
(06 March, 2009) Open General & Internal Medicine Journal
Mind-Body Medicine and Immune System Outcomes: A Systematic Review
(06 March, 2009) Open Complementary Medicine Journal
Response Equation Based Thermochemical Analysis of Singlet Bipolaron Structures in Oligo(3-Methyl-Thiophenes)
(06 March, 2009) Open Physical Chemistry Journal
Cutaneous Connective Tissue Diseases: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment
(06 March, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
Syndecans and CD44 in Normal Human Keratinocyte Cultures: Modulation with Medium Composition and All-trans Retinoic Acid
(06 March, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
Dihydroxyacetone and Methods to Improve its Performance as Artificial Tanner
(06 March, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
Adulterants and Diluents in Heroin, Amphetamine, and Cocaine Found on the Illicit Drug Market in Aarhus, Denmark
(06 March, 2009) Open Forensic Science Journal
Proteolytic Degradation of Silk Fibroin Scaffold by Protease XXIII
(06 March, 2009) Open Macromolecules Journal
Nonisothermal Crystallization Behavior of In-Situ Formed Polyethylene/Montmorillonite (PE/MMT) Nanocomposites Through Ethylene Copolymerization
(06 March, 2009) Open Macromolecules Journal
Chilling Injury of Sweet Potato Shoots Reduced by Prior Incubation of H2O2 and NaCl
(06 March, 2009) Open Horticulture Journal
Integrated Effects of Root-Zone Temperatures and Phosphorus Levels on Aeroponically-Grown Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in the Tropics
(06 March, 2009) Open Horticulture Journal
Variation in the Essential Oils in Different Leaves of Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) at Day Time
(06 March, 2009) Open Horticulture Journal
Biological and Economic Efficiency of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) Intercropped with Vegetable Amaranthus (Amaranthus tricolor L.)
(06 March, 2009) Open Horticulture Journal
Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Images of Disk Positions and Deformities in 1,265 Patients with Temporomandibular Disorder
(06 March, 2009) Open Dentistry Journal
Effect of Flask Closure Method and Post-Pressing Time on the Displacement of Maxillary Denture Teeth
(06 March, 2009) Open Dentistry Journal
Acidogenic Potential of “Sugar-Free” Cough Drops
(06 March, 2009) Open Dentistry Journal
Primary Structure Revision and Active Site Mapping of E. Coli IsoleucyltRNA Synthetase by Means of Maldi Mass Spectrometry
(06 March, 2009) Open Biochemistry Journal
Release of the Pro-Inflammatory Markers by BEAS-2B Cells Following In Vitro Exposure to Biodiesel Extracts
(06 March, 2009) Open Toxicology Journal
Potential for the Use of Exogenous Chemical Elicitors in Disease and Insect Pest Management of Conifer Seedling Production
(06 March, 2009) Open Forest Science Journal
Histamine, Histamine Receptors, and their Role in Immunomodulation:An Updated Systematic Review
(04 March, 2009) Open Immunology Journal
NAD+-Consuming Enzymes in the Regulation of Lung Immune Responses
(04 March, 2009) Open Immunology Journal
Status of Antioxidant Enzymes and Lipid Peroxidation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Micro Vascular Complications
(04 March, 2009) Open Endocrinology Journal
ANCA-Positive Patients: The Influence of PR3 and MPO Antibodies on Survival Rate and The Association with Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics
(04 March, 2009) Open Rheumatology Journal
Weak and Strong Unintended Consequences: Agent's Rationality and Predictability of Outcomes in Systems of Action
(04 March, 2009) Open Sociology Journal
Pectin and Pectinases: Production, Characterization and Industrial Application of Microbial Pectinolytic Enzymes
(03 March, 2009) Open Biotechnology Journal
Key Factors in Selecting an International Freight Forwarding Company
(03 March, 2009) Open Transportation Journal
Pregnancy Outcomes Among HIV-Infected Women Undergoing Antiretroviral Therapy
(03 March, 2009) Open AIDS Journal
TGF-β Made Easy
(03 March, 2009) Open Urology & Nephrology Journal
Aspirin Impairs Transport of Protective Osmolytes in Renal Inner Medullary Collecting Duct Cells
(03 March, 2009) Open Urology & Nephrology Journal
Setbacks in the Clinical Development of TRPV1 Antagonists: What Next?
(03 March, 2009) Open Drug Discovery Journal
Direct Osmosis for Reverse Osmosis Fouling Control: Principles, Applications and Recent Developments
(03 March, 2009) Open Chemical Engineering Journal
Phytase Expressed by pIAβ8 and pGAPZαA Vectors and Analysis of its Biochemical Characters
(03 March, 2009) Open Biotechnology Journal
Bone Marrow Transplantation
(03 March, 2009) Open Biotechnology Journal
Professional Driving and Adverse Reproductive Outcomes: The Evidence to Date and Research Challenges
(02 March, 2009) Open Occupational Health & Safety Journal
Hot Topic: Advances in XML and Internet Computing
(27 February, 2009) Open Information Science Journal
Metaheuristic Algorithms for Task Assignment in Distributed Computing Systems: A Comparative and Integrative Approach
(27 February, 2009) Open Artificial Intelligence Journal
Sudden Deafness Caused by Lifestyle Stress: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and New Therapeutic Perspectives
(27 February, 2009) Open Otorhinolaryngology Journal
Low Efficacy of Vocamine (MMH8®, Pediatric Formulation) in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum Malaria
(27 February, 2009) Open Tropical Medicine Journal
Animal Hygiene and Animal Health in Dairy Cattle Operations
(27 February, 2009) Open Veterinary Science Journal
An Investigation into the Cognitive Deficits Associated with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
(27 February, 2009) Open Neurology Journal
Serum Neuregulin-1ß as a Biomarker of Cardiovascular Fitness
(27 February, 2009) Open Biomarkers Journal
Prevalence and Genotypic Identification of Human Papillomavirus Infection in a Population from Northwestern Spain
(27 February, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
Preparation and Evaluation of [55Co](II)DTPA for Blood Cell Labeling
(27 February, 2009) Open Inorganic Chemistry Journal
Considerations About European Directives and Italian Regulation on Sludge from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants: Current Status and Future Prospective
(27 February, 2009) Open Waste Management Journal
Escape of the Atmosphere of Rotating Planet
(27 February, 2009) Open Astronomy Journal
Precursor Tsunami Signals Detected by Elephants
(26 February, 2009) Open Conservation Biology Journal
Cardiac Health Diagnosis Using Higher Order Spectra and Support Vector Machine
(26 February, 2009) Open Medical Informatics Journal
Toward an Understanding of High Performance Pharmaceutical Policy Systems:A “Triple-A” Framework and Example Analysis
(26 February, 2009) Open Health Services and Policy Journal
Elastin in the Avian Lungs
(26 February, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
Quantification of CD4+ CD25+ Regulatory T Cells in Peripheral Blood of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis
(26 February, 2009) Open Autoimmunity Journal
Effect of Asparagus Racemosus Willd Root Extract on Ovariectomized Rats
(26 February, 2009) Open Natural Products Journal
Disruption of Rankl/Rank Signaling Reduces TNF-Induced Joint Inflammation In Vivo
(26 February, 2009) Open Arthritis Journal
Cytoprotective Activity of Cissus quadrangularis Linn Variant I Against Gastric and Duodenal Ulcer in Rat Models
(26 February, 2009) Open Complementary Medicine Journal
Volterra Type Integral Equation by the Whittaker Cardinal Expansion
(26 February, 2009) Open Cybernetics & Systemics Journal
Gravity Effects in Inclined Air Showers Induced by Cosmic Neutrinos
(26 February, 2009) Open Astronomy Journal
Comment on Propagation and Dissipation of Alfven Waves in Coronal Holes
(26 February, 2009) Open Astronomy Journal
ShopTalk: Independent Blind Shopping Through Verbal Route Directions and Barcode Scans
(26 February, 2009) Open Rehabilitation Journal
The Use of IIEF-5 for Reporting Erectile Dysfunction Following Nerve-Sparing Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
(26 February, 2009) Open Prostate Cancer Journal
A Selective Policy Ensures Safe Integration of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection into the Practice of a Newly Appointed Consultant Surgeon
(26 February, 2009) Open Colorectal Cancer Journal
The Role of Myeloperoxidase in Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Associated Liver Cirrhosis
(26 February, 2009) Open Tropical Medicine Journal
Multi-Source Multi-Sensor Image Fusion Based on Bootstrap Approach and SEM Algorithm
(25 February, 2009) Open Remote Sensing Journal
Relative Bioavailability of Zinc in Yogurt Using Body Weight Gain, Femur Weight and Bone Zinc Content in Rats as Markers
(25 February, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
Natural Fragmentation Model of Zirab Coals, Iran
(25 February, 2009) Open Geology Journal
Opto-Mechanical Manipulation of Stem Cells
(25 February, 2009) Open Nanomedicine Journal
The Resilience Scale: A Duplication Study in Japan
(25 February, 2009) Open Family Studies Journal
Research Student Supervision: An Approach to Good Supervisory Practice
(25 February, 2009) Open Education Journal
The Effect of the Third Element Cr on Oxidation Behavior of Fe-xCr-10Al(at.%) Alloys at 900°C
(25 February, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Development of a Liquid-Liquid Extraction Procedure for the Analysis of Amphetamine in Biological Specimens by GC-FID
(24 February, 2009) Open Forensic Science Journal
Correlation of High Pressure Density Behaviors for Fluid Mixtures made of Carbon Dioxide with Solvent at 313.15 K
(24 February, 2009) Open Thermodynamics Journal
The Caloric Contribution of Protein-Containing Foods
(24 February, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Concentration of Coenzyme Q10 in Clinical Practice,A Breaking News Finding in Humans
(24 February, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Coryneform Bacteria Isolated from Semen
(24 February, 2009) Open Infectious Diseases Journal
Calcium-Induced Conformational Transition of Trout Ependymins Monitored by Tryptophan Fluorescence
(24 February, 2009) Open Biochemistry Journal
Neurobiology of Pain in Children: An Overview
(24 February, 2009) Open Biochemistry Journal
Editorial [Pharmacoeconomics & Health Economics: Opening Access to Science and Practice]
(23 February, 2009) Open Pharmacoeconomics & Health Economics Journal
An XPS Study on Hg-Doping Effect on Electronic Structure of BaPb0.75Bi0.25O3 Superconductor
(23 February, 2009) Open Superconductors Journal
Low Strength of Correlation between the Intensity of Neutrophil Elastase Expression in Lesional Skin and the Level of Serum IgA Antibodies to Epidermal Transglutaminase in Dermatitis Herpetiformis
(23 February, 2009) Open Autoimmunity Journal
Beneficial Effects of Herbal Medicine (Kampo) on Susceptibility to Infection in a Patient with Immunoglobulin Deficiency
(23 February, 2009) Open Pediatric Medicine Journal
c-Fos or pERK, Which is a Better Marker for Neuronal Activation and Central Sensitization After Noxious Stimulation and Tissue Injury?
(23 February, 2009) Open Pain Journal
Interleukin-1β Induces Long-Term Potentiation of C-Fiber Evoked Field Potentials in Spinal dorsal Horn in Rats with Neuropathic Pain
(23 February, 2009) Open Pain Journal
Adding Hydroxyurea to Imatinib is Effective in Patients with Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Resistant to Imatinib Alone
(20 February, 2009) Open Leukemia Journal
Effects of LY379268, A Selective Agonist of mGLu2/3 Receptors, on Isolation-Induced Aggression in Male Mice
(20 February, 2009) Open Pharmacology Journal
Evaluation of Rainfall Measurements from the WXT510 Sensor for Use in the Oklahoma City Micronet
(20 February, 2009) Open Atmospheric Science Journal
Investigation of the Ability of the Corrosion Protection of Zn-Mg Coatings
(20 February, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Study of Oxide Film Formed in a Pre Cracked CT Specimen of AISI 304L During a Rising Displacement Test in 288°C Water
(20 February, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Raloxifene: Mechanism of Action, Effects on Bone Tissue, and Applicability in Clinical Traumatology Practice
(20 February, 2009) Open Orthopaedics Journal
Maternal Factors Associated with Smoking and Inappropriate Weight Gain During Pregnancy
(20 February, 2009) Open Epidemiology Journal
Do Genetic Alterations in Sex Steroid Receptors Contribute to Lacrimal Gland Disease in Sjogren's Syndrome?
(20 February, 2009) Open Endocrinology Journal
Evidence for Excitatory and Inhibitory Amino Acids Participation in the Neuropharmacological Activity of Alpha- and Beta-Amyrin Acetate
(20 February, 2009) Open Pharmacology Journal
Migraine can be Managed with Virtual Scanning: Case Report
(19 February, 2009) Open Complementary Medicine Journal
Therapeutic Microinjection of Autologous Adult Human Neural Stem Cells and Differentiated Neurons for Parkinson's Disease: Five-Year Post-Operative Outcome
(19 February, 2009) Open Stem Cell Journal
Deicer Impacts on Pavement Materials: Introduction and Recent Developments
(19 February, 2009) Open Civil Engineering Journal
Remarks on the Current Theory of Shear Strength of Variable Depth Beams
(19 February, 2009) Open Civil Engineering Journal
Retrofitting of RC Beams with Externally Bonded Simcon Laminates
(19 February, 2009) Open Civil Engineering Journal
Assessing the Bearing Capacity of Cast Laterite in Compression and Flexure
(19 February, 2009) Open Civil Engineering Journal
Effect of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 and Doxycycline on the Differentiation of Osteoprogenitors from Human Femoral Bone
(19 February, 2009) Open Bone Journal
Antiarthritis Activity of Aristolochia Bracteata Extract in Experimental Animals
(19 February, 2009) Open Natural Products Journal
Carcinogenesis and Aging
(19 February, 2009) Open Longevity Science
Piggyback Technique with and without Inferior Vena Cava Cross-Clamping for Orthotopic Liver Transplant
(18 February, 2009) Open Transplantation Journal
Cost-Effective Skyhook Control for Semiactive Vehicle Suspension Applications
(18 February, 2009) Open Mechanical Engineering Journal
Vitamin D Deficiency as an Ignored Cause of Hypocalcemia in Acute Illness: Report of 2 Cases and Review of Literature
(18 February, 2009) Open Endocrinology Journal
Significance of CH/p Interactions on the Stability of Therapeutic Proteins
(18 February, 2009) Open Structural Biology Journal
Improved Protein Crystal Detection in Detergent and Lipidic Meso-Phases
(18 February, 2009) Open Structural Biology Journal
Neural Network Modeling in Dithiothreitol Reduction and Ion Treatment of Recombinant Human Insulin Obtained from the Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectral Information
(18 February, 2009) Open Bioinformatics Journal
Do Binucleate Cardiomyocytes Have A Role in Myocardial Repair? Insights Using Isolated Rodent Myocytes and Cell Culture
(17 February, 2009) Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal
Reductive Remediation of Pollutants Using Metals
(17 February, 2009) Open Waste Management Journal
Transient Left Ventricular Apical Ballooning Syndrome and Cardiac Dysfunction after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Similar Clinical Entities?
(17 February, 2009) Open Emergency Medicine Journal
Public Accountants' Perceptions of Ethical Work Climate: An Exploratory Study of the Difference Between Partners and Employees within the Instrumental Dimension
(17 February, 2009) Open Ethics Journal
Structural and Optical Properties of Indium Sulfide Thin Films Prepared by Silar Technique
(17 February, 2009) Open Condensed Matter Physics Journal
Effect of Dietary Energy to Protein Ratios on Growth Performance and Feed Efficiency of Juvenile Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)
(17 February, 2009) Open Fish Science Journal
Endogenous Activity Rhythms of Larval Fish Assemblages in a Mangrovefringed Estuary in North Brazil
(13 February, 2009) Open Fish Science Journal
Golgi-Disturbing Agents Lead to the Elimination of Intracellular Toxoplasma gondii
(13 February, 2009) Open Biology Journal
A New General Approach to Quantify Nitrogen Fixation Exemplified for the Baltic Proper
(13 February, 2009) Open Marine Biology Journal
Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks
(13 February, 2009) Open Ecology Journal
Relationship Between Ventilatory Threshold and Cerebral Blood Flow During Maximal Exercise in Humans
(13 February, 2009) Open Sports Medicine Journal
Problems and Counselling Needs of Unemployed Youths in Nigeria
(13 February, 2009) Open Area Studies Journal
Surface Thermodynamics and Extended DLVO Theory of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Cells Adhesion on Pyrite and Chalcopyrite
(13 February, 2009) Open Colloid Science Journal
Differentiation Between Pure Cultures of Streptococcus pyogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa by FT-ICR-MS Volatile Analysis
(13 February, 2009) Open Spectroscopy Journal
Magnetic Behavior at Low Temperature of Carbon Foams Prepared by the Controlled Pyrolysis of Saccharose
(13 February, 2009) Open Materials Science Journal
Adequate Patient Characterization in COPD: Reasons to Go Beyond GOLD Classification
(13 February, 2009) Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Ocimum gratissimum: A Review of its Chemical, Pharmacological and Ethnomedicinal Properties
(13 February, 2009) Open Complementary Medicine Journal
Peak Ground and Joint Forces in Step-Exercise Depending on Step-Pattern and Stepping-Rate
(13 February, 2009) Open Sports Sciences Journal
Modified Bjork Analysis of Lateral Head Radiographs of Southern Chinese
(13 February, 2009) Open Anthropology Journal
Cosmetic Safety: Proposal for the Replacement of In Vivo (Draize) by In Vitro Test
(12 February, 2009) Open Toxicology Journal
Base Stacking Configuration is a Major Determinant of Excited State Dynamics in A.T DNA and LNA
(12 February, 2009) Open Spectroscopy Journal
Fixation of the Cemented Stem: Clinical Relevance of the Porosity and Thickness of the Cement Mantle
(12 February, 2009) Open Orthopaedics Journal
Atmospheric Pressure Plasmas in Resonant Circuits
(12 February, 2009) Open Plasma Physics Journal
Time Course of H2 Production Following Oral Lactose Load in Children with and without Lactose Intolerance
(12 February, 2009) Open Pediatric Medicine Journal
Gadovosfeset Trisodium (Vasovist®) Enhanced MR Lymph Node Detection: Initial Observations
(12 February, 2009) Open Magnetic Resonance Journal
Gene Flow at the Crossroads of Humanity: mtDNA Sequence Diversity and Alu Insertion Polymorphism Frequencies in Uzbekistan
(12 February, 2009) Open Genomics Journal
Molecular Spectroscopic Study of Water Hyacinth Dry Matter
(12 February, 2009) Open Chemical Physics Journal
Size Effect on ESD Threshold and Degradation Behavior of InP Buried Heterostructure Semiconductor Lasers
(12 February, 2009) Open Applied Physics Journal
Environmental Assessment of Bottom Ash from Canadian Coal-Fired Power Plants
(11 February, 2009) Open Environmental & Biological Monitoring Journal
Operational Device and Procedure to Test the Initial Dissolution Rate of Chemicals After Ship Accidents: the Cedre Experimental Column
(11 February, 2009) Open Environmental Pollution & Toxicology Journal
Notes on Variational Minimizing Solutions for the 2-Fixed Center Problems
(11 February, 2009) Open Astronomy Journal
Bio Gas from Textile Cotton Waste - An Alternate Fuel for Diesel Engines
(11 February, 2009) Open Waste Management Journal
End Stage Dementia and Entropy Definition of Suffering
(11 February, 2009) Open Geriatric Medicine Journal
Characterization of Spray Pyrolysed CuInS2 Thin Films
(11 February, 2009) Open Surface Science Journal
Cadmium, Sexually Transmitted Disease, and Risk for Prostate Cancer
(11 February, 2009) Open Epidemiology Journal
Continuous-Time Tracking Filters for the Coordinated Turn Model
(11 February, 2009) Open Aerospace Engineering Journal
Effects of Showing Forest Simulation Results on SFM Preferences of Forest Users in Central Labrador
(11 February, 2009) Open Forest Science Journal
Coping with Saltwater: The Condition of Aquatic Insects in Estuaries as Determined by Gut Content Analysis
(11 February, 2009) Open Marine Biology Journal
Variations and Spurious Correlations Related to DIN, DIP, TN, TP, DIN/DIP and TN/TP in Lakes, Rivers, and Marine Systems
(11 February, 2009) Open Marine Biology Journal
Productive Efficiency and Heterogeneity of Health Care Systems: Results of a Measurement for OECD Countries
(11 February, 2009) Open Economics Journal
Statistical Properties of the Periodogram for Stable Random Field
(11 February, 2009) Open Statistics & Probability Journal
A “Comprehensive” Model for Accelerating the Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) / Wind Turbine (BIWT) Construction Projects in the Kingdom of Bahrain
(11 February, 2009) Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
Outbreak of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Producing the Carbapenemase OXA-58 in Turkey
(10 February, 2009) Open Antimicrobial Agents Journal
Shrinking Water Area in the Wetlands of the Central Valley of Manipur
(10 February, 2009) Open Renewable Energy Journal
Petrophysical Properties Evaluation of Tight Gas Sand Resrvoirs Using NMR and Conventional Openhole Logs
(10 February, 2009) Open Renewable Energy Journal
Optimization of Tilt Angle for Solar Collector to Receive Maximum Radiation
(10 February, 2009) Open Renewable Energy Journal
Differential Pulse Voltammetric and Conductimetric Determination of Diphenylpyraline HCl in Raw Material and Pharmaceutical Preparation
(10 February, 2009) Open Electrochemistry Journal
Dyskinetic Storm Induced by Intra-Operative Deep Brain Stimulator Placement
(10 February, 2009) Open Neurosurgery Journal
Adaptive BEM for Low Noise Propeller Design
(10 February, 2009) Open Acoustics Journal
Characterization of the Metabolic Syndrome in a Multi-Ethnic Sample of Children: Is it Useful?
(10 February, 2009) Open Obesity Journal
Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity among Children and Adolescents in Urban India
(10 February, 2009) Open Obesity Journal
Iridium(III) Catalyzed Oxidation of Benzyl Alcohol by Cerium(IV) Sulphate:A Kinetic and Synthetic Study
(10 February, 2009) Open Catalysis Journal
Alternating Group Coordinator (AGC): An Approach to Improve eXtreme Programming
(10 February, 2009) Open Software Engineering Journal
Characterisation of the Ion Exchange Reaction Between Propranolol-H+ or K+ with Amberlite™ IRP 69 Resin by Both, Isothermal Titration Calorimetry and (Flame) Photometric Equilibrium Analysis
(09 February, 2009) Open Drug Delivery Journal
Expression of CD105 (Endoglin) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Correlation with Intrahepatic Metastasis: Analysis Using Tissue Microarrays and Comparison with Other Endothelial Marker
(09 February, 2009) Open Pathology Journal
Sustained Remission After Combination Therapy with Rituximab and Etanercept in Two Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis After TNF Failure: Case Report
(09 February, 2009) Open Rheumatology Journal
Probing the Electric-Field Modulated Ferroelectric Liquid Crystal Films with Phase-Sensitive Raman Imaging Technique
(09 February, 2009) Open Optics Journal
Electro-Anatomic (CARTO) Mapping for Measurement of Left Atrial Volume:Validation Against Real-Time 3D Echocardiography
(09 February, 2009) Open Cardiovascular Imaging Journal
Theoretical Analysis of Conductivity for Composite Bipolar Plate
(06 February, 2009) Open Fuel Cells Journal
A Computational Aerodynamics Simulation of the NREL Phase II Rotor
(06 February, 2009) Open Mechanical Engineering Journal
Rib Giant Cell Tumour
(06 February, 2009) Open Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Journal
Stimulated Raman Scattering and its Applications in Optical Communications and Optical Sensors
(06 February, 2009) Open Optics Journal
The Effects of Using Direct Instruction Curricula in the Home to Teach Reading Comprehension to a 12-Year-Old Student with Cerebral Palsy
(06 February, 2009) Open Family Studies Journal
Foraging in the Landscape of Fear, the Predator`s Dilemma: Where Should I Hunt?
(05 February, 2009) Open Ecology Journal
Assessing the Capacity of Pension Institutions to Promote Distributive Justice: A “Liberal” Conceptual Framework
(05 February, 2009) Open Social Science Journal
Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we know and what we still Need to know
(05 February, 2009) Open Social Science Journal
Differences in Functional Clustering of Endogenous and Exogenous Substrates Between Members of the CYP1A Subfamily
(05 February, 2009) Open Drug Metabolism Journal
Ischemic Colitis: Characteristics and Predictive Factors of Severity, in Hospital Mortality and Relapse §
(05 February, 2009) Open Gastroenterology Journal
Characterization of a Chicken Embryo-Adapted H9N2 Subtype Avian Influenza Virus
(05 February, 2009) Open Veterinary Science Journal
Removal of Nitrite Ions from Aqueous Solutions Using Conducting Electroactive Polymers
(05 February, 2009) Open Process Chemistry Journal
Physical Performance and Decision Making in Association Football Referees:A Naturalistic Study
(05 February, 2009) Open Sports Sciences Journal
HTS-Compatible β-Lactamase Transcriptional Reporter Gene Assay for Interrogating the Heat Shock Response Pathway
(05 February, 2009) Current Chemical Genomics
The Galvanic Interaction Between a CoCrMo Alloy, Pure Titanium and Two Different Dental Amalgams with Special Attention on the Area Size
(03 February, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
The Use of Polarization Filters to Detect the Edge of the Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty(DSAEK) Graft
(03 February, 2009) Open Ophthalmology Journal
Improvement of Phencyclidine-Induced Cognitive Deficits in Mice by Subsequent Subchronic Administration of Fluvoxamine, but not Sertraline
(03 February, 2009) Open Clinical Chemistry Journal
Recognition and Recall in Low Birth Weight Infants
(03 February, 2009) Open Psychology Journal
Nonfatal Bicycle Accident Risk After an Evening of Alcohol Consumption
(03 February, 2009) Open Addiction Journal
Metaphor Usage in Early Press Coverage of Nanotechnology: Turning Science into Soccer Balls and Human Hair
(30 January, 2009) Open Social Science Journal
Aotearoa New Zealand Kindergarten Parents Reflecting on Kindergarten: 2006-2007
(30 January, 2009) Open Education Journal
Chinese Family Influence on Adolescent Volunteerism Scale: Scale Construction and Some Pioneering Findings in Hong Kong§
(30 January, 2009) Open Family Studies Journal
A Case of Beau's Lines at Even Intervals and Onycholysis Caused by Chemotherapy
(30 January, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
Incidence of Hospitalization Due to Pneumonia in Children Aged Less than 3 Years
(30 January, 2009) Open Infectious Diseases Journal
Photocatalytic Surfaces: Environmental Benefits of Nanotitania§
(30 January, 2009) Open Materials Science Journal
A Case of Native Cytomegalovirus Pancreatitis Following Deceased-Donor Renal Transplantation
(30 January, 2009) Open Transplantation Journal
First Metatarsal Bones as Substitutes for Tibias in Harris Lines Studies on Past Populations
(30 January, 2009) Open Anthropology Journal
Simulations of Ultrasonographic Periodontal Probe Using the Finite Integration Technique
(30 January, 2009) Open Acoustics Journal
Dissociation of Exact and Approximate Calculation in Severe Global Aphasia
(30 January, 2009) Open Neurology Journal
Signal Enhancement of the Central-Transition Signal in Solid-State NMR of Quadrupolar Nuclei with Spin I =5/2 Using Fast Amplitude-Modulated (FAM) Pulse Trains: A Computational Study
(30 January, 2009) Open Magnetic Resonance Journal
Violence Against Young Men and Women: A Vital Health Issue
(30 January, 2009) Open Public Health Journal
Communicable Disease Surveillance during Gujarat, India Earthquake,2001: A Survey
(30 January, 2009) Open Public Health Journal
The Response of Exchange Rate Pass-Through to the Macroeconomic Environment
(29 January, 2009) Open Business Journal
Magnetic Fields Induce Changes in Photosynthetic Pigments Content in Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) Seedlings
(29 January, 2009) Open Agriculture Journal
Air Treatment Techniques for Abatement of Emissions from Intensive Livestock Production
(29 January, 2009) Open Agriculture Journal
Analysis of Three Different Kalman Filter Implementations for Agricultural Vehicle Positioning
(29 January, 2009) Open Agriculture Journal
Estimation of Subcellular Proteomes in Bacterial Species
(29 January, 2009) Open Applied Informatics Journal
Effects of Mg Addition on Phase Transition and Dielectric Properties of Ba(Zr0.05Ti0.95)O3 System
(29 January, 2009) Open Condensed Matter Physics Journal
Tubular Erythropoietin Receptor Expression Mediates Erythropoietin-Induced Renoprotection
(29 January, 2009) Open Hematology Journal
High-Dose Cytarabine-Mitoxantrone Versus Hyper-CVAD in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Burkitt's Lymphoma: A Single Center Experience of Two Induction Regimens
(29 January, 2009) Open Leukemia Journal
High Hydrostatic Pressure for Disinfection of Bone Grafts and Biomaterials:An Experimental Study
(29 January, 2009) Open Orthopaedics Journal
Immaturity and Disease Severity are Independent Risk Factors to Develop Retinopathy of Prematurity
(29 January, 2009) Open Pediatric Medicine Journal
Hydrazonoyl Halides: Their Versatile Biological Activities
(29 January, 2009) Open Bioactive Compounds Journal
Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs) Damaged IgG, a Target for Circulating Autoantibodies in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
(29 January, 2009) Open Glycoscience
Isolation of Milk Oligosaccharides using Solid-Phase Extraction
(29 January, 2009) Open Glycoscience
Time of Day and Length of Antidepressant Drug Administration Influence Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and TrkB Levels in Rat Brain
(29 January, 2009) Open Pharmacology Journal
EM-Based Optimal Maximal Ratio Diversity Combiner for Constant Envelope Signals
(28 January, 2009) Open Signal Processing Journal
Endocardial Injury During Ventricular Assistance with an Intracardiac Microaxial Pump
(28 January, 2009) Open Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Journal
Simulation of Groundwater Flow and the Hydrological Balance of the Tecocomulco Lagoon, Central Mexico
(28 January, 2009) Open Environmental Sciences
A Hydrodynamical Analysis of the Steady-State Shock Model
(28 January, 2009) Open Astronomy Journal
Effect of Intake of Dried Mackerel on Brain Fatty Acid Composition and Passive Avoidance Performance
(28 January, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
Computed Tomographic Angiography as an Adjunct to Digital Subtraction Angiography for the Pre-Operative Assessment of Cerebral Aneurysms
(28 January, 2009) Open Neurology Journal
Editorial [Suppression of Premature Stop Codons for the Treatment of a Subset of Patients with Genetic Disorders]
(27 January, 2009) Journal of Medical Sciences
Molecular Genetics of Human Developmental Brain Disorders of the Arabian Gulf Region
(27 January, 2009) Journal of Medical Sciences
Targeting Endothelial Cell Surface Receptors: Novel Mechanisms of Microvascular Endothelial Barrier Transport
(27 January, 2009) Journal of Medical Sciences
Age-Related Macular Degeneration
(27 January, 2009) Journal of Medical Sciences
Pathogenesis of Hypertension: A Review
(27 January, 2009) Journal of Medical Sciences
The Genetic Research Cycle in Human Disease: The Huntington's Disease Paradigm
(27 January, 2009) Journal of Medical Sciences
Simultaneous Quantitative Analysis of EO9 (Apaziquone) and its Conversion Products EO5a and EO9-Cl in Human and Dog Urine by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry
(27 January, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
Development of Membrane Filter with Oligosaccharide Immobilized by Click Chemistry for Influenza Virus Adsorption
(27 January, 2009) Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal
Encasement of the Left Internal Mammary Arterial Graft to the Left Coronary Artery by Adenosquamous Carcinoma, an Unusual Tumor
(27 January, 2009) Open Cardiovascular Imaging Journal
Role of N-terminal His-rich Domain of Oscillatoria brevis Bxa1 in Both Ag(I)/Cu(I) and Cd(II)/Zn(II) Tolerance
(27 January, 2009) Open Microbiology Journal
An Empirical Framework for Objective Testing for P-Consciousness in an Artificial Agent
(27 January, 2009) Open Artificial Intelligence Journal
Analgesic and astropathic Effects of Salidroside Isolated from Acer tegmentosum Heartwood
(26 January, 2009) Open Bioactive Compounds Journal
Morbidity and Mortality after Emergency and Urgent Colorectal Surgery for Malignant and Benign Disease
(26 January, 2009) Open Colorectal Cancer Journal
The Influence of Language Contact and Vocabulary Knowledge on the Speaking Performance of Japanese Students of English
(26 January, 2009) Open Applied Linguistics Journal
13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Determine Fatty Acid Distribution in Triacylglycerols of Vegetable Oils with “High - Low Oleic Acid” and “High Linolenic Acid”
(26 January, 2009) Open Magnetic Resonance Journal
An Experimental Pharmacokinetic Computer Program to Predict Potential Drug-Drug Interactions
(26 January, 2009) Open Drug Metabolism Journal
Synthesis of Pyrene-Anthracene Conjugated Molecular Rods
(26 January, 2009) Open Organic Chemistry Journal
Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of a-Substituted Serines via Enantiodivergent Transformation
(26 January, 2009) Open Organic Chemistry Journal
Dynamics of Hepatic Melanogenesis in Newts in Recovery Phase from Hypoxia
(26 January, 2009) Open Zoology Journal
Habitat Variation Among Aquatic Gastropod Assemblages of Indiana, USA
(26 January, 2009) Open Zoology Journal
Electrochemical Behavior of Alloys for Fixed Partial Denture
(26 January, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
Does Phenoloxidase Contributed to the Resistance? Selection with Butane-Fipronil Enhanced its Activities from Diamondback Moths
(26 January, 2009) Open Biochemistry Journal
Biomimetic Techniques for Improving Sperm Quality in Animal Breeding: A Review
(23 January, 2009) Open Andrology Journal
Vaccines, Virucides and Drugs Against HIV/AIDS: Hopes and Optimisms for the Future
(23 January, 2009) Open AIDS Journal
Cross-Clade Recognition of HIV-1 CAp24 by CD4+ T Cells in HIV-1-Infected Individuals in Burkina Faso and Germany
(23 January, 2009) Open AIDS Journal
Tractive Performance of LGP-30 Wheeled Vehicle During Straight Motion on Sepang Peat Terrain in Malaysia
(23 January, 2009) Open Transportation Journal
An Evaluation of 0-Group Abundance Indices of Barents Sea Fish Stocks
(23 January, 2009) Open Fish Science Journal
Customer Satisfaction as a Quality Factor in Geriatric Rehabilitation
(23 January, 2009) Open Geriatric Medicine Journal
Serological Testing for Herpes Can Lead to Misinterpretation in Disease Transmission
(23 January, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
Synthesis of 3- Benzylidene, 5-Substituted 3-Benzylidene, 3-Hetarylmethylene and 5-Substituted Hetarylmethylene Derivatives of Indolin-2-ones
(23 January, 2009) Open Organic Chemistry Journal
Modeling Microscopic Chemical Sensors in Capillaries
(23 January, 2009) Open Nanomedicine Journal
A New Configurational Analysis of 1,6,7-triacetoxy-8,13-epoxy-14-labden-11-one Isolated from Plectranthus ornatus Based on NMR and Theoretical Calculations
(23 January, 2009) Open Natural Products Journal
Histomorphological Variation in the Appendicular Skeleton
(22 January, 2009) Open Anthropology Journal
Toxoplasmosis in Sheep: A Potential Risk of Infection Among Residents and Farm Workers in Lajes, Brazil
(22 January, 2009) Open Parasitology Journal
Assessment of Genetic Shielding for Adenovirus Vectors
(22 January, 2009) Open Gene Therapy Journal
New Evidence on the Excess Smoothness of Consumption
(22 January, 2009) Open Economics Journal
Empirical Analysis of Monetary Transmission in Tunisia: What do SVAR Models Tell Us?
(21 January, 2009) Open Economics Journal
Prevention of Postoperative Pulmonary Edema on the Ward by Application of a Central Venous Pressure Rule§
(21 January, 2009) Open Surgery Journal
Three-Dimensional (3D) Visualisation of the Cardiovascular System of Mouse Embryos and Fetus
(21 January, 2009) Open Cardiovascular Imaging Journal
Correlations Between Allergic and Infectious Diseases – Results of the Latest German National Health Survey (NHS98) and the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)
(21 January, 2009) Open Allergy Journal
Salt Modulates Oligomerization Properties of hRad51 and hRad52 Proteins
(21 January, 2009) Open Biology Journal
Reducing Ethnocentrism in U.S. College Students by Completing a Cross-Cultural Psychology Course
(21 January, 2009) Open Social Science Journal
Factors and Criteria to Quantify the Bioproduction Potential of Coastal Areas and Presentation of a Simple Operational Index of Biological Value (IBV) for Coastal Management
(21 January, 2009) Open Marine Biology Journal
Habitat Usage of the Thumbprint Emporer Lethrinus harak (Forsskal, 1775) in an Indo-Pacific Coastal Seascape
(21 January, 2009) Open Marine Biology Journal
Crystal Structure of Bis(5-Chloro-2,4-Dimethoxyanilinium) Tetrachlorozincate Trihydrate
(21 January, 2009) Open Crystallography Journal
Replication of Functional MRI Detection of Deception
(21 January, 2009) Open Forensic Science Journal
Protein Domain Boundary Predictions: A Structural Biology Perspective
(21 January, 2009) Open Biochemistry Journal
A Fall and Near-Fall Assessment and Evaluation System
(21 January, 2009) Open Biomedical Engineering Journal
Flexibility of Tolls for Optimal Flows in Networks with Fixed and Elastic Demands
(21 January, 2009) Open Transportation Journal
Braess`s Paradox and Power-Law Nonlinearities in Five-Arc and Six-Arc Two-Terminal Networks
(21 January, 2009) Open Transportation Journal
Antimyogenic Effect of SARS-CoV Spike Protein in C2C12 Myoblasts
(21 January, 2009) Open Infectious Diseases Journal
Bioavailability of Stabilized Iron (II) Sulfate in an Industrialized Fortified Infant Dessert. Studies in Rats by Means of the Prophylactic-Preventive Method
(21 January, 2009) Open Nutraceuticals Journal
Resonance-Induced Enhancement of the High-Order Harmonic Generation in Plasma
(21 January, 2009) Open Spectroscopy Journal
The Deformation Microstructure and Eutectic Melting Activation Energy of AZ91D Alloy
(21 January, 2009) Open Materials Science Journal
Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Thumb Base in Severe Symptomatic Osteoarthritis: A Comparison with Radiographs and Clinical Symptoms
(21 January, 2009) Open Arthritis Journal
Pityriasis Alba: A Condition with Possibly Multiple Etiologies
(21 January, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
Recommendation for a Simple, Office-Friendly, Standardized Testing for Head Lice
(21 January, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
A Topical Application Containing Sucralfate, Zinc Oxide and Ketoconazole Provides High Patient Satisfaction in the Treatment of Intertrigo
(21 January, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
Accelerated Allogeneic Haemopoietic Engraftment after Preceding Rituximab-Therapy
(21 January, 2009) Open Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Journal
Three Dimensional OCT in the Engineering of Tissue Constructs: A Potentially Powerful Tool for Assessing Optimal Scaffold Structure
(21 January, 2009) Open Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Journal
Contributions of the Ventrolateral Orbital Cortex to Pain-Related Negative Emotion
(21 January, 2009) Open Pain Journal
Evidence Suggesting the Beneficial use of Magnesium in Cerebral Ischaemia in an Experimental Model of Cardiac Arrest
(21 January, 2009) Open Emergency Medicine Journal
Coordination Aspects in Modern Inorganic Chemistry
(21 January, 2009) Open Inorganic Chemistry Journal
Effects of Rifampin on the Disposition of Gepirone ER and Its Metabolites
(16 January, 2009) Open Drug Metabolism Journal
Lux-Flood Basicity of Mixed La2O3-Alkali Molten Carbonates Determined by Analysis of their Oxygen Solubility Properties
(16 January, 2009) Open Physical Chemistry Journal
Glutamate Neurotransmission in Psychotic Disorders and Substance Abuse
(16 January, 2009) Open Psychiatry Journal
Venous Thromboembolism Involving Internal Jugular, Subclavian, Axillar and Brachial Veins in a Patient with Multiple Thrombophilic Defects and Malignancy
(16 January, 2009) Open Atherosclerosis & Thrombosis Journal
Hospital Mortality After Major Amputation of the Lower Limbs for Critical Ischemia
(16 January, 2009) Open Atherosclerosis & Thrombosis Journal
Thrombospondin Inhibits VEGF-Induced Endothelial Survival and Cell Cycle Progression
(16 January, 2009) Open Circulation & Vascular Journal
New Lightning Detection Networks in Poland – LINET and LLDN
(16 January, 2009) Open Atmospheric Science Journal
Mini Open Foraminotomy (MOF) for Cervical Radiculopathy: Technical Note
(16 January, 2009) Open Spine Journal
What Parameters Correlate with the Sense of Knowledge During the Early Phase of a Bird Flu Outbreak in Israel?
(16 January, 2009) Open Epidemiology Journal
Alcohol Dose-Dependently Enhances 3α-Androstanediol Formation in Frontal Cortex of Male Rats Concomitant with Aggression
(15 January, 2009) Open Neuropsychopharmacology Journal
Hospitalised Eye Injuries in New South Wales, Australia
(15 January, 2009) Open Epidemiology Journal
Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in a Patient with Congenital Heart Disease
(15 January, 2009) Open Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Journal
Concomittant Coronary Revascularization and Resection of a Cardiac Tumor
(15 January, 2009) Open Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Journal
Significance of Osteopontin Expression in Human Invasive Breast Tumour Stroma
(15 January, 2009) Open Breast Cancer Journal
A Case of Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia of the Breast Presenting with Chest Pain
(15 January, 2009) Open Breast Cancer Journal
Effect of TEC Variation on GPS Precise Point at Low Latitude
(15 January, 2009) Open Atmospheric Science Journal
Application of ATOVS Radiance with ARW WRF/GSI Data Assimilation System in the Prediction of Hurricane Katrina
(15 January, 2009) Open Atmospheric Science Journal
The 2004 Paralympic Games: Physiotherapy Services in the Paralympic Village Polyclinic
(15 January, 2009) Open Sports Medicine Journal
Analysis of Technology Management Functions in Finnish High Tech Companies
(15 January, 2009) Open Management Journal
Stimulation of Human CD4+ T Lymphocytes via TLR3, TLR5 and TLR7/8 Up-Regulates Expression of Costimulatory and Modulates Proliferation
(15 January, 2009) Open Microbiology Journal
Utilisation of Carbon Sources by Pythium, Phytophthora and Fusarium Species as Determined by Biolog® Microplate Assay
(15 January, 2009) Open Microbiology Journal
Conceiving of an Electrochemical Cell for In Situ Hydrodynamic Approach
(15 January, 2009) Open Chemical Engineering Journal
Model Discrimination in Chemical Kinetics
(15 January, 2009) Open Catalysis Journal
Compressed Air Discharge from a Blowing Unit
(15 January, 2009) Open Mechanical Engineering Journal
Chance Finding of Proteinuria Leads to the Diagnosis of ANCA Associated Vasculitis
(15 January, 2009) Open General & Internal Medicine Journal
Multilineage Differentiation Potential of Bone and Cartilage Cells Derived from Explant Culture
(15 January, 2009) Open Stem Cell Journal
On Moments of the Power Series Distributions
(15 January, 2009) Open Statistics & Probability Journal
Asymptotic Expansion for Inverse Moments of Binomial and Poisson Distributions
(15 January, 2009) Open Statistics & Probability Journal
User Experience of Office Chairs and Anthropometrics of Female Chinese and Hong Kong Chinese Office and Factory Workers
(15 January, 2009) Ergonomics Open Journal
Foot Controls: Riding the Pedal
(15 January, 2009) Ergonomics Open Journal
Enhancement of Extracellular Pullulanase Production by Raoultella planticola DSMZ 4617 Using Optimized Medium Based on Sago Starch
(15 January, 2009) Open Biotechnology Journal
The Intestinal Evacuation and Maximum Daily Consumption of Purified Formulated Diets by Juvenile Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)
(14 January, 2009) Open Fish Science Journal
Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies and “Tumor-Only” Antigens: An Update
(14 January, 2009) Open Immunology Journal
Evolution of the mob Gene Family
(14 January, 2009) Open Cell Signaling Journal
HIV Care Providers' Role Legitimacy as Supporters of Their Patients' Alcohol Reduction
(14 January, 2009) Open Infectious Diseases Journal
Sertaconazole-Loaded Cyclodextrin – Polysaccharide Hydrogels as Antifungal Devices§
(14 January, 2009) Open Drug Delivery Journal
Analysis of Alu Insertion Polymorphism in South Morocco (Souss): Use of Markers in Forensic Science
(14 January, 2009) Open Forensic Science Journal
Intrinsic Motivation in Saudi Learners of English as a Foreign Language#
(14 January, 2009) Open Applied Linguistics Journal
Political Deadlock and Judicial De-Integration in the Single European Pharmaceutical Market
(14 January, 2009) Open Political Science Journal
Management Factors Affecting the Establishment of Pine Based Silvopastures in Southern Grasslands in the United States
(14 January, 2009) Open Forest Science Journal
Comparative Profiling of mRNA and microRNA Expression in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Adult Adipose and Lipoma Tissues
(12 January, 2009) Open Stem Cell Journal
Uses of Bile Salts, Namely Cholate and Deoxycholate for Earwax Removal
(12 January, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
Oral Pigmentation as a Sign of Addison`s Disease: A Brief Reappraisal
(12 January, 2009) Open Dermatology Journal
An Adaptive Least-Squares Mixed Finite Element Method for Fourth- Order Elliptic Equations
(09 January, 2009) Open Numerical Methods Journal
Discrepancy Among Observational Studies: Example of Naproxen-Associated Adverse Events
(09 January, 2009) Open Rheumatology Journal
Fecal Strings Associated with Streptococcus agalactiae Infection in Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus
(09 January, 2009) Open Veterinary Science Journal
Subconjunctival Air Leakage After Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty(DSAEK) in a Post-Trabeculectomy Eye
(09 January, 2009) Open Ophthalmology Journal
Diagonal-SPRITE and Its Applications for In Vivo Imaging at High Field
(09 January, 2009) Open Magnetic Resonance Journal
Viral Encephalitis: Etiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Management
(09 January, 2009) Open Infectious Diseases Journal
Mutual Information as a Measure of Contextual Effects on Single Switch Use
(09 January, 2009) Open Rehabilitation Journal
Truth Commissions in Post-Communism: The Overlooked Solution?
(09 January, 2009) Open Political Science Journal
Malignant Desmoplastic Type Mesothelioma Mimicking a Fibrous Pseudotumor of the Tunica Vaginalis: A Case Report and Literature Review
(09 January, 2009) Open Pathology Journal
Interplanetary Plasma Scattering Diagnostics from Anisotropy-time Profiles of Solar Energetic Particles
(09 January, 2009) Open Plasma Physics Journal
Associations Between Abortion-Records in Goats and Test-Positivity to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis
(06 January, 2009) Open Veterinary Science Journal
A Protection of the Environment Through the Prevention of Surface Cracking
(06 January, 2009) Open Civil Engineering Journal
Mollusks Found Inside Octopus (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) Pots in the State of Ceara, Northeast Brazil
(06 January, 2009) Open Marine Biology Journal
Late Quaternary Caspian: Sea-Levels, Environments and Human Settlement
(06 January, 2009) Open Geography Journal
Synergistic Inhibition Between Polyvinylpyrollidone and Iodide Ions on Corrosion of Aluminium in HCl
(06 January, 2009) Open Corrosion Journal
An Unusual Preferences Among Regression Designs
(06 January, 2009) Open Statistics & Probability Journal
Enhancement in Photoluminescence on Mg Substitution in MgxSr1-xAl2O4: Eu, Nd
(02 January, 2009) Open Applied Physics Journal
Diagnostic Markers for Identifying Sepsis in Patients with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS): A Prospective Study
(02 January, 2009) Open Pediatric Medicine Journal
Application of Cavity Expansion Theory in Predicting Centrifuge Cone Penetration Resistance
(02 January, 2009) Open Civil Engineering Journal
Novel Angiogenic Factors for Predicting Preeclampsia: sFlt-1, PlGF, and Soluble Endoglin
(02 January, 2009) Open Clinical Chemistry Journal
Laboratory Study on Precipitation of Barium Sulphate in Malaysia Sandstone Cores
(02 January, 2009) Open Petroleum Engineering Journal
siRNA-Lipoplex-Mediated Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL Gene Silencing Induces Apoptosis in

MANY MORE:

http://www.bentham.org/open/articles.htm

[ChumpDumper]

How is metal molten if you can pick it up with a crane?

[The Final Countdown]

How is metal molten if you can pick it up with a crane?

Its mixed in with other debris,

Like you really want answers, you just want to take the opposing side no matter how many times we prove you wrong. Your out to get peoples goats.

[Alex Jones]

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-785283.png

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-785065.png

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-777805.png

[ChumpDumper]

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-785283.png

Andrews AFB was not a fighter alert base for the Northeast Air Defense Sector in 2001. Fighters were sent up from Otis AFB, which was a fighter alert base in 2001.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-777805.png

Demolition expert Romero regrets that his comments to the Albuquerque Journal became fodder for conspiracy theorists. "I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building," he tells PM. "I only said that that's what it looked like."

Romero, who agrees with the scientific conclusion that fire triggered the collapses, demanded a retraction from the Journal. It was printed Sept. 22, 2001. "I felt like my scientific reputation was on the line." But emperors-clothes.com saw something else: "The paymaster of Romero's research institute is the Pentagon. Directly or indirectly, pressure was brought to bear, forcing Romero to retract his original statement." Romero responds: "Conspiracy theorists came out saying that the government got to me. That is the farthest thing from the truth. This has been an albatross around my neck for three years."

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=4

[Blake]

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-785283.png

Andrews AFB was not a fighter alert base for the Northeast Air Defense Sector in 2001. Fighters were sent up from Otis AFB, which was a fighter alert base in 2001.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-777805.png

Demolition expert Romero regrets that his comments to the Albuquerque Journal became fodder for conspiracy theorists. "I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building," he tells PM. "I only said that that's what it looked like."

Romero, who agrees with the scientific conclusion that fire triggered the collapses, demanded a retraction from the Journal. It was printed Sept. 22, 2001. "I felt like my scientific reputation was on the line." But emperors-clothes.com saw something else: "The paymaster of Romero's research institute is the Pentagon. Directly or indirectly, pressure was brought to bear, forcing Romero to retract his original statement." Romero responds: "Conspiracy theorists came out saying that the government got to me. That is the farthest thing from the truth. This has been an albatross around my neck for three years."

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=4

mouse isn't really interested in what really took place on 9/11. He's just here to argue with anyone to help cure his boredom.

[Alex Jones]

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-777522.png

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-786743.png

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/vlcsnap-776948.png

[ChumpDumper]

I think he sells bootleg copies of the DVDs for profit.

[ChumpDumper]

Are you going to post every slide from Richard Gage's little show?

Be sure to include his high tech models:

http://www.petersnewyork.com/GAGE1.JPG

[DarrinS]

Are you going to post every slide from Richard Gage's little show?

Be sure to include his high tech models:

http://www.petersnewyork.com/GAGE1.JPG



:lmao

[ClintSquint]

mouse isn't really interested in what really took place on 9/11. He's just here to argue with anyone to help cure his boredom.

:lmao You got that right.

[Galileo]

A danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust (english subtitles)



Niels Harrit and 8 other scientists found nano-thermite in the dust from the World Trade Center.

He is interviewed on danish TV2 News.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o



ALSO



Tomorrow, Saturday April 11th, Dr. Kevin Barrett will be interviewing two key 9/11 eyewitnesses on Truth Jihad Radio, 6-8 pm Eastern (3-5 pm Pacific) at http://www.wfuradio.com.



First hour guest will be Scott Forbes, who worked in the WTC and exposed the 36-hour power-down in the South Tower on the weekend before 9/11. This would have disabled all security systems and allowed "engineers" to come and go at will with (last-minute demolition prep?) equipment. The official story denies this power-down ever happened -- but Forbes is credible and says he has lots of corroborating witnesses, who will presumably come forward when subpoenaed by the upcoming New York City official re-investigation:



http://www.nyccan.org



In the second hour, April Gallop, a survivor of the Pentagon attack who carried an injured baby out the hole in the building and saw no evidence whatsoever of any airplane debris--then was browbeaten in the hospital by security guys insisting she should say it was a plane. April is suing the government for not evacuating the Pentagon even though they were aware an attack was imminent, and will discuss the progress of her lawsuit. She says that based on what she experienced, alongside other evidence, the damage at the Pentagon was done by a bomb, not a passenger aircraft. April is clearly a sincere, credible witness.

[DarrinS]

This is a political forum. Can't they make a bat-shit crazy forum for these threads?

[Galileo]

This is a political forum. Can't they make a bat-shit crazy forum for these threads?

Some dunce on a website thinks he's smarter than a scientist. Nice!

[DarrinS]

Some dunce on a website thinks he's smarter than a scientist. Nice!


Nice autobiographical comment.

[Blake]

Some dunce on a website thinks he's smarter than a scientist. Nice!

some rambling idiot that copies and pastes everything with the numbers 9 1 1 on it thinks he's smarter than the NIST. Even nicer!

[SpursReportSucks]

Some dunce on a website thinks he's smarter than a scientist. Nice!


not only that but theses guys are Architect experts and demolition experts.

[Blake]

not only that but theses guys are Architect experts and demolition experts.

I'm not. You're not. The NIST are the experts.

You're idiots.

[ChumpDumper]

How is metal molten if you can pick it up with a crane?


Its mixed in with other debrisWouldn't it have burned or melted all the other debris?


Like you really want answers, you just want to take the opposing side no matter how many times we prove you wrong. Your out to get peoples goats.When have you proven me wrong?

[Galileo]

Here is another explosive interview with Niels Harrit:

Danish 9/11 truth in MSM with subtitles, Niels Harrit on "GoodMorning Denmark" in december 2007.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jze33vZCpwo

Your jig is up, debunkers. Time to switch, rather than fight.

Further Implications:

1)

Those who are sick from breathing in toxic WTC dust are now known to have breathed in nano-thermite. This paper will be evidence at their lawsuits.

2)

Military grade, explosive nano-thermite is probably a guarded military secret. If so, the military should not have spread 10 tons of it in the World Trade Center.

3)

Some claim the media is in on the conspiracy. Well, I can tell you categorically that Danish TV is not in on the conspiracy!

[Galileo]

The Bentham Open Behavioral Science Journal Editorial Board

ISSN: 1874-2300 Volume 3, 2009

Editor-in-Chief:

Kiyofumi Yamada
Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
Nagoya, Japan

Editorial Advisory Board:

J. Agassi (Israel)
G. Ascoli (USA)
G.J.L. Beckers (Germany)
L.L. Betzig (USA)
D.F. Bjorklund (USA)
S. Blackmore (UK)
J. Boden (New Zealand)
D.L. Boero (Italy)
P. Bouissac (Canada)
C.R. Bramham (Norway)
S. Bråten (Norway)
M. Brüne (Germany)
M.M.C. Brysbaert (UK)
G.M. Burghardt (USA)

etc.

See all 113:

http://www.bentham.org/open/tobsj/EBM.htm

[ChumpDumper]

Tell me what the scientists did to specifically rule out red paint as the material in the chips.

[Galileo]

Tell me what the scientists did to specifically rule out red paint as the material in the chips.

You wouldn't be able to understand it. This is advanced science. PhD Chemists can tell the difference between red paint and thermite.

[ChumpDumper]

You wouldn't be able to understand it. This is advanced science. PhD Chemists can tell the difference between red paint and thermite.Surely you can explain it to us.

[Galileo]

Surely you can explain it to us.

PhD Chemists can tell the difference between red paint and reactive thermite.

You have just been nominated to the idiot of the month club.

[ChumpDumper]

PhD Chemists can tell the difference between red paint and reactive thermite.Then you can tell me how they did it.

Please explain.

[Galileo]

Then you can tell me how they did it.

Please explain.

I don't have a PhD in chemistry. I took 5 credits of engineering chemisty in college, that's it.

Why don't you go play outside with a third-grader's chemistry set?

[ChumpDumper]

So you don't understand anything they wrote?

Ok.

[Galileo]

So you don't understand anything they wrote?

Ok.

Do you think PhD chemists can tell the difference between red paint and thermite?

[ChumpDumper]

After viewing that report, I started to wonder -- that's why I'm asking what they did to specifically rule it out.

[Galileo]

After viewing that report, I started to wonder -- that's why I'm asking what they did to specifically rule it out.

That makes you a paranoid conspiracy theorist.

[ChumpDumper]

That makes you a paranoid conspiracy theorist.From my reading, they didn't exclude the possibility of the chips' being red paint.

If you believe they did, let me know how they did it.

[Galileo]

From my reading, they didn't exclude the possibility of the chips' being red paint.

If you believe they did, let me know how they did it.

Dude; you're crazy.

I suggest you go read about Adam & Eve or join the flat earth society.

[ChumpDumper]

I suggest you go read about the composition of paint.

[Wild Cobra]

Do you think PhD chemists can tell the difference between red paint and thermite?
If you have two colors of paint pigments that are mixed for a specific color, and then a fire burns the nonmetallic components out, it is real easy to have nano thermite type residue.

from wiki: pigment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigment)


Other ISO standards pertain to particular classes or categories of pigments, based on their chemical composition, such as ultramarine pigments, titanium dioxide, iron oxide pigments, and so forth.


Iron oxide pigments: Sanguine, Caput Mortuum, Oxide Red, Red Ochre, Venetian Red, Prussian blue


Ultramarine, originally the semi-precious stone lapis lazuli, has been replaced by an inexpensive modern synthetic pigment manufactured from aluminium silicate with sulfur impurities.

[911]

Proof of explosives!


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/wtc2.gif

[911]

The flash Chump and Blake don't want you to know about!

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/flash399.gif

[911]

Black smoke is a sign oxygen deprived fires,the fire did not burn at full strength .


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/911RippleEffect3.gif

[911]

The pod underneath the belly of the plane proves it was a military aircraft.




http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/pod.gif

[911]

Numerous cameras at the Pentagon and yet we only see a few frames?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/911RippleEffect5.gif

[ChumpDumper]

:sleep

We've been over every one of the issues raised in your bloated GIFs.

Seriously, work on those. They're ridiculous.

[The Power Hour.]

:sleep
We've been over every one of the issues raised in your bloated GIFs.
Seriously, work on those. They're ridiculous.


Translation this 911 person has their shit together I want no part of him.

[911]

:sleep

We've been over every one of the issues raised in your bloated GIFs.

Seriously, work on those. They're ridiculous.

Now you know how the rest of us feel when you and your buddy Blake keep calling us tin foil hat heads that gets old too.

Just admit the 9/11 commission is barely 10% truth and left out much needed information like WTC7 or at least admit the government is not on the up and up and I will stop. If not the GIFs continue......

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/IMAG0246-small.jpg

[Wild Cobra]

Translation this 911 person has their shit together I want no part of him.
No. They have been so thoroughly debunked in years past, I don't remember the details. Chump might, but I don't.

You guys are better at raising the dead than any 9/11 conspiracy evidence.

[Indazone]

The answer lies with building 7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIOM1Dh1AX0

[Alex Jones]

The answer lies with building 7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIOM1Dh1AX0

:tu

[RandomGuy]

:tu

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=57&pictureid=584

[RandomGuy]

Since the 9-11 CTers like to copy and paste ad inifinitum, let's see if we can get some good stuff here.

It might surprise you CTers but there is a whole cottage industry built up around your bullshit.

They don't sell T-shirts, mugs, or crappy videos.

http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6243624912447824934

http://www.911mysteriesguide.com/

http://www.911myths.com/WTC7_Lies.pdf

Here is a gem: The 9-11 "truthers" in their own "like, words". Icky.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7216643725166640147&hl=en

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/

http://wtc.nist.gov/

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

http://www.911myths.com/

Best one out of all the lot so far:
http://www.debunking911.com/

Mike Walter talking about the plane hitting the pentagon, and how irritated he is with the 9-11 "truth" movement for lying about what he said.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycPUDktZpCU

Link to a TON of debunking links:
http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm

Here ARE SOME REALLY PRECIOUS LINKS.

9-11 "truth" scholars turning on each other. You thought they were unstable and kooky when they talk about the government, wait until they start talking about each other.

http://www.911myths.com/html/911_infighting_links.html


Shabby, Self-Serving Internet Reports by Pseudo Journalists and Activists Cause Webb Family Grief - It's Time for Real Journalists and Activists to Shun Demagogues, Hysterics and Profiteers

by

Michael C. Ruppert
A whole page of youtube debunking videos (http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=RKOwens4&p=r)

A whole page of decent debunking links and one of the best ones so far. (http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home)

[RandomGuy]

Either the conspiracy theorists are right about a massive organized evil conspiracy, or they are wrong.

If they are right about 9-11 being planned by an evil government conspiracy willing and capable of killing thousand of their own citizens, they would be just as motivated to keep that fact a secret.

An easy method of doing this is to do a disinformation campaign. All it takes is one or two paid evil guys willing to lie, a computer and some time.

The best way to do such a disinformation campaign is, as the conspiracy theorists themselves point out in my previous post is as follows:

Think of the stupidest shit possible
Present it in such a blatantly false and easily debunked manner that anybody with any common sense at all would recognize it immediately as stupid bullshit
This would then lead normal pepole to then associate all the real conspiracy evidence with this obvious quackery to discredit the whole movement to expose the grand evil conspiracy

IF there is a grand evil conspiracy, THEN at least SOME of the conspiracy "evidence" has been manufactured to be obviously stupid to put people off the trail.

THEREFORE:
IF the evil conpiracy exists AND you say you believe all of the conspiracy "evidence/theories" you MUST either:

1) Be one of those paid disinformation agents, and be lying and evil

or

2) Be too stupid to not recognize the obviously fake stuff that has been planted by the paid disinformation agents.
If there is no massive evil conspiracy then anybody who believes in ALL of the conspiracy theories is definitely too stupid to realize the conspiracy doesn't really exist.

Since no one can be part of something that doesn't exist, if you believe all the conspiracy theories/evidence, and the conspiracy doesn't exist you can't be lying and evil.

In either case it boils down to this:

If you say you believe in all of the conspiracy evidence, you MUST either be

1) A lying evil agent of the conspiracy

or

2) Too stupid to recognize obviously false information when you see it.

There are no other possibilities.

Which is it?

[Illuminati]

truth 10


RandomLie blake wild cobra chump 0

[RandomGuy]

truth 10


RandomLie blake wild cobra chump 0

If you say you believe in all of the conspiracy evidence, you MUST either be

1) A lying evil agent of the conspiracy

or

2) Too stupid to recognize obviously false information when you see it.

[mouse]

Just because someone doesn't think WTC7 fell due to gravity why should you feel you have to insult them, or call them out as a nut?

I think the the government is hiding something about the Pentagon attack why should I be grouped in with the conspiracy nuts?

Your lack of common sense clouds your mind to enable to properly cipher a good honest question from an off the wall theory tells me your small brain is very limited. And i mean that not as an insult, but as an honest observation from your postings I have read.

[ChumpDumper]

Just because someone doesn't think WTC7 fell due to gravity why should you feel you have to insult them, or call them out as a nut?What did you think caused it to fall?


I think the the government is hiding something about the Pentagon attack why should I be grouped in with the conspiracy nuts?What do you think they are hiding?


Your lack of common sense clouds your mind to enable to properly cipher a good honest question from an off the wall theory tells me your small brain is very limited. And i mean that not as an insult, but as an honest observation from your postings I have read.My good, honest question is this:

What do you think really happened on 9/11?

[Winehole23]

I know you asked mouse, but here is my take: I find the official account more plausible, but I do not have confidence that all relevant angles have been investigated yet, nor that what is known has been liberally disclosed.

IMHO, the what really happened question isn't answerable. The 9/11 logomachy is, IMO, a battle between contending myths. I'm plenty skeptical a nuts and bolts understanding of 9/11 will ever be declassified, if it is ever in fact reached to begin with.

Focusing on what made the buildings fall is a red herring IMO. The real questions I want to know is what made our security and intelligence fail, and how did US officials exploit the ensuing insecurity?

I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer to this.

Nor am I convinced that the extraordinary official adjustments to 9/11 will be any more effective against a future attack.

[Winehole23]

Source: THE DEVIL'S DICTIONARY ((C)1911 Released April 15 1993)

LOGOMACHY, n. A war in which the weapons are words and the wounds
punctures in the swim-bladder of self-esteem -- a kind of contest in
which, the vanquished being unconscious of defeat, the victor is
denied the reward of success.

'Tis said by divers of the scholar-men
That poor Salmasius died of Milton's pen.
Alas! we cannot know if this is true,
For reading Milton's wit we perish too.

[Laker Lanny]

I know you asked mouse, but here is my take: I find the official account more plausible, but I do not have confidence that all relevant angles have been investigated yet, nor that what is known has been liberally disclosed.

IMHO, the what really happened question isn't answerable. The 9/11 logomachy is, IMO, a battle between contending myths. I'm plenty skeptical a nuts and bolts understanding of 9/11 will ever be declassified, if it is ever in fact reached to begin with.

Focusing on what made the buildings fall is a red herring IMO. The real questions I want to know is what made our security and intelligence fail, and how did US officials exploit the ensuing insecurity?

I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer to this.

Nor am I convinced that the extraordinary official adjustments to 9/11 will be any more effective against a future attack.


:tu

[Galileo]

Journal of 9/11 Studies

Thank you for visiting The Journal of 9/11 Studies, a peer-reviewed, open-access, electronic-only journal, covering the whole of research related to the events of 11 September, 2001. Many fields of study are represented in the journal, including Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics and Psychology.

52 Articles

The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis
Prof. Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti

Obstacles to Persuasion: Lessons from the Classroom
Mark Vorobej

The Ghost in the Machines: Evidence of Foreknowledge in the WTC Hard Drive Recoveries
Michael Fury

Plausibility Of 9/11 Aircraft Attacks Generated By GPS-Guided Aircraft Autopilot Systems
Aidan Monaghan

The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
Kevin Ryan

9/11 and Probability Theory
Dr. Frank M. Legge

The Impact of the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks on the US Economy
Prof. Olivia A. Jackson

Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction
Dr. Steven E. Jones, Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins, Dr. Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Dr. Crockett Grabbe

Waiting for Seven: WTC 7 Collapse Warnings in the FDNY Oral Histories
Prof. Graeme MacQueen

9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation was Impossible
Dr. Frank Legge and Tony Szamboti, ME

Analysis of the Mass and Potential Energy of World Trade Center Tower 1
Gregory H. Urich

Appeal Filed with NIST, Pursuant to Earlier Request for Correction
James Gourley, Bob McIlvaine, Bill Doyle, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Richard Gage, Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice

Appendix: Sept. 2007 Response to April 2007 RFC, from NIST

Islam and the 9/11 Wars: Steven Jones Interviews Kevin Barrett
Dr. Kevin Barrett and Dr. Steven Jones

9/11, JFK, and War: Recurring Patterns in America’s Deep Events
Prof. Peter Dale Scott

Solving The Great Steel Caper: DEW-Demolition Contrary Evidence
Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins

Supplemental: DEW-Demolition Contrary Evidence
Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins

9/11 Commission Deception, Cheney’s Actions on 9/11, and Why He Should Testify Under Oath
Prof. Peter Dale Scott

9/11 – Proof of Explosive Demolition without Calculations
Frank Legge, Ph.D.

Conspiracy Theories, Myths, Skepticism, and 9/11: their Impact on Democracy
Frank Legge, Ph.D.

Faulty Towers of Belief: Part II. Rebuilding the Road to Freedom of Reason
Laurie A. Manwell, M.Sc.

Direct Evidence for Explosions: Flying Projectiles and Widespread Impact Damage
Dr. Crockett Grabbe

High Velocity Bursts of Debris From Point-Like Sources in the WTC Towers
Kevin Ryan

Why Did the World’s Most Advanced Electronics Warfare Plane Circle Over The White House on 9/11?
Mark H. Gaffney

Some Physical Chemistry Aspects of Thermite, Thermate, Iron-Aluminum-Rich Microspheres, the Eutectic, and the Iron-Sulfur System as Applied to the Demise of Three World Trade Center Buildings on 9/11/2001
Jerry Lobdill

Faulty Towers of Belief: Part I. Demolishing the Iconic Psychological Barriers to 9/11 Truth
Laurie A. Manwell, M.Sc.

9/11 Family Members and Scholars: Request for Correction Submitted to NIST
Bob McIlvaine, Bill Doyle, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Richard Gage, Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice

Request for an Investigation by the Senate Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health into the Falsification of pH Corrosivity Data for World Trade Center Dust
Dr. Cate Jenkins

Addendum: Request for an Investigation by the FBI into the Falsification of pH Corrosivity Data for World Trade Center Dust
Dr. Cate Jenkins

Revisiting 9/11/2001 --Applying the Scientific Method
Dr. Steven E. Jones

The Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis for the Destruction of the Twin Towers
Tony Szamboti, ME

NIST and Dr. Bazant - Simultaneous Failure
Gordon Ross, ME

The American Empire and 9/11
Prof. David Ray Griffin (Also published in March/April 2007 Issue of Tikkun; here: full-length version with notes)

Proof That The Thermal and Gravitational Energy Available Were Insufficient to Melt Steel in the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center on 9/11/01
Prof. Terry Morrone

Jones v. Robertson, A Physicist and a Structural Engineer Debate the Controlled Demolition of the World Trade Center
Gregg Roberts

A description of molten aluminum poured onto rusty steel
Wes Lifferth

The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center
Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins

Statement Regarding Thermite, Part 1
Robert Moore, Esq.

The NIST WTC Investigation--How Real Was The Simulation?, Word version
Eric Douglas, R.A.

9/11 - Acceleration Study Proves Explosive Demolition
Dr. Frank Legge

A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories
Eric Salter

Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?, Word Document, French Translation
Dr. Steven E. Jones

Seismic Proof - 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version III)
by Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross

What is 9/11 Truth? - The First Steps
Kevin Ryan

To whom it may concern
Dr. Frank R. Greening

Reply to Dr. Greening (See also How the Towers were Demolished)
Gordon Ross, ME

Intersecting Facts and Theories on 9/11
Joseph P. Firmage

118 Witnesses: The Firefighter's Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers
Prof. Graeme MacQueen

NIST Data Disproves Collapse Theories Based on Fire
Dr. Frank Legge

WTC 7: A Short Computation
Prof. Kenneth L. Kuttler

9/11 - Evidence for Controlled Demolition: a Short List of Observations
Dr. Frank Legge

9/11 - Evidence Suggests Complicity: Inferences from Actions
Dr. Frank Legge

Momentum Transfer Analysis of the Collapse of the Upper Storeys of WTC1
Gordon Ross, ME

http://www.journalof911studies.com/

[ChumpDumper]

Let's make a journal with a specific agenda and have people with the same agenda review each other's papers. Then we can pay to have it published on the internets! Then we'll be taken seriously!

[Nbadan]

Your lack of common sense clouds your mind to enable to properly cipher a good honest question from an off the wall theory tells me your small brain is very limited. And i mean that not as an insult, but as an honest observation from your postings I have read.

Mouse, I support another investigation, but you really need to quit pushing every 9/11 conspiracy theory on the net, especially Alex Jones and Loosechange...

[B-Boys]

Let's make a journal with a specific agenda and have people with the same agenda review each other's papers. Then we can pay to have it published on the internets! Then we'll be taken seriously!

Back off on the insults, and maybe meet people half way when they make a point, and you may be taken seriously. :tu

[mouse]

Mouse, I support another investigation, but you really need to quit pushing every 9/11 conspiracy theory on the net, especially Alex Jones and Loosechange...

So what do you think really happened on 9/11?

[Robert Mruczek]

Mouse, I support another investigation, but you really need to quit pushing every 9/11 conspiracy theory on the net, especially Alex Jones and Loosechange...

Tell that to the 2,900 people who died on 9/11
:bang

[Alex Jones]

Mouse, I support another investigation, but you really need to quit pushing every 9/11 conspiracy theory on the net, especially Alex Jones and Loosechange...



ok brah you and Galileo (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=9641) are on your own have fun................

[mouse]

Mouse, I support another investigation, but you really need to quit pushing every 9/11 conspiracy theory on the net, especially Alex Jones and Loosechange...

Dude your getting tea bagged by Chump,Blake,Cobra,andRandomLie and you want me to back off?


Have it your way from now on I will just read, good lick! :tu

[911]

And I had some new evidence to post!

:bang

[The Power Hour.]

Nbadan is throwing in the towel?

[Blake]

Mouse, I support another investigation, but you really need to quit pushing every 9/11 conspiracy theory on the net, especially Alex Jones and Loosechange...

:lol

yeah, so what is the "true and official" 9/11 conspiracy theory?

[ChumpDumper]

Back off on the insults, and maybe meet people half way when they make a point, and you may be taken seriously. :tuWho are you? If you are mouse, this is one of many reasons you are not taken seriously. :tu

[Cant_Be_Faded]

Give me an alternative comparable commission report, then I'll take you seriously :tu

[ChumpDumper]

Give me anything resembling a coherent theory and I'll take you seriously. :tu

[Indazone]

Mouse, I support another investigation, but you really need to quit pushing every 9/11 conspiracy theory on the net, especially Alex Jones and Loosechange...

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/lieofthecentury.html

Remember these:

USS Maine lie to start the Spanish American War
Poland had attacked Germany First excuse for Germany to invade Poland
The Gulf of Tonkin - Excuse to send Americans to Vietnam

These are well documented. It's not like Gov'ts tell the truth all the time to their citizens. Do you really expect that they do?

[France B-boy]

The secrets of 9/11 will soon be uncovered!

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/RTM-3/kobe-in-bed.gif

[Galileo]

You won't learn the truth going back and forth with comments in forums. To learn the truth, you need to sit down and study an extended presentation.

Here is another great one that I missed:

9/11 Blueprint for Truth (2008 Edition)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4617650616903609314

This one is cold, scientific analysis, not quite as entertaining as the movies, but very good. I suggest it for follow up.

[ChumpDumper]

Another Richard Gage video?

Does he give his famous high tech model demonstration?

http://911guide.googlepages.com/Gagebox-full.jpg/Gagebox-full-full.jpg

[Galileo]

Another Richard Gage video?

Does he give his famous high tech model demonstration?

http://911guide.googlepages.com/Gagebox-full.jpg/Gagebox-full-full.jpg

do you think the undamaged portion of the WTC below the impact point would offer resistence to collapse?

[ChumpDumper]

Yes, because it did -- just not enough to stop the collapse.

[Nbadan]

Yes, because it did -- just not enough to stop the collapse.

That's debatable...

[ChumpDumper]

Not really. If you can prove each twin tower was designed to catch 1/3 of itself once that section became detached, please show your work.

[Parker2112]

0lU-vu2JvZY

JZNQq7XBLwc

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/10/911-explosive-evidence-%E2%80%93-experts-speak-out/

[Nbadan]

So what do you think really happened on 9/11?

I think the U.S., the FBI, had more than enough intelligence to move on Atta, but yet they didn't...the whole Huffman Aviation connection was just swept under the rug by the M$M..to me where there is smoke, there is fire...

Was Atta CIA?

[Nbadan]

Fourteen of the 9/11 hijackers made Florida their base of operation, and clustered around two flight schools. What is it about Florida, and these flight schools, that drew them?

Atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi paid $28,000 each to Rudi Dekkers’ Huffman Aviation for flight instruction that, the chief instructor of a neighboring school said, was available at dozens of other nearby locations for a fraction of the price. So why did they pay an inflated price to Dekkers? Wally Hilliard is a supposedly-retired, born again insurance executive from the Midwest (motto for his insurance company had been "Hate Sin, Fight Communism, Back the Pack!"), who upon arriving in Florida entered into aviation businesses with an assortment of criminal and covert intelligence elements.

Dekkers and Hilliard had not been in the flight school business before they made the purchase. They paid an inflated price for the school, and did no due diligence before the purchase. They lost millions, but this was apparently not a problem. Charlie Voss, former employee of Dekkers and an Iran/Contra pilot who’d also flown "Northern Alliance guys" in Afghanistan in the 1980s, and who had given Atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi a place to stay for a few weeks when they first arrived in Venice Florida: "Rudi’s greedy, and when you’re greedy you can be used for something.... When something doesn’t make obvious business sense, sometimes it’s because things are being done for another reason that doesn’t have a lot to do with dollars and cents. His business did not add up.

[ChumpDumper]

The strongest theory so far has been the one linked to the World Trade Center building #7- WTC7- that collapsed like a house of cards into its basement at free fall speed of 6.5 seconds.Did WTC7 even have a basement?

[TDMVPDPOY]

i wonder why wikileaks hasnt leaked docus about this...was it premeditated...

[CosmicCowboy]

I still can't believe this shit keeps coming up. The airplanes/fuel alone were enough to bring the buildings down. You didn't need some complicated "additional explosives" theory...

As soon as I saw the first image maybe 5 minutes after the plane hit I told my partner (in my office with me looking at it on the computer) that the building was coming down. Thats the one big drawback of building with steel. You can spray the beams with fire resistant insulation but the insulation just isn't made to resist something like a plane crashing into them and then the super high temp fire...

The steel gets red and soft and can no longer support the weight of all the floors above it...one starts to sag, then the next, then you have a catastrophic domino failure with the resulting pancaking of floors.

[Sportcamper]

Cosmic-It is really annoying when a poster brings engineering facts & logic to a conspiracy theory thread…

[Parker2112]

I still can't believe this shit keeps coming up. The airplanes/fuel alone were enough to bring the buildings down. You didn't need some complicated "additional explosives" theory...

As soon as I saw the first image maybe 5 minutes after the plane hit I told my partner (in my office with me looking at it on the computer) that the building was coming down. Thats the one big drawback of building with steel. You can spray the beams with fire resistant insulation but the insulation just isn't made to resist something like a plane crashing into them and then the super high temp fire...

The steel gets red and soft and can no longer support the weight of all the floors above it...one starts to sag, then the next, then you have a catastrophic domino failure with the resulting pancaking of floors.

You aren't addressing what they found. The scientists finding nano particles in the WTC dust, I mean.

[CosmicCowboy]

Didn't they use explosives to clear the remaining rubble and demolish damaged structures?

Duh. Not like you are gonna read about that on your "truther" sites, though...

[mouse]

Didn't they use explosives to clear the remaining rubble and demolish damaged structures?

Duh. Not like you are gonna read about that on your "truther" sites, though...


Dude put down the beef jerky and find some shade. I know you love going out on your huge ranch with the sun beaming off your 10 gallon hat but you need to start on page one and work your way here before you try to engage in matters already covered.

the "9/11" dust was collected hours after the collapse / demolition of the buildings. One lady took the dust off her balcony and inside her upstairs luxury downtown condo and it was annualized it contained traces of Active Thermitic Material,
but the hard headed ignorant Bush voters in this forum who believe they evolved from an ape because some opium smoking wannabe hippy found some birds on an island with the same feathers and wrote a book 200 years ago don't want the truth, they want cheap oil and tax breaks and after all those lives were lost they got neither.

[TeyshaBlue]

You aren't addressing what they found. The scientists finding nano particles in the WTC dust, I mean.

Actual chemical composition of said nano particles, plz.

[ChumpDumper]

You aren't addressing what they found. The scientists finding nano particles in the WTC dust, I mean.Did they conclusively rule out the possibility those chips were red paint?

I'd like to see how they did that.

[Parker2112]

Did they conclusively rule out the possibility those chips were red paint?

I'd like to see how they did that.


The chips reacted at the expected ignition temps and produced iron...all the trademarks of a thermitic reaction. In addition, the chips were found to be consistent with thermite down to a nano particular level, which could not be the result of the surrounding events (rust, aircraft aluminum, office furniture, aircraft fuel), but were consistent with nano thermite which could only be manufactured by a sophisticated scientific process effective down to a molecular level. Watch the interviews.

[Parker2112]

Didn't they use explosives to clear the remaining rubble and demolish damaged structures?

Duh. Not like you are gonna read about that on your "truther" sites, though...

thermite is not an explosive. It is a chemical reaction that takes place at extremely high temps. Its tell-tale signature is that it produces small iron balls (the product of robbing iron oxide of the oxygen molecule). Explosives dont do this. balls like this were found at the scene. Watch the interviews.

[Parker2112]

Here is an engineer doing experiments in his back yard to show thermite can cut through steel from a vertical exposure.

s-e_oDlCFHo

very informative about the science

[ChumpDumper]

The chips reacted at the expected ignition temps and produced iron...all the trademarks of a thermitic reaction.Also a trademark of paint.
In addition, the chips were found to be consistent with thermite down to a nano particular level, which could not be the result of the surrounding events (rust, aircraft aluminum, office furniture, aircraft fuel), but were consistent with nano thermite which could only be manufactured by a sophisticated scientific process effective down to a molecular level. Watch the interviews.I've seen enough to know they haven't ruled out paint.

And they never actually come up with a believable narrative for putting huge amounts of "nanothermite" at the exact floors hit by the planes and how they stayed in place throughout the impacts and resulting fires.

No need to watch anything posted about this bullshit.

Paint and rust.

[TeyshaBlue]

Parker, there are at least 10 or so thermitic compounds that I'm aware of that can be rendered in this fashion. Do you have any idea which one is being referenced here?

[mouse]

Did they conclusively rule out the possibility those chips were red paint?

I'd like to see how they did that.


No you don't. Your never going to admit you was wrong about 9/11 all these years.

Someone could post an actual video of men planting explosives on the wtc beams and you will be saying.."I would like to hear from the bomb experts involved" "I would like to see a sworn statement from the person taking the video"

Your so much in denial you still don't believe the Hindenburg exploded because it was not filmed in HD.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/nsrammstein/vlcsnap-156363.png
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/nsrammstein/vlcsnap-157042.png
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/nsrammstein/vlcsnap-155969.png

[Parker2112]

Parker, there are at least 10 or so thermitic compounds that I'm aware of that can be rendered in this fashion. Do you have any idea which one is being referenced here?

nano thermite is the one in question...this is not the thermite you can mix up in your kitchen sink. The difference: nano aluminum particles are required, and they are not readily available in large quantities unless you have govt approval.

[TeyshaBlue]

nano thermite is the one in question...this is not the thermite you can mix up in your kitchen sink. The difference: nano aluminum particles are required, and they are not readily available in large quantities unless you have govt approval.

No, nano thermite is simply a rendering of thermitic compounds, of which there are many. Also, not all of them rely on aluminum...for example, magnesium/teflon is a fairly common nano rendered thermitic compound.

[CosmicCowboy]

Also a trademark of paint.I've seen enough to know they haven't ruled out paint.

And they never actually come up with a believable narrative for putting huge amounts of "nanothermite" at the exact floors hit by the planes and how they stayed in place throughout the impacts and resulting fires.

No need to watch anything posted about this bullshit.

Paint and rust.
:toast

I'm with Chump on this one.

[Parker2112]

Also a trademark of paint.I've seen enough to know they haven't ruled out paint.

And they never actually come up with a believable narrative for putting huge amounts of "nanothermite" at the exact floors hit by the planes and how they stayed in place throughout the impacts and resulting fires.

No need to watch anything posted about this bullshit.

Paint and rust.

actually, they have a pretty plausible theory in the interviews and the vid by Jon Cole above.

1: Jon Cole shows that even your run of the mill engineer can use everday thermite to cut steel beams with a little ingenuity. He builds a box which focuses the reaction on the beam in a straight line.

2. The second interview in that post of two interviews talks about how you can add additional chemicals into the nano thermite to reduce the melting temp of the affected steel below its normal properties, making the nano thermite even more effective.

3. One of the interviews references patents on nano thermite held for building demolition.

4. Nano thermite's sig is that the particles are engineered down to a molecular level. Paint is not, nor has ever been, engineered down to a molecular level. This rules out paint.

5. Taking all this into account, the contention that large quantities were needed falls apart.

take a look-see. Unless you prefer to continue with the blind convenient assumptions.

p.s. the nano thermite could be applied in a painted on application.

[Parker2112]

Parker, there are at least 10 or so thermitic compounds that I'm aware of that can be rendered in this fashion. Do you have any idea which one is being referenced here?

as far as I know, they are talking about nano aluminum and iron oxide, with potentially other compounds in the mix.

[Parker2112]

PS:

Thermite cutting steel looks like...
http://www.thepowerhour.com/images/9-11_thermite2.jpg

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/why/whypics/45_thermite2_2960.jpg

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQkPkBj8yIHJxjsQkgAW_9rdUPAgoSg2 UWdv_1KBGMfbWR-xNUmkg

http://www.debunking911.com/moltenflow.jpg

[TeyshaBlue]

actually, they have a pretty plausible theory in the interviews and the vid by Jon Cole above.

1: Jon Cole shows that even your run of the mill engineer can use everday thermite to cut steel beams with a little ingenuity. He builds a box which focuses the reaction on the beam in a straight line.

2. The second interview in that post of two interviews talks about how you can add additional chemicals into the nano thermite to reduce the melting temp of the affected steel below its normal properties, making the nano thermite even more effective.

3. One of the interviews references patents on nano thermite held for building demolition.

4. Nano thermite's sig is that the particles are engineered down to a molecular level. Paint is not, nor has ever been, engineered down to a molecular level. This rules out paint.

5. Taking all this into account, the contention that large quantities were needed falls apart.

take a look-see. Unless you prefer to continue with the blind convenient assumptions.

1. Factor in the amount of steel beams that would need to be cut. Please show your calculations.
2. Please show where these specific enhancing chemical compounds were found in the 9/11 debris.
3. Patents prove exactly what? I mean, we already know nano thermite actually exists.
4. Please study how paint is manufactured. You'll quickly find out you don't know what you're talking about as molecular formulations for paint have been around for decades.
5. Please show the math that quantifies how much would be needed since you contend that large quantities are not needed.

Examine this phrase. "You don't know what you don't know."
Your assumptions would appear to be quite blind at this point. Questions? Ok, I'm game. Assumptions? Nah...not yet.

[mouse]

If this to you looks like a building collapsing then its going to be an uphill battle to educate many.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/nsrammstein/vlcsnap-50115.png




What buildings that collapse look like.



http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/nsrammstein/e2465.jpg


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/nsrammstein/building-collapse.jpg




http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/nsrammstein/collapsed_building4.jpg

WTC

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/nsrammstein/wtc-photo-cropped.jpg



still have questions?

[Parker2112]

I agree. You know tons more than I do about this topic.

But what you are calling my assumptions are coming straight from the interviews with the scientist and the engineer. Dont ask me to prove their work.

If you want to hear their side of things, give it a listen. If you want to argue technical points with a dumbass on the subject (me), well, I tire easily. lol.

the interviews are interesting. The guys have cred. Give em a shot. or dont. But to continue to argue without being willing to hear the opposition (NOT ME, but the actual scientists), as chump and cc are doing, is pretty arrogant and actually takes away from their cred. I dont know if you are willing to watch or not though.

[TeyshaBlue]

I agree. You know tons more than I do about this topic.

But what you are calling my assumptions are coming straight from the interviews with the scientist and the engineer. Dont ask me to prove their work.

If you want to hear their side of things, give it a listen. If you want to argue technical points with a dumbass on the subject (me), well, I tire easily. lol.

the interviews are interesting. The guys have cred. Give em a shot. or dont. But to continue to argue without being willing to hear the opposition (NOT ME, but the actual scientists), as chump and cc are doing, is pretty arrogant and actually takes away from their cred. I dont know if you are willing to watch or not though.

Parker, for the record, I'm not stating that I have any more knowledge of this subject than you or anyone else here. I do however, read when I need to. I have listened to the nano thermite arguements..(these that you have presented are not unique in any sense of the word) and I continue to find them lacking. The mechanics of demolition are pretty open. What is missing from most of these arguments are specifications of what would've been needed....how much...what was the bonding agent....what was the initiator....relevant pieces of information.

[Parker2112]

Parker, for the record, I'm not stating that I have any more knowledge of this subject than you or anyone else here. I do however, read when I need to. I have listened to the nano thermite arguements..(these that you have presented are not unique in any sense of the word) and I continue to find them lacking. The mechanics of demolition are pretty open. What is missing from most of these arguments are specifications of what would've been needed....how much...what was the bonding agent....what was the initiator....relevant pieces of information.

I am telling you I only know what I saw in these. I have never investigated thermite. ever. I stumbled upon these interviews and I watched because I had heard the nano thermite particles had been found months back, but never heard anything else about it.

As for the premise that the only way to make an effetive argument is to come up with a complete picture of how demolition was carried out: this is bullshit. Chump is very good at this...prove it from a-z or shut up. But that is bs.

If this was carried out by a rogue faction within the govt/military, you WOULD NOT be able to trace their steps from A to Z. No way. So to argue this is bs.

The standard: We have ceased investigating. But anything that arises that is not explained by the original investigation warrants a new look. The only way to put a-z together is through a thourough investigation that doesnt stop till questions or answered, or else it remains unsolved. These scientists are saying unsolved.

If we convicted a man based on certain evidence, and then new evidence shows that conspirators prints/DNA was also found on the weapon and at the scene, we would search for conspirators.

[CosmicCowboy]

My degree was a hybrid Architecture/Civil Engineering degree and if you understand how those steel curtain wall buildings were constructed you would understand the it is extremely probably that it happened exactly the way it looks..the fire weakened/melted the steel in those 3-4 floors and the rest of the building pancaked when the weight from above hit it falling...

[Parker2112]

My degree was a hybrid Architecture/Civil engineering degree and if you understand how those buildings were constructed you would understand the it is extremely probably that it happened exactly the way it looks..the fire weakened/melted the steel in those 3-4 floors and the rest of the building pancaked when the weight from above hit it falling...

you arent talking about these particles...you are talking about your own already-formed conclusions. If what you say is true, there is no reason the dust should include nano thermite.

[CosmicCowboy]

Fine. You are more than welcome to believe any convoluted conspiracy theories you want.

[TeyshaBlue]

I am telling you I only know what I saw in these. I have never investigated thermite. ever. I stumbled upon these interviews and I watched because I had heard the nano thermite particles had been found months back, but never heard anything else about it.

As for the premise that the only way to make an effetive argument is to come up with a complete picture of how demolition was carried out: this is bullshit. Chump is very good at this...prove it from a-z or shut up. But that is bs.

Anything that is not explained by the original investigation warrants a new look.

If we convicted a man based on certain evidence, and then new evidence shows that conspirators prints/DNA was also found on the weapon and at the scene, we would search for conspirators.

But you never questioned whether they were actually nano thermite compounds or not. You just assumed they were and ran with it?
How can an investigation explain something that may not even be true? The "evidence" can't even be considered circumstantial until it conforms to a framework of intent and structure. Then, it may achieve corroborative status if other like pieces of evidence are introduced and a network of relation established. Thus far, I've seen none of this attendant structure. I could just as easily posit that my chihuahua brought down the trade towers absent anything resembling corroborative evidence.

[Parker2112]

Fine. You are more than welcome to believe any convoluted conspiracy theories you want.

I actually dont have a theory. I have a ton of questions though.

I dont think anyone KNOWS what happened. Thats why I think we should still be investigating this thing till it cracks. If it ever does.

[TeyshaBlue]

I actually dont have a theory. I have a ton of questions though.

I dont think anyone KNOWS what happened. Thats why I think we should still be investigating this thing till it cracks. If it ever does.

If it doesn't crack, then will your questions be answered?

Somehow, I'm doubting that.

[Parker2112]

But you never questioned whether they were actually nano thermite compounds or not. You just assumed they were and ran with it?
How can an investigation explain something that may not even be true? The "evidence" can't even be considered circumstantial until it conforms to a framework of intent and structure. Then, it may achieve corroborative status if other like pieces of evidence are introduced and a network of relation established. Thus far, I've seen none of this attendant structure. I could just as easily posit that my chihuahua brought down the trade towers absent anything resembling corroborative evidence.

The official version ruled out super thermite? If not, why? Why wasnt it even addressed? And if the investigation never addressed the possibility, and only accepted conclusions inside a certain perimiter, how can we conclusively dismiss these scientists?

If the official investigation said they tested and found no evidence of N/T, then you could discount these guys as kooks pretty easy.

This is a problem. And we as Americans who were all wounded that day deserve closure and desrve to be able to dismiss this theory. Our govt owes us that. It also owes that to future generations.

And the chihuahua version is impossible. The thermite versionn, as we have already said is a known possibility. Big difference.


One last thing: Dont be arrogant enough to think we can track the most elite destructive force on the planet...our military and intelligence communities. If someone was acting from a position within either of these, with that type of expertise, you would likely NEVER find the complete chain of details without a full confession.

[Parker2112]

If it doesn't crack, then will your questions be answered?

Somehow, I'm doubting that.

we havent addressed thermite at all. see above. That is a pretty easy detail to crack.

[Parker2112]

My degree was a hybrid Architecture/Civil Engineering degree and if you understand how those steel curtain wall buildings were constructed you would understand the it is extremely probably that it happened exactly the way it looks..the fire weakened/melted the steel in those 3-4 floors and the rest of the building pancaked when the weight from above hit it falling...

interesting thing...the official conclusion rules out "pancaking"...




2. Why did NIST not consider a “controlled demolition” hypothesis with matching computer modeling and explanation as it did for the “pancake theory” hypothesis? A key critique of NIST’s work lies in the complete lack of analysis supporting a “progressive collapse” after the point of collapse initiation and the lack of consideration given to a controlled demolition hypothesis.
NIST conducted an extremely thorough three-year investigation into what caused the WTC towers to collapse, as explained in NIST’s dedicated Web site, http://wtc.nist.gov. This included consideration of a number of hypotheses for the collapses of the towers.
Some 200 technical experts—including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia—reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse.
Based on this comprehensive investigation, NIST concluded that the WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires (which reached temperatures as high as 1,000 degrees Celsius) significantly weakened the floors and columns with dislodged fireproofing to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns. This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers. Both photographic and video evidence—as well as accounts from the New York Police Department aviation unit during a half-hour period prior to collapse—support this sequence for each tower.
NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system—that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns—consisted of a grid of steel “trusses” integrated with a concrete slab; see diagram below). Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon.

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

[Parker2112]

the NIST report eliminated explosives, but never touched thermite. see for yourselves.

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

Which, if you watch the Jon Cole vid, he talks about how ridiculous this is, given that many involved with NIST had been involved with thermite experiments first hand and knew well what it could have done if it was present.

Thats a pretty gaping hole in the official story if you ask me. Sounds like they need to rethink a to z. lol.

[TeyshaBlue]

And the chihuahua version is impossible. The thermite versionn, as we have already said is a known possibility. Big difference.


Again, you don't know what you don't know. You've never met my chihuahua. That fucking dog is a nuclear powered 5lb. yapping/killing machine.:lol

[Parker2112]

Again, you don't know what you don't know. You've never met my chihuahua. That fucking dog is a nuclear powered 5lb. yapping/killing machine.:lol

:lol

:nope

[TeyshaBlue]

the NIST report eliminated explosives, but never touched thermite. see for yourselves.

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

Which, if you watch the Jon Cole vid, he talks about how ridiculous this is, given that many involved with NIST had been involved with thermite experiments first hand and knew well what it could have done if it was present.

Thats a pretty gaping hole in the official story if you ask me. Sounds like they need to rethink a to z. lol.

The NIST report didn't touch on thermite because, it wasn't relevant. Still isn't. Many of the same constraints placed upon locating explosives prior to the collapse apply to thermite...and like the explosive "theories", they aren't credible. You have to answer the questions I've already posited....how much...what was the igniter...how was it applied...before the thermite theory, and I hesitate to even call it that since it doesn't even meet the criteria for theory, can even be considered.

[Parker2112]

You rule it out, and yet Danish scientists have found it in the rubble. where it should not be. Sounds like you and Neils need to have a beer.

[TeyshaBlue]

You rule it out, and yet Danish scientists have found it in the rubble. where it should not be. Sounds like you and Neils need to have a beer.
I don't rule it out. Thus far, logic rules it out.
I'm all about the beer. Danish scientists say they have found it in the rubble. I've yet to see evidence of that. They can say what ever they want. They need to show it. That they won't/can't is telling.

[Parker2112]

I don't rule it out. Thus far, logic rules it out.
I'm all about the beer. Danish scientists say they have found it in the rubble. I've yet to see evidence of that. They can say what ever they want. They need to show it. That they won't/can't is telling.

What if they did? What if I showed you the article showing their methods in a professional science journal? Maybe the Open Chemical Physics Journal? Would you take the time to check it out?

[Parker2112]

Boom.
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf

:p:

[TeyshaBlue]

What if they did? What if I showed you the article showing their methods in a professional science journal? Maybe the Open Chemical Physics Journal? Would you take the time to check it out?

Actually, I would as long as it included documented samples from the site.

[TeyshaBlue]

Boom.
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf

:p:

BOOM Goes the no peer reviewed paper.

When you have a legit, peer reviewed study, let me know.

http://911blogger.com/news/2009-06-16/attacks-nano-thermite-paper-and-bentham-journals-begin

It is not surprising that the public is not aware of the fact that the so-called Bentham Open Science publishing group is basically a vanity publication where anyone can publish a “peer reviewed scientific journal article” which is not actually peer reviewed.

This embarrassing fact became all too clear recently when another Bentham “peer reviewed” journal was caught publishing a fake paper submitted by Philip Davis, a PhD student in scientific communications at Cornell University.

Davis used a well known computer program that was designed specifically to generate nonsense science articles which would be spotted as such by any legitimate peer review process. The fake article entitled “Deconstructing Access Points” contained wonderfully nonsensical statements such as “Note that vacuum tubes have less jagged effective
floppy disk throughput curves than do autogenerated robots”.

Despite making no sense whatsoever, the paper was accepted at the Bentham Publishing Groups journal “The Open Information Science Journal” as though it was peer reviewed, despite the fact that the author, Davis, never received any reviewer comments, which is a universal part of the peer review process. Instead, Davis simply received a bill for an $800 fee which was to be sent to a post office box in the United Arab Emirates.

Following the disclosure of the fake nature of the article (and withdrawal of the manuscript) by Davis, the chief editor at the journal, Bambang Parmanto, resigned. "I didn't like what happened," Parmanto told reporters for The Scientist Magazine. "If this is true, I don't have full control of the content that is accepted to this journal." Following this, Marc Williams, an immunologist and stem cell researcher at the University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry who served on the editorial advisory board of The Open Stem Cell Journal also resigned his position with the Bentham Group.

Previously, the chief editor of the Bentham journal that the Thermite article was published in resigned, and denounced the journal with this statement: “I cannot accept that this topic is published in my journal. The article has nothing to do with physical chemistry or chemical physics, and I could well believe that there is a political viewpoint behind its publication. If anyone had asked me, I would say that the article should never have been published in this journal. Period.” Despite supposedly being the chief editor, she had not been informed that the thermite article was going to be published in her journal.

[Parker2112]

BOOM Goes the no peer reviewed paper.

When you have a legit, peer reviewed study, let me know.

http://911blogger.com/news/2009-06-16/attacks-nano-thermite-paper-and-bentham-journals-begin

It is not surprising that the public is not aware of the fact that the so-called Bentham Open Science publishing group is basically a vanity publication where anyone can publish a “peer reviewed scientific journal article” which is not actually peer reviewed.

This embarrassing fact became all too clear recently when another Bentham “peer reviewed” journal was caught publishing a fake paper submitted by Philip Davis, a PhD student in scientific communications at Cornell University.

Davis used a well known computer program that was designed specifically to generate nonsense science articles which would be spotted as such by any legitimate peer review process. The fake article entitled “Deconstructing Access Points” contained wonderfully nonsensical statements such as “Note that vacuum tubes have less jagged effective
floppy disk throughput curves than do autogenerated robots”.

Despite making no sense whatsoever, the paper was accepted at the Bentham Publishing Groups journal “The Open Information Science Journal” as though it was peer reviewed, despite the fact that the author, Davis, never received any reviewer comments, which is a universal part of the peer review process. Instead, Davis simply received a bill for an $800 fee which was to be sent to a post office box in the United Arab Emirates.

Following the disclosure of the fake nature of the article (and withdrawal of the manuscript) by Davis, the chief editor at the journal, Bambang Parmanto, resigned. "I didn't like what happened," Parmanto told reporters for The Scientist Magazine. "If this is true, I don't have full control of the content that is accepted to this journal." Following this, Marc Williams, an immunologist and stem cell researcher at the University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry who served on the editorial advisory board of The Open Stem Cell Journal also resigned his position with the Bentham Group.

Previously, the chief editor of the Bentham journal that the Thermite article was published in resigned, and denounced the journal with this statement: “I cannot accept that this topic is published in my journal. The article has nothing to do with physical chemistry or chemical physics, and I could well believe that there is a political viewpoint behind its publication. If anyone had asked me, I would say that the article should never have been published in this journal. Period.” Despite supposedly being the chief editor, she had not been informed that the thermite article was going to be published in her journal.

so parrotted biased blogs are fact? :lol

Ill look into it further....

[TeyshaBlue]

so parrotted biased blogs are fact? :lol

Ill look into it further....

Go ahead. That took 0.25 seconds with teh google.

[Parker2112]

BOOM BOOM.

Author's response to the hack that you quoted.




"And a response from the main author:-

What you need to know about “Peer-review”

ProfJones Blog — April 7, 2009
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19780

Since the days of Sir Isaac Newton, Science has proceeded through the publication of peer-reviewed papers. Peer-review means a thorough reading, commentary and even challenge before publication by “peers”, that is, other PhD’s and professors. This paper was thoroughly peer-reviewed with several pages of tough comments that required of our team MONTHS of additional experiments and studies. It was the toughest peer-review I’ve ever had, including THREE papers for which I was first author in NATURE. (Please note that Prof. Harrit is first author on this paper.) We sought an established journal that would allow us a LONG paper (this paper is 25 pages long) with MANY COLOR IMAGES AND GRAPHS. Such a scientific journal is not easy to find. Page charges are common for scientific journals these days, and are typically paid by the University of the first or second author (as is the case with this paper) or by an external grant.

A peer-reviewed journal is also called a “refereed” journal. Peer-reviewers are almost always anonymous for scientific publications like this — that is standard in the scientific world. While authors commonly recommend potential peer-reviewers, editors choose the referees and usually pick at least one or two reviewers that the authors did NOT mention — and that is almost certainly the case with this paper (based on commentary we received from the reviewers). In the end, all the reviewers — who were selected by the editor(s) — approved publication. Thus, the paper was subjected to peer review by the editor or editors, and it passed the peer-review process.

Debunkers may raise all sorts of objections on forums, such as “Oh, it’s just paint” or “the aluminum is bound up in kaolin.” We have answered those questions in the paper, and shown them to be nonsense, but you have to read to find the answers. I may also provide answers here and in emails, often quoting from the paper to show that the answers are already in it.

Here’s what you need to know (especially if you are not a scientist): UNLESS AN OBJECTOR ACTUALLY PUBLISHES HIS OR HER OBJECTION IN A PEER-REVIEWED ESTABLISHED JOURNAL (yes that would include Bentham Scientific journals), THEN THE OBJECTION IS NOT CONSIDERED SERIOUS IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY. YOU SHOULD NOT WORRY ABOUT NON-PUBLISHED OBJECTIONS EITHER.

So how do you, as a non-scientist, discern whether the arguments are valid or not? You should first ask, “is the objection PUBLISHED in an ESTABLISHED PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL?” If not, you can and should say — “I will wait to see this formally published in a refereed scientific journal. Until then, the published peer-reviewed work by Harrit et al. stands. ”

BTW, there also has been no PUBLISHED REFEREED paper yet that counters either the “Fourteen Points” paper or the “Environmental Anomalies” papers we published last year.

IF it is so easy to publish in Bentham Scientific journals, or if these are “vanity publications” (note: there is no factual basis for these charges) — then why don’t the objectors write up their objections and get them peer-reviewed and published?? The fact is, it is not easy, as serious objectors will find out.

Our results have passed the gauntlet of peer-review (including in this case, review at BYU consistent with the fact that there are two authors from BYU).

We say that this paper has the “imprimatur of peer-review”. That is a significant breakthrough. You cannot say that of big-foot or Elvis sightings… We are now in a different world from such things, the world of the published scientific community. CAN YOU APPRECIATE THE DIFFERENCE? I hope so. And this is what has our opponents so worried IMO…"

[TeyshaBlue]

And you obviously didn't read the blog. The dude is fairly predisposed to believe anything but the NIST report. That he's pointing this out is fairly damning, dude.