View Full Version : Past Championship Duos (Duncan + Parker enough?)
Since I am in an optimistic mood, looking at the past 20 NBA seasons, here are the past championship duos:
1990-93
Jordan
Pippen
1993-95
Olajuwon
Drexler
1995-98
Jordan
Pippen
1999
Duncan
Robinson
2000-03
Shaq
Kobe
2006
Wade
Shaq
2009?
Parker
Duncan
or
Duncan
Parker
In fact, the number of championships won by a "duo" outnumbers the ones won by a "big 3." The only times a big 3 won a championship in the modern NBA era were in 2003 (kind of), 2005, 2007, and 2008. In order for the Spurs to win without a big 3, either Parker needs to elevate himself or Duncan to re-elevate himself to superstar status. With Parker's emergence as an undisputed elite point guard and Duncan's earlier dominance, it may be possible. Parker needs to develop more point guard skills to take the pressure off him or Duncan needs to play at a MVP level like he did at the beginning of the season. Just pretend Ginobili's salary is going to Gooden.
SA210
04-07-2009, 04:34 PM
Since I am in an optimistic mood, looking at the past 20 NBA seasons, here are the past championship duos:
1990-93
Jordan
Pippen
1993-95
Olajuwon
Drexler
1995-98
Jordan
Pippen
1999
Duncan
Robinson
2000-03
Shaq
Kobe
2006
Wade
Shaq
2009?
Parker
Duncan
or
Duncan
Parker
In fact, the number of championships won by a "duo" outnumbers the ones won by a "big 3." The only times a big 3 won a championship in the modern NBA era were in 2003 (kind of), 2005, 2007, and 2008. In order for the Spurs to win without a big 3, either Parker needs to elevate himself or Duncan to re-elevate himself to superstar status. With Parker's emergence as an undisputed elite point guard and Duncan's earlier dominance, it may be possible. Parker needs to develop more point guard skills to take the pressure off him or Duncan needs to play at a MVP level like he did at the beginning of the season. Just pretend Ginobili's salary is going to Gooden.
:tu
Now just start Bruce! :flag:
VI_Massive
04-07-2009, 04:35 PM
those other teams all had key role players. and we have about half of a tim duncan right now.
the weakness of the spurs has never been their big 3. neither their big 2. neither their franchise player. neither their 9 to 15 players.
but their 5-8 players have often been so-so these past years, behind tim, tony, manu and bruce.
with manu out and bowen no more used, you could argue our 3-8 players are average. that's our weakness.
good stars. deep bench (but not really useful in the PO where the rotation is more short). poor role players.
if Mason, KT, Gooden, and Hill plays at the best we've seen them this year, with Fin and Bruce doing their things in PO, Tim and Tony could be enough as stars to win some games.
xtremesteven33
04-07-2009, 04:44 PM
thanks for the optimism :tu
DPG21920
04-07-2009, 04:46 PM
with duncan past his prime this is now TP's Team
it would be funny if we made it to finals and proved we don't need manu's crippled ass anymore. then maybe we could finally dump him.
Hi Ducks.
timaios
04-07-2009, 04:48 PM
Hi Ducks.
:lol
mexicanjunior
04-07-2009, 04:51 PM
Those "duo" teams had much better supporting casts than what we are trotting out on a nightly basis...
anonoftheinternets
04-07-2009, 04:54 PM
then maybe we could finally dump him.
lol who is this chump? :rollin
Slinkyman
04-07-2009, 04:54 PM
If Jordan had Vaughn as his back up point guard he'd have 3 less titles. BTW 95-98 the bulls also had Rodman.
SA210
04-07-2009, 05:03 PM
Hi Ducks.
:lol
crc21209
04-07-2009, 06:31 PM
Forget FTL. It's FTW (Fuck the World) now. That's the mindset our boys have to have now. I BELIEVE in them. EVERYONE is doubting them now. Time to shut everyone up.
Who was the big duo in '94, dream & Otis Thorpe?
Manufan909
04-07-2009, 11:59 PM
the weakness of the spurs has never been their big 3. neither their big 2. neither their franchise player. neither their 9 to 15 players.
but their 5-8 players have often been so-so these past years, behind tim, tony, manu and bruce.
with manu out and bowen no more used, you could argue our 3-8 players are average. that's our weakness.
good stars. deep bench (but not really useful in the PO where the rotation is more short). poor role players.
if Mason, KT, Gooden, and Hill plays at the best we've seen them this year, with Fin and Bruce doing their things in PO, Tim and Tony could be enough as stars to win some games.
Hope you're off about needing Hill, since he will play about 2 mns a game. But if him and Hairston get half an hour between them in the POs, I will regain my faith. But Pop has to trust the rooks first, and Bowen needs 25+minutes, with Roy, Paul/Peja, Kobe, and Lebron/Pierce in the Spurs way to #5.
ducks
04-08-2009, 12:01 AM
that is not ducks
ducks has only one screen name ASK KORI
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.