PDA

View Full Version : Magic better without Howard ??


kace
05-01-2009, 03:39 AM
"They're actually better without Dwight Howard,'' Sixers guard Andre Miller said. "One of their players told me that they were better without Dwight Howard. They said the ball moves quicker. They're not standing around a lot.''

:wow
Xylus
05-01-2009, 03:40 AM
That's absurd.

The Sixers probably didn't plan for the game very well. The Magic obviously had to play a little differently without their big man, and the Sixers reacted poorly.
coldsweat
05-01-2009, 03:41 AM
calling spursdynasty.
Allanon
05-01-2009, 03:44 AM
Magic aren't better without Dwight. Philly just sucks.
timvp
05-01-2009, 03:45 AM
I disagree.
Xylus
05-01-2009, 04:10 AM
I'm not sure why Miller would even say that. It doesn't make his team look better, and it certainly doesn't accurately justify why they got blown out on their home floor.
kace
05-01-2009, 04:35 AM
I'm not sure why Miller would even say that. It doesn't make his team look better, and it certainly doesn't accurately justify why they got blown out on their home floor.

well, it seems he really said that:

http://www.nba.com/games/20090430/ORLPHI/recap.html

i don't think it's very smart from Miller either.
timvp
05-01-2009, 05:09 AM
Had to be Anthony Johnson -- Miller's former teammate in Cleveland. Rafer is too new and Redick is too quiet.
pauls931
05-01-2009, 08:49 AM
Good, blow up the team and send dwight to phoenix.
resistanze
05-01-2009, 08:53 AM
calling spursdynasty.


I disagree.

:wow
hater
05-01-2009, 09:13 AM
Andre Miller has always been an idiot. but he is partly right on this one.

It's not that the team is better without Howard, but that without Howard, the Magic play like the 2007 Warriors and that matchup kills Philly. It's all about matchups.

still if Magic has any hope to go far in the playoffs they need Howard