PDA

View Full Version : We're the freakin' Lakers.



TheWriter
03-23-2005, 10:20 PM
Without Tim, we're this years Lakers.

God!

SpursChampsIII
03-23-2005, 10:21 PM
We're worse.

TDfan2007
03-23-2005, 10:47 PM
funny :blah

but sadly true

:depressed :depressed

King
03-23-2005, 10:47 PM
So is any team missing their best player...and decimated with other various injuries.

TheWriter
03-23-2005, 10:48 PM
Maybe, at home we'll play better.

exstatic
03-23-2005, 11:06 PM
Shaq's never coming back, though. :lol

ALVAREZ6
03-23-2005, 11:07 PM
We are way worse than the Lakers without Duncan, and you don't know how much I dislike this comment..but it's true.

ducks
03-23-2005, 11:14 PM
give spurs time to adjust
spurs just do not have duncan'
they do not have a healthy manu (the spurs second allstar)

E20
03-23-2005, 11:22 PM
Look at the minutes Tony and Manu didn't play nearly the minutes they should have, why? Because they're playing after being injured and that takes time to adjust.

CHAMPS AGAIN
03-23-2005, 11:50 PM
Look at the minutes Tony and Manu didn't play nearly the minutes they should have, why? Because they're playing after being injured and that takes time to adjust.

agree they play over 36 minutes SPURS WIN

Das Texan
03-24-2005, 12:30 AM
If Ginobili was close to being fully healthy, the Spurs are much closer to winning these games and probably pull off at least two of them.

Drachen
03-24-2005, 12:49 AM
So is any team missing their best player...and decimated with other various injuries.
except maybe the Pacers although their 2nd best player isnt out with injuries per se . . .

alamo50
03-24-2005, 05:35 AM
No we are not worse than the Fakers without Timmy.
We are a TEAM with diverse injuries other than Timmy being out.

MI21
03-24-2005, 09:12 AM
I think in a 7 game series, the Lakers would defeat us if we didn't have Tim.

Bowen does a fantastic job on Kobe generally, but a lot of that is due to having Timmy and Rasho back there to help. The Spurs suck against Odom as it is, without Timmy just takes away another option. I actually don't think the Lakers supporting cast is that bad, Odom, Mihm, Atkins, Butler, Jones, Grant etc are all solid players, Kobe is a big part of the problem with the way he plays. If LA had LeBron, they'd be better.

Medvedenko
03-24-2005, 09:37 AM
Actually, the lakers have Odom out....Mihm has back problems and Sucky Crapkings can't gaurd his own lunch, and kobe has been inujred the entire season. However, in a 7 game series it would be fun..but I still give the nod to the spurs....more experience and better coaching.