View Full Version : 09 Lakers vs 06 Heat
baseline bum
05-14-2009, 09:18 PM
It's a foregone conclusion that LA will win the title, but god they look horrible even against shit competition. Then Denver and Cleveland next round? No Garnett, no Ginobili, no McGrady, no Yao? They have lucked in to a ridiculously easy title run. Is this the worst title team of the last 20 years? I mean, Miami had defenders and Wade was every bit the player Bryant is.
Armando
05-14-2009, 09:23 PM
I disagree seeing the Lakers in the playoffs I have no doubt Cleveland will be celebrating thier 1st title.
Spursfan092120
05-14-2009, 09:28 PM
It's a foregone conclusion that LA will win the title.
:wow Really? I don't see that as a foregone conclusion at all.
Ghazi
05-14-2009, 09:29 PM
06 heat didnt win shit
mavs>spurs2
05-14-2009, 09:30 PM
1 ring faggots
Spursfan092120
05-14-2009, 09:31 PM
06 heat didnt win shit
http://www.dwyane-wade.us/images/main.jpghttp://www.nba.com/media/heat/wade7_300_060620.jpg
Mr. Wade disagrees
Armando
05-14-2009, 09:33 PM
06 heat didnt win shit
Let it go just admit you got beat. Your worse then Nash still saying the Spurs have 3 titles.
Ghazi
05-14-2009, 09:37 PM
theres a reason the heat didnt look impressive in victory
cause they were winning games they were not supposed to thanks to refs.
what did they do well? defend? protect the basketbalL? shoot free throws? score?
we remember spurs for D
pistons for D, Celtics for D
Lakers for Shaq/Kobe dominance
Bulls for... awesomeness
Cheat? remembered for whistles
lefty
05-14-2009, 09:38 PM
L.A is talented and deep, but too soft
resistanze
05-14-2009, 10:09 PM
The Lakers are still the favorites, IMO, to win the title.
If they do, they'll definately be the worst champion in the past 25 years (at least). Slightly worse than the Heat. It's almost equivalent to the 2005-07 Suns winning a title.
Amaso
05-14-2009, 10:13 PM
Just off the top of my head, of the teams that won a championship in the past 20 years... these will have been worse than these 09 Lakers:
06 Mavericks
95 Rockets
99 Spurs
07 Spurs
resistanze
05-14-2009, 10:16 PM
Just off the top of my head, of the teams that won a championship in the past 20 years... these will have been worse than these 09 Lakers:
06 Mavericks
95 Rockets
99 Spurs
07 Spurs
LMAO!!!!!
Disregarding your first choice, LMAO!
99 Spurs were one of the most dominant team defensively in decades.
07 Spurs were vastly superior and more balanced than the 09 Lakers.
95 Rockets had the 94 MVP and arguably could've won the 95 MVP, and had some of the clutchest shooters in recent memory.
baseline bum
05-14-2009, 11:43 PM
Just off the top of my head, of the teams that won a championship in the past 20 years... these will have been worse than these 09 Lakers:
06 Mavericks
95 Rockets
99 Spurs
07 Spurs
06 Mavs are pussies; maybe even moreso than the 09 Lakers.
95 Rockets? LMAO. The team that beat 3 60 win teams and a 59 win team despite not having homecourt? The 95 Rockets would beat the 09 Lakers in 5... 6 max.
99 Spurs? 15-2 vs pushed to the brink by a team missing its two best players? OK. :lmao
The 07 Spurs took care of all the inferior competition they had and played fucking defense. They'd beat the 09 Lakers in 6 max.
LMAO Lakers. They should have won this series in 5.
stretch
05-15-2009, 08:43 AM
06 Mavs > 09 Lakers
florige
05-15-2009, 08:49 AM
Just off the top of my head, of the teams that won a championship in the past 20 years... these will have been worse than these 09 Lakers:
06 Mavericks
95 Rockets
99 Spurs
07 Spurs
I would like to see this pussy of a Laker team up against the 99 Spurs. Might have been a sweep. Stupid list.
stretch
05-15-2009, 09:04 AM
09 Lakers wouldnt even beat the 02 Kings.
It's a foregone conclusion that LA will win the title, but god they look horrible even against shit competition. Then Denver and Cleveland next round? No Garnett, no Ginobili, no McGrady, no Yao? They have lucked in to a ridiculously easy title run. Is this the worst title team of the last 20 years? I mean, Miami had defenders and Wade was every bit the player Bryant is.
How would that've mattered? You still would've lost to Dallas is six or seven instead:bking
Just off the top of my head, of the teams that won a championship in the past 20 years... these will have been worse than these 09 Lakers:
06 Mavericks
95 Rockets
99 Spurs
07 Spurs
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha
DUNCANownsKOBE2
05-15-2009, 12:11 PM
Just off the top of my head, of the teams that won a championship in the past 20 years... these will have been worse than these 09 Lakers:
06 Mavericks
95 Rockets
99 Spurs
07 Spurs
lol, the 1999 Spurs ran a train through the playoffs going 16-2. They went 37-13 in the regular season, that's roughly 60 games when projected over an 82 game season. Their defensive rating that year was 95.0, two points better than any other team. The 1999 Spurs would have face fucked the 2009 Lakers.
The 2006 Mavs didn't win a title.
lol the 1995 Rockets. The Dream would have destroyed Gasol, Odom or Bynum.
Some Spurs fans will be mad at this, but the 2007 Spurs would have had a tough time against this Laker team. The 2007 NBA in general was just shitty. The 2007 Suns and 2007 Mavs are no way in hell 60 win teams this season. It would have been a close series with a game 6 or 7 but IMO the talent gap is pretty big.
Basketballgirl25
05-15-2009, 12:13 PM
06 heat didnt win shit
why do mav fans think they won when everyone knows they didn't sure the refs sucked, that doesn't mean mavs won, they lost
http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k72/tropikaal/heat.jpg
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l156/drunkman00/wallpaper0506_champs_800.jpg
TheMACHINE
05-15-2009, 12:15 PM
06 Mavs > 07 Spurs
Spurs fans thanks the Warriors every night for that one.
Ghazi
05-15-2009, 12:28 PM
03 Mavs > 03 Spurs
2003*
*-Dirk got hurt
Ghazi
05-15-2009, 12:30 PM
I agree DoK.
The 2007 NBA season did seem to be kinda shitty.
The decline of the Mavs and Suns wasn't even THAT drastic, although there was certainly a decline. The West and NBa as a whole got much stronger and the FO's made some bad moves/some core players got older/the shots just stopped falling.
for example, my 2006 NBA champion Dallas Mavs which won a championship would have no shot against healthy Boston and Cleveland IMO, not sure how they do v Lakers though.
Mavs 2010 NBA Champs though (and 2006!)
baseline bum
05-15-2009, 12:40 PM
06 Mavs > 07 Spurs
Spurs fans thanks the Warriors every night for that one.
LOL. The 07 Spurs dominated their shitty eastern conference opponent in the Finals, and were healthier in 07 than 06. No way the 07 Mavs were going to do shit against the Spurs; they peaked in March and went downhill fast.
JamStone
05-15-2009, 01:07 PM
Yeah, if you're going to criticize a Spurs championship team, you go with the 2003 team with Robinson having one foot out the door and Parker and Ginobili not yet the contributors they later became. That is often lauded by Spurs fans as Tim Duncan's most impressive season for almost single-handedly carrying that team to a title.
The 95 Rockets were a great team especially after trading for Drexler. I'd say the 94 Rockets were less impressive. You can't just look at the regular season with the 95 Rockets because Drexler played less than half the season with them and Hakeem missed a bunch of games too.
The 06 Heat were one of the weaker championship teams in a while, but even if Dallas won, they would have been one of the weaker champs too. Even in his decline, Shaq was still a presence down low and forced teams to play him, at least pay attention to him. The supporting cast was weak, but an old Shaq and Wade is still a very strong championship duo.
LOL @ 99/07 Spurs being "weak" championship teams. That 99 team had extreme balls (including a young, healthy Tim and still primed DRob) and proved it by beating the fuck out of everyone they played in the postseason, including shaq/kobe's Lakers.
2007 is underrated. That was a team that took care of business on both ends consistently. There's no doubt in my mind the 2007 spurs could handle the 09 Lakers.
exactly that team had a prime duncan and a prime robinson up front!!!!!! best defensive team ever also. we fcking swept the 2nd and 3rd rounds, lost only 2 games the entire playoffs including SWEEPING the shaq-kobe lakers.
Pure DOMINANCE
oh and also the '95 Rockets would have absolutely butchered these Lakers. it would have been brutal.
Cry Havoc
05-15-2009, 01:52 PM
Just off the top of my head, of the teams that won a championship in the past 20 years... these will have been worse than these 09 Lakers:
06 Mavericks
95 Rockets
99 Spurs
07 Spurs
The Lakers can't handle Luis Scola and Carl Landry in the paint.
What would Hakeem have done to them? :wow :wow :wow
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.