PDA

View Full Version : Topless Photos of Britney Spears Surface



mrsmaalox
06-09-2009, 01:58 PM
Topless Photos of Britney Spears Surface

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525402,00.html?mrp
There's a link to NSFW photos here

Monday, June 08, 2009

America’s favorite comeback queen is now at the center of a topless photo scandal.

That's right folks, half-nude photos of Britney Spears -- ones we probably all knew existed-- have finally surfaced online.

The photos – outtakes from her 2007 video “Gimme More” — show the pop princess writhing around a stripper pole with her breasts covered only by fake rose tattoos.

Taken during the height of her infamous breakdown, the photos have been kept under wraps for nearly two years. Since then, the star has enjoyed a return to fame, with her incredibly successful “Circus” tour currently selling big in the U.K.

But Spears has come under fire recently for her raunchy performances and lyrics, including the suggestive song “If You Seek Amy.”

Viva Las Espuelas
06-09-2009, 01:59 PM
i had enough with her bare cooter.

InRareForm
06-09-2009, 01:59 PM
Ttiwwp

JudynTX
06-09-2009, 01:59 PM
I saw them. :D

mrsmaalox
06-09-2009, 02:04 PM
i had enough with her bare cooter.

Yup, it had that raw chicken thing going on! :lol

paparazzi
06-09-2009, 02:05 PM
This would be greater news if it were Jessica Simpson.

Strike
06-09-2009, 02:06 PM
Yup, it had that raw chicken thing going on! :lol

:vomit:

Wow. Just, wow.

JoeChalupa
06-09-2009, 02:13 PM
Yeah, I've already checked out those little snack fun bags.

Viva Las Espuelas
06-09-2009, 02:13 PM
Yup, it had that raw chicken thing going on! :lol
with a hint of gristle

Thunder Dan
06-09-2009, 02:14 PM
talk about being 8 years late

monosylab1k
06-09-2009, 02:16 PM
talk about being 8 years late

:lol exactly what I was thinking. This would have been great back when I was a teenager and still thought she was hot.

Viva Las Espuelas
06-09-2009, 02:16 PM
This would be greater news if it were Jessica Simpson.

undoubtedly.

JoeChalupa
06-09-2009, 02:17 PM
this would be greater news if it were jessica simpson.

+100

Viva Las Espuelas
06-09-2009, 02:22 PM
i just had to
http://www.blisstree.com/files/97/2008/04/raw-chicken-free-image.jpg
not really, but i did it anyway

JudynTX
06-09-2009, 02:22 PM
i had enough with her bare cooter.

Ya know, I never saw her beaver pics. No thanks. :D

BRHornet45
06-09-2009, 02:23 PM
This would be greater news if it were Jessica Simpson.

son mothafuckin co-signed!

Thunder Dan
06-09-2009, 02:28 PM
now here is the question.

In my original comment I said 8 years, but I really meant 10 years, however 10 years would put her underage and insinuate that I like illegal porn. That said, I'm 25, so 10 years ago I would have also been underage. So if a picture came out in 1999, I could look at it and not be arrested, but now that I wish for it, it makes me sound creepy. Where is the right side in this situation?

LnGrrrR
06-09-2009, 02:30 PM
now here is the question.

In my original comment I said 8 years, but I really meant 10 years, however 10 years would put her underage and insinuate that I like illegal porn. That said, I'm 25, so 10 years ago I would have also been underage. So if a picture came out in 1999, I could look at it and not be arrested, but now that I wish for it, it makes me sound creepy. Where is the right side in this situation?

Just set yourself on fire now. I don't think Descartes, Socrates, Plato, Locke and Sartre combined could answer that one. :D

Thunder Dan
06-09-2009, 02:32 PM
Just set yourself on fire now. I don't think Descartes, Socrates, Plato, Locke and Sartre combined could answer that one. :D

I took a philosophy class back in college, this was one of the major topics of discussion

CuckingFunt
06-09-2009, 02:33 PM
Her breasts are odd.

Like they're sagging around the implant.

Chris Hansen
06-09-2009, 02:34 PM
now here is the question.

In my original comment I said 8 years, but I really meant 10 years, however 10 years would put her underage and insinuate that I like illegal porn. That said, I'm 25, so 10 years ago I would have also been underage. So if a picture came out in 1999, I could look at it and not be arrested, but now that I wish for it, it makes me sound creepy. Where is the right side in this situation?

We need to talk.....

jack sommerset
06-09-2009, 02:34 PM
If you don't see nips it ain't topless.

JudynTX
06-09-2009, 02:35 PM
If you don't see nips it ain't topless.

I saw nips.

Thunder Dan
06-09-2009, 02:37 PM
Whenever I hear the term topless, I think of this and giggle like a little girl
KhLulnRo7XI

LnGrrrR
06-09-2009, 02:48 PM
I took a philosophy class back in college, this was one of the major topics of discussion

In all honesty, being a fan of philosophy, I would say it's certainly ok for you to think of that, if you're remembering it wistfully and imagining what it's like for you to be a child, wanting a celebrity. However, it's inappropriate to think that today.

So the only way that it would be morally ok to imagine it would be to imagine yourself again as a 15 year old, imagining her naked. But it would be wrong for you to be picturing yourself NOW imagining her underage and naked :D

To me though, I don't think it's extremely peevy to imagine females around your age naked, especially if they blossom early. I'm sure many guys have imagined 17 yr old nude. 16 and 15 are somewhat drawing the line, but it is tough to tell sometimes. :p

I think it's just as peevy for a 60 year old guy to be ogling a hot 25 yr old as it is a 25yr old to ogle a 16 yr old. I'm sure I'm in the minority on that though.

the chair
06-09-2009, 02:55 PM
Philosophy and hooters in the same thread?

MiamiHeat
06-09-2009, 02:56 PM
Britney Spears is FUGLY now because she's crazy and stupid as fuck. Kevin Federline? REALLY?!?

I wouldn't have sex with her if it was FREE.

ididnotnothat
06-09-2009, 03:06 PM
She is way past her prime.

S_A_Longhorn
06-09-2009, 03:14 PM
Britney Spears is FUGLY now because she's crazy and stupid as fuck. Kevin Federline? REALLY?!?

I wouldn't have sex with her if it was FREE.

Yeah. You would.

MiamiHeat
06-09-2009, 03:36 PM
nope.

JudynTX
06-09-2009, 03:38 PM
nope.

Would you do Lindsay Lohan? :lol Trainwreck!

Thunder Dan
06-09-2009, 03:46 PM
Would you do Lindsay Lohan? :lol Trainwreck!

I think Lindsay Lohan is smokin. I love crazy chicks though

MiamiHeat
06-09-2009, 03:46 PM
Would you do Lindsay Lohan? :lol Trainwreck!

Lindsay Lohan is very hot physically... in another parallel universe, i would love for her to be mine

but.

in this universe, fuck no. once i saw her dancing in some club with one of those moron rappers with the do-rag on their head and the clown pants showing their boxers, i was done.

and that was BEFORE her meltdown in the recent years.

so fuck no.

I wouldn't touch Lohan if it was free.

ShoogarBear
06-09-2009, 03:50 PM
now here is the question.

In my original comment I said 8 years, but I really meant 10 years, however 10 years would put her underage and insinuate that I like illegal porn. That said, I'm 25, so 10 years ago I would have also been underage. So if a picture came out in 1999, I could look at it and not be arrested, but now that I wish for it, it makes me sound creepy. Where is the right side in this situation?


The other side to this question: what about pcitures of Marilyn Monroe? She's, like, dead.

ShoogarBear
06-09-2009, 03:52 PM
so fuck no.

I wouldn't touch Lohan if it was free.

You're just crushing the girl's ego.

JudynTX
06-09-2009, 03:54 PM
I think Lindsay Lohan is smokin. I love crazy chicks though

Have you seen her lately? :wow You can count her ribs.



in this universe, fuck no. once i saw her dancing in some club with one of those moron rappers with the do-rag on their head and the clown pants showing their boxers, i was done.

and that was BEFORE her meltdown in the recent years.

so fuck no.

I wouldn't touch Lohan if it was free.

Would you do Brooke Hogan? :lol

sonic21
06-09-2009, 03:58 PM
so fuck no.

I wouldn't touch Lohan if it was free.

she seems to be a very nice person

http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/0d646e2edb/lindsay-lohan-s-eharmony-profile

Thunder Dan
06-09-2009, 03:59 PM
Have you seen her lately? :wow You can count her ribs.

that's hot

FaithInOne
06-09-2009, 03:59 PM
Do Not Want.

Thunder Dan
06-09-2009, 04:01 PM
who seriously doesn't want to party with her?

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y225/alexxshannon/lohanknife.jpg
http://www.claudepate.com/albums/Graphics/lohandrinky01.jpg

sonic21
06-09-2009, 04:02 PM
but she's in to girls, so what's the point

JoeChalupa
06-09-2009, 04:05 PM
I think Lindsay Lohan is smokin. I love crazy chicks though

I've never found her to be hot.

Thunder Dan
06-09-2009, 04:10 PM
but she's into girls, so what's the point

ok. everyone if telling me things about my girl to turn me off of her, but it's doing the opposite

sonic21
06-09-2009, 04:12 PM
ok. everyone if telling me things about my girl to turn me off of her, but it's doing the opposite

:lol
i do think she's hot, i'm like you i love crazy chicks

howbouthemspurs
06-10-2009, 01:43 AM
Britney's ppuuurrrtyy

LnGrrrR
06-10-2009, 07:10 AM
I used to think Lohan was smoking hot... not as much lately though.

My top three still goes Alba, Shannon Elizabeth... and I rotate the third girl in and out depending on my mood :D

spurster
06-10-2009, 08:30 AM
now here is the question.

In my original comment I said 8 years, but I really meant 10 years, however 10 years would put her underage and insinuate that I like illegal porn. That said, I'm 25, so 10 years ago I would have also been underage. So if a picture came out in 1999, I could look at it and not be arrested, but now that I wish for it, it makes me sound creepy. Where is the right side in this situation?

Nudity is not pornography.

Bukefal
06-10-2009, 08:44 AM
:lmao

manufan10
06-10-2009, 10:45 PM
Would you do Brooke Hogan? :lol

Brooke Hogan is HOT!! I would be scared of Hulk though. :lol