PDA

View Full Version : 2005 Miami vs. 2004 LALAkers ????


TheAfricanFan
03-31-2005, 10:37 AM
Wich team is the best?
Wich team do you fear most and why?
ducks
03-31-2005, 10:49 AM
is this not a little early
playoff basketball is what counts not regualar season
coz
03-31-2005, 10:51 AM
2005 spurs
TheAfricanFan
03-31-2005, 10:55 AM
If you want to win playoff games you need to analise and preview situations and I'm pretty sure that's why Malik was traded for Narz. You need to realise that if that possibility becomes true you need to be aware of your "strengths"
and how it matches against your opponent so that's why I'm talking about it now. :fro
smeagol
03-31-2005, 11:00 AM
Don't wanna sound rude but, . . . who cares?
waly.mg
03-31-2005, 11:23 AM
The 2004 Lakers were a Team????????

i donīt think so

Only great players but a so bad team

Miami is better because is a very good team
Medvedenko
03-31-2005, 12:13 PM
Very eloquently put...Wally....
So by your deduction....Miami would sweep the Spurs...because they are a better team. It's all about health when considering these claims...
baseline bum
03-31-2005, 12:30 PM
I don't see Miami taking 4 straight from a team on a 19-game winning streak.
CHAMPS AGAIN
03-31-2005, 01:47 PM
Wich team is the best?
Wich team do you fear most and why?


2005 heat-2004 lakers- 2006-rockets against the 1999-2003-2005 SPURS
who f^cking cares :lol :lol :idiot
SequSpur
03-31-2005, 08:25 PM
Heat.
xcoriate
03-31-2005, 08:30 PM
If you want to win playoff games you need to analise and preview situations and I'm pretty sure that's why Malik was traded for Narz. You need to realise that if that possibility becomes true you need to be aware of your "strengths"

Malik was traded for the cap relief pop said so himself.

Heat would win.
ShoogarBear
03-31-2005, 08:45 PM
Some people are missing the point of the question, which is a good one.

The 2004 Lakers beat a Spurs team that had a lot fewer questions going into the playoffs than this year's Spurs will have.

So if you accept the premise that the 2005 Heat are better than the Lakers, then there's a real possibility they can beat the Spurs.

Of course, last year a lot of you (you know who you are) were saying there was no way the Lakers would win that series.
TDfan2007
03-31-2005, 09:59 PM
Some people are missing the point of the question, which is a good one.

The 2004 Lakers beat a Spurs team that had a lot fewer questions going into the playoffs than this year's Spurs will have.

So if you accept the premise that the 2005 Heat are better than the Lakers, then there's a real possibility they can beat the Spurs.

Of course, last year a lot of you (you know who you are) were saying there was no way the Lakers would win that series.

We were 4 tenths-of-a-second away from winning that series.
ShoogarBear
03-31-2005, 10:02 PM
We still could have won the series even with 0.4*.

We didn't.

And, to repeat, is this year's Spurs team going to go into the playoffs playing better than last year's?