PDA

View Full Version : No threads about the Iranian election?



DarrinS
06-15-2009, 02:53 PM
.

DarrinS
06-15-2009, 02:56 PM
At least this admin has failed to condemn the crackdown on protesters.

The Iranian election: Barack Obama’s cowardly silence (http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/nile_gardiner/blog/2009/06/15/the_iranian_election_barack_obamas_cowardly_silenc e)





The Obama administration's response to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's fraudulent election victory is cowardly, lily-livered and wrong. The White House's refusal to officially question the result or even condemn the brutal suppression of opposition protestors, is undermining America's standing as a global power, and is little more than a face-saving, cynical exercise in appeasement that will all end in tears.

Vice President Joe Biden, while expressing "some real doubt" about the election, summed up the administration's position on Sunday's Meet the Press - "we're going to withhold comment... I mean we're just waiting to see." Waiting to see what Mr. Biden? More savage beatings of opposition supporters including women? The further arrest of hundreds of opposition leaders? Even greater suppression of the press and free speech?

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton basically said the same thing in a pathetic statement on Saturday, declaring "the United States has refrained from commenting on the election in Iran," while White House spokesman Robert Gibbs, who thinks nothing of savaging domestic opponents, meekly noted the administration was "impressed by the vigorous debate and enthusiasm this election generated."

As blood flows on the streets of Tehran, the United States government remains as silent as a Trappist Monk. It is highly embarrassing when even the German government is showing more backbone than the White House. In contrast, the Germans, who shamefully happen to be Europe's biggest exporters to Iran, strongly denounced the crackdown on protestors, as have a number of European governments. Foreign Minister Frank Walter Steinmeier condemned the "brutal actions" against demonstrators, and summoned the Iranian Ambassador to Berlin in protest.

Fortunately there are some U.S. politicians speaking out against the White House's position, including former presidential candidate Mitt Romney and Senator Joe Lieberman. As Romney put it on ABC's This Week, "what has occurred is that the election is a fraud, the results are inaccurate, and you're seeing a brutal repression of the people as they protest." Lieberman didn't mince his words when he declared "through intimidation, violence, manipulation and outright fraud, the Iranian regime has once again made a mockery of democracy and confirmed its repressive and dictatorial character."

It's about time the Obama administration dropped this ludicrous policy of "engagement" with Tehran, and started focusing on halting the rise of a nuclear-armed Iran, as well as building up America's defences in the face of a highly dangerous rogue regime. That includes moving forward with a global missile defence system as well as actually increasing defence spending instead of cutting it. It would also be wise for this administration to actually stand up for human rights rather than brushing them under the carpet when Iran, North Korea or China pops up.

Obama's deafening silence over the Iranian election is a disgrace. According to The New York Times, the president "did not even convene any high-level White House meetings or conference calls on Sunday". That's not the mark of a leader but a clear display of weakness. It's a sad day when the greatest power in the world withholds criticism of a brutal, tyrannical and illegitimate regime for fear of upsetting its rulers.

coyotes_geek
06-15-2009, 03:07 PM
If Obama won't stand up to North Korea I don't see why we should expect him to stand up to Iran.

ChumpDumper
06-15-2009, 03:08 PM
If you don't count the thread about the Iranian election, I guess you're right.

clambake
06-15-2009, 03:09 PM
did iran object to the fraudulent US election in 2000?

PixelPusher
06-15-2009, 03:10 PM
.

I guess looking down to the 6th or 7th thread on the first page would be expecting too much from you.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128551

Winehole23
06-15-2009, 03:58 PM
Darrin is more of an avid poster than an avid reader. Sometimes, he doesn't even read his own posts.

Viva Las Espuelas
06-15-2009, 04:03 PM
did iran object to the fraudulent US election in 2000?
talk about butt hurt

FaithInOne
06-15-2009, 04:03 PM
did iran object to the fraudulent US election in 2000?

lol I'll give you a :toast on that


Really, none of us should care about this. Iran is Iran. N. Korea is N. Korea. Nukes really fucked up the entire balancing act of this reality. Way to go Oppenheimer. Douchebag. :lol:depressed