Log in

View Full Version : Fuel tax could be replaced with by-the-mile road tax



Marcus Bryant
07-01-2009, 09:09 PM
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/nation/story/71078.html

Fuel tax could be replaced with by-the-mile road tax

By Steve Everly | The Kansas City Star
Posted on Wednesday, July 1, 2009

The year is 2020 and the gasoline tax is history. In its place you get a monthly tax bill based on each mile you drove — tracked by a Global Positioning System device in your car and uploaded to a billing center.

What once was science fiction is being field-tested by the University of Iowa to iron out the wrinkles should a by-the-mile road tax ever be enacted.

Besides the technological advances making such a tax possible, the idea is getting a hard push from a growing number of transportation experts and officials. That is because the traditional by-the-gallon fuel tax, struggling to keep up with road building and maintenance demands, could fall even farther behind as vehicles' gas mileage rises and more alternative-fuel vehicles come on line.

The idea of shifting to a by-the-mile tax has been discussed for years, but it now appears to be getting more serious attention. A federal commission, after a two-year study, concluded earlier this year that the road tax was the "best path forward" to keep revenues flowing to highway and transportation projects, and could be an important new tool to help manage traffic and relieve congestion.

The decision by the 15-member National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission was unanimous, which surprised Robert Atkinson, the group's chairman. But he said it became clear as the commission's work progressed that a road tax on miles traveled was the best option.

"If you're committed to the system being improved then it was a no-brainer," he said.

Marcus Bryant
07-01-2009, 09:17 PM
How long will it take Government Motors to comply?

Bender
07-01-2009, 09:23 PM
over 20% of the price of gas is just taxes. I wonder if anyone knows the true amount?

I don't like more Big Brother stuff though.

Winehole23
07-01-2009, 09:29 PM
Bad for traveling salesmen like me.


Plus, it's new.



I don't like it.

Crookshanks
07-01-2009, 09:44 PM
Besides not liking any new taxes, I'm not at all thrilled that Big Brother could track my whereabouts.

Aggie Hoopsfan
07-01-2009, 10:17 PM
Cool, more taxes. More play money for the left to buy votes with. Piling tax after tax after tax after tax on the American people. It appears some in D.C. weren't paying attention in their U.S. history classes...

Crookshanks
07-01-2009, 11:37 PM
They aren't paying attention to anything but their leftist agenda. There are warning sirens going off everywhere - from Warren Buffet to the CBO - but they are blind, deaf, and definitely dumb to all of them!

jman3000
07-01-2009, 11:47 PM
It'd be like driving on a toll road... but everywhere.

Fantastic.

Winehole23
07-01-2009, 11:51 PM
blind, deaf, and definitely dumb

CRR-WlLVj74

jman3000
07-01-2009, 11:56 PM
Wouldn't this hurt those who have better gas mileage?

Anyway... it's all speculation at this point. It'd be impossible to retro fit all cars and the government would be double dipping people who have it installed at the pump and at the wheel. I doubt it goes anywhere.

Aggie Hoopsfan
07-01-2009, 11:58 PM
Wouldn't this hurt those who have better gas mileage?

Anyway... it's all speculation at this point. I doubt it goes anywhere because it's too intrusive and it'd be impossible to retrofit all cars. It'd be impossible to retro fit all cars and the government would be double dipping with those with it installed at the pump and at the wheel.

Howabout toll roads? Triple taxation...

Wild Cobra
07-02-2009, 12:03 AM
The liberals in Oregon have been talking about it for years with resistance. To accomplish it, they want to put a GPS data system in the cars, to track where you drive and tax according to traffic density as well.

Talk about government intrusion... Monitoring where and when you drive!

jman3000
07-02-2009, 12:15 AM
I'm not for stupid ideas like this, but from a practicality standpoint this is bugging me.

Wouldn't it be a whole lot easier and a whole lot cheaper to just have them check your odometer once a year as another step to getting your car inspection sticker? At least then you could repeal the sales tax immediately, but instead of getting by the mile taxes it would just be 1 lump sum at the end of the year.


Expensive ass GPS units in every damn car. An entirely new bureaucracy in a government billing center.

Retardedly wasteful.

SnakeBoy
07-02-2009, 12:27 AM
Wouldn't it be a whole lot easier and a whole lot cheaper to just have them check your odometer once a year as another step to getting your car inspection sticker? At least then you could repeal the sales tax immediately, but instead of getting by the mile taxes it would just be 1 lump sum at the end of the year.


Expensive ass GPS units in every damn car. An entirely new bureaucracy in a government billing center.

Retardedly wasteful.

You have no place in government.

SonOfAGun
07-02-2009, 12:29 AM
Being taxed by the mile is against my religion and I demand the Federal Government respect my beliefs.


They have been trying to get this through (Rhode Island, etc) for years.

jman3000
07-02-2009, 12:31 AM
You have no place in government.


ha... I'm actually interviewing for an internship at DHS next week : p

Viva Las Espuelas
07-02-2009, 12:43 AM
i actually thought about this right when all this cap and trade talk began early last year, and actually i'm kinda freaked out that it might be something not far fetched now. it's actually the idea that jman came up with, but i just thought of registration. inspection you can buy fakes 'cause cops don't have the info that your inspection is expire. they have to rely on sight of the design of the sticker, but it's easy to counterfeit. expired registrations can be accessed pulling up your license number. believe me. i know.


another thing, carbon tax related, i thought about then is they would somehow tax us for doing barbeques. on wood, charcoal, propane. i can imagine how much more expensive barbeque restaurants would get. more and more i can see that easily happen...........and some of you keep on with the R against D debate......

LnGrrrR
07-02-2009, 07:29 AM
another thing, carbon tax related, i thought about then is they would somehow tax us for doing barbeques. on wood, charcoal, propane. i can imagine how much more expensive barbeque restaurants would get. more and more i can see that easily happen...........and some of you keep on with the R against D debate......

Uhm... cooking with gas or electricity uses energy too. I'm pretty sure the government won't get their hands messy with people's backyard barbecues, or even barbecue restaurants.

I'll throw in my two cents that I'm leery of this GPS system too. As it is, people who drive more have to buy more gasoline. Plus, it's a built-in incentive now to get a car that has better MPG.

ElNono
07-02-2009, 07:35 AM
Not only that, insurance companies could directly asses how many miles you drove last year by that data and adjust your policy accordingly.
Or police could tell if you were speeding if you went from point A to point B in an amount of time smaller than what it should really be if you were doing the posted speed limit.

Where does it stop?

coyotes_geek
07-02-2009, 07:45 AM
Just raise the damn gas tax and be done with it. There's no issues with the government tracking everyone's whereabouts, the infrastructure to collect the taxes already exists, you don't have to worry about not collecting tax revenue from out of state vehicles who aren't hooked up to the GPS, you don't have to worry about people not paying their tax bill, and it provides an extra incentive for people to drive fuel efficient cars.

fyatuk
07-02-2009, 07:48 AM
Yeah, I certainly don't approve of the GPS driven by-the-mile tax idea. I have no interest in effectively being lo-jacked at all times. It's stupid to give up that much privacy.

They should definitely change vehicle registration fees to scale inversely with gas mileage, and I would love to see a by-the-mile tax replace the gas tax provided it is done with GPS (or anything that violates privacy).

Of course, a by-the-mile tax has to keep fuel efficient cars cheaper than other cars to operate, otherwise it defeats the purpose.

Viva Las Espuelas
07-02-2009, 08:06 AM
Uhm... cooking with gas or electricity uses energy too. I'm pretty sure the government won't get their hands messy with people's backyard barbecues, or even barbecue restaurants.

let's just wait and see and then come back to this.

LnGrrrR
07-02-2009, 08:11 AM
let's just wait and see and then come back to this.

Sure! I'm down for that.

On a side note, I think it's interesting that no one on the boards thinks this is a good idea. :lol

Extra Stout
07-02-2009, 08:27 AM
I'm starting to grow weary of this whole "United States of America" thing.

Phenomanul
07-02-2009, 08:46 AM
just great... :rolleyes

101A
07-02-2009, 08:57 AM
Not only that, insurance companies could directly asses how many miles you drove last year by that data and adjust your policy accordingly.
Or police could tell if you were speeding if you went from point A to point B in an amount of time smaller than what it should really be if you were doing the posted speed limit.

Where does it stop?

You're not taking this far enough AT ALL.

Insurance companies could have real time access to the travel "grid", and track where you are, and how fast you are driving RIGHT NOW.

Cops could simply ding your bank account (or credit card if ur broke), the INSTANT you exceed a speed limit, and for every second you remain over it. Run a stop sign? Caught.

There could be a database that knows the location of your vehicle every minute of every day....adulterers & slackers beware; your wife/boss might be able to get at those records......

coyotes_geek
07-02-2009, 09:01 AM
You're not taking this far enough AT ALL.

Insurance companies could have real time access to the travel "grid", and track where you are, and how fast you are driving RIGHT NOW.

Cops could simply ding your bank account (or credit card if ur broke), the INSTANT you exceed a speed limit, and for every second you remain over it. Run a stop sign? Caught.

There could be a database that knows the location of your vehicle every minute of every day....adulterers & slackers beware; your wife/boss might be able to get at those records......

Got a toll tag? They can do this to you already.

jman3000
07-02-2009, 09:02 AM
This discussion should have ended a while ago.

None of this shit is gonna come to fruition.

coyotes_geek
07-02-2009, 09:04 AM
This discussion should have ended a while ago.

None of this shit is gonna come to fruition.

Don't be so sure. Texas is studying this too.

Winehole23
07-02-2009, 09:10 AM
Just raise the damn gas tax and be done with it. There's no issues with the government tracking everyone's whereabouts...I'm surprised to hear you say this, CG. Did you just get exasperated, or do you really mean it?


... the infrastructure to collect the taxes already exists, you don't have to worry about not collecting tax revenue from out of state vehicles who aren't hooked up to the GPS, you don't have to worry about people not paying their tax bill, and it provides an extra incentive for people to drive fuel efficient cars.The efficiencies are clear enough. Again, I'm just surprised you're the one arguing for them, given the official penetration of everyday life they presume.


Insurance companies could have real time access to the travel "grid", and track where you are, and how fast you are driving RIGHT NOW.That they do not yet stands out prominently to me.

Am I wrong about this, 101?

Aggie Hoopsfan
07-02-2009, 09:20 AM
Just raise the damn gas tax and be done with it. There's no issues with the government tracking everyone's whereabouts, the infrastructure to collect the taxes already exists, you don't have to worry about not collecting tax revenue from out of state vehicles who aren't hooked up to the GPS, you don't have to worry about people not paying their tax bill, and it provides an extra incentive for people to drive fuel efficient cars.

Oh come on, the Messiah and his Democratic minions are great. Everyone should get on board this statist bandwagon, it's the only way to stick it to the evil corporations and big oil [/leftist trash]

jack sommerset
07-02-2009, 09:21 AM
Talk about civil rights being violated. The Government will know everywhere u go. People who bitched about Bush wire taping....go fuck urself for not saying shit about this. People who bitch about ur car being searched..go fuck yourself too.

Obama is one dumb motherfucker.

coyotes_geek
07-02-2009, 09:23 AM
I'm surprised to hear you say this, CG. Did you just get exasperated, or do you really mean it?

Not sure I follow. In other discussions have I been giving off the impression that I'm in favor of the government tracking people's movements? I'm not btw.


The efficiencies are clear enough. Again, I'm just surprised you're the one arguing for them, given the official penetration of everyday life they presume.

Our transportation infrastructure is horribly underfunded. We need it, we want it, so we've got to pay for it. Right now we're not paying enough. I know I'm anti-tax on most other things, but infrastructure is on the short list of things I do believe the government has to be involved in. And given it's importance in how we're able to live the way we do, it's something that is worth spending money on.

101A
07-02-2009, 09:32 AM
That they do not yet stands out prominently to me.

Am I wrong about this, 101?

Don't do any p/c insurance, but I assume you ask me because you remember my occupation is related to insurance; but from the underwriter's mindset, I can answer your question:

Insurance companies want to know EVERYTHING they can to underwrite risk accurately; if they could know that (technological and regulatory hurdles all cleared), they would.

101A
07-02-2009, 09:35 AM
Got a toll tag? They can do this to you already.

I thought the toll tag was only read via radio waves at the toll booth itself?

I don't think there's GPS technology in that thing.

How EZ Pass works (http://www.ezpass.com/static/info/howit.shtml)

jman3000
07-02-2009, 09:45 AM
Talk about civil rights being violated. The Government will know everywhere u go. People who bitched about Bush wire taping....go fuck urself for not saying shit about this. People who bitch about ur car being searched..go fuck yourself too.

Obama is one dumb motherfucker.

:lol speaking of one dumb motherfucker.

Welcome to the thread. You should have read the article and the posts first.

Thanks.

Aggie Hoopsfan
07-02-2009, 09:45 AM
I thought the toll tag was only read via radio waves at the toll booth itself?

I don't think there's GPS technology in that thing.

How EZ Pass works (http://www.ezpass.com/static/info/howit.shtml)

I think he just means that it shows each location you pass through on the tollroad, so in effect they have a rudimentary idea of your travel about the city (at least on the toll roads).

Marcus Bryant
07-02-2009, 09:47 AM
Don't do any p/c insurance, but I assume you ask me because you remember my occupation is related to insurance; but from the underwriter's mindset, I can answer your question:

Insurance companies want to know EVERYTHING they can to underwrite risk accurately; if they could know that (technological and regulatory hurdles all cleared), they would.

Not to mention employers and creditors.

Viva Las Espuelas
07-02-2009, 09:48 AM
On a side note, I think it's interesting that no one on the boards thinks this is a good idea. :lol
i'm really not campaigning for the popularity vote, dude.

coyotes_geek
07-02-2009, 09:50 AM
I thought the toll tag was only read via radio waves at the toll booth itself?

I don't think there's GPS technology in that thing.

How EZ Pass works (http://www.ezpass.com/static/info/howit.shtml)

There isn't GPS in those, but you don't need it. Say there's two toll booths 1 mile apart and the speed limit is 60 mph. The tolling equipment records the time you went through the booth, down to the .01 of a second. If you cross through the second toll booth less than a minute after you crossed through the first one, you were obviously speeding. It wouldn't be any trouble at all to have a computer just spit out speeding tickets to anyone who covered that distance in 50 seconds (equates to 72 mph) or less. It also wouldn't be any trouble to set up the monitoring equipment on any non-toll road and do the same thing.

edit: Just for more useless info, even though the technology to do something like this already exists, toll authorities have resisted doing something like this because they want people driving the roads and paying tolls. People won't do that if they're getting tickets mailed to them. However, toll authorities are all quasi-public entities and there could come a day where governments start leaning on them to do some kind of automated speed enforcement as a source of revenue.

ElNono
07-02-2009, 10:00 AM
The flip side is that there will probably be a new very lucrative business that hacks and modifies GPS devices. It will probably be declared illegal ASAP, but hey, it will generate some jobs! :lol

Wild Cobra
07-02-2009, 10:14 AM
I'm not for stupid ideas like this, but from a practicality standpoint this is bugging me.

Wouldn't it be a whole lot easier and a whole lot cheaper to just have them check your odometer once a year as another step to getting your car inspection sticker? At least then you could repeal the sales tax immediately, but instead of getting by the mile taxes it would just be 1 lump sum at the end of the year.


Expensive ass GPS units in every damn car. An entirely new bureaucracy in a government billing center.
Yes, but then they cannot track your activities. Like Viva Las Espuelas points out, other methods are easy to cheat. Odometers can be rolled back, or changed. The only thing that will work at this level of government control is a tamper-proof piece of data recording equipment. I find it ironic that liberals complain about the Patriot Act, which has practical national security usages, then think it's right to track people's mileage for taxes.


another thing, carbon tax related, i thought about then is they would somehow tax us for doing barbeques. on wood, charcoal, propane. i can imagine how much more expensive barbeque restaurants would get. more and more i can see that easily happen...........and some of you keep on with the R against D debate......
There would probably be carbon taxes on both the briquettes and starter fluids, except I think they would more likely outlaw that form, only allowing gas grills that meet new emission standards, and tax that fuel too.

Not only that, insurance companies could directly asses how many miles you drove last year by that data and adjust your policy accordingly.
Or police could tell if you were speeding if you went from point A to point B in an amount of time smaller than what it should really be if you were doing the posted speed limit.

Where does it stop?
Absolutely. Any form of data recording can also be subpoenaed for courts. Maybe to check on alibis, traffic accidents, vehicle speed for speeding tickets, etc.

Do we really want a 'black box' in our cars like aircraft are required to have?

There isn't GPS in those, but you don't need it. Say there's two toll booths 1 mile apart and the speed limit is 60 mph. The tolling equipment records the time you went through the booth, down to the .01 of a second. If you cross through the second toll booth less than a minute after you crossed through the first one, you were obviously speeding. It wouldn't be any trouble at all to have a computer just spit out speeding tickets to anyone who covered that distance in 50 seconds (equates to 72 mph) or less. It also wouldn't be any trouble to set up the monitoring equipment on any non-toll road and do the same thing.
Agreed.

I say if they are hellbent on a mileage tax, tax the tires by wear life.

LnGrrrR
07-02-2009, 10:32 AM
i'm really not campaigning for the popularity vote, dude.

That wasn't just in response to you. That's why I labled it a "side note". As in, not related to our discussion.

Take a chill pill Viva. Not everything is about you. :)

LnGrrrR
07-02-2009, 10:35 AM
Oh come on, the Messiah and his Democratic minions are great. Everyone should get on board this statist bandwagon, it's the only way to stick it to the evil corporations and big oil [/leftist trash]


Talk about civil rights being violated. The Government will know everywhere u go. People who bitched about Bush wire taping....go fuck urself for not saying shit about this. People who bitch about ur car being searched..go fuck yourself too.

Obama is one dumb motherfucker.


I find it ironic that liberals complain about the Patriot Act, which has practical national security usages, then think it's right to track people's mileage for taxes.

Could any of the people on these boards calling out 'lefties' for supporting this, please show where any of the board lefties are supporting this?

Anyone?

ElNono
07-02-2009, 10:35 AM
Could any of the people on these boards calling out 'lefties' for supporting this, please show where any of the board lefties are supporting this?

Anyone?

My thoughts exactly...

EDIT: And the faux indignation at the abuses of the Patriot Act at this point is laughable...

SonOfAGun
07-02-2009, 10:45 AM
I'm going to make like Wal-Mart and Roll back the prmilesces. :bking

Winehole23
07-02-2009, 11:01 AM
Not sure I follow. In other discussions have I been giving off the impression that I'm in favor of the government tracking people's movements? I'm not btw.Fair enough. But the following graf raises the question again IMO, if implicitly.


Our transportation infrastructure is horribly underfunded. We need it, we want it, so we've got to pay for it. Right now we're not paying enough. I know I'm anti-tax on most other things, but infrastructure is on the short list of things I do believe the government has to be involved in. And given it's importance in how we're able to live the way we do, it's something that is worth spending money on.This is eminently reasonable and prudential, and I agree with you.

But a tax with a toll tag?

Rly?

Wild Cobra
07-02-2009, 11:09 AM
Our transportation infrastructure is horribly underfunded. We need it, we want it, so we've got to pay for it. Right now we're not paying enough. I know I'm anti-tax on most other things, but infrastructure is on the short list of things I do believe the government has to be involved in. And given it's importance in how we're able to live the way we do, it's something that is worth spending money on.
I agree. We need to fund the roads more money. Gasoline taxes have not increased with the cost of living, labor, or whatever standard you want to use in most states. The federal gas tax is 18.4 cents per gallon, and for how long now? I don't know. Revenue for road taxes is actually decreasing over the years per mile driven as well with more fuel efficient vehicles.

I am all for raising both state and federal gas taxes, then placing an annual increase that follows the CPI, or some other index. It has a condition however. Fuel taxes are for roads only. Not to pay for mass transit. We have such deteriorating roads here in Portland partially because the fuel taxes are being used to fund rail transportation.

coyotes_geek
07-02-2009, 11:12 AM
Fair enough. But the following graf raises the question again IMO, if implicitly.

This is eminently reasonable and prudential, and I agree with you.

But a tax with a toll tag?

Rly?

Sorry, you're losing me again. I support raising the taxes per gallon we pay at the pump. I'm not in favor of any kind of electronic record keeping tracking people's driving habits and taxing off of that. This doesn't need to get any more complicated than pay at the pump.

The toll tag stuff was was just tangential conversation.

Winehole23
07-02-2009, 11:26 AM
Gotcha. My bad.

TDMVPDPOY
07-02-2009, 11:32 AM
thats fuckd up if ur traveling 1hr to work or a regular on highways logging big kms to work and back....

at least self employed/contractors can claim deductions, but what about the regular office worker.....

Marcus Bryant
07-02-2009, 11:57 AM
Could any of the people on these boards calling out 'lefties' for supporting this, please show where any of the board lefties are supporting this?

Anyone?

This would be yet another example of a government action with no popular support which nonetheless comes into existence as "our" public representatives put on their kneepads and lipstick for their corporate or bureaucratic masters.

Winehole23
07-02-2009, 12:07 PM
Chapstick.

*Kneepads and chapstick* was my received version.

Winehole23
07-02-2009, 12:08 PM
Amplified:


By the case.

Winehole23
07-02-2009, 01:32 PM
Many men are too demure (http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O27-demure.html) for lipstick.

DarrinS
07-02-2009, 02:14 PM
The government knows what's best for us, so this is a great idea that should'nt be questioned.

Winehole23
07-02-2009, 02:20 PM
Hey, D.

Winehole23
07-02-2009, 02:21 PM
Don't ever change. :lol

SonOfAGun
07-02-2009, 02:22 PM
Winehole's been hittin' the bottle again!

Winehole23
07-02-2009, 02:24 PM
Who said I ever stopped?

jack sommerset
07-02-2009, 04:30 PM
ha... I'm actually interviewing for an internship at DHS next week : p

:lol speaking of dumb motherfuckers

Viva Las Espuelas
07-19-2009, 02:25 PM
Sure! I'm down for that.

On a side note, I think it's interesting that no one on the boards thinks this is a good idea. :lol
i was bored and did and quick search. being that this administration likes the european way....

BRUSSELS, April 3 (RIA Novosti) - The government of Belgium's French-speaking region of Wallonia, which has a population of about 4 million, has approved a tax on barbequing, local media reported. Experts said that between 50 and 100 grams of CO2, a so-called greenhouse gas, is emitted during barbequing. Beginning June 2007, residents of Wallonia will have to pay 20 euros for a grilling session.
The local authorities plan to monitor compliance with the new tax legislation from helicopters, whose thermal sensors will detect burning grills.
Scientists believe CO2 emissions are a major cause of global warming.



http://en.rian.ru/world/20070403/62999935.html






truth is stranger than fiction, huh lnggrrrr?

coyotes_geek
07-19-2009, 02:39 PM
The local authorities plan to monitor compliance with the new tax legislation from helicopters

:rollin

Hilarious. How much CO2 does that helicopter put out?

whottt
07-19-2009, 02:47 PM
I've actually got no problem with this except for the fact that it only taxes automobiles. Flight and really all travel commercial or private should be taxed and the more costly, in terms of fuel consumption per trip, the mode of travel, the higher the tax should be...in fact I'm pretty sure that wealthy liberals will get to contrbitue to "wealth redistribution" to their hearts content under this concept.

Spursmania
07-19-2009, 04:20 PM
I don't need any more bad news. I'm getting sick already with the new taxes coming. Where does it end?:depressed

Wild Cobra
07-19-2009, 09:20 PM
I don't need any more bad news. I'm getting sick already with the new taxes coming. Where does it end?:depressed

It will end when the liberals in congress think they've repressed this nation enough.

Marcus Bryant
07-19-2009, 11:03 PM
i was bored and did and quick search. being that this administration likes the european way....

BRUSSELS, April 3 (RIA Novosti) - The government of Belgium's French-speaking region of Wallonia, which has a population of about 4 million, has approved a tax on barbequing, local media reported. Experts said that between 50 and 100 grams of CO2, a so-called greenhouse gas, is emitted during barbequing. Beginning June 2007, residents of Wallonia will have to pay 20 euros for a grilling session.
The local authorities plan to monitor compliance with the new tax legislation from helicopters, whose thermal sensors will detect burning grills.
Scientists believe CO2 emissions are a major cause of global warming.

http://en.rian.ru/world/20070403/62999935.html


truth is stranger than fiction, huh lnggrrrr?

Let's just kill off those who cannot justify their 'carbon footprint.'

Viva Las Espuelas
07-20-2009, 12:54 AM
Let's just kill off those who cannot justify their 'carbon footprint.'
that's called the "obama" healthcare plan, i believe................

ducks
07-20-2009, 01:25 AM
I don't need any more bad news. I'm getting sick already with the new taxes coming. Where does it end?:depressed

when palin is elected and rollsback all the stupid things that get passed

LnGrrrR
07-20-2009, 09:02 AM
i was bored and did and quick search. being that this administration likes the european way....

BRUSSELS, April 3 (RIA Novosti) - The government of Belgium's French-speaking region of Wallonia, which has a population of about 4 million, has approved a tax on barbequing, local media reported. Experts said that between 50 and 100 grams of CO2, a so-called greenhouse gas, is emitted during barbequing. Beginning June 2007, residents of Wallonia will have to pay 20 euros for a grilling session.
The local authorities plan to monitor compliance with the new tax legislation from helicopters, whose thermal sensors will detect burning grills.
Scientists believe CO2 emissions are a major cause of global warming.



http://en.rian.ru/world/20070403/62999935.html






truth is stranger than fiction, huh lnggrrrr?

Not when it's a hoax.

http://en.rian.ru/world/20070404/63077075.html

Looks like this was a rumor, and was never a bill seriously considered being signed into law. The fact that it said the grills were going to be monitored by HELICOPTERS gave me a clue.

Edit: Additionally, if a law like this made BELGIANS furious, imagine what it would do in America? :lol

ElNono
07-20-2009, 09:06 AM
Not when it's a hoax.

http://en.rian.ru/world/20070404/63077075.html

Looks like this was a rumor, and was never a bill seriously considered being signed into law. The fact that it said the grills were going to be monitored by HELICOPTERS gave me a clue.

Edit: Additionally, if a law like this made BELGIANS furious, imagine what it would do in America? :lol

You're not supposed to post this. You're supposed to panic and get enraged at them Dems... :rolleyes

LnGrrrR
07-20-2009, 09:40 AM
You're not supposed to post this. You're supposed to panic and get enraged at them Dems... :rolleyes

What's great is that it's from the same source, a day later. Also, note that the news article was posted on the 3rd of April... so most likely it came out on April Fool's Day, as the article mentioned.

Again, the idea that they were going to trace carbon emissions with HELICOPTERS seemed a giveaway.

Winehole23
07-20-2009, 11:53 AM
i was bored and did and quick search. being that this administration likes the european way....

BRUSSELS, April 3 (RIA Novosti) - The government of Belgium's French-speaking region of Wallonia, which has a population of about 4 million, has approved a tax on barbequing, local media reported. Experts said that between 50 and 100 grams of CO2, a so-called greenhouse gas, is emitted during barbequing. Beginning June 2007, residents of Wallonia will have to pay 20 euros for a grilling session.

The local authorities plan to monitor compliance with the new tax legislation from helicopters, whose thermal sensors will detect burning grills.
Scientists believe CO2 emissions are a major cause of global warming.

truth is stranger than fiction, huh lnggrrrr?State supervision of barbeque fires from helicopters? Not in my country. This would never fly here.

LNGR can always consider buying carbon offsets for his barbecues if it really bothers him.

I will continue to release barbeque smoke into the environment at will and without scruple, in the manner of my Texas countrymen. :flag:

Viva Las Espuelas
07-20-2009, 11:56 AM
Not when it's a hoax.

http://en.rian.ru/world/20070404/63077075.html

Looks like this was a rumor, and was never a bill seriously considered being signed into law. The fact that it said the grills were going to be monitored by HELICOPTERS gave me a clue.

Edit: Additionally, if a law like this made BELGIANS furious, imagine what it would do in America? :lol

oh wow. i didn't even pay attention to the date. oh well, i still won't dismiss this as something that won't be used in the future just yet.

LnGrrrR
07-20-2009, 11:58 AM
oh wow. i didn't even pay attention to the date. oh well, i still won't dismiss this as something that won't be used in the future just yet.

LnGrrrR 1, Viva 0 :lol

Hey, it's cool. We all do that every once in awhile. That's why we have opponents... to double-check our facts for us. :D

Winehole23
07-20-2009, 12:01 PM
oh wow. i didn't even pay attention to the date. oh well, i still won't dismiss this as something that won't be used in the future just yet.I wouldn't be so eager to put such a weak arrow in my quiver to hedge against contingency, but you're certainly welcome to it.

Are you looking forward to the barbeque ban, VLE? :lol

Wild Cobra
07-20-2009, 12:05 PM
I wouldn't be so eager to put such a weak arrow in my quiver to hedge against contingency, but you're certainly welcome to it.

Are you looking forward to the barbeque ban, VLE? :lol
Thing is, the way government likes to regulate things, I didn't even question the accuracy of the article. It sounded like any other unreasonable things that government gives us. Now I would have looked things up myself if I went to debate anything about a tax I hadn't heard of.

Winehole23
07-20-2009, 12:12 PM
It sounded like any other unreasonable things that government gives us.You wanted to believe it too? :rollin

ElNono
07-20-2009, 12:44 PM
it sounded like any other unreasonable things that a socialist democrat government gives us.

fify

Viva Las Espuelas
07-20-2009, 12:45 PM
I wouldn't be so eager to put such a weak arrow in my quiver to hedge against contingency, but you're certainly welcome to it.

Are you looking forward to the barbeque ban, VLE? :lolno, but did you think buying and selling of "carbon credits" was a far fetched idea a few short years ago? i wouldn't put anything past people in washington. quit giving them so much credit.

Winehole23
07-20-2009, 12:53 PM
no, but did you think buying and selling of "carbon credits" was a far fetched idea a few short years ago?Once I saw the *inconvenient* PBS special, in my ignorance I assumed it was a foregone conclusion.

Viva Las Espuelas
07-20-2009, 01:01 PM
Once I saw the *inconvenient* PBS special, in my ignorance I assumed it was a foregone conclusion.
that's right. i need to find the rags you bow down to.

Winehole23
07-20-2009, 01:12 PM
that's right. i need to find the rags you bow down to.I follow my own feeble inner lights more than any particular source.

Checked daily:

Bloomberg
WSJ
RCP
Takimag
Reason
NYT
amconmag(Eunomia)
antiwar.com
frontporchrepublic
huffpo
drudge
TPM
Instapundit
googlenews
boingboing
fark
whatreallyhappened

Winehole23
07-20-2009, 01:16 PM
FT
RGE monitor
Economist