PDA

View Full Version : Thank You Peter Holt



timvp
07-08-2009, 05:25 PM
I'm not sure what has gotten into you and the rest of the ownership group but thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Spurs Nation

slick'81
07-08-2009, 05:26 PM
no1 can call the spurs cheap nemore they ante'up to try and get timmy one more ring

Bruno
07-08-2009, 05:27 PM
Yep, huge thanks.
Spurs will be at least $10M over the tax. :wow

anjlbitz
07-08-2009, 05:27 PM
avatar...

Summers
07-08-2009, 05:27 PM
(signing big card)

Spurs#1
07-08-2009, 05:27 PM
There would have been criminal charges if Spurs owners, management blew the last few years of Duncans reign.

benefactor
07-08-2009, 05:28 PM
I was just thinking about making a thread like this. Holt has shown that he is just as invested as a fan as he is as an owner. Thank you...from the bottom of our hearts.

timvp
07-08-2009, 05:28 PM
Yep, huge thanks.
Spurs will be at least $10M over the tax. :wow

That's just crazy.

baseline bum
07-08-2009, 05:28 PM
Major thanks for stepping up to the plate and bringing us the team we'll need to get another banner up in the AT&T Center. :tu

SouthTexasRancher
07-08-2009, 05:29 PM
I'm not sure what has gotten into you and the rest of the ownership group but thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Spurs Nation


Damn straight. Mr. Holt, you are the man. When you say you're bringing it, you really mean it. The Best Pro Sports Owner of them all. And thanks to R.C. for signing McDyess instead of Sheed. Dice is EXACTLY the guy we need.

Aggie Hoopsfan
07-08-2009, 05:29 PM
:toast

jag
07-08-2009, 05:31 PM
The timing of all this is what gets me. He stepped up to the plate during a broken economy when every other owner is trying to cut spending.

Holt, Pop and RC deserve major respect.

Spurs Brazil
07-08-2009, 05:32 PM
Thanks P.Holt :tu

baseline bum
07-08-2009, 05:34 PM
Yep, huge thanks.
Spurs will be at least $10M over the tax. :wow

How? I'm seeing about a $78 million payroll with
1) Duncan
2) Parker
3) Ginobili
4) Jefferson
5) McDyess
6) Mason
7) Mahinmi
8) Finley
9) Bonner
10) Hill
11) Blair
12) McClinton
13) Marcus Williams

Plus, they might add Bowen, Oberto, or one other minimum player, plus whatever part of Haislip's deal may be guaranteed. Maybe that payroll could push low $79 million or so. With the cap at $58.68 million (48.8% BRI), the luxury tax threshold (61.1% BRI) should roughly be about $74.6 million, shouldn't it?

Solid D
07-08-2009, 05:35 PM
As mentioned before in the RC thread, it's up to us as fans to keep the purple and gold jersied or red jersey-wearing fans out of the AT&T Center. To bring back an old Spurs' slogan "Fill It Up!".

MaNu4Tres
07-08-2009, 05:36 PM
Peter Holt thank you.

If you ever think about passing around a collection basket via PayPal.

You got a Hundred dollar bill from me my man.

If I ever see you out at a Spurs game next year, your next Jack and Coke is on me.


Thank you Peter!

Creation88
07-08-2009, 05:36 PM
when does the season start!? thanks pete!

lurker23
07-08-2009, 05:36 PM
Thank you owners. You rock. :toast

And if you're going to go over the luxury tax line, might as well do it in style, eh?

200 miles
07-08-2009, 05:36 PM
Aside from the wait-and-see of all of the possible signings of Blair, Gist and McClinton, do we now call it an offseason?

timvp
07-08-2009, 05:37 PM
How? I'm seeing about a $78 million payroll with
1) Duncan
2) Parker
3) Ginobili
4) Jefferson
5) McDyess
6) Mason
7) Mahinmi
8) Finley
9) Bonner
10) Hill
11) Blair
12) McClinton
13) Marcus Williams

Plus, they might add Bowen, Oberto, or one other minimum player, plus whatever part of Haislip's deal may be guaranteed. Maybe that payroll could push low $79 million or so. With the cap at $58.68 million (48.8% BRI), the luxury tax threshold (61.1% BRI) should roughly be about $74.6 million, shouldn't it?Lux tax is around $69M.

poeticism707
07-08-2009, 05:38 PM
This is to you, Holt and FO!

You all did very little talking, BUT TOOK ALL THE NECESSARY ACTION to make the Spurs into true contenders again.

Much respect!

:flag::flag::flag:

MaNu4Tres
07-08-2009, 05:39 PM
How? I'm seeing about a $78 million payroll with
1) Duncan
2) Parker
3) Ginobili
4) Jefferson
5) McDyess
6) Mason
7) Mahinmi
8) Finley
9) Bonner
10) Hill
11) Blair
12) McClinton
13) Marcus Williams

Plus, they might add Bowen, Oberto, or one other minimum player, plus whatever part of Haislip's deal may be guaranteed. Maybe that payroll could push low $79 million or so. With the cap at $58.68 million (48.8% BRI), the luxury tax threshold (61.1% BRI) should roughly be about $74.6 million, shouldn't it?

Your forgetting Haislip and possibly Gist.

DPG21920
07-08-2009, 05:39 PM
Wow. Hopefully these re-vamped Spurs can make it up by a long playoff run!

Ditty
07-08-2009, 05:39 PM
thanks pete i will defintley go to all the games i can go to next year even maybe some road ones

Ed Helicopter Jones
07-08-2009, 05:40 PM
I think this proves that Holt is a badass competitor. He won 4 championships staying mostly under the cap. The first time a team led by Timmy got eliminated in the first round he and the FO fixed it.

Dude likes to win and is smart enough to buy when others are selling. That's how you get rich in any league. I don't think the offseason deals are over yet either.

Spursmania
07-08-2009, 05:41 PM
:worthy::worthy:

ElNono
07-08-2009, 05:41 PM
http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/3/6s9gtd.jpg.gif

Thank you Peter, you're the MAN...

objective
07-08-2009, 05:42 PM
Thank you Peter Holt and the rest of the ownership group

Thompson
07-08-2009, 05:42 PM
Thank you Mr. Holt. This means a lot especially coming during an economic downturn. I'll try to see as many games as I can out of gratitude (and because I'm excited of course).

duncan228
07-08-2009, 05:42 PM
From a Duncan fan: Thanks. It's much appreciated. Duncan deserves the best possible chance to bring home another one. :toast

anonoftheinternets
07-08-2009, 05:44 PM
hopefully the SPAM posts will be relevant once more .. :flag:


I think this proves that Holt is a badass competitor. He won 4 championships staying mostly under the cap. The first time a team led by Timmy got eliminated in the first round he and the FO fixed it.

Dude likes to win and is smart enough to buy when others are selling. That's how you get rich in any league. I don't think the offseason deals are over yet either.

Bruno
07-08-2009, 05:44 PM
A quick update of Spurs team salary

Players with a guaranteed salary :
Spurs have 11 players with a fully guaranteed contract
Salaries for these 11 players are :
Tim Duncan: $22,183,220
Richard Jefferson: $14,200,000
Tony Parker: $12,600,000
Manu Ginobili: $10,728,130
Antonio McDyess: $5,854,000
Roger Mason: $3,780,000
Matt Bonner: $3,256,000
Micheal Finley: $2,500,000
Marcus Haislip: $1,990,000
George Hill: $1,081,680
Ian Mahinmi: $899,700
The total salary for these 11 players is $79,072,730

The tax level is $69,920,000.

Spurs will fill the roster with min salary and should end up between $10M and $12M above the tax.

scottspurs
07-08-2009, 05:45 PM
Everyone at Spurstalk shoud thank Peter Holt, RC Buford, and Coach Pop in this thread and we should send it to him via email.

We need to do our part now by supporting the Spurs with all our heart. Go to as many games as possible and everyone should use extra change on a new spurs jersey instead of the beer we were are all thinking about buying in celebration. The FO has been wise now we should follow. Be confident because the Spurs are going all the way.

SAY IT LOUD AND PROUD,

GO SPURS GO

biziofromdowntown
07-08-2009, 05:45 PM
Mr Holt, thank u. Sir. We'll win 4 u.

admiralfats
07-08-2009, 05:51 PM
let's hope they can make up some of that money from championship memorabilia sales.

200 miles
07-08-2009, 05:52 PM
http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/3/6s9gtd.jpg.gif

:lmao
shaun of the dead. nice.

MaNu4Tres
07-08-2009, 05:53 PM
I don't think I've ever been as excited going into a season since Tim Duncan's rookie year.

rayray2k8
07-08-2009, 05:58 PM
This still doesn't excuse the release of Scola....








:wgaf::lol

Ditty
07-08-2009, 06:01 PM
ST mentioned on 1250

Timvp mention also :toast

Spursox
07-08-2009, 06:02 PM
Thank you Peter and RC! Now Pop can return from his overseas trip hungry, motivated and ready to kick some ass again.......

DBMethos
07-08-2009, 06:06 PM
I fully endorse this thread and the sentiments contained herein. :)

50 cent
07-08-2009, 06:06 PM
The ownership group is in a very nice financial position compared to a lot of other teams (and not just Peter Holt).

I think they collectively realize that we have 2 more years to try to get #5 before Duncan is done.

Props to them for making it happen.

Agloco
07-08-2009, 06:09 PM
I'm not sure what has gotten into you and the rest of the ownership group but thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Spurs Nation

A fifth of Vodka probably. Id temper my enthusiasm until after we see how the organization does financially.

xellos88330
07-08-2009, 06:12 PM
I am going to buy a pair of season tickets for sure now.

I just need help finding the right type of medication that I can give my wife so she will sleep through the whole season and never know that I bought them.

spurspokesman
07-08-2009, 06:16 PM
I'm not sure what has gotten into you and the rest of the ownership group but thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Spurs Nation

Nothing sparks a competitor more than losing. First round lost= priceless+change

Props to the whole spurs FO:toast

spurspokesman
07-08-2009, 06:19 PM
This still doesn't excuse the release of Scola....
Maybe not for everybody but let the good times roll ray







:wgaf::lol

bigdog
07-08-2009, 06:26 PM
Peter Holt, I love you.

Mavs<Spurs
07-08-2009, 06:33 PM
I'm not sure what has gotten into you and the rest of the ownership group but thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Spurs Nation
+ 1

Thank you very much !!!

jay014
07-08-2009, 06:34 PM
Business is boominghttp://www.constructionweekonline.com/pictures/gallery/Gallery/ObamaCaterpillar.jpg

picnroll
07-08-2009, 06:35 PM
Holt sending Duncan and Pop out in style.:toast

RodNIc91
07-08-2009, 06:39 PM
Thank you and all the group. I think we will be going all the way just like 2 years ago. It will be worth it

barbacoataco
07-08-2009, 06:42 PM
I agree with this post. Spurs ownership is trying to do whatever possible to be truly in the championship hunt.

rayray2k8
07-08-2009, 06:44 PM
Now, it's all up to this man :pop: to lead the spurs..

Mavs<Spurs
07-08-2009, 06:44 PM
The timing of all this is what gets me. He stepped up to the plate during a broken economy when every other owner is trying to cut spending.

Holt, Pop and RC deserve major respect.

Great Point !

45 bank shot
07-08-2009, 06:44 PM
Thank you owner, thank you FO, thank you Pop

SenorSpur
07-08-2009, 06:44 PM
Thanks Mr. HoltCat for challenging and allowing the FO to "pull out all the stops" to upgrade the roster in the "drive for five".

I'm seriously looking for my old Cat Diesel Power hat.

J.T.
07-08-2009, 06:49 PM
I'm just glad this team didn't win another championship with the old as dirt roster it had, because this offseason would've never happened.

Blackjack
07-08-2009, 06:53 PM
Mr. Holt, you're a real life american hero, with a story like few others, and have done nothing but represent this town and team in a first-class manor...

I, and the rest of my Spurs brethren, can never thank you enough.:toast

Kent_in_Atlanta
07-08-2009, 06:55 PM
Business is boominghttp://www.constructionweekonline.com/pictures/gallery/Gallery/ObamaCaterpillar.jpg

Beautiful!!!!!! :LMAO

StoneBuddha
07-08-2009, 07:11 PM
:worthy:

+1 on all the praise to Holt.

urunobili
07-08-2009, 07:12 PM
You couldn't have said it better. From Montevideo, Uruguay and probably all over the rest of the world filled with Spurs fans, THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!!!

I'm promising this now as well, If McClinton makes the team I'll buy his Jersey and go to San Antonio (or Austin) to have it signed by him.

CubanMustGo
07-08-2009, 08:17 PM
Thanks to Peter Holt and the ownership group. Never thought I'd see the day when the Spurs would go hard into luxtaxland like they have this summer, but man, what a job by the FO. Hopefully there's a little left for kibble for Holt's Cat.

Now, Pop, get your head out of your ass and play rotations that make sense now that you have the players to do so. Last year was not your best.

robot89
07-08-2009, 08:18 PM
now ship out bonner and fin & get us splitter and gist

SonOfAGun
07-08-2009, 08:19 PM
I'm a Kabota man myself, but I will send some love to CAT somewhere down the line. :toast

DMX7
07-08-2009, 08:20 PM
There would have been criminal charges if Spurs owners, management blew the last few years of Duncans reign.

True, but its still a business.

50 cent
07-08-2009, 08:39 PM
We are finally out of the Holting Pattern.

:toast:toast:toast

baseline bum
07-08-2009, 08:41 PM
Lux tax is around $69M.

$69M? Did they change the definition from 61.1% of the average BRI? Or did they change the salary cap from 48.8%?

baseline bum
07-08-2009, 08:46 PM
$69M? Did they change the definition from 61.1% of the average BRI? Or did they change the salary cap from 48.8%?

Never mind. The cap is $57.7M and is 51% of projected average BRI now. Man, that just makes it even more unbelievable that they'd spend at $8+ million in taxes in this economy to put a winner on the floor. No wonder we're hearing about a lockout after next season with the cap climbing to 51%.

crc21209
07-08-2009, 08:50 PM
I'm not sure what has gotten into you and the rest of the ownership group but thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Spurs Nation

Co-sign. +100000000. :flag:

angelbelow
07-08-2009, 08:50 PM
THANK YOU MR. HOLT!!!!!!

ps. how can i contribute? buy merch off spurs.com would help right? (i live in LA so i cant goto games etc.)

crc21209
07-08-2009, 08:54 PM
As mentioned before in the RC thread, it's up to us as fans to keep the purple and gold jersied or red jersey-wearing fans out of the AT&T Center. To bring back an old Spurs' slogan "Fill It Up!".

Damn right. Every Spurs fan better come out in a flurry this year to the games. I experienced one of the worst experiences this past season....Game 1 Spurs-Mavs...after the game I was right by and heard a bunch of stupid Mavs fans chanting "Let's Go Mavs" and "Sorry San Antonio if was fun watching you kick our asses for years but its finally over. You're done." I never wanna hear this shit EVER again in OUR house.

RuffnReadyOzStyle
07-08-2009, 09:18 PM
Yeah, many thanks Peter Holt. It is a total surprise that you would open the purse strings just as money becomes tight, but you've obviously realised that it would be a tragedy to waste the end of the Greatest PF ever's career. Well done. :toast

Das Texan
07-08-2009, 09:20 PM
I wish I owned some land or needed to move some earth so I could go out and buy a Holt tractor or two.

Danny.Zhu
07-08-2009, 09:42 PM
Thank you Peter. Thank you so much.

Samr
07-08-2009, 09:53 PM
The timing of all this is what gets me. He stepped up to the plate during a broken economy when every other owner is trying to cut spending.

Holt, Pop and RC deserve major respect.


I am not sure if anyone here reads Seth Godin's blog (http://sethgodin.typepad.com/) but there was a really good post a few months ago about why now, in this economy, is the perfect time to start a company. He basically said that the best time to start something new is when others are hedging their bets, cutting back, and being conservative. Spent at the time when other's save. Take risks when others are standing sill.

He said (paraphrased) that success you may have is magnified in relation to your competitors when they hold back or slow down. Now is a great time to go on way, because everyone else is going the other, and the space between you and them will be greater than if you wait for everything to get "better."

Seth Godin is a business and marketing professional, and Peter Holt is a business man.

I'm just glad Holt's knowledge of business strategy translates to basketball. As a Spurs fan, I'm REALLY glad of that.

Spurs_9_20_21
07-08-2009, 10:01 PM
Thank you to everybody that made the signings possible, the people who drafted Blair, McClinton and the the other guy. What's his name? IDK And... everything else! :toast

Samr
07-08-2009, 10:03 PM
For the first time in her life, Peter Holt's wife may have reason to be wary of groupies.

Spurs9
07-08-2009, 10:13 PM
Thanks Holt! :D

fleggy2k2
07-08-2009, 10:40 PM
wouldn't it be funny/devastating if all of this was just a huge unified dream that thousands of people had and when we wake up the roster would be the same as when the 09 season just ended.

Avitus1
07-08-2009, 10:54 PM
Thank's guys you guys slam dunked the shit out of this offseason.

Budkin
07-08-2009, 11:02 PM
I think Timmy spoke up...

ShoogarBear
07-08-2009, 11:05 PM
:toast

:lobt2::lobt2::lobt2::lobt2::lobt2:

z0sa
07-08-2009, 11:12 PM
I will be buying season tix.

manustarting2gd
07-08-2009, 11:21 PM
Thanks Mr Holt and all the parties involved with this offseason! You injected life back into the championship spirits of every Spurs fan across the globe!

spurs_fan_in_exile
07-08-2009, 11:35 PM
I think someday the true story will come out: that the night before the RJ trade Holt was visited by the ghosts of Angelo Drossos, Charles Comiskey, and Harry Frazee.

phxspurfan
07-08-2009, 11:38 PM
I love the signings, and if I lived in SA, would be all over a ticket package. For now, I will have to follow what I can from Sun land and hopefully make a couple trips out to SA to see the craziness live.

manufan10
07-08-2009, 11:43 PM
Time to buy a bunch of Spurs' gear! :D

Spursfan092120
07-08-2009, 11:50 PM
I think Timmy spoke up...
I don't think he needed to. After everything Timmy did for this team, Peter, RC, and Pop want to give him at least one more ring before he leaves...Tim has a big smile on his face right now as he's playing Madden.

Slydragon
07-08-2009, 11:56 PM
Spurs are Holt,
Holding
Onto
LARRY O'BRIEN TROPHY
Team

peskypesky
07-08-2009, 11:57 PM
I'm not sure what has gotten into you and the rest of the ownership group but thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Spurs Nation

:toast
:flag:
:lobt::lobt::lobt::lobt::lobt2:

SA210
07-09-2009, 12:29 AM
Let the FO love fest continue, but people will see we won't have anyone to slow down Kobe and Artest when it matters if we don't get Bruce back.

Brazil
07-09-2009, 12:34 AM
Props to Peter to make the effort to try to give an another ring to Tim: he deserved that

DrHouse
07-09-2009, 12:40 AM
Let the FO love fest continue, but people will see we won't have anyone to slow down Kobe and Artest when it matters if we don't get Bruce back.

Bowen couldn't even guard Kobe in '08. Kobe shot 50% from the field in that series.

To think 2 years later that he would be any better is ludicrous.

superbigtime
07-09-2009, 12:58 AM
Truly an arms race offseason. Thank you Mr. Holt for giving up the $

Borosai
07-09-2009, 01:08 AM
Losing in the first round, to the Mavs, in five games, will do things to you.

This will be a good season.

raspsa
07-09-2009, 01:11 AM
I think Timmy spoke up...

I don't think Timmy had to say anything.. at least not recently. When he negotiated his contract extension a couple of years back, TD accepted a significantly lower paycheck with the intention of giving the FO the flexibility to hire better talent later on. Well, the time has come for the owners to put up and they have shown themselves to be true to their commitment to foot the bill and upgrade the team. I fear to think how Timmy would have reacted if the Holt & Co. had not done so.

ehz33satx
07-09-2009, 01:18 AM
Let the FO love fest continue, but people will see we won't have anyone to slow down Kobe and Artest when it matters if we don't get Bruce back.

Forget Kobe! How are the Lakers going to slow down Dejuan "The Beast" Blair???!!!

Blackjack
07-09-2009, 02:19 AM
Bowen couldn't even guard Kobe in '08. Kobe shot 50% from the field in that series.

To think 2 years later that he would be any better is ludicrous.

He'd guard him just about as well as anyone out there nowadays, but admittedly, not as well as in past years. Citing Kobe's shooting percentage in '08 against Bowen would be a misguided premise, though.

The Spurs and Bowen did exactly what they wanted to do against the Lakers defensively. Their offense failed them.

Pop decided to let Kobe get his points off of jumpers, Bowen obliged, and Kobe didn't live at the free-throw line. The script basically played out the way the coaching staff envisioned.

Now, you can say it was a bad strategy, which I don't believe it was, but you can't say that it was an indictment on Bowen's ability when the coaching staff basically took away his aggressiveness.

But, I'm sure a knowledgeable Laker fan like yourself knew that and was just doing a little needling...

RodNIc91
07-09-2009, 03:41 AM
Bowen couldn't even guard Kobe in '08. Kobe shot 50% from the field in that series.

To think 2 years later that he would be any better is ludicrous.

Totally agree with the post of BlackJack. Plus if seem to recall there was even one game in regular seaosn when bowen held kobe to 18 points and actualyy outscored him. He does a significant better job than many out there and I doubt that he has run out of gas.

timvp
07-09-2009, 04:08 AM
http://www.holtcat.com/images/loaderBillboard.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/04tra3w3mPbyW/610x.jpg

poeticism707
07-09-2009, 04:12 AM
He'd guard him just about as well as anyone out there nowadays, but admittedly, not as well as in past years. Citing Kobe's shooting percentage in '08 against Bowen would be a misguided premise, though.

The Spurs and Bowen did exactly what they wanted to do against the Lakers defensively. Their offense failed them.

Pop decided to let Kobe get his points off of jumpers, Bowen obliged, and Kobe didn't live at the free-throw line. The script basically played out the way the coaching staff envisioned.

Now, you can say it was a bad strategy, which I don't believe it was, but you can't say that it was an indictment on Bowen's ability when the coaching staff basically took away his aggressiveness.

But, I'm sure a knowledgeable Laker fan like yourself knew that and was just doing a little needling...
:toast

timvp
07-09-2009, 04:14 AM
http://www.holtcat.com/images/PartsStorePDF/tile1.jpg

I might have to find something to buy up in there . . .

TJastal
07-09-2009, 05:09 AM
If I lived down south I would defenitely buy several spurs tickets, I am however stationed up in the midwest.

Good job all around by Holt / RC / Pop. I'm excited to be a spurs fan right now, and if everyone stays healthy I think they can win it all.

To me, the coup de grace was stealing McDyess and basically using Rasheed as the smoke screen bitch. Kudos :toast

We soon shall see if this was the "right move" but what seems evident the past few years is Rasheed is a quitter who I think would have undoubtedly quit on the spurs at some point when the going got tough. McDyess will give it everything he's got right up till the end. That's the kind of player you want on your team setting the example, especially with so many young players like the spurs have.

alamo50
07-09-2009, 05:17 AM
I'm not sure what has gotten into you and the rest of the ownership group.


Getting knocked out in the 1st round.

MajorMike
07-09-2009, 10:33 AM
A quick update of Spurs team salary

Players with a guaranteed salary :
Spurs have 11 players with a fully guaranteed contract
Salaries for these 11 players are :
Tim Duncan: $22,183,220
Richard Jefferson: $14,200,000
Tony Parker: $12,600,000
Manu Ginobili: $10,728,130
Antonio McDyess: $5,854,000
Roger Mason: $3,780,000
Matt Bonner: $3,256,000
Micheal Finley: $2,500,000
Marcus Haislip: $1,990,000
George Hill: $1,081,680
Ian Mahinmi: $899,700
The total salary for these 11 players is $79,072,730

The tax level is $69,920,000.

Spurs will fill the roster with min salary and should end up between $10M and $12M above the tax.


Yes, but do you have the info on how many of those lower-end contracts are using exceptions?

Dice for sure is using MLE, and I don't think that counts against cap. Do we have any other exempts out there?

MajorMike
07-09-2009, 10:39 AM
Exceptions
Because the NBA's salary cap is a soft one, the CBA allows for several important scenarios in which a team can sign players even if their payroll exceeds the cap. The exceptions are as follows:


Mid-level exception
A team is allowed to sign one player to a contract equal to the average NBA salary, even if the team is over the salary cap already, or if the signing would put them over the cap. This is known as the Mid-level exception (MLE). The MLE may be used on an individual free agent or split among multiple free agents, and is available to any team that exceeds the salary cap at the beginning of the offseason. The Mid-Level Exception for the 2008-09 NBA season was $5.585 million.[5] The MLE is $5.854 million for the 2009-10 NBA regular season.[6]

An example would be the Toronto Raptors' acquisition of Jason Kapono during the 2007 off-season.


Bi-annual exception
The bi-annual exception may be used to sign any free agent to a contract starting at $1.672 million in 2005-06, but cannot be used two years in a row (and if the $1 million exception from the previous CBA was used in 2004-05, the bi-annual exception cannot be used in 2005-06). Like the mid-level exception, the $1 million exception can also be split among more than one player, and can be used to sign players for up to two years, with raises limited to 8% per year. This exception was referred to as the "$1 million exception" in the 1999 CBA, although it was only valued at $1 million for the first year of the agreement.

An example of the $1 million exception was the Los Angeles Lakers' signing of Karl Malone to a contract before the 2003-04 season.


Rookie exception
The CBA allows teams to sign their 1st-round draft choices to rookie "scale" contracts even if their payroll exceeds the cap.


Larry Bird exception
Perhaps the most well-known of the NBA's salary cap exceptions, it is so named because the Boston Celtics were the first team permitted to exceed the salary cap to re-sign one of their own players (in that case, Larry Bird). Free agents who qualify for this exception are called "qualifying veteran free agents" or "Bird Free Agents" in the CBA, and this exception falls under the auspices of the Veteran Free Agent exception. In essence, the Larry Bird exception allows teams to exceed the salary cap to re-sign their own free agents, at an amount up to the maximum salary. To qualify as a Bird free agent, a player must have played three seasons without being waived or changing teams as a free agent. This means a player can obtain "Bird rights" by playing under three one-year contracts, a single contract of at least three years, or any combination thereof. It also means that when a player is traded, his Bird rights are traded with him, and his new team can use the Bird exception to re-sign him. Bird-exception contracts can be up to six years in length.


Early Bird exception
This is the lesser form of the Larry Bird Exception. Free agents who qualify for this exception are called "early qualifying veteran free agents," and qualify after playing two seasons without being waived or changing teams as a free agent. Using this exception, a team can re-sign its own free agent for either 175% of his salary the previous season, or the NBA's average salary, whichever is greater. Early Bird contracts must be for at least two seasons, but can last no longer than five seasons.

A much-publicized example for this would be Devean George, who vetoed his inclusion into a larger trade during the 2007-08 that would have sent him from the Dallas Mavericks to the New Jersey Nets because he would have lost his Early Bird rights.


Non-Bird exception
Free Agents who qualify for this exception are called "non-qualifying free agents" in the CBA, meaning they do not qualify under either the Larry Bird Exception or the Early Bird Exception. Under this exception, teams can re-sign a player to a contract beginning at either 120% of his salary for the previous season, or 120% of the league's minimum salary, whichever amount is higher. Contracts signed under the Non-Bird exception can last up to six years.


Other exceptions
Minimum Salary Exception: Teams can sign players for the NBA's minimum salary even if they are over the cap, for up to two years in length. In the case of two-year contracts, the second-season salary is the minimum salary for that season. The contract may not contain a signing bonus. This exception also allows minimum-salary players to be acquired via trade. There is no limit to the number of players that can be signed or acquired using this exception.

Traded Player Exception: If a team trades away a player with a higher salary than the player they acquire in return (we'll call this initial deal "Trade #1"), they receive what is called a Traded Player Exception, also known colloquially as a "Trade Exception". Teams with a trade exception have up to a year in which they can acquire more salary in other trades (Trade #2, #3, etc) than they send away, as long as the gulf in salaries for Trade #2, #3, etc are less than or equal to the difference in salary for Trade #1. This exception is particularly useful when teams trade draft picks straight-up for a player; since draft picks have no salary value, often the only way to get salaries to match is to use a trade exception, which allows trades to be made despite unbalanced salaries. It is also useful to compensate teams for losing free agents as they can do a sign and trade of that free agent to acquire a trade exception that can be used later. Note this exception is for single player trades only, though additional cash and draft picks can be part of the trade.

Disabled Player Exception: Allows a team that is over the cap to acquire a replacement for a disabled player who will be out for either the remainder of that season (for in-season injuries/deaths) or the next season (if the disability occurs during the offseason). The maximum salary of the replacement player is either 50% of the injured player's salary, or the average salary, whichever is less. This exception requires an NBA-designated doctor to verify the extent of the injury.

Note that while teams can often use one exception to sign multiple players, they cannot use a combination of exceptions to sign a single player.

SpursWench21
07-09-2009, 10:50 AM
Thank you Mr. Holt, and the rest of the FO for a Spurstacular summer!:toast

Now...NBA 09-10 season...hurry up please, im bored..:flag:

peskypesky
07-09-2009, 11:10 AM
Getting knocked out in the 1st round.

:rollin

Yeah, maybe Holt got used to all the money he was making off the deep playoff runs, and the first-round loss was a cold glass of water to the face.

I'm almost to the point where I think CIA Pop might have thrown that first series to the Mavs on purpose, to really shake the owner/FO up and make them realize they had better get Tim some more help...and fast.

timvp
07-09-2009, 11:15 AM
Yes, but do you have the info on how many of those lower-end contracts are using exceptions?

Dice for sure is using MLE, and I don't think that counts against cap. Do we have any other exempts out there?

?

Everything counts against the cap.

Spurs only have minimum contracts to offer now.

tp2021
07-09-2009, 11:39 AM
?

Everything counts against the cap.

Spurs only have minimum contracts to offer now.

Would Bruce take the minimum to come back?

MajorMike
07-09-2009, 11:40 AM
?

Everything counts against the cap.

Spurs only have minimum contracts to offer now.

Not true; not everything counts against cap. That's why they are called exceptions.

"The Mid-Level Exception- A team can sign any free agent using the exception, which is defined as a league average salary that doesn't count against the cap. "

None of the exceptions listed count against the cap. I just don't know who has used what on what.


As not mentioned earlier, the salary cap in 2008 was 55.63 million dollars. What you'll notice immediately is that numerous teams spent more than that in '07-'08, including the Hornets (who spent 62.42 million dollars). What you'll also notice is that most of these teams didn't pay any luxury taxes for being over the cap. Why? The threshold for paying luxury taxes isn't the same as the salary cap itself. If you exceed a payroll of $55.63 million by using legal exceptions, the league won't come after you.

If you exceed the league defined number 67.87 million dollars, that's where you run into trouble. $67.87 Million is the luxury tax threshold. Cross that, and you pay double on every dollar you exceed it by. Last year, the Knicks exceeded it somewhere in the 20 Million dollar range (22.05 I believe), and this year they exceeded it by 28 MIL if I'm not mistaken. So last year, they paid 44.1 million in luxury tax, and this year they should pay 56 million.

timvp
07-09-2009, 11:43 AM
Not true; not everything counts against cap. That's why they are called exceptions.

"The Mid-Level Exception- A team can sign any free agent using the exception, which is defined as a league average salary that doesn't count against the cap. "

None of the exceptions listed count against the cap. I just don't know who has used what on what.

Those exceptions allow teams to exceed the salary cap. That doesn't mean they don't count against the cap. When it comes to having to pay the luxury tax, everything counts.

SpursFan0728
07-09-2009, 11:48 AM
A quick update of Spurs team salary

Players with a guaranteed salary :
Spurs have 11 players with a fully guaranteed contract
Salaries for these 11 players are :
Tim Duncan: $22,183,220
Richard Jefferson: $14,200,000
Tony Parker: $12,600,000
Manu Ginobili: $10,728,130
Antonio McDyess: $5,854,000
Roger Mason: $3,780,000
Matt Bonner: $3,256,000
Micheal Finley: $2,500,000
Marcus Haislip: $1,990,000
George Hill: $1,081,680
Ian Mahinmi: $899,700
The total salary for these 11 players is $79,072,730

The tax level is $69,920,000.

Spurs will fill the roster with min salary and should end up between $10M and $12M above the tax.

sorry I am a salary dummy but does this mean Holt have to pay 20-24mill as a result?>

MajorMike
07-09-2009, 11:48 AM
Those exceptions allow teams to exceed the salary cap. That doesn't mean they don't count against the cap. When it comes to having to pay the luxury tax, everything counts.

Um... no. Exceptions let you exceed the cap without paying tax.

tp2021
07-09-2009, 11:51 AM
Um... no. Exceptions let you exceed the cap without paying tax.

Exceeding the cap never makes you pay tax. Exceeding the luxury tax line makes you pay tax. Exceptions are the only things you can use to sign players when you are over the cap. The salary cap and luxtax line are 2 different amounts of money.

timvp
07-09-2009, 11:53 AM
Um... no. Exceptions let you exceed the cap without paying tax.

Exceptions allow you to exceed the salary cap without paying tax ... up until the luxury tax threshold. The luxury tax threshold this year is around $70 million this year. The Spurs are going to have around $80-82 million in contracts. All of which is taxable.

I'm not sure what your point is. You don't think the Spurs will have to pay $10-12 million in luxury tax? You think you've found a loophole the rest of the inhabited world missed?

rogcl1
07-09-2009, 11:56 AM
Um... no. Exceptions let you exceed the cap without paying tax.

No, exceptions let you add players if you are over the salary cap, but they do count toward the luxury tax.

Blackjack
07-09-2009, 01:31 PM
In Appreciation of Peter Holt



The presumed net worth of Peter Holt, CEO and owner of Spurs Sports & Entertainment, is around $80 million, making him one of the least wealthy owners in the NBA. Mr. Holt’s wealth derives from HOLT CAT, the nation’s largest authorized dealer of caterpillar machines, of which he is also CEO. Given the housing crisis that the United States has been experiencing since the fall of 2008, it’s safe to assume these are unnerving times for a man whose livelihood is based on the sale of construction equipment.

(I was unable to find financial data on HOLT CAT but the stock price for Caterpillar Inc., a company to which HOLT CAT’s fortunes are closely aligned, has fallen by nearly half since September 2008.)

Considering the financial pressure Holt is currently under, he did something brave yesterday: He allowed R.C. Buford to send the Spurs at least $10 million over the luxury tax line.


With a collective salary of $72,054,727, the Spurs were already $2.13 million dollars over the tax line (set by the NBA yesterday at $69.9 million) before they signed Antonio McDyess, Marcus Haislip, and Malik Hairston.

For every dollar the Spurs spend over the line, they must pay a one dollar tax to the league. By signing McDyess to the full Mid-Level Exception and Haislip to the full Bi-Annual Exception (most likely), the Spurs are now a solid $10 million over the line. In that number I have yet to include the recently signed contract of Malik Hairtson (the details which are unknown), and the still unnegotiated contracts of DeJuan Blair and Jack McClinton. In short, the Spurs just committed themselves to paying anywhere from $12 to $15 million worth of luxury tax dollars this upcoming season.

Peter Holt took a serious financial hit yesterday and he did so for the good of the franchise you love.

It’s hard to feel sympathy for a man whose net worth is counted not just in millions but in tens of millions, but compare Holt’s situation to Mark Cuban’s, whose net worth is presumed to be north of $2 billion, and you begin to recognize the commitment Holt is making to the franchise. When the Mavericks head into the luxury tax, Cuban hardly feels the prick of a pin. Holt and the rest of the Spurs ownership group commit a significant fraction of the franchise’s net worth to the team’s success.

Mr. Holt’s financial commitment to the team is significant to no one more than the 3 individuals we adore most: Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, and Tony Parker. Whether by only requesting reasonable contracts or restructuring their contracts to allow the team to acquire the necessary supporting cast, over the last several years the big three have done their part to ensure the Spurs are in a position to compete for championships. By allowing the front office to take the steps they took today, Holt has kept up his end of the bargain.

In 2008, the median income of a household in San Antonio was $39,140. Over the last 12 months, that figure has surely gone down. I have just begun graduate school and am now neck deep in student loans. For all intents and purposes, you could say my net worth is zero. Given that most sports-related financial figures exist in millions, not thousands, it’s hard to feel like you can affect the life of a man like Mr. Holt. But you can.

Buy a ticket. Buy season tickets. Hell, buy a backhoe for all I care. You alone may speak the language of thousands, not millions. But there are over 2 million people in the greater San Antonio metropolitan area. We speak in millions. Fans have been known to organize financial boycotts of their favorite franchises when they disapprove of the ownership (see Cincinnati Bengals Fans for a simultaneously righteous and hilarious example). We can express approval with our wallets as well.

And remember, the franchise consists of more than just the Spurs. Go to Austin Toros games. Go to Silver Stars games. The franchise is deeply committed to the success of those two teams as well.

In many people’s opinion, the Spurs were teetering on the edge of irrelevance. By giving R.C. Buford and Gregg Popovich the necessary freedom, he has helped bring them back to the center of the contender debate. And he has done so during a time of great financial uncertainty. For this, Mr. Holt, we are deeply appreciative.

http://www.48minutesofhell.com/2009/07/09/in-appreciation-of-peter-holt/#more-3621

:tu

benefactor
07-09-2009, 01:36 PM
I would buy season tickets this year if I lived in SA. Guess I'll have to save a little money and buy some extra merchandise when I am at the game.

Aggie Hoopsfan
07-09-2009, 01:37 PM
Um... no. Exceptions let you exceed the cap without paying tax.

You're dumb.

hater
07-09-2009, 01:57 PM
We who are about to Post Salute You!!!

Blackjack
07-09-2009, 02:01 PM
http://www.holtcat.com/images/loaderBillboard.jpg

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/04tra3w3mPbyW/610x.jpg


http://www.holtcat.com/images/PartsStorePDF/tile1.jpg

I might have to find something to buy up in there . . .

timvp just filling the void after the untimely loss of one, Billy Mays.:smokin

jack0fspeed
07-09-2009, 02:06 PM
Isn't it like Christmas morning? I know that's how we are feeling up North too.

Most other teams are tightening the belts, but everyone that thinks they can win is opening the wallet. From a fans standpoint, you have to love it.

velik_m
07-09-2009, 02:43 PM
The Silver Lining of the Salary Cap Cloud

July 8, 2009 5:40 PM

As ESPN's Marc Stein broke some news about the NBA salary cap level for 2009-2010, and more importantly about some surprising NBA projections about what it might be for 2010-2011. Any team that hoarded cap space for the summer of 2010 is, today, faced with the possibility that they may have far less available than they had hoped.

While the memo had bad news for the basketball staffs, looking to spend more and more to acquire talent, I expect the memo was borderline thrilling to some, including poor teams, many owners and the bean counters who worry about teams' balance sheets.

There are four ways this memo might make them happy.

$6.5 Million in Cash for Every Team on July 29
Remember the NBA's escrow system? Basically, reported amounts for player salaries are not precisely the amounts they get. Instead, a percentage of every player salary is held aside, in escrow. At the end of the year, the league tallies up how much players made as a percentage of the league's "basketball-related income."

If the basketball-related income was high, then the players get their money back.

If the basketball-related income was low, then the owners get a mulligan on some of what they agreed to pay the players.

The result, is a pretty good recession buster for the owners. At the moment there's nearly $205 million in the escrow account. $194 million of that, according to the memo, will be distributed equally to the 30 teams on July 29 -- meaning each team gets $6,467,847 in cash. The rest goes towards benefits (a long story), meaning teams will also each be spared $363,087 they would have been expected to contribute for next year.

In effect, each team will get about $6.8 million, the vast majority in cash.

Lower Salaries for the Same Players
The news in the memo, undeniably, has the potential to simply reduce the price of top basketball talent (Andre Miller or Shawn Marion for the mid-level exception, anyone?). Any team hoping to sign LeBron James or any other 2010 free agent now has more impetus than ever to shed salary.

One of the biggest effects this could have will be on players who are soon to come off rookie deals hoping for max contracts. Think about someone like Brandon Roy. The maximum contract for veterans like LeBron James or Dwyane Wade is calculated as a percentage of his previous year's salary -- basically, they can get a 5% raise. So they're largely unaffected. But Roy is still earning rookie scale, and is looking for much more than a 5% raise. His maximum is based on the league's basketball-related income, which has gone down and could go down further.

Which means the maximum he could get each year is almost certainly going to be less than what, say, Chris Paul got in his extension.

Does that mean players like Roy might, in light of that, sign a shorter deal to get to free agency sooner? (In free agency, players have the ability to make even more.) It's certainly possible.

Luxury Tax Disbursements to 23 Teams
You probably know about the NBA's luxury tax. A refresher: Teams pay one dollar to the NBA for every dollar they spend in salary in excess of a certain amount, which we now know was $71.15 million this past season. That means seven teams will pay, and they are, as Stein reports:

New York ($23,736,207), Dallas ($23,611,661), Cleveland ($13,707,010), Boston ($8,294,664), Los Angeles Lakers ($7,185,631), Portland ($5,899,356) and Phoenix ($4,918,136).

The other 23 teams, however, each get 1/30th of that money back, in cash. That means the 23 teams not listed above are each about to get $2,911,756, which is not a bad little shot in the arm.

Help for Low Revenue Teams
If you're doing the math at home, you'll realize that the luxury tax arrangement means the league is sending out 23 luxury tax payments, and each one of those is a 30th of what they took in.

So, inspector, where are the other seven 30ths? It is something I have always wondered.

Meet the NBA's Revenue Assistance Plan for low revenue teams. I'll be honest, I don't know much about this, but I can tell you it's described a little in the memo from the NBA Stein reported on:

In accordance with the league's Revenue Assistance Plan, the remaining $20.4 million of "undistributed" tax funds will be used to fund assistance payments to teams for the 2008-09 season.

(Under the Plan, up to $49 million of assistance will be paid to low-revenue teams for the 2008-09 season. The assistance payments will be funded in three tiers: first, with "undistributed" tax funds ($20.4 million); second, to the extent that additional funding is needed, with contributions from the 30 teams in proportion to each team's local revenues (up to one-third of total assistance payments); and third, to the extent that additional funding is needed, the shortfall will be funded with distributions from league entities.)

Anyway you slice it, that's up to $49 million for the team's sorriest teams. How it is divided and under what terms it's disbursed is unclear.

This might not seem like all that much. But consider those teams that are hurting. They're trying to sell tickets for tens or hundreds of dollars a pop, or season tickets for thousands. Faced with difficult economic times, many teams have laid off front office staffers with regular working salaries.

Now all 30 of those teams will have a $6.8 million shot in the arm. 23 of them will get an additional $2.9 million in luxury tax. And the lowest revenue teams will apparently be getting even more funds than that -- even as player salaries likely get cheaper.

A bad day, to be sure, for those dreaming of being tens of millions under the cap. But not so dire, I suspect, for those who write the checks.

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-42-41/The-Silver-Lining-of-the-Salary-Cap-Cloud.html

EmantheSpursFan
07-09-2009, 03:20 PM
Would Bruce take the minimum to come back?
One of my sources who is a good friend of Bowen told me yesterday that bowen will most likely be back, bowen has a lot of business here in SA and wasnt worried to much about being traded.

IronMexican
07-09-2009, 03:23 PM
lol, Okie Light education.

Casey Kasum
07-09-2009, 03:31 PM
:tu :tu :tu

MajorMike
07-09-2009, 04:28 PM
lol, Okie Light education.


Yup; my Okie Light ed-u-muh-cation is dern near as good as your GED.

johngateswhiteley
07-09-2009, 04:34 PM
i'll sign in for this. thx.

Dark Gable
07-09-2009, 04:38 PM
Way to go Pete.

IcemanCometh
07-09-2009, 04:58 PM
Have a drink on me