Something for Laker fans and haters.

[MaNu4Tres]

The Spurs last year won the Southwest Division and won 54 games.

This was without Manu Ginobili (a top 20 player). Without Richard Jefferson. Without Antonio McDyess. And with a one-legged Tim Duncan with Matt Bonner starting. Not to mention the steal of the draft DeJuan Blair ( if his knees hold up).

Lakers are still the favorite being the reigning champions. But to say the Spurs still don't have enough to beat the Lakers is such an ignorant thing to say.

The Spurs are officially back.:lobt2:

[Culburn369]

You'd better hope so, daddy-O. Otherwise, what's transpired since Fisher went vertical over Nelson will seem like Sunday school.

[MaNu4Tres]

Basically Spurs are substituting

Udoka/ Vaughn/ Oberto/ Kurt Thomas/ Bruce Bowen/ Gooden for...

Manu /McClinton/ Blair / Antonio McDyess/ Richard Jefferson/ Haislip or Gist


Huge off-season!

[carrao45]

The Spurs last year won the Southwest Division and won 54 games.

This was without Manu Ginobili (a top 20 player). Without Richard Jefferson. Without Antonio McDyess. And with a one-legged Tim Duncan with Matt Bonner starting. Not to mention the steal of the draft DeJuan Blair ( if his knees hold up).

Lakers are still the favorite being the reigning champions. But to say the Spurs still don't have enough to beat the Lakers is such an ignorant thing to say.

The Spurs are officially back.:lobt2:

He doesn't get to be called a steal until he proves to be relevant

[MaNu4Tres]

Slow down sista, we're not the favorites because we're the champs, we're the favorites because we da best.

Champs indeed. Congrats. Last year is last year. Spurs will be the Lakers' biggest threat next year. It should be a war.

[MaNu4Tres]

He doesn't get to be called a steal until he proves to be relevant

Even if he hurts his knees and has to retire.

Manu+ RJ + Mcdyess >>>>>>>>>> Udoka/ Bowen/ Kurt Thomas.

You exploiting the part of my post that is the least relevant is typical of Laker fan in denial.

[Ghazi]

Their biggest threat is probably the Celtics.

Spurs are just yesterdays news. They capitalized on a down time in the NBA and even then needed technicalities and injuries to win their titles.

The league is much stronger these days and the Spurs cornerstone's best years are behind him.

[carrao45]

Champs indeed. Congrats. Last year is last year. Spurs will be the Lakers' biggest threat next year. It should be a war.

Actually no, the Magic, Celtics, and Cavs are all better than the Spurs. They are the biggest threats. 4th place sucks huh

[MaNu4Tres]

Their biggest threat is probably the Celtics.

Spurs are just yesterdays news. They capitalized on a down time in the NBA and even then needed technicalities and injuries to win their titles.

The league is much stronger these days and the Spurs cornerstone's best years are behind him.

Parker> Rondo
Manu> Allen
RJ< Pierce
Tim> KG
McDyess= Sheed

I'd say Spurs are the biggest threat.

Although you could counter with Perkins> Bonner.

Which is true, but doesn't make up for the comparison between the five most important pieces to each team.

[MaNu4Tres]

Continuing...

Parker> Nelson
Manu= Carter
RJ> Pietrus
Duncan> Lewis
McDyess< Howard

[Culburn369]

the Spurs cornerstone's best years are behind him.

True. If Duncan is forced much further out he'll need a slingshot, a gross of Ben-Gay, and a Gideon's Bible.

[carrao45]

Parker> Rondo
Manu> Allen
RJ< Pierce
Tim> KG
McDyess= Sheed

I'd say Spurs are the biggest threat.

Although you could counter with Perkins> Bonner.

Which is true, but doesn't make up for the comparison between the five most important pieces to each team.

Manu is not better than RayRay, especially considering Manu is injury prone.
Sheed is better than McDyess, and you would be saying it too if the Spurs had gotten sheed instead.

And the Celtics give us more problems than the Spurs do. And everybody knows it

[MaNu4Tres]

Parker> Mo Williams
Manu> Delonte West
RJ< Lebron
Duncan> Varajao
McDyess< Shaq

Spurs 3 to 2 again and have the better bench than both the Magic and the Cavs and Boston.

[IronMexican]

The Spurs also have ALL THAT DEPTH on they're bench. Not many teams can say they are lucky enough to have Matt Bonner waiting to come in.

[Amaso]

The Spurs are no longer a threat because they don't have even a good defense anymore. In fact, I'll go as far as saying the Lakers are a better defensive team then the Spurs are, and the Lakers are clearly a more dominant offensive team.

[MaNu4Tres]

Manu is not better than RayRay, especially considering Manu is injury prone.
Sheed is better than McDyess, and you would be saying it too if the Spurs had gotten sheed instead.

And the Celtics give us more problems than the Spurs do. And everybody knows it

Manu is better than Ray Ray. That's like me saying Garnett is injury prone so he doesn't count. Get a clue.

Sheed was barely better than McDyess. As Wallace has gotten older hes floated away to being a 3 point chucker who doesn't mix it up inside. Therefore now McDyess has narrowed the gap.

[MaNu4Tres]

The Spurs also have ALL THAT DEPTH on they're bench. Not many teams can say they are lucky enough to have Matt Bonner waiting to come in.

Same thing goes for the Lakers with Luke Walton.

[R4R]

Spurs have no depth at all. Which is mainly why Lakers > Spurs as of now, even with the signing of RJ.

[Allanon]

I'll go as far as saying the Lakers are a better defensive team then the Spurs are.

Hard to believe but I agree with this.

[MaNu4Tres]

The Spurs are no longer a threat because they don't have even a good defense anymore. In fact, I'll go as far as saying the Lakers are a better defensive team then the Spurs are, and the Lakers are clearly a more dominant offensive team.

lol Do you understand this years Spurs team is going to be significantly different than last years? You are blind. You poor child.

Last year Spurs main five was:

Bonner/ Duncan/ Finley/ Mason/ Parker

3 players who are horrible defensively. This next year is going to be a different story.

McDyess/ Duncan/ Jefferson/ Manu/ Parker

[carrao45]

Nice sig, son.:toast

Thanks:toast

[MaNu4Tres]

Spurs have no depth at all.

:lol:

[carrao45]

Manu is better than Ray Ray. That's like me saying Garnett is injury prone so he doesn't count. Get a clue.

Sheed was barely better than McDyess. As Wallace has gotten older hes floated away to being a 3 point chucker who doesn't mix it up inside. Therefore now McDyess has narrowed the gap.

KG had A knee injury. Manu has been consisstently injured for two years.
And again the Celtics give the Lakers more problems than the Spurs

[ginobili's bald spot]

Im just glad there are two of these threads. Two times the fail for the price of one.

[carrao45]

Same thing goes for the Lakers with Luke Walton.

Lamar Odom is better than any Spurs bench player

[ginobili's bald spot]

Lamar Odom is better than any Spurs bench player

And most of their starters.

[carrao45]

lol Do you understand this years Spurs team is going to be significantly different than last years? You are blind. You poor child.

Last year Spurs main five was:

Bonner/ Duncan/ Finley/ Mason/ Parker

3 players who are horrible defensively. This next year is going to be a different story.

McDyess/ Duncan/ Jefferson/ Manu/ Parker

Last years team had 4 players who were poor defensively

This years team has 3 who are poor defensively
HUGE difference huh

[GooberNuts]

Lamar Odom is better than any Spurs bench player

Lamar Odom vs Manu Ginobili??? I'd take Ginobili. Granted, Odom is an important piece of the Lakers team, but Ginobili is a better player overall.

[carrao45]

Lamar Odom vs Manu Ginobili??? I'd take Ginobili. Granted, Odom is an important piece of the Lakers team, but Ginobili is a better player overall.

I'd take Odom because he has been healthy for two straight years and it is becoming clear that Ginobili cannot be relied upon to be healthy for an entire season.
But healthy Ginobili is probably better

[MaNu4Tres]

KG had A knee injury. Manu has been consisstently injured for 14 months.
And again the Celtics give the Lakers more problems than the Spurs

Fixed

Which Spurs team? The Spurs team where Ginobili was playing on a broken ankle that had Finley and Udoka playing the center spot over Oberto? That same Spurs team that had Jacque Vaughn playing back up point guard?


Or the Spurs team that has totally transformed with the new additions?
Which one?

2009/ 2010 Spurs will be completely different than those recently injury plagued old slow teams of the Spurs from the past 2 years.

I thought you would be smarter than that.

[MaNu4Tres]

Last years team had 4 players who were poor defensively

This years team has 3 who are poor defensively
HUGE difference huh

Your just a blind and ignorant Laker fan. It's like arguing that the sky is blue and the grass is green.

[Spursmania]

The Spurs' make-up has changed completey. No sense in denying it.

[ginobili's bald spot]

Your just a blind and ignorant Laker fan. It's like arguing that the sky is blue and the grass is green.

:lmao Coming from the guy starting threads like this talking shit saying his team who was first round fodder will beat the defending champions because they added a 35 year old role player. Hypocrisy much?

[turiaf for president]

^ lol

[MaNu4Tres]

:lmao Coming from the guy starting threads like this talking shit saying his team who was first round fodder will beat the defending champions because they added a 35 year old role player. Hypocrisy much?

Yeah since they just added Antonio McDyess and kept everyone else?

Wow your clueless as well.

That's like you saying a Celtic fan is stupid for thinking their team has a leginament shot at the title next year. Since they just added a 35 year old role player.

Totally disregarding KG's injury ( Like you are with Manu Ginobili and the addition of Richard Jefferson)

[Spursmania]

Hopefully the Spur and Laker fans will have a great rivalry again. We sucked this past year.:toast

[DrHouse]

People treat Duncan and Ginobili like they are the same players they were in '05/'07. The reality is they aren't, and it's because of this that the Spurs have not made it back to the Finals since.

They need their Big 3 to be dominant to go all the way. What the Spurs have now is good enough to make it to the WCF maybe, but not good enough to truly compete with the big boys. For that they would need some help from Father Time.

[carrao45]

Yeah since they just added Antonio McDyess and kept everyone else?

Wow your clueless as well.

That's like you saying a Celtic fan is stupid for thinking their team has a leginament shot at the title next year. Since they just added a 35 year old role player.

Totally disregarding KG's injury ( Like you are with Manu Ginobili and the addition of Richard Jefferson)

Last year gooden was the "savior.'' this year its McDyess??:lmao

[carrao45]

Yeah since they just added Antonio McDyess and kept everyone else?

Wow your clueless as well.

That's like you saying a Celtic fan is stupid for thinking their team has a leginament shot at the title next year. Since they just added a 35 year old role player.

Totally disregarding KG's injury ( Like you are with Manu Ginobili and the addition of Richard Jefferson)

Celtics have a shot because they have the basically same team as their 08 championship team. The Spurs defense is not even close to as good as 07

[MaNu4Tres]

People treat Duncan and Ginobili like they are the same players they were in '05/'07. The reality is they aren't, and it's because of this that the Spurs have not made it back to the Finals since.

They need their Big 3 to be dominant to go all the way. What the Spurs have now is good enough to make it to the WCF maybe, but not good enough to truly compete with the big boys. For that they would need some help from Father Time.

:lol

Actually Ginobili had his best year in 2008. Then he got hurt in the playoffs against the Suns.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/stats?playerId=272


Tim Duncan has been the same player since 2005. As a matter of fact he was having his best year since 2003 before he got a severe case of knee tendonosis.

To prove my point after his injury, he only avg. 16.5 points a game in March on .46 percent shooting, the whole year before that he was putting up his best numbers in years.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/gamelog?playerId=215



Spurs haven't won since 2007 because of injuries at bad times. It happens. It's not because the Big Three suck now.

I will admit even with our big 3 healthy this past year, we wouldn't have gotten by the lakers.

With the additions the Spurs have made and if Spurs as fortunate as the Lakers were last year in regard of injuries. Spurs will be the biggest threat.


Again your points are horrible Dr. House.

[carrao45]

The Spurs' make-up has changed completey. No sense in denying it.

i agree, but the OP is being a dumb bitch...and i like to argue

[MaNu4Tres]

Celtics have a shot because they have the basically same team as their 08 championship team. The Spurs defense is not even close to as good as 07

You don't make any sense. Spurs have better defensive players now than they did in 2007 ( outside of Bruce).

Spurs have had the same team since 2007, they were just hurt the past two seasons. Now the Spurs have kept their best defensive players IQ wise and talent wise( outside of bowen). And have replaced the players outside of Manu Tim and Tony with players able to be versatile defenders.

[La Peace]

The spurs put themselves in the best position to compete with the likes of the Lakers. There is no doubt about that.


They've gotten better. But I wouldn't crown them yet.

I believe this is a little bit of premature ejaculation.

[Spurs_210]

Lamar Odom is better than any Spurs bench player
I don't know why people are saying the Spurs have the best starting 5 or assuming Manu won't resume his role off the bench.

Manu (when healthy) > Lamar (when he shows up)

[Spurs_210]

the spurs put themselves in the best position to compete with the likes of the lakers. There is no doubt about that.


They've gotten better. But i wouldn't crown them yet.

I believe this is a little bit of premature ejaculation.


+1

[MaNu4Tres]

The spurs put themselves in the best position to compete with the likes of the Lakers. There is no doubt about that.


They've gotten better. But I wouldn't crown them yet.



That was the whole point of the thread. I never said Spurs leap frogged the Lakers. Yet Laker fans in denial refuse to admit the Spurs improved significantly.

For that I thank you for being one of the only rational Laker fans on this board.:toast

And best of luck next year.

[tlongII]

Fuck the Spurs and Fuck the Lakers too. You dumbshits think your teams can hold us off, but you're sadly mistaken. It's ALL about the Blazers from now until the next 10 years!

[ginobili's bald spot]

Fuck the Spurs and Fuck the Lakers too. You dumbshits think your teams can hold us off, but you're sadly mistaken. It's ALL about the Blazers from now until the next 10 years!

:lmao

[tlongII]

:lmao

I don't think you'll be laughing so much as soon as we play you next season.

[Culburn369]

Please. You always get up for us. Then as soon as we leave Portland you assume your Chinese firedrill approach to NBA Basketball. Yer Charlotte East, I mean West.

Christ, if you ever endeavored the other 80 games like you do those few in Oregon against us you could possibly amount to something. But, like every other team who has a hard on for the Lakers, but, no self respect, yer hopeless.

[tlongII]

Please. You always get up for us. Then as soon as we leave Portland you assume your Chinese firedrill approach to NBA Basketball. Yer Charlotte East, I mean West.

Christ, if you ever endeavored the other 80 games like you do those few in Oregon against us you could possibly amount to something. But, like every other team who has a hard on for the Lakers, but, no self respect, yer hopeless.

:lmao

You don't get it, do you? We were the 2nd youngest team in the league last year. And yet we won 54 games! I could tell you some things about why we are going to make you our bitches this year, but I choose not to out of respect.

[Culburn369]

:lmao

You don't get it, do you?

A course I get it, blankethead::: You (especially the Blazers) all run over to your respective wall calendars and circle the dates when "the rapist" is comin' to town with those "Fakers", you call ma & dad (especially the Blazers) and remind them to watch. You forget about the 1st & 15th and those f'in paychex for like the first time in like months (especially the Blazers) and really concentrate (yes, especially the Blazers). You blow your wad for 2, 2 and half hours against the Lakers (you & Blazers j/o in equality), you win, (you run back to the bench/Blazers only) and quickly look down to the "Fakers" end to see if Kobe & Phil are A. mad, and/or B. watching.

Then the next evening when the team directly above you (by a half game) comes to town you (Blazers only) can't find the ball with both hands, or, the broad the side of a barn.

Frankly, yer a disgrace.

[carrao45]

:lol

Actually Ginobili had his best year in 2008. Then he got hurt in the playoffs against the Suns.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/stats?playerId=272


Tim Duncan has been the same player since 2005. As a matter of fact he was having his best year since 2003 before he got a severe case of knee tendonosis.

To prove my point after his injury, he only avg. 16.5 points a game in March on .46 percent shooting, the whole year before that he was putting up his best numbers in years.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/gamelog?playerId=215



Spurs haven't won since 2007 because of injuries at bad times. It happens. It's not because the Big Three suck now.

I will admit even with our big 3 healthy this past year, we wouldn't have gotten by the lakers.

With the additions the Spurs have made and if Spurs as fortunate as the Lakers were last year in regard of injuries. Spurs will be the biggest threat.


Again your points are horrible Dr. House.

Man the Spurs got help from the Suns and Stern in 07. and in 2003 three in many ways they won becaus thy were the last team standing w/o injuries

[carrao45]

You don't make any sense. Spurs have better defensive players now than they did in 2007 ( outside of Bruce).

Spurs have had the same team since 2007, they were just hurt the past two seasons. Now the Spurs have kept their best defensive players IQ wise and talent wise( outside of bowen). And have replaced the players outside of Manu Tim and Tony with players able to be versatile defenders.

OK then...Who on the Spurs can guard Kobe?
Who can guard LO?
Artest can guard RJ very well.
And Bynum did a great job guarding Duncan in thir last meeting.
Pop cannot outcoach Phil

Celtics give LA mor problems and anyone who saw the games knows this

[Laker-fan-in-SanAnto]

I don't think you'll be laughing so much as soon as we play you next season.

You can laugh and celebrate all you want when your team beats the champs in a regular season game at the rose garden next season. We will have the last laugh when a team like the mavs or spurs knock your kiddie team out of the playoffs in the first round, assuming your team makes it.:toast

[carrao45]

:lmao

You don't get it, do you? We were the 2nd youngest team in the league last year. And yet we won 54 games! I could tell you some things about why we are going to make you our bitches this year, but I choose not to out of respect.

You never show respect. Tell us why

[MaNu4Tres]

OK then...Who on the Spurs can guard Kobe?
Who can guard LO?
Artest can guard RJ very well.
And Bynum did a great job guarding Duncan in thir last meeting.
Pop cannot outcoach Phil

Celtics give LA mor problems and anyone who saw the games knows this

Your not worth arguing with. Your NBA knowledge is too dense.

[carrao45]

Your not worth arguing with. Your NBA knowledge is too dense.

Clearly...And yet your argument consists of:
Manu>Ray
RJ<Pierce
TD>KG
McDyess=Sheed.

Thats all you got. And two of those are wrong. Dyess is not as good as Sheed, and Ray is better than Ginobili (espcially cuz Rayis healthy).
And while Duncan is clearly better, i would argue the type of defensive tenacity KG bring to the Celtics hurts LA more than what Duncan brings to the Spurs

[MaNu4Tres]

Clearly...And yet your argument consists of:
Manu>Ray
RJ<Pierce
TD>KG
McDyess=Sheed.

Thats all you got. And two of those are wrong. Dyess is not as good as Sheed, and Ray is better than Ginobili (espcially cuz Rayis healthy).
And while Duncan is clearly better, i would argue the type of defensive tenacity KG bring to the Celtics hurts LA more than what Duncan brings to the Spurs

Your arguing just to argue. You don't bring anything significant to the table. You are too lazy to back up your facts and too lazy to even spell correctly. I'm done arguing with a dunce. Good luck next year.

[carrao45]

Your arguing just to argue. You don't bring anything significant to the table. You are too lazy to back up your facts and too lazy to even spell correctly. I'm done arguing with a dunce. Good luck next year.

Name ONE significant thing you brought to the table
Name a significant fact you brought to the table

[Spurs_210]

OK then...Who on the Spurs can guard Kobe?
Who can guard LO?
Artest can guard RJ very well.
And Bynum did a great job guarding Duncan in thir last meeting.
Pop cannot outcoach Phil

Celtics give LA mor problems and anyone who saw the games knows this

Who can guard Parker? Who can guard Ginobili? Bynum did not guard Duncan VERY well. Both ends have match ups that will cause the other problems it will boil down to the x-factors Ginobili and Odom

[carrao45]

Who can guard Parker? Who can guard Ginobili? Bynum did not guard Duncan VERY well. Both ends have match ups that will cause the other problems it will boil down to the x-factors Ginobili and Odom

Look I'm arguing with the OP because he is stupid. I know the Spurs will be great next year.
He did a good job on Duncan

[MaNu4Tres]

Name ONE significant thing you brought to the table
Name a significant fact you brought to the table



Even if he hurts his knees and has to retire.

Manu+ RJ + Mcdyess >>>>>>>>>> Udoka/ Bowen/ Kurt Thomas.

You exploiting the part of my post that is the least relevant is typical of Laker fan in denial.


:lol

Actually Ginobili had his best year in 2008. Then he got hurt in the playoffs against the Suns.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/stats?playerId=272


Tim Duncan has been the same player since 2005. As a matter of fact he was having his best year since 2003 before he got a severe case of knee tendonosis.

To prove my point after his injury, he only avg. 16.5 points a game in March on .46 percent shooting, the whole year before that he was putting up his best numbers in years.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/gamelog?playerId=215



Spurs haven't won since 2007 because of injuries at bad times. It happens. It's not because the Big Three suck now.

I will admit even with our big 3 healthy this past year, we wouldn't have gotten by the lakers.

With the additions the Spurs have made and if Spurs as fortunate as the Lakers were last year in regard of injuries. Spurs will be the biggest threat.


Again your points are horrible Dr. House.



You don't make any sense. Spurs have better defensive players now than they did in 2007 ( outside of Bruce).

Spurs have had the same team since 2007, they were just hurt the past two seasons. Now the Spurs have kept their best defensive players IQ wise and talent wise( outside of bowen). And have replaced the players outside of Manu Tim and Tony with players able to be versatile defenders.



Just to point out a few.

[MaNu4Tres]

Who can guard Parker? Who can guard Ginobili? Bynum did not guard Duncan VERY well. Both ends have match ups that will cause the other problems it will boil down to the x-factors Ginobili and Odom

Thank you for proving my point on how dense carrao45 is.

[MaNu4Tres]

Look I'm arguing with the OP because he is stupid. I know the Spurs will be great next year.
He did a good job on Duncan

Like I said you are just arguing to just argue. Your points are stupid. Spurs 210 helped me prove it.

[carrao45]

Just to point out a few.

OK the second quote was significant i admit

[MaNu4Tres]

OK the second quote was significant i admit

thank you.

[ginobili's bald spot]

Notice how no spurs fans have joined you in this little crusade that you're on? That should tell you something.

[cornbread]

and in 2003 three in many ways they won becaus thy were the last team standing w/o injuries

Are you sure you're not talking about the 2009 Lakers?

[TD4THREE]

Notice how no spurs fans have joined you in this little crusade that you're on? Because it's pointless to argue with Laker fans.

[Killakobe81]

Funny thing is since 2003 All we heard is that Laker fans were dwelling inthe past and the Spurs has won more recently ...NOw that the Lakers are champs it's all excuses:
1.) Duncan was playing on one leg
2.) Manu was hurt
3.) Pop messed with Hill's head
4.) Pop took away RJ's mojo
5.) Yao was hurt
6.) KG was hurt
7.) Jameer was hurt
8.) Lebron had no help
9.) Stern wants us to win
10.) That damn Chris Wallace

All reasons why the Lakers are not very good and lucked in to a title and won't repeat according to some on here ...whatever ...

When the Spurs won I gave props you guys are consumed with your hate for Kobe/Lakers amd that willonly lead you to the darkside!!!

[Killakobe81]

Excuses are for losers ...

[redzero]

Manu Ginobili is better than Walter Ray Allen? News to me.

[La Peace]

You guys are silly

[rayray2k8]

Wait until the season or better yet, the playoffs start before you start running your mouth..
You're acting like a noob spurs fan. Oh wait, you ARE a noob fan.

[Brazil]

You guys are silly

+1

this whole discussion is stupid.

Only time will tell if the SAS can compete with the Lakers. One thing is sure so far: the spurs FO couldn't do better job this offseason to revamp this team. Spurs are moving strong and fast will it be enough ? I hope so, anyway next season will be fun to watch.

[carrao45]

thank you.

Just the second one though

[werewolf]

Damn! These Laker fans have some hot chicks in their sigs.

Ok, hijack over. Please continue the quarreling.

[ChickHearnMic]

Lakers/Spurs WCF 2010 ?


Great pickup
http://cdn0.sbnation.com/photo_images/24727/61561_Oklahoma_City_Thunder_v_Milwaukee_Bucks_larg e.jpg

[Muser]

Slow down people, lets get to the season first.

[mystargtr34]

I admire Spur fans who can spend time in the NBA Forum with so many cocky, arrogant and delusional Laker fans.

[DrHouse]

I admire Spur fans who can spend time in the NBA Forum with so many cocky, arrogant and delusional Laker fans.

Yea it's not like their team just won a championship or anything.

[samikeyp]

Were two threads stating the same thing really needed?

:bang

[Extra Stout]

http://www.mrdowling.com/images/604nile.jpg

[MaNu4Tres]

Were two threads stating the same thing really needed?

:bang

Lol it was an accident. I don't know how it happened. Totally unintentional. Sorry

[JustBlaze]

It's all about the Nuggets.:toast

[TheManFromAcme]

It's all about the Nuggets.:toast

:lol I am not laughing at the nuggets just that you came out of nowhere with this. ^

The Nuggets should be solid again next season. I think George Karl is not the one to take you to the promise land.

[Gino]

If Odom comes back, then the only team that can challenge the Lakers is the Celtics.

Its is what it is. Im just not a big Jefferson fan and I dont think Manu will be able to return to his 2005 form which is what they would need to beat the Lakers or Celtics.

If Odom doesnt return to LA, though, its wide open. I could see the Spurs getting past an Odom-less Lakers. Maybe even the Mavs as well.

[ChickHearnMic]

If Odom comes back, then the only team that can challenge the Lakers is the Celtics

I think you guys are still heavy in the MIX

I think adding Jefferson to your guys team does a whole lot now.

I thinking alot of people are taking that addition for granted.

Now you have a steady wing player who can hit the three and drive to the rim with tenacity to assist Tim,Manu, and T.P.

[Laker-fan-in-SanAnto]

If Odom comes back, then the only team that can challenge the Lakers is the Celtics.

Its is what it is. Im just not a big Jefferson fan and I dont think Manu will be able to return to his 2005 form which is what they would need to beat the Lakers or Celtics.

If Odom doesnt return to LA, though, its wide open. I could see the Spurs getting past an Odom-less Lakers. Maybe even the Mavs as well.


I finally agree with a spurs fan.:toast

[Gino]

I finally agree with a spurs fan.:toast

Im a Celtics fan :P

It used say "Boston Celtics" under my favorite team and then inexplicably changed a few months back.

I asked Kori "what gives" but never got a response.

[Laker-fan-in-SanAnto]

Im a Celtics fan :P

It used say "Boston Celtics" under my favorite team and then inexplicably changed a few months back.

I asked Kori "what gives" but never got a response.


:bang I take that back, I can't agree with with a Celtics fan, sorry

[IronMexican]

Im a Celtics fan :P

It used say "Boston Celtics" under my favorite team and then inexplicably changed a few months back.

I asked Kori "what gives" but never got a response.

You registered as a Spur fan, which is why it made you a Spur fan.