PDA

View Full Version : I must make a public apology,



mouse
04-05-2005, 11:34 AM
I must make a public apology,

I had no idea who or what the Pope really was, All my life I just saw this old man driving through different countries waving his hands in the air,

I figured there goes another Catholic trying to get folks to give money to the church, And after the Priest molestation cases that keep popping up every week? I really wanted no part of Catholics or the Pope.


But after watching the news and seeing what this man accomplished I felt he could be Buddhist as far as I care, the man made changes ,and he did many good things to different people, I saw that yesterday when some dude from the middle east who is not catholic was there to try and get a glimpse of the pope, he said this man did not care where you come from or your religion he was there to spread peace and good will.


Now that I know more about this man I would like to take back any thing I might have said towards him in a negative way,
I am sorry to him, and anyone else I may have offended with my negative comments.

Thank You

Clandestino
04-05-2005, 11:41 AM
you are still going to hell mouse! haha

Al Sharpton
04-05-2005, 11:47 AM
From the looks of this place mouse won't be alone.......... :lmao

desflood
04-05-2005, 11:48 AM
HEY! I may be going to hell, but not because of anything I said in here! :lol

mouse
04-05-2005, 11:53 AM
Don't get me wrong, I still stand where I always have with the Catholic church and there members. This apology is for the Pope and anyone I may have offended in the last 3 days.

I know for a fact a sinner like myself has a better chance to go to heaven than the most religious Catholic I have ever met. If you read the bible you will see there is only one way to GOD.

Oh by the way I went to a Catholic church last weekend not one Bible to be found on the pews, So maybe most of you have an alibi since you might not know there is such a book.

desflood
04-05-2005, 12:10 PM
How many Catholics are there in here? A few are obvious, but it's hard to tell with some others.

mouse
04-05-2005, 12:28 PM
That is a good question, Catholic people are like vampires, they only surface on certain occasions. Once a catholic person leaves church they go about there every day routines, And if they have sinned during that week they go to confession or pray about it next Sunday. After 3 years of going to a catholic church I found that out the hard way, These people I went to church with as soon as they left the door and got in there car? All I heard was "look where this fuck head parked how are we going to get out of here"? as we drank beer and went to Bandera downs to bet on horses? I had to here every 10 minutes how so and so was screwing his secretary and how Fred at work is a son of A bitch for not bringing enough ice to the company pic nick. As there daughter who was On the pill gave me blow jobs in the parking lot, I kinda figured this catholic thing is cool. I can sin like Satan all week as long as I show up in church Sunday, Why else to the Catholics get that ash on there heads once a year? Is it the only way into heaven? or do they do it cause their continuos bothers them?

Or do they do it cause they see everyone else doing it?

Trust me If there is a Knock at your door? It usually means its a Mormon or Jehovah witness, maybe a Christian trying to spread the word of God or asking for Donations,

If your at a local bust stop downtown and you hear some man yelling at the top of their lungs? 99.9% it is not a Catholic. When was the last time a Catholic person asked you if you know Jesus?

The Catholics have all the rights in the world to do and say what they wish, I just won't sit by silent and not say what Jesus wants the world to know.

Maybe before I leave this earth I can convince at least one Catholic to change their ways and by that we can both rejoice in heaven as we celebrate the right choices we both made together. Will you be that person?

desflood
04-05-2005, 12:31 PM
:lmao
Holy Hell, you're funny today. But I hope you don't think I'm Catholic!

Carnie
04-05-2005, 12:35 PM
:lmao
Holy Hell, you're funny today. But I hope you don't think I'm Catholic!

There is no such thing as a Catholic, just those who try and act like one.

Ed Helicopter Jones
04-05-2005, 12:39 PM
I set my moral compass on the teachings of the Mouse. I'm glad he's around to tell me how bad those Catholics are.





Amen.

bigzak25
04-05-2005, 12:43 PM
catholic upbringing...st. jude around my neck with my cross....didn't care much for catholic church growing up....went most of my teen years and first couple college years not going to church...questioned God and such...typical teen behavior....but then I woke up and have attended baptist most of my adult life....recently switched to a wesleyan church...because my friend is the pastor and his wife and my wife are friends....it's much like baptist but a more homey than castle hills first baptist where we used to go....i'm thinking of being baptized...we shall see.

Glad you came around on Pope John Paul, mouseman....i too am a bit ignorant of all he's accomplished and will be watching and learning....

mouse
04-05-2005, 12:44 PM
When you go to borders book store look around on books about Cults and the Catholic religion, you will be amazed at what you read from former priest, and Catholics that saw the light. The answer is out there my friend...

http://www.boomspeed.com/woaimouse/mouse-saves.jpg

gay abc
04-05-2005, 01:16 PM
Why else to the Catholics get that ash on there heads once a year?


to scare their co-workers :lol

Victor Newman
04-05-2005, 01:21 PM
:lmao

Your very funny would you like to work for me at Newman Enterprises?

gay abc
04-05-2005, 01:49 PM
:lmao

Your very funny would you like to work for me at Newman Enterprises?



sure - but i must warn you - i'm very very expensive

Jimcs50
04-05-2005, 02:37 PM
I am Catholic.

When I see you Mouse, you better run.

:flipoff

Jimcs50
04-05-2005, 02:39 PM
Man it is hard to feign anger in a post that has my sig staring at you after my post.

:)

CrazyOne
04-05-2005, 03:46 PM
I also have misgivings about some aspects of Catholic theology and practice, but the Pope really did some great things and stood firm for many good things. He will be missed. I hope his predecessor carries on his heritage.

bigzak25
04-05-2005, 03:54 PM
successor...but i'm crazy too...so it's okay...i know what you meant.

CrazyOne
04-05-2005, 03:56 PM
D'oh!

Victor Newman
04-05-2005, 04:16 PM
I am Catholic.

When I see you Mouse, you better run.

:flipoff

You must make all Catholics proud. way to prove mouse's point.

mrblonde17
04-05-2005, 04:24 PM
Judge not lest ye be judged.

At least that's what I think it says, but then again I'm just an ignorant Catholic that doesn't know anything about the Bible.

Mouse, you can mouth off all you want to about Catholics and the church and I'll support your right to do so. However, your legitimacy is pretty freakin' low. I'm not offended by anything you say about the church and the members. I'm offended at your incredible ignorance and hatred. If you really wanted to understand the dogma and traditions of our church, you'd get information from people that actually have an understanding of what goes on there instead of some disgruntled and/or defrocked priest whose screeds are printed and passed out like toilet paper or through the longstanding ignorance that you seem to have subscribed to. And you have the audacity to actually suggest that you're better than Catholics and your chances of reaching heaven are greater because you're not a Catholic. That may be one of the most unChristian comments I've ever been subjected to.

I don't agree with the teachings of all the churches and faiths and religions, but I do respect them and their beliefs. I don't belittle them nor do I think I'm better than they are because they're not Catholic. I think you might want to do some soul searching and possibly reread your Bible. The God that I believe in doesn't see people as Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Buddhists, or Muslims. My God sees us as people.

mouse
04-05-2005, 04:51 PM
I can make my point with out the bitterness you have shown us all.


http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/Cults/Catholicism/isitcult.htm

Roman Catholicism
Is It A Cult?
To many Christians, the Roman Catholic Church is an enigma -- a mysterious ecclesiastical system of laws, rituals, and religious orders. For centuries there have been angry denouncements from Roman Catholics against Protestantism for the schism created by the Reformation, and from Protestants against Roman Catholicism for its theological errors and its claim to be the only one true church.

Out of this controversy, charges have arisen that Roman Catholicism is not truly Christian, but is in fact, the largest and oldest "Christian" cult in the world.

The Christian Research Institute, (CRI), founded by the late Dr. Walter Martin, is regarded by many as the foremost authority on cults and the occult. They also see themselves as experts on what constitutes Biblical theology. CRI has produced position papers on Roman Catholicism, addressing some of the doctrines with which they are in disagreement. They have stopped short, however, of acknowledging Roman Catholicism as a cult. They are, in fact, adamant in their defense of Roman Catholicism as an orthodox Christian religion. In this regard, they have come against others for their insistence that Roman Catholicism meets the criteria of a cult.

That there are grave problems with many Roman Catholic doctrines and interpretations of Scripture, no knowledgeable non-Catholic would dispute. But to what degree does Roman Catholicism present a danger to the purity of Biblical truth? Are their teachings, practices, and liturgy commiserate with cultism? Or are they truly Christian, differing only in minor interpretations and applications? To answer these questions, it is necessary to define just what constitutes a cult.

What is a Cult?
The word "cult" connotes neither good nor evil. Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary defines a cult as "a system of religious beliefs and ritual; also: its body of adherents."

Based on this rather simple definition, every church body may be classified as a cult. But there is another definition offered by Webster's , which is more akin to the use of the word employed by theologians and sociologists: "a religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious; also: its body of adherents," and "great devotion to a person, idea, or thing."

But even this definition is inadequate in light of current trends in Christian thought. There is a wide distinction between the sociological and theological viewpoints.

Our concern is with the theological definition. Yet even here, one of the problems we have today is that there have developed several benchmarks from which to define a cult. For example, the Christian Research Institute has established as its benchmark what it terms "orthodoxy." That is, the historical position of the Church or churches from the time of the apostles to the present. This definition includes the early Roman Catholic Church fathers. On this basis, CRI (as do other cult-watching groups) considers Roman Catholicism as orthodox, but in error in only some teachings. However, Dr. Martin's original assessment would have to include Roman Catholicism:

"... a cult might also be defined as a group of people gathered about a specific person or person's interpretation of the Bible. For example, Jehovah's Witnesses are, for the most part, followers of the interpretation of Charles T. Russell and J. F. Rutherford. The Christian Scientist of today is a disciple of Mary Baker Eddy and her interpretations of Scripture. The Mormons, by their own admission, adhere to those interpretations found in the writings of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young. It would be possible to go on citing many others, including the Unity School of Christianity, which follows the theology of Charles and Myrtle Filmore. From a theological viewpoint, the cults contain not a few major deviations from historic Christianity. Yet paradoxically, they continue to insist that they are entitled to be classified as Christians" (Kingdom of the Cults, p. 11).

The basis for determining what constitutes a cult must go beyond stated doctrinal positions. If we use Dr. Martin's original test, "a group of people gathered about a specific person or person's interpretation of the Bible," we will not be fooled into thinking that, just because an organization issues a doctrinal statement in conformity with "orthodoxy," that organization is truly Christian.

Even if an organization can be said to have been established by God, there are no guarantees that God is going to continue to sanction it if it doesn't continue in the spirit and purpose for which He established it. And unless its criterion for establishing truth is the unadulterated Word of God rightly divided, its existence is counterproductive to the Faith. Add to this any liturgy or practices which are counter to the spirit of the Word, and you have the makings of a cult in the theological sense.

Ron Enroth, author of The Lure of the Cults and New Religions, and professor of sociology at [the neo-evangelical and liberal] Westmont College in Santa Barbara, California, cites Brooks Alexander, co-founder of the Spiritual Counterfeits Project, as having established the criteria for determining what constitutes a cult from a Biblical theological perspective. These are twofold:

1. A false or inadequate basis of salvation. The apostle Paul drew a distinction that is utterly basic to our understanding of truth when he said, "By grace are you saved through faith; and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God: not of works lest any man should boast" (Eph. 2:8-9). Inasmuch as the central doctrine of biblical Christianity is the sacrificial death of Christ for our sin, all cultic deviations tend to downplay the finished work of Christ and emphasize the importance of earning moral acceptance before God through our own religious works as a basis of salvation.

2. A false basis of authority. Biblical Christianity by definition takes the Bible as its yardstick of the true, the false, the necessary, the permitted, the forbidden, and the irrelevant. Cults, on the other hand, commonly resort to extra-biblical documents or contemporary "revelation" as the substantial basis of their theology (e.g. Mormons). While some cult groups go through the motions of accepting the authority of Scripture, they actually honor the group's or leader's novel interpretation of Scripture as normative (e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses, The Way International) (Enroth, The Lure of the Cults & New Religions, p. 21).

Enroth and Alexander make the distinction between sociological understanding of what constitutes a cult, and theological understanding. The sociological position is that whatever is normative to a given culture is not a cult. The Biblical theological position is that those groups that adhere to the Bible as the basis for all theology and practice are normative. Those groups that offer other criteria as equal to or superior to the Bible, including erroneous and/or exclusive interpretations of Scripture, are cults.

From the sociological point of view, Roman Catholicism is not a cult. But what about the Biblical theological point of view? To ascertain the answer to this question, we will be quoting almost exclusively from the Vatican II documents. This is because of the misconception that the Roman Catholic Church is not the same as it was in the past, and that it has instituted reforms through the Vatican II Council which allow for evangelical Christianity to seek unity with the papacy. While Vatican II has softened its stance in regard to its approach toward non-Catholics, it will be seen that it still holds major doctrines and practices that rule out unity for true Christians who have the knowledge to understand the insurmountable barriers erected by the Roman Church itself.

The Basis for Salvation
The Roman Catholic Church claims that salvation is by grace through the shed blood of Christ on the cross. But in practice and other teachings, how true is their affirmation of that crucial doctrine?

Historically, Roman Catholicism has maintained that Jesus merely made the way open for salvation. But to enter into that salvation, one must live in obedience to the authority of the papacy. In addition, Jesus' provision for salvation not being complete, the Church offers other means to assure one's salvation.

It is through the Roman Catholic Church alone that salvation in its fullest sense can be attained:

"For it is through Christ's Catholic Church alone, which is the universal help towards salvation. that the fullness of the means of salvation can be obtained. It was to the apostolic college alone, of which Peter is the head, that we believe that Our Lord entrusted all the blessings of the New Covenant, in order to establish on earth the one Body of Christ into which all those should be fully incorporated who belong in any way to the people of God" (Vatican Council II, p. 456).

Penance
On the subject of salvation and the expiation of sin, Vatican Council II stated:

"Therefore, the Church announces the good tidings of salvation to those who do not believe, so that all men may know the one true God and Jesus Christ whom he has sent and may be converted from their ways, doing penance (Vatican Council II, p. 6).

"The full taking away and, as it is called, reparation of sins requires two things. Firstly, friendship with God must be restored. Amends must be made for offending his wisdom and goodness. This is done by a sincere conversion of mind. Secondly, all the personal and social values, as well as those that are universal, which sin has lessened or destroyed must be fully made good. This is done in two ways. The first is by feely making reparation, which involves punishment. The second is by accepting the punishments God's just and most holy wisdom has appointed. From this the holiness and splendor of his glory shine out through the world. ...

"The doctrine of purgatory clearly demonstrates that even when the guilt of sin has been taken away, punishment for it or the consequences of it may remain to be expiated or cleansed. They often are. In fact, in purgatory the souls of those 'who died in the charity of God and truly repentant, but who had not made satisfaction with adequate penance for their sins and omissions' are cleansed after death with punishment designed to purge away their debt" (Vatican Council II, p. 64).

Indulgences
One means of attaining salvation from the punishment of one's sins is what the Roman Church calls indulgences. These may be purchased with money or through acts of penitence, acts of charity, or other pietistic means. The concept of indulgences is based on the idea that one's good works merit God's grace. Since Christ's sacrifice was insufficient for the full payment of the penalty of sin, acts of piety and gifts to the Roman Church may be used as partial payment for one's sins. The efficacy of an indulgence depends upon the merit attributed to it by the church. For example, one may pay to have a mass said for a relative believed to be in purgatory. The mass will then account for a certain number of days deleted from his purgatorial sentence.

"The use of indulgences spread gradually. It became a very clear element in the history of the Church when the Popes decreed that certain works which were suitable for promoting the common good of the Church 'could replace all penitential practices' and that the faithful who were 'genuinely sorry for and had confessed their sins' and done such works were granted 'by almighty God's mercy and ... trusting in his Apostles merits and authority' and 'by virtue of the fullness of the apostolic power' 'not only full and abundant forgiveness, but the most complete forgiveness possible for their sins.

"For 'God's only-begotten Son ... has won a treasure for the militant Church ... he has entrusted it to blessed Peter, the key-bearer of heaven, and to his successors who are Christ's vicars on earth, so that they may distribute it to the faithful for their salvation. They may apply it with mercy for reasonable causes to all who have repented for and have confessed their sins. At times they may remit completely, and at other times only partially, the temporal punishment due to sin in a general as well as in special ways (insofar as they judge to be fitting in the sight of the Lord). The merits of the Blessed Mother of God and of the elect ... are known to add further to this treasure'" (Vatican Council II, p. 70).

While acknowledging that indulgences have been abused, the Roman Church ascribes that abuse to "the past," as if no such abuse occurs today. But the very nature of indulgences is an abuse against the purity of the Faith. To make matters worse, the Roman Church condemns those who oppose the idea of indulgences:

"[The Roman Catholic Church] 'teaches and commands that the usage of indulgences -- a usage most beneficial to Christians and approved by the authority of the Sacred Councils -- should be kept in the Church; and it condemns with anathema [cursing by ecclesiastical authority] those who say that indulgences are useless or that the Church does not have the power to grant them.'" (Vatican Council II, p. 71)

The Roman Catholic Church says it alone can grant this essential blessing for full salvation, and then condemns to hell those who disagree -- virtually all non-Catholics!

It was primarily Martin Luther's opposition to the evil practice of selling indulgences that sparked the Reformation. While he sought to remain in the Roman Church and bring reform to it [e.g., Martin Luther never gave up the false doctrine of baptismal regeneration], he was eventually excommunicated for his stand, as were other Reformers.

The response of Roman Catholicism to the Reformation was a hardening of the papal heart which resulted in mass executions, torture, and other violent means to squelch the rejection of papal authority. The Counter-Reformation resulted in the creation of Order of Jesus -- the Jesuits -- as a means to spy out and destroy those who sought to follow the path to freedom from Rome's tyrannical grip upon their souls. Thus ensued one of the bloodiest periods in the history of the Church, which saw countless martyrs for Christ at the hands of the papacy. With all its posturing to win the hearts of non-Catholic Christians today, the Roman Catholic Church has never offered an apology for its murdering of our ancestral brethren. This chapter in history is virtually ignored by the Vatican.

The Eucharist & The Mass
Roman Catholicism states that redemption is accomplished in the Eucharist:

"For it is the liturgy through which, especially in the divine sacrifice of the Eucharist, 'the work of our redemption is accomplished'" (Vatican Council II, p. 1).

In Roman Catholic belief, the Eucharist is the embodiment of Christ in the bread of the Roman Catholic communion table; the bread is literally His body, and the wine is literally His blood. To non-Catholics, this can be confusing. But the Vatican II documents spell out the degree to which this literalness is held by its affirmation of the Council of Trent's Decree on the Eucharist that the wafer is to be worshiped as God. Is not idolatry the sign of a cult?

"There should be no doubt in anyone's mind 'that all the faithful ought to show to this most holy sacrament the worship which is due to the true God, as has always been the custom of the Catholic Church. Nor is it to be adored by any the less because it was instituted by Christ to be eaten'" (Vatican Council II, p. 104).

The Roman Church insists that Christ's sacrifice was not sufficient in itself to take away the penalty for our sins, but that we must add to His sacrifice through penance and through the application of the Roman Catholic mass as an ongoing sacrifice:

"Hence the Mass, the Lord's Supper, is at the same time and inseparably: a sacrifice in which the sacrifice of the cross is perpetuated (Vatican Council II, p. 102).

"Christ's own association of what he did at the Last Supper with what he was to do on Good Friday has been the Church's own norm for intimately relating the two. The sacrifice of the altar, then is no mere empty commemoration of Calvary, but a true and proper act of sacrifice, whereby Christ is the high priest by an unbloody immolation offers himself a most acceptable victim to the eternal Father, as he did on the cross. 'It is one and the same victim; the same person now offers it by the ministry of his priests, who then offered himself on the cross. Only the manner of offering is different.' ... Worth stressing is that what makes the Mass a sacrifice is that Christ is a living human being with a human will, still capable of offering (hence priest) and being offered (hence victim), no less truly today than occurred on the cross. (John Hardon, The Catholic Catechism, pp. 465-66) (cf. Heb. 10:12-18).

Scripture is clear that Jesus' sacrifice on the cross was sufficient for taking away not only the guilt, but also the punishment for our sins. The whole purpose of His suffering was to bear our punishment (Isa. 53:4-6).

The chastisement (or punishment) that reconciled us to God (establishing peace with Him) was laid upon Jesus at the cross. There is not a single Scripture that speaks of punishment for our sins if we die in Christ. At worst, we will suffer the loss of reward for our failure to produce fruit in our lives to our capabilities. But all Scriptural references to punishment apply to unbelievers only. For the believer, to be absent from the body is to be present with Christ (2 Cor. 5:8).

Does this make us more inclined to sin and take a cavalier attitude about our position in Christ? Just the opposite. When those who have the Spirit of God consider the awful price paid for our redemption, we abhor our sins all the more. If we fall, it is as Paul said, the result of sin that dwells in our mortal bodies. But our spirits -- our attitude -- is one of hatred for sin.

The history of the Catholic Church proves conclusively that its means for salvation is not by grace, but by works of its own laws. This, in itself, qualifies it to deemed a cult. It was one of the "approved religions" under the pagan emperor Constantine -- the first major cult that broke from the teachings of the apostles.

The Basis for Authority
Perhaps the most cogent argument offered against the cults by true believers in Christ Jesus is that Scripture is the sole authority for all belief and practice for those who are in Christ. The first avenue of attack against a cult's theology takes the researcher through that cult's basis for belief. Even those cults which affirm the validity of the Bible as the sole authority, add their own authorities to it. And that is what cult researchers mark as one of the unmistakable signs of a cult.

Like other cults, the Roman Catholic Church teaches that the Bible is the inspired Word of God, and that is the basis for establishing truth, doctrine, and practice. But it also has other criteria that it says are equal to Scripture: tradition, and Magesterium (the teaching authority of the Church).

While asserting, as do all aberrant "Christian" cults, that Scripture is the primary source of all revelation, the Roman Catholic Church in practice and in its teachings affirms that its interpretation of Scripture is the only valid basis upon which all truth resides and upon which its other authorities rest.

"Sacred Tradition and sacred Scripture, then, are bound closely together, and communicate one with the other. For both of them , flowing out from the same divine wellspring, move towards the same goal. Sacred Scripture is the speech of God as it is put down in writing under the breath of the Holy Spirit. And Tradition transmits in its entirety the Word of God which has been entrusted to the apostles by Christ the Lord and the Holy Spirit. It transmits it to the successors of the apostles [the pope and bishops of the Roman Catholic Church] so that, enlightened by the Spirit of truth, they may faithfully preserve, expound and spread it abroad by their preaching. Thus it comes about that the Church does not draw her certainty about all revealed truths from the Holy Scriptures alone. Hence, both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and honored with equal feelings of devotion and reverence...

"But the task of giving an authentic interpretation of the Word of God, whether in its written form or in the form of Tradition, has been entrusted to the living teaching office of the Church alone. Its authority in this matter is exercised in the name of Jesus Christ. Yet this Magesterium is not superior to the Word of God, but is its servant. It teaches only what has been handed on to it. At the divine command and with the help of the Holy Spirit, it listens to this devotedly, guards it with dedication and expounds it faithfully. All that it proposes for belief as being divinely revealed is drawn from this single deposit of faith.

"It is clear, therefore, that, in the supremely wise arrangement of God, sacred Tradition, sacred Scripture and the Magesterium of the Church are so connected and associated that one of them cannot stand without the others. Working together, each in its own way under the action of the one Holy Spirit, they all contribute effectively to the salvation of souls" (Vatican Council II , pp. 755-756). (Emphasis ours.)

In addition, the Roman Church openly professes that its view of Scripture differs from that of 'other' Christians:

"But when Christians separated from us affirm the divine authority of the sacred books, they think differently from us -- different ones in different ways -- about the relationship between the scriptures and the Church. For the Church according to Catholic belief, its authentic teaching office has a special place in expounding and preaching the written Word of God (Vatican Council II, p. 468).

"It is for the bishops, 'with whom the apostolic doctrine resides' suitably to instruct the faithful entrusted to them in the correct use of the divine books, especially of the New Testament, and in particular of the Gospels. They do this by giving them translations of the sacred texts which are equipped with necessary and really adequate explanations. Thus the children of the Church can familiarize themselves safely and profitably with sacred Scriptures, and become steeped in their spirit.

"Moreover, editions of sacred Scripture, provided with suitable notes, should be prepared for the use of even non-Christians and adapted to their circumstances. These should be prudently circulated, either by pastors of souls, or by Christians of any rank" (Vatican Council II, pp. 764-765).

The cry of Reformation was sola scriptura -- the insistence that the Bible alone is the ultimate authority for all believers. The Holy Spirit's enlightenment is a safeguard against religious tyranny.

But for the Roman Catholic Church, the Scriptures are not sufficient of themselves to provide all that is necessary "for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works" (2 Tim. 3:16-17) without the Roman Church's interpretations. Isn't that what CRI originally established as one of the primary criteria for determining if a group is as cult?

Exclusivity
Another sign of a cult is its exclusivity and insistence that it alone holds the authority as God's only true church. Rather than acknowledge that the true Church is comprised of individuals bound to God the Father through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, a cult looks upon the organization itself -- that is, the hierarchical structure -- as the Church. This is true of Romanism.

Although the Roman Catholic Church admits today that God's grace is active in non-Catholic Christians, we are referred to as "separated brethren" (which the Roman Church, through its ecumenical movement, hopes to some day bring into fellowship under its authority). According to Romanism, unless we acquiesce to this movement toward "unity," we remain outside the graces of the Church, regardless of how much in God's grace we live.

"Bishops should show affectionate consideration in their relations with the separated brethren and should urge the faithful also to exercise all kindness and charity in their regard, encouraging ecumenism as it is understood by the Church" (Vatican Council II, p. 573).

The key phrase in this statement is "as it is understood by the Church." This betrays Roman Catholicism's cult mindset that sees the Church as a separate entity from the corporate body of all true believers. How the Roman Church views ecumenism is revealed in the Vatican II documents:

"The term 'ecumenical movement' indicates the initiatives and activities encouraged and organized, according to the various needs of the Church and as opportunities offer, to promote Christian unity" (Vatican Council II, p. 457).

To the papacy, the purpose of the ecumenical movement is to meet the needs of the Vatican's ecclesiastical system on the pretext of promoting Christian unity. But on what terms is unity to be realized?

"This sacred Council urges the faithful to abstain from any frivolous or imprudent zeal, for these can cause harm to true progress toward unity. Their ecumenical activity cannot be other than fully and sincerely Catholic, that is, loyal to the truth we have received from the Apostles and the Fathers, and in harmony with the faith which the Catholic Church has always professed, and at the same time tending toward that fullness in which our Lord wants his Body to grow in the course of time" (Vatican Council II, p. 470).

Through the ecumenical movement, the Roman Catholic Church is attempting to undo the Reformation, and to bring all of Christendom under the authority of the papacy. While it encourages "dialogue" with non-Catholic Christians, its position is adamant: there will be no unity without surrender to "Mother Church."

This establishes the pope as the central figure for the Faith in the same way that the apostles of other cults are established. While they acknowledge that Jesus Christ is the central figure of the faith to which they adhere, there can be no true relationship with Him apart from the dictates of the hierarchical pronouncements. The cult of the papacy is in itself sufficient grounds to recognize the Roman Church as a cult. The display of adoration, the gaudy parade of a mere man as if he were a god, the pandering to idolatrous worship through bowing down and kissing his ring, the insistence that he be addressed as His Holiness the Pope (or Father) of all Christians cannot but confirm to any Christian -- let alone professed cult-watchers -- that Roman Catholicism is a cult.

Conclusion
There are other evidences of cultism in Roman Catholicism, too numerous to mention here. One significant consideration: any religious group that threatens damnation and/or excommunication to any segment of its membership for eating, drinking, marrying, or failure to attend religious rites is a cult.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: Dr. Bill Jackson, president of the Association of Fundamentalists Evangelizing Catholics (AFEC), prepared the following, "The Marks of a Cult," as applied to the Roman Catholic Church:

1) Extra Biblical Revelation. Dr. Ludwig Ott, probably the most readable and conservative Roman Catholic theologian, has written in Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma: “Theology, like faith, accepts as the source of its knowledge Holy Writ and Tradition ... and also the doctrinal assertions of the church … this latter means the day by day teaching ministry of the Church through the pope and the bishops united with the pope.” (This latter is referred to as the Magesterium.)

2) False Basis of Salvation. From Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994), #16: “the ways of reaching beatitude—through right conduct, with the help of God’s law and grace, through conduct that fulfills the twofold commandment of charity, specified in God’s Ten Commandments.”

3) Uncertain Hope. A very complimentary article in The Philadelphia Inquirer stated of the late Cardinal Krol: “He doesn’t have to worry about food, clothing, shelter. What are his worries? ‘My salvation, getting to Heaven’ says the Prelate.”

4) Presumptuous Messianic Leadership. If the pope is NOT the Vicar of the Messiah (Christ), he is presumptuous in thus identifying himself. Jesus Christ knew His church would need an infallible Head, so He Himself chose His Vicar in John 14:26, 15:26 and 16:7-15. This Vicar is not only infallible, He is infinite. He is the Holy Spirit.

5) Doctrinal Ambiguity. From the New Catholic Encyclopedia: “The Bible as a literary work had traditions that included myth” (Vol. 10, p. 184); “Some of the miracles recorded in Holy Scripture may be fictional and include imaginative literary exaggerations. The episode of Noah and the Ark is imaginative literary creation” (Vol. 9, p. 887); “The Gospels are not biographies of Jesus and still less scientific history” (Vol. 12, p. 403).

6) Claims of Special Discoveries. These, in Catholicism, are numberless. They go from the Letter of the Oration, a “true letter” of Jesus found in the Holy Sepulchre to the revelations at Fatima (an apparition approved by the Vatican). In between are countless appearances of Mary to Catherine Laboure, Simon Stock, the visionaries at Medjugorje and Bernadette Soubirous, etc. Add a few of Bob and Penny Lord’s “Eucharistic Miracles” and you have more special discoveries than all the other cults combined.

7) Defective Christology. Pius XII’s encyclical, Mediator Dei: Christ “has offered and continues to offer Himself as a victim for our sins.” Hebrews 9:25 says, “nor yet that he should offer himself often.” Hebrews 10:14, “For by one offering he hath perfected forever them that are sanctified.”

8) Segmented Biblical Attention. “The Seven Verses of Scripture Authoritatively Interpreted by Rome” (from the Denver Catholic Register, 3/29/90, p. 10): “Father (Francis X.) Cleary (S.J.), scripture scholar and professor in the Department of Theological Studies of St. Louis University, writes, ‘Many people think that the Church has an official “party line” about every sentence in the Bible. In fact, only seven passages have been definitively interpreted.’”

9) Enslaving Organizational Structures. This may not be as evident in contemporary “liberated” American Catholicism, but it was very much a fact for Europe’s millions in past centuries. All were taught that there was no salvation outside of the Catholic Church, which through her bishops could impose anathemas or excommunication seemingly at will. The masses of people were controlled by that system. Even the kings of Europe quaked at the possibility of papal displeasure.

10) Financial Exploitation. The coins ringing in the coffers of Tetzel have ceased, and exorbitant payments for early purgatorial release can be relegated to previous centuries, but the very fact that any Mass stipend is expected for Masses to remit fictitious purgatorial suffering is a case for financial exploitation.

11) Denunciation of Others. Priest Lawrence Feeney of the Boston Heresy Trial believed “extra nullus salus ecclesia” (no salvation outside the church). He was approached by Bobby Kennedy, who complained that Feeney was sending his Protestant friends to hell. Feeney replied, “I’m not sending them to hell, but I am telling them where to come if they want to get to Heaven.”

12) Syncretism. From Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994), #846: “Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try by their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience—those too may achieve eternal salvation.”


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*This material (preceding the Note directly above) has been excerpted and/or adapted from a Media Spotlight Special Report of October, 1991.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Biblical Discernment Ministries - Revised 12/01




http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060522321/factnet-20/002-0784101-9680865
http://www.factnet.org/cults/Catholic/Recommended_Books_on_Catholicism.htm

http://www.biblebelievers.net/Romanism/kjcroman.htm


18 Questions For "Saved" Roman Catholics

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Occasionally, some well-meaning Christian thinks he knows a "saved Roman Catholic". We invite such a person to introduce us to his friend so that we may, in his presence, ask the Roman Catholic the following questions. His answers will easily determine that he is not saved in the true, Biblical sense.

The new "accommodation" approach of the Roman Church in these ecumenical days of apostasy is to use the same expressions as Fundamental Christians. But Christian love is not shown by permitting these people to believe they are saved when they are not. Christian love is shown by making the true Gospel plain and clear so that the "religious but lost" person will recognize his unsaved condition and his need of a Saviour, the true Christ of the Bible, not a counterfeit, as in the Roman, Greek and many other churches.

The Apostle Paul said that he was free from the blood of all men. May the same be true of every genuine witness for Jesus Christ! Here are the questions:

When were you converted?
How were you converted?
To what, or to whom, were you converted?
What do you believe now that you did not believe before your conversion?
What does it mean to be saved?
On what Scriptural promises do you base your salvation?
What does it mean to be born again?
Are you sure today that if you die tomorrow, or at any time in the future, you will be in heaven immediately after death?
What do you believe about Purgatory?
What do you believe about the Mass?
Do you still participate in the Mass?
Do you believe that to miss Mass voluntarily on Sunday would be a mortal sin, so that if you did not confess it before you died, you would not go to heaven?
Do you believe that any sinner can be saved who dies without trusting in Jesus Christ alone for the salvation of his soul and forgiveness of his sins?
Do you believe that Mary and Roman Catholic saints can help you get to heaven?
How do you believe that the blood sacrifice of Jesus Christ is applied to your soul?
Have you told your priest you have been saved (converted)?
Do you believe you will still go to heaven if you leave the Roman Catholic Church, receive believer's baptism and join a fundamental Protestant church?
When and where do you plan to do this?
As these questions, and others you can think of, are discussed in detail, you will quickly see that the person is trusting in his work, merits, baptism, confirmation, sacraments, or something besides - or plus - Jesus Christ and not in Christ and Christ alone. He can then be shown the difference between his unbiblical form of salvation and the saving faith of the Bible. (From The Gospel Catholic - The Conversion Center, Phila. PA)

Related Resources:

Can A Good Catholic Be Saved?
Is Romanism Christianity?
Open Letter to Roman Catholics

Return to Index Listing on Roman Catholicism


Customers who bought this book also bought
Lead Us Not into Temptation: Catholic Priests and the Sexual Abuse of Children by Andrew M. Greeley
Betrayal: The Crisis in the Catholic Church by The Investigative Staff of the Boston Globe
Our Fathers : The Secret Life of the Catholic Church in an Age of Scandal by DAVID FRANCE
Pedophiles and Priests: Anatomy of a Contemporary Crisis by Philip Jenkins
Vows of Silence : The Abuse of Power in the Papacy of John Paul II by Jason Berry
Slayer of the Soul: Child Sexual Abuse and the Catholic Church by Stephen J. Rossetti
Explore Similar Items: in Books



Berry
Slayer of the Soul: Child Sexual Abuse and the Catholic Church by Stephen J. Rossetti
Explore Similar Items: in Books

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly
In this riveting, disturbing expose, journalists Burkett of the Miami Herald and Bruni of the Detroit Free Press , present an indictment of not only pedophiliac priests, but also of a church hierarchy that is interested more in concealment than compassion. Among the cases documented, the book focuses on Frank Fitzpatrick, a private detective living in Rhode Island, and his search for Father James Porter, a priest who 30 years earlier had molested him in elementary school in Massachusetts. Fitzpatrick was stonewalled by both the church and the law in tracking down the elusive cleric. When he finally found him in Minnesota in 1990--now married but also still a molester, according to court records-- Fitzpatrick helped direct the public's attention to a problem the church had been denying for years. Through the attention of the media, more than 200 people nationwide accused Porter of molesting them. This case could serve as a catalyst for many Catholics, male and female alike, who had been molested by their parish priests to now come forward. The authors estimate that the lawsuits to date have cost the church $400-500 million. Unfortunately, one concludes from this frightening book that if your child is molested by a priest, the bishop is not the avenue of recourse; better to call the police and a lawyer. Photos.
Copyright 1993 Reed Business Information, Inc.--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Product Description:
The relentless crescendo of revelations of sexual abuse in the nation's Catholic churches has rocked the nation. Just how widespread is child sexual abuse by the Catholic clergy? And why hasn't the Catholic church done more to stop it?

In A Gospel of Shame, Pulitzer Prize-nominated journalists Elinor Burkett and Frank Bruni provide the answers to these questions and more. The answers, however, turn out to be infuriating and heartbreaking, difficult to accept but impossible to dismiss. The authors thoroughly document dozens of cases across the country and reveal how this heinous abuse of trust has been tacitly sanctioned by the Church's silence.

coz
04-05-2005, 04:51 PM
I'm under the impression that this was a mouse joke that just wasn't funny.

mouse
04-05-2005, 04:54 PM
Judge not lest ye be judged.
Mouse, your legitimacy is pretty freakin' low.

Priceless :lmao

mrblonde17
04-05-2005, 04:57 PM
It was on the internet so it must be true.

mouse
04-05-2005, 05:06 PM
http://www.snapnetwork.org/books_section/book_images/church_forgot_120.jpg



http://www.rickross.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?config=htdig&restrict=&exclude=&method=and&format=builtin-long&sort=score&words=catholics


http://www.snapnetwork.org

http://www.snapnetwork.org/stuff/snap.jpg

BuffMacchio
04-05-2005, 05:09 PM
if you don't like religious jokes, jump ahead 1 post!
jokes courtesy maxim archive.
Godbless the Pope, and remember, i'm sure on a couple of these our Lord is laughing with us, on the others, yeah, my ticket to hell might be punched, he forgives all right? :angel


-----------------------------------------------------

A man walks into a church confessional and says to the priest, “Bless me, father, for I have sinned. I was with seven different women last night.”

The priest is silent for a moment, then says, “Go home and cut seven lemons in half. Squeeze the juice into a glass and drink it down in one gulp.”

“And I’ll be forgiven?” asks the man.

“No,” replies the priest, “but it will wipe that fucking smirk off your face.”
---------------------------------

During a sermon, the preacher says to his congregation, “The Bible covers everything. I challenge anyone to name a subject I can’t find in the Good Book.”

A woman in a back pew raises her hand and asks, “What about PMS?”

Caught by surprise, the preacher nervously thumbs through the Bible before exclaiming, “Oh, here it is: ‘And Mary rode Joseph’s ass all the way to Bethlehem.’”

----------------------------------------

oldie, but goodie....


Immediately after mass one Sunday morning, a man stops to shake the preacher’s hand.

“That was a goddamned fine sermon you gave today,” the man tells the preacher. “Goddamned fine!”

“Thank you, sir,” the preacher answers, “but I’d rather you didn’t use that kind of foul, blasphemous language in the Lord’s house.”

“You know, I was so goddamned impressed with that fucking sermon that I put $5,000 in the goddamned offering plate!” says the man.

“No shit?” says the preacher.

-------------------------------------------------

Jeff and Mike were killed in an accident. Jeff arrives at the Pearly Gates, and is met by St. Peter.

“Where is my friend Mike?” Jeff asks.

St. Peter replies, “Well, Mike was not as fortunate as you. He went in the other direction instead of getting into Heaven.”

Jeff was bothered by this and asked, “Well, could I see Mike one more time just to be sure he is OK?”

So, Jeff and St. Peter walked over to the edge of Heaven and looked down. There was Mike, on a sandy beach, with a gorgeous sexy blonde in a bikini, and a keg of beer.

“I don’t mean to complain, but Mike seems to have it pretty nice down there in Hell,” says Jeff.

“It’s not as it appears to be,” says St. Peter. “You see, the keg has a hole in it and the blonde doesn’t.”

------------------------------------------------

The pope had become very ill and was taken to many doctors, all of whom could not figure out how to cure him. Finally he was brought to an old physician, who stated that he could figure it out. After about an hour’s examination he came out and told the cardinals that he knew what was wrong. He said that the bad news was that it was a rare disorder of the testicles. He said that the good news was that all the pope had to do to be cured was to have sex.

Well, this was not good news to the cardinals, who argued about it at length. Finally they went to the pope with the doctor and explained the situation.After some thought, the pope stated, “I agree, but under four conditions.”

The cardinals were amazed and there arose quite an uproar. Over all ofthe noise there arose a single voice that asked, “And what are the four conditions?” The room stilled. There was a long pause…

The pope replied, “First the girl must be blind, so that she cannot see with whom she is having sex. Second, she must be deaf, so that she cannot hear with whom she is having sex. Third, she must be dumb so that if somehow she figures out with whom she is having sex, she can tell no one.”

After another long pause a voice arose and asked, “And the fourth condition?”

“Big tits.”

Godbless the Pope.
----------------------------------------------------------------

The Pope is on a goodwill tour in New York. As he’s waving to the crowd, he sees a young boy puffing on a cigarette.

“You’re far too young to be smoking, my son,” says the Pope.

“Fuck you,” replies the boy.

“I beg your pardon,” says the Pope. “Do you know who I am? I’m the head of the entire Roman Catholic Church, the spiritual leader for millions of people, and the representative of God himself. No, no, no, kid. Fuck you!”

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Two old Jewish men are strolling down the street one day, when they happen to walk by a Catholic church. They see a big sign posted that says, “Convert to Catholicism and get $10.“

One of the Jewish men stops walking and stares at the sign. His friend turns to him and says, “Murray, what’s going on?”

“Abe,” replies Murray, “I’m thinking of doing it.”

Abe says, “What are you, crazy?”

Murray thinks for a minute and says, “Abe, I’m going to do it.”

With that, Murray strides purposefully into the church and comes out twenty minutes later with his head bowed.

“So,” asks Abe, “did you get your ten dollars?”

Murray looks up at him and says, “Is that all you people think about?”

----------------------------------------------------

Two nuns are driving down the highway, when, out of nowhere, a Vampire lands on the front hood of their car and is facing them through the windshield. The two nuns begin to panic when one nun yells to the other, “Do something! Show it your cross!”

The nun in the passenger seat agrees, leans out the window in rage and yells, “Get the fuck off the windshield!”

-----------------------------------------------------

Two nuns are on a break in the rectory.

“I was cleaning Father Tom’s room a few days ago,” gossips the first nun, “and I found a bunch of condoms.”

“Oh, my,” gasps the second nun. “What did you do?”

“I poked holes in them,” she replies.

“Fuck!” says the second nun.

-----------------------------------------------------

mouse
04-05-2005, 05:13 PM
http://www.snapnetwork.org/books_section/books_to_read_.htm



http://www.snapnetwork.org/books_section/book_images/vows_silence_120.jpg

http://www.snapnetwork.org/books_section/book_images/gospel_shame_150.jpg

mrblonde17
04-05-2005, 05:14 PM
You're right louse...Catholics are the only people that have done bad things.

I can go to Amazon just as well and dig up thrash jobs on every single organized religion that has ever existed. I find books that rip the president. I can find websites that suggest that Rush Limbaugh is actually Satan. And I can find media figures that think the world is flat. What does that prove? It proves that you have entirely too much time and hatred on your hands.

JoeChalupa
04-05-2005, 06:56 PM
Don't get me wrong, I still stand where I always have with the Catholic church and there members. This apology is for the Pope and anyone I may have offended in the last 3 days.

I know for a fact a sinner like myself has a better chance to go to heaven than the most religious Catholic I have ever met. If you read the bible you will see there is only one way to GOD.

Oh by the way I went to a Catholic church last weekend not one Bible to be found on the pews, So maybe most of you have an alibi since you might not know there is such a book.

Mouse, the Scriptures for the Mass ARE in the pews. Not the entire Bible and carrying a Bible around doesn't get you a "golden ticket" to Heaven.

I know you dislike Catholics and that is fine but I don't think you should criticize its members.

Like I told you this weekend..if you don't find Jesus in the Catholic Church then I hope you find him somewhere else.

My faith is solid so all the naysayers, books about cults, yada yada yada do not bother me. But I will admit that I do get defensive, and I need to work on that, when it comes to my religion.

But I teach my girls NEVER to question ones faith for it is a personal issue.

I've been to a Baptist Church, Church of Christ, Protestant, Methodist and some non-denomination Churches because a friend invited me but never thought about leaving the Catholic Church.

It is a PERSONAL choice. Don't knock someone for what they believe and God bless you Mouse.

jalbre6
04-05-2005, 07:17 PM
I have a question for the religious folks in here:

Where I live, you can't go a mile without seeing some huge expensive uberchurch or one under construction. They get filled one day a week and then have some weekday events for the elderly and the kiddos. I realize that religion is a business and a big one at that, but wouldn't it be a lot more "spiritually fulfilling" to have a modest building and then use these tremendous donations to help charitable causes?

I'm just curious.

GoldToe
04-05-2005, 07:24 PM
I see a quite a few expensive homes popping up everywhere.
Why aren't more people living in modest homes so they can give more to charitable causes? Do you really need 3500 sq.ft. to live in?

jalbre6
04-05-2005, 07:27 PM
I see a quite a few expensive homes popping up everywhere.
Why aren't more people living in modest homes so they can give more to charitable causes? Do you really need 3500 sq.ft. to live in?
:lol

I couldn't have asked for a better answer. Thank you.

Jimcs50
04-05-2005, 07:29 PM
I see a quite a few expensive homes popping up everywhere.
Why aren't more people living in modest homes so they can give more to charitable causes? Do you really need 3500 sq.ft. to live in?

Yes I do. I need my space.

GoldToe
04-05-2005, 07:37 PM
Yes I do. I need my space.

Do you really need it, or do you just want it?

Materialism.

mouse
04-05-2005, 07:39 PM
Mouse, the Scriptures for the Mass ARE in the pews. Not the entire Bible and carrying a Bible around doesn't get you a "golden ticket" to Heaven.

just like a Catholic to bring up Gold. Any ticket will do just fine, And the real reason they don't have the complete bible they are afraid someone might read some pages where it talks about worshiping saints and idols,


I know you dislike Catholics and that is fine but I don't think you should criticize its members.

I don't dislike anyone, If I didn't care about your lost souls I wouldn't make an effort to help you by bringing the truth.


Like I told you this weekend..if you don't find Jesus in the Catholic Church then I hope you find him somewhere else.

Jesus is Standing right in front of you, you have to let him in he is knocking at your door.


My faith is solid so all the naysayers, books about cults, yada yada yada do not bother me. But I will admit that I do get defensive, and I need to work on that, when it comes to my religion.

I must admit your the first Catholic at this website that can talk without the curse words and insults.


But I teach my girls NEVER to question ones faith for it is a personal issue.

Then how do you explain to them why they can't say Christmas in school?


I've been to a Baptist Church, Church of Christ, Protestant, Methodist and some non-denomination Churches because a friend invited me but never thought about leaving the Catholic Church.

Now your going over board, I have known you for years and not once have you come to our church even though I bribe you. You said you was born a Catholic and I don't see you going in anyone's church unless you was asking for Directions or something.


It is a PERSONAL choice. Don't knock someone for what they believe

yes I should just do like you, bury my head in the sand and mind my own business as my fellow posters are headed to the lake of fire,

You must be one heck of a Witness to God


God bless you Mouse.

he has many times each day, it's you that needs his blessings.

MannyIsGod
04-05-2005, 08:41 PM
Judge not lest ye be judged.
Mouse, your legitimacy is pretty freakin' low.

Mouse won any debate in this thread based on that one post. Nice.

mrblonde17
04-05-2005, 08:44 PM
Look up Rev. Fred Phelps mouse. I think you'll find a great friend in him. The two of you have much in common.

Have a nice day.

MannyIsGod
04-05-2005, 08:45 PM
I see a quite a few expensive homes popping up everywhere.
Why aren't more people living in modest homes so they can give more to charitable causes? Do you really need 3500 sq.ft. to live in?

This is one thing I've always wondered, but I haven't had the opportunity to ask a minister or priest, or anyone else who would be knowledgable on Christian faith.

I don't understand how under that faith, you'd be able to live in excess (such as having a house in the Dominion Mr. Hagee) while there are Christians (and other people as well) who are starving as well. Wouldn't you be obligated to use that excess money to help those people before it would be right to use it in a gluttonous fashion?

I believe you have a right to things that make you happy, including some things in excess, but I don't see how that would go with a Christian lifestyle.

Goliadnative
04-05-2005, 10:04 PM
Long time lurker here. Just wanted to add a little background on one of the areas you had an objection to.


In reference to confession to a priest, we are just doing what the Bible tells us to do. If we look at James 5:16, it reads "Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous man is powerful and effective." (New International Version) or "Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much." (King James Version) As can be seen, we are to confess our sins to one another but what good is that since only God can forgive sins. Maybe he gave that authority to someone on earth.

Let's look at John 20:21-23. It reads "Again Jesus said, “Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.” And with that he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven.”" (New International Version) or "Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you. And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost: Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained." (King James Version) Per those verses, He gave the Apostles the authority to forgive or retain sins. They would have to hear a person's sins in order to make the determination whether to forgive or retain. This authority has been passed down to the present day priests through Apostolic succession. So when we are confessing to a priest, we are doing what the Bible tells us to do and since it is the Word of God, what God wants us to do.


The attitude that you encountered with the Catholics you associated with about confession is not what the Church teaches. From the Catechism of the Catholic Church, "1490 The movement of return to God, called conversion and repentance, entails sorrow for and abhorrence of sins committed, and the firm purpose of sinning no more in the future. Conversion touches the past and the future and is nourished by hope in God's mercy."Just as Jesus told the women He saved from stoning from the Pharisees "“Then neither do I condemn you,” Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.” (John 8:11 New International Version) or "And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more." (John 8:11 King James Version), the Church wants us to try sincerely to sin no more.


Also, the Bible is read at every mass, three readings on Sunday and two readings Monday through Saturday. If you would go to every mass (weekends and weekdays) for three years, you would essentially hear the entire Bible. We also have Bible study, so it's not like we are discouraged from reading it.

mouse
04-06-2005, 01:20 AM
I love lurkers, They kinda creep me out sometimes, Whenever I make a topic about how bad coach Pop sucked during a game I often wonder if he reads sometimes. Then again why say something if you can't back it up. But I think it's cool to know others are reading also, not just the same folks you think are on line all the time. I know a few lurkers like Texpro ShinnerBock lady and others, I always ask them at the Gtg's how they can read and not post? It's like going to krispy kream each day and never eating a hot sweet fresh donut.

In any case thanks for the Info. Sometimes I posts links and paste so fast I am not sure what it reads. I am just so excited to get someone's goat I get sloppy at times.

Well, if anything good came out of this topic it's a lurker coming out of the dark to post and to me that alone makes my day complete.
Thank you, and welcome to the club.

Ps: You post from work? Just curious.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v646/FunkysPix/guys4.gif

Drachen
04-06-2005, 02:11 AM
I have a question for the religious folks in here:

Where I live, you can't go a mile without seeing some huge expensive uberchurch or one under construction. They get filled one day a week and then have some weekday events for the elderly and the kiddos. I realize that religion is a business and a big one at that, but wouldn't it be a lot more "spiritually fulfilling" to have a modest building and then use these tremendous donations to help charitable causes?

I'm just curious.

You must live at 281 and 1604! (I live in that area and it is exactly as you described)

Drachen
04-06-2005, 02:13 AM
Do you really need it, or do you just want it?

Materialism.


You just proved his point. Shouldnt a church be held up to a higher level of morality than an individual?

Drachen
04-06-2005, 02:31 AM
just like a Catholic to bring up Gold. Any ticket will do just fine, And the real reason they don't have the complete bible they are afraid someone might read some pages where it talks about worshiping saints and idols,
Ok the first sentence was just a crappy attempt at an insult (its an expression). Wrong about the bible, I was encouraged in cathecism to read the bible (every year), the Sunday masses are something specific for you to think about each week, but the bible is for you to read on your own time to develop a personal relationship with God, rather than having a pastor tell you how to have a relationship with God.



yes I should just do like you, bury my head in the sand and mind my own business as my fellow posters are headed to the lake of fire

You must be one heck of a Witness to God

Dont really know what your religion professes, but Catholics believe in an all-loving and forgiving God, and that if you accept Jesus in your heart that you have a (insert adjective here) ticket to heaven. As far as your "confession" comments earlier Catholics only believe that your sins are forgiven after confession if you are truely sorry for them. Oh and as far as the "as soon as they get outta church they cuss about parking" thats the worst, I mean worst example you could use to say that catholics are bad, due to the fact that every religion has 'em. I could go the opposite and say well Mother Theresa was a catholic and was one of the greatest and most humble examples of a human being, so Catholicism must be the only way to go!

edit:umm shoulda read all the way to the bottom, goliadnative made this point already, and much better I might add, thanks goliad!




Lastly, it should be noted that I was raised Catholic, and went to a catholic school until 4th grade, and attended cathecism until confirmation, I know a lot about the church. I would consider myself to be athiest and have been for about 9 years (that is a whole 'nuther thread). I continue to educate myself on religion though (currently going to a bible study every monday at an episcopalian (sp?) church), but this is moreso for the historical aspects of the bible. I defend catholics though because my family is catholic and I love them, we may have different belief systems and occasionally get into debates, but we respect eachother's ideas.

Mr Hanky
04-06-2005, 02:44 AM
.
it should be noted that I was raised Catholic,


can we get an un Bias view from someone?

Drachen
04-06-2005, 02:56 AM
can we get an un Bias view from someone?

Well mouse, more than likely an unbiased person wont have the knowledge of the catholic church that would be necessary to make an educated response to your accusations (akin to asking a mathematician to tell you the intimate details of a sonnet and what keys to look for to find out who wrote it, when there is a perfectly good literary scholar right next to you). If you would like more info directly from the church, about the church as to what catholicism is all about I would recommend doing a search maybe on newadvent.com, or maybe look up the catechism of the catholic church.

Mr Hanky
04-06-2005, 03:05 AM
Have you ever been to a full gospel church? Have you ever seen a church full of happy people singing songs and praising the lord?

how would you compare it to your church ? If your church is fun and you leave happy you went? Then I shall give your church a visit. maybe i went to the only boring Catholic church in San Antonio, Maybe your church is where I need to go, What part of town is it located?

I went to catholic church for 3 years straight and it felt more like going to a job, something I had to do or pay the price.

Drachen
04-06-2005, 03:12 AM
Have you ever been to a full gospel church? Have you ever seen a church full of happy people singing songs and praising the lord?

how would you compare it to your church ? If your church is fun and you leave happy you went? Then I shall give your church a visit. maybe i went to the only boring Catholic church in San Antonio, Maybe your church is where I need to go, What part of town is it located?

I went to catholic church for 3 years straight and it felt more like going to a job, something I had to do or pay the price.

I can tell you the church that I used to go to, St. Monica's. It's in Converse, its got guitar music (along with horns and such and everyone sings along). I have been recently (about 4 or 5 weeks ago to see some friends), there is a new Priest (old one retired), the music seemed to be a little stale, but that coulda just been that particular mass (although my niece was dancing to a couple of songs, shes 1 and a half), but under the old priest it never was.

Also, whats that last comment supposed to mean?

Drachen
04-06-2005, 03:16 AM
I can carry this on tomorrow, but I have to be downtown at 7:30 and just realized what time it is. Goodnight all.

Mr Hanky
04-06-2005, 03:25 AM
Thanks for the info have a good night also. I wish I could sleep but I recently bought an expressio machine.

My last comment was the reason I went to church, The girl I was dating her and her parents are catholic, If I did not go to church she was not allowed to date me.
And If I missed any Sundays I had to hear it from them every day, the guilt trip was a price to pay, as they reminded me on a daily basis, I hope no one here goes to church for only that reason.

If only more Catholics where like you we would not have all the hate. Maybe deep down inside your a closet Christian :lmao

JoeChalupa
04-06-2005, 07:06 AM
I can tell you the church that I used to go to, St. Monica's. It's in Converse, its got guitar music (along with horns and such and everyone sings along). I have been recently (about 4 or 5 weeks ago to see some friends), there is a new Priest (old one retired), the music seemed to be a little stale, but that coulda just been that particular mass (although my niece was dancing to a couple of songs, shes 1 and a half), but under the old priest it never was.

Also, whats that last comment supposed to mean?

St. Monica's is where we go to Mass. We usually go to the 8:30am Mass.
I always walk away with a happy heart and shed a tear during Mass.
I've heard many say that Mass is boring but we sing and are happy every Sunday. To each his own I guess.

And Mouse, I do know that my not going to your Church is a real issue for you so I will go in the next few weeks.

Drachen
04-06-2005, 07:11 AM
St. Monica's is where we go to Mass. We usually go to the 8:30am Mass.
I always walk away with a happy heart and shed a tear during Mass.
I've heard many say that Mass is boring but we sing and are happy every Sunday. To each his own I guess.

And Mouse, I do know that my not going to your Church is a real issue for you so I will go in the next few weeks.

Really, how long have you been going there? My family has been going there for about 25 years. (as I said, I went to school there too, way back before that school was built and it was just the old church (now the thrift shop) and some portables.

JoeChalupa
04-06-2005, 07:14 AM
About the past 5 years.
I joined the Knights of Columbus back in January. We like it.

Drachen
04-06-2005, 07:17 AM
About the past 5 years.
I joined the Knights of Columbus back in January. We like it.


Cool deal, I always did like their breakfasts! Did you know Father Flannagan. He was definitely very cool, blunt, funny, and if Notre Dame was playing, mass would only be like 20 minutes because "God's Team" was playing. :lol
Father Dennis seems to be a little tamer.

JoeChalupa
04-06-2005, 07:19 AM
Yeah, Father Flannagan was cool and funny.
Father Dennis has good homilies and our daughters love him.
Gotta love the Notre Dame!

NeoConIV
04-06-2005, 07:20 AM
By the way everybody, my wife received Baptism, Holy Eucharist, Confirmation, and had our marriage convalidated last Saturday at Holy Spirit Catholic Church. It was a day beyond explanation. The most beautiful Mass I've ever experienced.

Drachen
04-06-2005, 07:21 AM
Yeah I used to live on Kneupper and North, 1 block away, from there for most of my life. Ahh the old 'hood. :lol

NeoConIV
04-06-2005, 07:28 AM
About the past 5 years.
I joined the Knights of Columbus back in January. We like it.
Hey hey! I've been a Knight for about 3 years. That's awesome Joe! The Knights of Columbus are really the greatest bunch of guys one could meet.

Just pulled a life insurance policy from KofC....good stuff, if you don't already have life.

JoeChalupa
04-06-2005, 07:42 AM
By the way everybody, my wife received Baptism, Holy Eucharist, Confirmation, and had our marriage convalidated last Saturday at Holy Spirit Catholic Church. It was a day beyond explanation. The most beautiful Mass I've ever experienced.

That is great! My wife is studying the Catholic Church and may convert.
The K of C are a great organization and I got the insurance too.

NeoConIV
04-06-2005, 07:49 AM
That is great! My wife is studying the Catholic Church and may convert.
The K of C are a great organization and I got the insurance too.
What faith is your wife right now?

My wife wasn't anything really. She was raised with only the slightest tinge of Buddhism, but did not stick. She is thrilled to be a Catholic now. Loves reading about the Church, prays the rosary almost daily...

Samurai Jane
04-06-2005, 09:53 AM
I have a question for the religious folks in here:

Where I live, you can't go a mile without seeing some huge expensive uberchurch or one under construction. They get filled one day a week and then have some weekday events for the elderly and the kiddos. I realize that religion is a business and a big one at that, but wouldn't it be a lot more "spiritually fulfilling" to have a modest building and then use these tremendous donations to help charitable causes?

I'm just curious.

I go to one of those churches and I can tell you that the construction of our building was necessary. We are just growing so fast!! That church is filled at least 2 days a week and you can go any day of the week and something will be going on, like basketball, LifeGroups, classes, etc. It's not the most ornate building, a pleasant atmosphere though, and we have a down to earth pastor that doesn't live in the Dominion. We spend a substantial amount on outreach missions in several countries abroad and here at home.

Ishta
04-06-2005, 10:39 AM
By the way everybody, my wife received Baptism, Holy Eucharist, Confirmation, and had our marriage convalidated last Saturday at Holy Spirit Catholic Church. It was a day beyond explanation. The most beautiful Mass I've ever experienced.
Congrats to your wife, and you! I too went through RCIA myself about 6 years ago. It's funny to hear people talk so badly about catholics. There is a lot of wrong information that is put out through the media. The funny thing is ... The fastest growing religion right now is the Catholic religion.

MannyIsGod
04-06-2005, 10:42 AM
Congrats to your wife, and you! I too went through RCIA myself about 6 years ago. It's funny to hear people talk so badly about catholics. There is a lot of wrong information that is put out through the media. The funny thing is ... The fastest growing religion right now is the Catholic religion.

Between what? It and Satanism?

In all seriousnesss, it's my understanding that Catholsism was on the decline overall, and that Islam was the fastest growing religion.

desflood
04-06-2005, 10:51 AM
Fast-growing Islam winning converts in Western world
April 14, 1997

CAIRO (CNN) -- In the port city of Suez -- and across the Islamic world -- they are celebrating the Hajj, the pilgrimage to the holy city of Mecca.

"This is a joyous day and the best day in the life of a man," said pilgrim Hussein Suleiman Hussein. "It is as if I am being born anew."


Millions of Muslims across the world will trek to Mecca this week for the annual religious event. They circle the Kaaba, a shrine that contains a black stone sacred to the Prophet Mohammed.


Mohammed decreed that every Muslim who can afford it make the Hajj at least once. It is one of five holy duties required in Islam.

A Muslim's first duty is to proclaim that there is only one God and that Mohammed is his prophet. Muslims also must pray five times a day, give charity to the poor and fast during the daylight hours of the holy month of Ramadan.

When a cannon signals that the sun has set during Ramadan, Muslims in Cairo break their fast with friends and family, often inviting the poor to share their meals.


The second-largest religion in the world after Christianity, Islam is also the fastest-growing religion. In the United States, for example, nearly 80 percent of the more than 1,200 mosques have been built in the past 12 years.

MannyIsGod
04-06-2005, 11:01 AM
Actually, I bet you anything the fastest growing group in this country is those that do not subscribe to a specific religion.

I'm not sure where I'd find numbers to back that up though.

Ishta
04-06-2005, 11:19 AM
I wasn't clear enough.. In the USA it is the fastest.. Sorry! I was speaking of the last 2 years not from the 90's..

DrRich
04-06-2005, 01:38 PM
Have you guys (Joe and Neo or anyone else) been on an ACTS retreat yet? If you haven't, find one that you can go on!! This is an awesome weekend of awesome spiritual growth. We, St. Domonic's, are having a Men's retreat on Apr 21 st - April 24th, Let me know if you want any info about it!

NeoConIV
04-06-2005, 03:59 PM
Have you guys (Joe and Neo or anyone else) been on an ACTS retreat yet? If you haven't, find one that you can go on!! This is an awesome weekend of awesome spiritual growth. We, St. Domonic's, are having a Men's retreat on Apr 21 st - April 24th, Let me know if you want any info about it!
I haven't been to an ACTS retreat, but I did go to a SEARCH retreat when I was 18, which is a retreat similar in substance and format. And let's just say that when the retreat was finished I had contemplated priesthood for the next two years. I had dinner with two vocational directors at the time, which is kinda funny because both of are bigshots now...then Fr Patrick Zurek (Now a bishop)who was in Bryan at the time and Fr David Garcia, now pastor at San Fernando and all around spokesman at large for the Catholic Church in San Antonio.

Anyhoo, I really want and need to go to an ACTS retreat. I've heard about lots of great experiences. One day soon...

DrRich
04-06-2005, 05:22 PM
I haven't been to an ACTS retreat, but I did go to a SEARCH retreat when I was 18, which is a retreat similar in substance and format. And let's just say that when the retreat was finished I had contemplated priesthood for the next two years. I had dinner with two vocational directors at the time, which is kinda funny because both of are bigshots now...then Fr Patrick Zurek (Now a bishop)who was in Bryan at the time and Fr David Garcia, now pastor at San Fernando and all around spokesman at large for the Catholic Church in San Antonio.

Anyhoo, I really want and need to go to an ACTS retreat. I've heard about lots of great experiences. One day soon...

Well we're having one at St. Dominic's on April 21st - April 24th; you are more than welcome to join us!

Drachen
04-06-2005, 11:23 PM
What faith is your wife right now?

My wife wasn't anything really. She was raised with only the slightest tinge of Buddhism, but did not stick. She is thrilled to be a Catholic now. Loves reading about the Church, prays the rosary almost daily...


Thats how my dad was about 8 years ago and he went through RCIA at St. Monicas, it is amazing how much it changed him.

MannyIsGod
04-07-2005, 02:19 AM
Well we're having one at St. Dominic's on April 21st - April 24th; you are more than welcome to join us!

Hey, is Father Paul still around? I usually hated going to church as a teenager, but Father Paul made it very enjoyable.

JoeChalupa
04-07-2005, 07:33 AM
Have you guys (Joe and Neo or anyone else) been on an ACTS retreat yet? If you haven't, find one that you can go on!! This is an awesome weekend of awesome spiritual growth. We, St. Domonic's, are having a Men's retreat on Apr 21 st - April 24th, Let me know if you want any info about it!

The wife and I are looking for a marriage encounter to attend. We loved the retreat we attended before we got married.

JoeChalupa
04-07-2005, 07:34 AM
What faith is your wife right now?

My wife wasn't anything really. She was raised with only the slightest tinge of Buddhism, but did not stick. She is thrilled to be a Catholic now. Loves reading about the Church, prays the rosary almost daily...

She is Baptist but she hasn't gone to Baptist Church in some time.
We just haven't made it to her Church lately.

DrRich
04-07-2005, 08:19 AM
Hey, is Father Paul still around? I usually hated going to church as a teenager, but Father Paul made it very enjoyable.

Yeah, he sure is! Awesome guy!!

MannyIsGod
04-07-2005, 02:49 PM
Yeah, he sure is! Awesome guy!!

Very nice. I loved that guy.

mouse
04-07-2005, 09:50 PM
What about Al Gore? W/O him would we even be here?

http://www.pitt.edu/~mrmst55/guys4.gif

timvp
11-23-2008, 06:39 PM
Apology Accepted.

mouse
11-23-2008, 08:09 PM
Apology Accepted.


Thank you for the rapid reply! :tu

Heath Ledger
11-23-2008, 08:17 PM
Where do i sign up for this Catholic shit, you mean i can fuck around on my girlfriend and just go say some hell marys and all will be forgotten? Like everyweek. Sign me up. Im in vegas baby ahh the fun i could have here guilt free if i were a Catholic.

travis2
11-24-2008, 07:12 AM
Mouse, if you consider this to be Christian behavior, you are sorely mistaken.

bdictjames
11-24-2008, 08:32 AM
I'm Catholic myself, and mouse your accusations must just be in your community. I have heard this from other Christian organizations myself (Sunday go to church then the other days of the week.. sin) and I'm not surprised.

I do not think going to church or hell, even doing good deeds would repair your sins. It is by the grace of God alone that we are saved, all we can hope and do is get it by hopefully following the word the best way we can.

And Pope John Paul II was a truly great man. I am from the Philippines, and during the hard times of my country when we were trying to oust the dictator the Pope was there to show support. Its no wonder people always love Karol Wojtyla.

mouse
11-24-2008, 11:12 AM
Mouse, if you consider this to be Christian behavior, you are sorely mistaken.


Your so right I should take after our Christian role models.


http://usversusthem.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/ted_haggard-thumb.jpg

http://img.timeinc.net/time/daily/2007/0710/oral_roberts_1026.jpg

http://www.holyfile.com/upload/video589.jpg


http://graphics.boston.com/bonzai-fba/AP_Photo/2007/07/22/1185108218_4876.jpg

http://gary2idaho.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/_38691859_swaggart238.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_evangelist_scandals
List of Christian evangelist scandals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Christian evangelist scandals)
Jump to: navigation, search

This is a list of scandals related to American Christian evangelists. (Roman Catholic clergy and high-profile leaders from New Religious Movements are not within the scope of this list.)
Contents
[hide]

* 1 List of Christian Evangelists
o 1.1 Aimee Semple McPherson, 1920s-40s
o 1.2 Lonnie Frisbee, 1970s - 1980s
o 1.3 Oral Roberts, 1977 and 1986
o 1.4 Jim & Tammy Bakker and Jimmy Swaggart, 1986 and 1991
o 1.5 Peter Popoff, 1987
o 1.6 Mike Warnke, 1991
o 1.7 Robert Tilton, 1991
o 1.8 Frank Houston, 2000
o 1.9 John Paulk, 2000
o 1.10 Douglas Goodman, 2004
o 1.11 Kent Hovind, 2006
o 1.12 Ted Haggard, 2006
o 1.13 Paul Barnes, 2006
o 1.14 Lonnie Latham, 2006
o 1.15 Richard Roberts, 2007
o 1.16 Bishop Earl Paulk, 2007
o 1.17 Coy Privette, 2007
o 1.18 Phil Driscoll, 2007
o 1.19 Joe Barron, 2008
o 1.20 Todd Bentley, 2008
o 1.21 Tony Alamo, 2008

mouse
11-24-2008, 11:24 AM
I'm Catholic myself, and mouse your accusations must just be in your community.

Really, when was the last time you went up to someone and asked them if they was saved? Catholic people don't do that. And if your going to say your the one Catholic that is different and you do all these walk on water things, then maybe you should convert, why would a good person like yourself want to not go to heaven? Catholic's go against the bible with all the saints they pray to,and having to go though a priest in order to ask for forgiveness where does it say in the bible you have to take a class in order to accept communion?

I know your from that special top secret very hush hush underground Catholic church that is hidden from the public that is against child molestation, your a different form of Catholic, the rare breed everyone hears about but never sees. your like the bigfoot of Catholic's we know your there if only we had real proof.




I have heard this from other Christian organizations myself (Sunday go to church then the other days of the week.. sin) and I'm not surprised.


Did you invite them to your church they should fit right in. :tu

mouse
11-24-2008, 11:35 AM
Mouse, if you consider this to be Christian behavior, you are sorely mistaken.




What FUCKING RIGHT do you have to claim EITHER ONE OF THEM are "just making stuff up now"?



Let He Who Is Without Sin Cast The First Stone

so much for that Bible verse! :lmao

mouse
11-24-2008, 11:39 AM
I'm Catholic myself, and mouse your accusations must just be in your community.

Hey I have an idea I will post some many links to where they say the Catholic religion is a cult, and that the Catholic's are going to hell etc...

and you post as many links you can find where they say Christians are going to hell and lets see who can post more links! :tu