View Full Version : Free Agent: Ben Wallace
hsxvvd
07-14-2009, 08:03 AM
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/2009/07/13/20090713spt-wallacebutout.html
Likely he will retire, but it it worth making a phone call?
With a $10mil payout the money shouldn't be a factor.
TDMVPDPOY
07-14-2009, 08:15 AM
for the minimum doesnt hurt
urunobili
07-14-2009, 08:21 AM
I'd prefer to develop Gist...
Muser
07-14-2009, 08:23 AM
He's done, no thanks.
galvatron3000
07-14-2009, 08:32 AM
no thank you, need size, height, length got enough undersized centers via pf's.
NickiRasgo
07-14-2009, 08:41 AM
For the 15th spot and for the minimum, it's alright.
nkdlunch
07-14-2009, 08:51 AM
Dude's Done
mountainballer
07-14-2009, 08:52 AM
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/2009/07/13/20090713spt-wallacebutout.html
Likely he will retire, but it it worth making a phone call?
With a $10mil payout the money shouldn't be a factor.
I mentioned it in the other thread:
Dice and Big Ben are close friends. (there were speculations that this might help to bring him to the Cavs last season, before he went back to Detroit)
well, maybe Dice calls his old friend. for the vet min I'm all for it. Ben's 40 minutes production is still significant enough to want him on the bench. (11 RPG, 2.2 BPG, only 2,5 fouls per 40 minutes).
Leetonidas
07-14-2009, 09:16 AM
I think he could provide spot minutes at the end of the bench and bring some nice energy and defense. But for anything more than the minimum, hell no.
nkdlunch
07-14-2009, 09:19 AM
I guess we could take him for the vet min in a Mutombo like role.
SKINNYPIMP210
07-14-2009, 09:37 AM
I guess we could take him for the vet min in a Mutombo like role.
Me too :toast
BG_Spurs_Fan
07-14-2009, 09:58 AM
Yeah I'd agree to a point. Cut Williams, send McClinton overseas sign Gist and Wallace and our line up will be something like this
Parker/Hill
Mason/Manu/Hairston
Jefferson/Finley/Gist(Toros)
Duncan/McDyess/Blair
Wallace/Ian/Haislip/Bonner
that's 15. If a Bonner+Finley trade comes up then we'll have that extra roster spot Pop likes to have.
I'm deffinitely not against Wallace for the vet min, but do you see Pop going with 7 bigs on the roster? Alternatively, if we assume Bonner would be traded to make room, we'd have no big who is a 3 point threat, don't think Pop would like that.
bishopospurs
07-14-2009, 10:14 AM
If we get him for the minimum why not? He is 34, but like someone said earlier to have him around like Dikembe was for Houston, he could even ride the bench like Sam Cassell in case of injury.
With that said, I would also like the spurs to explore a few more trade options before settling on Wallace. We need a bigger center and to see how the Summer League plays out.
ohmwrecker
07-14-2009, 10:19 AM
Meh.
Ben Wallace for the vet. min.? Hell yes !!!
ohmwrecker
07-14-2009, 10:23 AM
I would rather get Oberto back.
spurs_fan_in_exile
07-14-2009, 10:42 AM
Spurs could do a lot worse. Worth a look for the vet min.
ohmwrecker
07-14-2009, 10:44 AM
Wallace blocks shots, Oberto doesn't. We need a proven shot blocker. He can ride the bench and be a just in case guy worst case. Oberto is more likely a risk for any amount of money because of his heart.
Wallace used to block shots. He doesn't do much of anything anymore. So, you want him to block shots on the bench?
Mr.Bottomtooth
07-14-2009, 10:53 AM
:tu I wouldn't mind the Spurs bringing him on.
AFBlue
07-14-2009, 12:52 PM
Bringing in a defense-only, past-his-prime veteran reeks of the FO's previous philosophy, and I think they'll try to resist it...but ultimately they'll probably give in and pursue.
And why not? As with Bowen last year, Big Ben would not be a starter but instead would be called on to provide an intimidating presence defensively. In my mind, he'd complete the overhaul of the frontcourt.
Bottom Line: He certainly wasn't worth the $15M/yr or starting spot that he received in Chicago and Cleveland...but as a bench guy for the vet min...he makes a TON of sense for the Spurs. I expect them to go after him.
coyotes_geek
07-14-2009, 12:58 PM
The Spurs are pretty well stocked in the 6-7 to 6-10 frontcourt player category. If we're going to add another frontcourt player I'd prefer someone 6-10+.
Duncan2177
07-14-2009, 01:01 PM
Bringing in a defense-only, past-his-prime veteran reeks of the FO's previous philosophy, and I think they'll try to resist it...but ultimately they'll probably give in and pursue.
And why not? As with Bowen last year, Big Ben would not be a starter but instead would be called on to provide an intimidating presence defensively. In my mind, he'd complete the overhaul of the frontcourt.
Bottom Line: He certainly wasn't worth the $15M/yr or starting spot that he received in Chicago and Cleveland...but as a bench guy for the vet min...he makes a TON of sense for the Spurs. I expect them to go after him.
We are going after Wallace :pop:
Pistons < Spurs
07-14-2009, 01:40 PM
Sounds like Detroit may talk to Ben.
AFBlue
07-14-2009, 03:39 PM
Sounds like Detroit may talk to Ben.
For the vet min, he'll have no shortage of suitors. I think it'll be hard for him to walk away from the game this year.
poeticism707
07-14-2009, 03:58 PM
Spurs could do a lot worse. Worth a look for the vet min.
Agreed. Big Ben is MORE THAN ENOUGH defensive and rebounding presence for the Vet Min or LLE.
Sign him, FO!
That's of course, if Blair doesn't sit out until he gets the ENTIRE LLE.
peskypesky
07-14-2009, 04:55 PM
I wouldn't mind getting him for the minimum. He could help some against Shaq in the Finals.
Dro210
07-14-2009, 04:58 PM
I'm all for this... hoped it would happen soon as I heard he was being moved and bought out in the Shaq deal
slick'81
07-14-2009, 05:42 PM
The Spurs are pretty well stocked in the 6-7 to 6-10 frontcourt player category. If we're going to add another frontcourt player I'd prefer someone 6-10+.
agreed a nice legit 7'footer wouldnt be bad :wow
HarlemHeat37
07-14-2009, 05:51 PM
Wallace's offense is beyond horrible, maybe the worst in the NBA..he used to make up for it with his elite defense and athleticism, but he's no longer athletic at all, and his defense doesn't nearly make up for it..
also, as coyote pointed out, we have enough big men his size..if we're going after a big, he needs to be at least 6'10 or 6'11 IMO..
I could see him going to Detroit to retire, but I can't see him going anywhere else..
ffadicted
07-14-2009, 05:59 PM
Wallace isn't worth the Vet Min x 2
FilSpursFan
07-14-2009, 07:07 PM
For vet min? of course... let's get him...:rollin:rollin:rollin
completely deck
07-14-2009, 07:34 PM
For vet min? of course... let's get him...:rollin:rollin:rollin
what exactly did you misspell in that post?
Mr.Bottomtooth
07-14-2009, 07:42 PM
:lol
Danny.Zhu
07-14-2009, 10:33 PM
If he still want to play? Why would he not getting the extra 4m bucks?
angelbelow
07-14-2009, 11:29 PM
no way, hes done.
Spurs16212
07-15-2009, 12:47 AM
May be worth the LLE......
barbacoataco
07-15-2009, 01:38 AM
Would rather have Rasho as a defensive insurance big.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.