PDA

View Full Version : Clippers Trade Randolph To Memphis For Richardson



duncan228
07-17-2009, 06:48 PM
Clippers trade Randolph to Memphis for Richardson (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=txgrizzliesclipperstra&prov=st&type=lgns)

The Clippers have traded leading scorer Zach Randolph to Memphis in exchange for Quentin Richardson.

The deal was announced Friday.

Richardson averaged 10.2 points and 4.4 rebounds in 72 games with the New York Knicks last season. He’s returning to the Clippers, where he played from 2000-04 after being drafted by the team out of DePaul.

The 29-year-old guard-forward was acquired by Memphis on June 25 in exchange for Darko Milicic. Richardson originally left Los Angeles as a free agent and went to Phoenix, where he played one season before joining the Knicks.

Randolph was acquired in a trade with the Knicks in November 2008. The forward averaged 20.8 points and 10.1 rebounds in 50 games for the Clippers last season.

23LeBronJames23
07-17-2009, 07:03 PM
If Memphis also get A.i. They could actually an alright team
imagine:
PG ai
SG mayo
SF rudy
PF zach/marc
C thabeet

DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-17-2009, 07:03 PM
^that'd be horrible. Every team Z-Bo has ever been on has sucked.

DPG21920
07-17-2009, 07:14 PM
I guess since Memphis was so far under the cap, the salaries did not have to match, so they did this straight up?

angelbelow
07-17-2009, 07:17 PM
Haha this is still funny after 3 weeks. Memphis = Fail.

angelbelow
07-17-2009, 07:18 PM
I guess since Memphis was so far under the cap, the salaries did not have to match, so they did this straight up?

Yup.

pawe
07-17-2009, 10:12 PM
Wow, Memphis finally got him, they always have a boner on Zbo. Good luck developing the young guns with that black hole of a player.

Cry Havoc
07-17-2009, 10:15 PM
It's not like they gave up much to get him. Q-Rich will probably average 9 and 4 this year.

Bob Lanier
07-18-2009, 12:15 AM
If Memphis also get A.i. They could actually an alright team
imagine:
PG ai
SG mayo
SF rudy
PF zach/marc
C thabeet
You're missing a verb. Is it "lose to"?