View Full Version : Which Team Will Likely Be The Worst in 09-10
23LeBronJames23
07-22-2009, 08:33 PM
.
METALMiKE
07-22-2009, 08:35 PM
I'm gonna go with Memphis
turiaf for president
07-22-2009, 08:35 PM
kings or knicks
23LeBronJames23
07-22-2009, 08:38 PM
Kings might be iight cuz that new PG they got. i think Golden State Warriors might make playoffs btw
Ghazi
07-22-2009, 08:38 PM
Kings IMO will struggle to crack 20.
spursfan1000
07-22-2009, 09:20 PM
Milwaukee Bucks or Sacramento Kings
Rogue
07-22-2009, 09:54 PM
Rockets IMHO, though the worst stats won't guarantee them a NO.1 draft pick. However, the NO.1 draft pick also can't promise them a decent player after all. For example, with the NO.1 of 2002 NBA draft the Houston Rockets selected that 7'6 big man but dude has already turned out a piece of ****.
DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-22-2009, 09:56 PM
Rockets IMHO, though the worst stats won't guarantee them a NO.1 draft pick. However, the NO.1 draft pick also can't promise them a decent player after all. For example, with the NO.1 of 2002 NBA draft the Houston Rockets selected that 7'6 big man but dude has already turned out a piece of ****.
:lmao
jazzypimp
07-22-2009, 09:59 PM
I hope the knicks. We get there pick next year, unprotected!
23LeBronJames23
07-22-2009, 10:00 PM
i actually agree that Rockets may be on their way to the lottery pick
bdictjames
07-22-2009, 10:05 PM
Indiana.
Basketballgirl25
07-22-2009, 10:14 PM
I'm going to say Nets, since we are a young team, but if Knicks are worse I can deal with that, because as of now we have better young players. I'm dreaming about Mavs being the worst since Nets have the pick, but I know that is a longshot hopefully they suck though
23LeBronJames23
07-22-2009, 10:23 PM
The Lakers
The Rockets
Pistons < Spurs
07-22-2009, 10:24 PM
It's got to be the Bucks.
DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-22-2009, 10:24 PM
I hope the knicks. We get there pick next year, unprotected!
Courtesy of the Suns, where trading unprotected draft picks happens.
talent wise the rockets our 2 best players are brooks and scola
hopefully we tank HARD
DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-22-2009, 10:33 PM
If the Knicks wind up losing Harrington, Lee and Robinson, the Jazz have a 25% shot at the #1 overall pick.
DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-22-2009, 10:35 PM
It'll be a new low if the Suns wind up sucking so they'll have traded two top 10 picks in what many consider an extremely, deep talented draft.
gaKNOW!blee
07-22-2009, 10:41 PM
Rockets IMHO, though the worst stats won't guarantee them a NO.1 draft pick. However, the NO.1 draft pick also can't promise them a decent player after all. For example, with the NO.1 of 2002 NBA draft the Houston Rockets selected that 7'6 big man but dude has already turned out a piece of ****.
Why didn't you just type out "shit"?
Amuseddaysleeper
07-22-2009, 10:42 PM
I'm thinking the Bucks as well.
Spursfan092120
07-22-2009, 11:08 PM
Milwaukee Bucks or Sacramento Kings
The Bucks will lose every game they play...except when they play the Spurs..they will win all of those.
KSeal
07-22-2009, 11:12 PM
Spurs will be near the bottom when it's all said and done. They're way too old and injury prone.
dirk4mvp
07-22-2009, 11:36 PM
Whatever faggot said the Grizzlies should have his eyelids pulled off.
They won't even be close to the worst team in the league.
Ghazi
07-22-2009, 11:38 PM
Agreed. They won't even be the worst team in their division. Hornets got that seat warm :lol
23LeBronJames23
07-23-2009, 01:59 AM
lol so true.
Bucks > Spurs
Bucks>all nba teams!
redzero
07-23-2009, 02:36 AM
Agreed. They won't even be the worst team in their division. Hornets got that seat warm :lol
How will the Hornets go from getting 49 wins with injuries to becoming the worst team in the division when healthy?
:downspin: Dumbest poster in the history of Spurstalk.
23LeBronJames23
07-23-2009, 02:42 AM
How will the Hornets go from getting 49 wins with injuries to becoming the worst team in the division when healthy?
:downspin: Dumbest poster in the history of Spurstalk.
:lmao
bigdog
07-23-2009, 03:43 AM
Bucks or Kings.
The Bucks, because they're just in trouble. I mean, come on, look at them.
The Kings, because, well.....they have Beno.
KidCongo
07-23-2009, 04:08 AM
Kings will finish with worst record then the T'Wolves. A team from the west will finish with the worst record.
timtonymanu
07-23-2009, 04:27 AM
Bucks - no more RJ
Knicks - if they cant get Lee and Nate back.
Pacers - they just suck.
Darrin
07-23-2009, 04:51 AM
Bucks
Muser
07-23-2009, 05:25 AM
Bucks, they lost 2 of their best players.
KidCongo
07-23-2009, 05:27 AM
Bucks going to prove haters wrong, they got Redd and Bogut coming back, if they resign Sessions they definately won't have the worst record.
Morg1411
07-23-2009, 10:42 AM
It's a toss up between the T-Wolves and the Bucks. Hard to see much hope for either team with those fucking rosters.
mountainballer
07-23-2009, 11:36 AM
Knicks in the East and Kings in the West.
DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-23-2009, 11:42 AM
Bucks going to prove haters wrong, they got Redd and Bogut coming back, if they resign Sessions they definately won't have the worst record.
lol Bogut
KidCongo
07-23-2009, 11:42 AM
lol Bogut
lol dropped career high on suns
Darthkiller
07-23-2009, 11:42 AM
duhon
hughes?/Chandler
Gallonari?
Harrington/hill
Darko?/Curry
that's a horrible line up
DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-23-2009, 11:54 AM
lol dropped career high on suns
lol that was when Amare was playing center
lol Bogut's career high is like a retard's smartest day
lol Shaq dropped 30+ on him twice this year
lol Bogut
DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-23-2009, 11:55 AM
duhon
hughes?/Chandler
Gallonari?
Harrington/hill
Darko?/Curry
that's a horrible line up
Harrington is a free agent highly unlikely to resign.
Ghazi
07-23-2009, 11:59 AM
Bogut's not bad.
minnesota. they seem to have no clue at this time. or a long term plan that concedes a few losing seasons.
DUNCANownsKOBE2
07-23-2009, 12:03 PM
minnesota. they seem to have no clue at this time. or a long term plan that concedes a few losing seasons.
Al Jefferson is good enough to ensure they aren't the worst team.
resistanze
07-23-2009, 12:14 PM
Kings are so shit they had their forum at SpursTalk revoked.
Henke
07-23-2009, 12:22 PM
Sacramento Queens.
23LeBronJames23
07-23-2009, 01:05 PM
Bucks - no more RJ
Knicks - if they cant get Lee and Nate back.
Pacers - they just suck.
pacers got danny granger and now picked up hansbrough. i dont think that will make em the worst team
JustBlaze
07-23-2009, 01:20 PM
Redzero's team.
23LeBronJames23
11-30-2009, 10:47 PM
Now we all know that then Nets will be the worst. But Minnesota is still in the race though
Xylus
11-30-2009, 11:55 PM
Suns
/thread
Good call.
ginobili's bald spot
12-01-2009, 12:13 AM
Good call.
Spurfan just being the basketball expert they are supposed to be. Right on the money as always.
j-money24
12-01-2009, 01:56 AM
I'm going to say Nets, since we are a young team, but if Knicks are worse I can deal with that, because as of now we have better young players. I'm dreaming about Mavs being the worst since Nets have the pick, but I know that is a longshot hopefully they suck though
Good call :lol
j-money24
12-01-2009, 01:57 AM
Suns
/thread
Stpupid typical Spursfan
Spursfan092120
12-01-2009, 02:04 AM
Spurfan just being the basketball expert they are supposed to be. Right on the money as always.
Kinda like KSeal saying the Spurs will be at the bottom?
Spursfan092120
12-01-2009, 02:04 AM
Stpupid typical Spursfan
wow..nice spelling
KidCongo
12-01-2009, 02:10 AM
Said the Bucks would prove the haters wrong.
The Franchise
12-01-2009, 02:27 AM
Said the Bucks would prove the haters wrong.
Which team will likely be the worst in 2010-11? :lmao:lmao :p:
duhoh
12-01-2009, 04:35 AM
Which team will likely be the worst in 2010-11? :lmao:lmao :p:
Nets repeat :hat
AI-square
12-01-2009, 07:18 AM
Philly. Eddie Jordan is destroying that team.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.