PDA

View Full Version : Pick the best: Fisher vs. Kerr


hater
08-03-2009, 02:16 PM
Allanon time to humiliate you...
Allanon
08-03-2009, 02:17 PM
Let's see..

Steve Kerr- ALL TIME #1 - 3pt % for a Season (Better than Larry Bird, Reggie Miller)
Steve Kerr- ALL TIME #1 - 3pt % for a career (Better than Larry Bird, Reggie Miller)

Fisher - .4 was his greatest deed, otherwise, he lost his starting job in Golden State and got traded. Then he was backup PG for the Jazz before coming to the Lakers because Smush Parker sucked so bad.
hater
08-03-2009, 02:18 PM
passing: fisher
ballhandling: fisher
rebounding: fisher
defense: fisher
DAF86
08-03-2009, 02:19 PM
passing: fisher
ballhandling: fisher
rebounding: fisher
defense: fisher

Besides is not like Fisher is a scrub at shooting.
Dex
08-03-2009, 02:20 PM
winning: kerr
nkdlunch
08-03-2009, 02:20 PM
is this a fucking joke???

yeah Steve Kerr could shoot, but come on. THis is ridiculous. Fisher is an NBA level player. Kerr was nothing but a great shooting scrub
Allanon
08-03-2009, 02:23 PM
Not surprised that .4 still hurts on a Spurs forum.

You guys can call Steve Kerr, the #1 3pt% shooter of all time a Scrub when Fisher lost his starting job in LA, GSW, JAZZ :lol
cheguevara
08-03-2009, 02:26 PM
Not surprised that .4 still hurts on a Spurs forum.

You guys can call Steve Kerr, the #1 3pt% shooter of all time a Scrub when Fisher lost his starting job in LA, GSW, JAZZ :lol

there is more to basketball than just shooting. a lot more.
Allanon
08-03-2009, 02:27 PM
there is more to basketball than just shooting. a lot more.

And what is Fisher so great at?

Reggie Miller is a great player because he could shoot. So was Glen Rice and so was Steve Kerr. Those are some of the absolute best shooters ever. It's about scoring right?

Kerr was #1 in shooting...What was Fisher ever so great at? Was Fisher ever #1 at anything?
Muser
08-03-2009, 02:29 PM
Not great, just better than Kerr at areas other than shooting.
cheguevara
08-03-2009, 02:30 PM
And what is Fisher so great at?

Reggie Miller is a great player because he could shoot. So was Glen Rice and so was Steve Kerr. Those are some of the absolute best shooters ever. It's about scoring right?

Kerr was #1 in shooting...What was Fisher ever so great at? Was Fisher ever #1 at anything?

Reggie Miller could do a lot more than just shoot.

like someone else pointed out. Fisher is better at everything else.
LnGrrrR
08-03-2009, 02:30 PM
I'm undecided. Overall Fisher is much better, but Kerr fit better as a role player, who came off the bench to do one thing, and one thing only.
Allanon
08-03-2009, 02:31 PM
Not great, just better than Kerr at areas other than shooting.

In all other categories, Fisher was just average. No stat sticks out; yet Kerr has the distinction of being #1 of ALL TIME.

Fisher's statistical career is very un-noteworthy, and is not even top 50 in any stat All Time.
Allanon
08-03-2009, 02:32 PM
Reggie Miller could do a lot more than just shoot.

like someone else pointed out. Fisher is better at everything else.

You say Fisher is better at everything else...but that was still very average. Kerr has that one thing he did extremely well. Fisher...what did he do extremely well?
hater
08-03-2009, 02:33 PM
I'm undecided. Overall Fisher is much better, but Kerr fit better as a role player, who came off the bench to do one thing, and one thing only.

exactly. Fisher is a starting NBA PG. Kerr could never start in the NBA. He was nothing more than a great shooting bench guy.
Allanon
08-03-2009, 02:34 PM
Fisher is better than Smush and Jordan Farmar, but that's not saying much. The Lakers don't have much choice.

Fisher was a backup PG on the Jazz and Warriors that didn't see much PT.
it's me
08-03-2009, 03:00 PM
pescador no questions.
Allanon
08-03-2009, 03:03 PM
Uhmm, yeah.

This isn't about who would be a better GM, guys.
DUNCANownsKOBE2
08-03-2009, 03:06 PM
Better player: Fisher
Better GM: Fisher
DUNCANownsKOBE2
08-03-2009, 03:08 PM
Fisher was a backup PG on the Jazz and Warriors that didn't see much PT.

His two seasons with the Warriors, he averaged 30.0 and 31.6 minutes. On the Jazz he averaged 27.9 minutes.
DUNCANownsKOBE2
08-03-2009, 03:11 PM
Who cares anyway?
da_suns_fan
08-03-2009, 03:19 PM
Better player: Fisher
Better GM: Fisher

Yep. Right now he has a GM score of "0" which is much, much greater than what I'd give Steve Kerr.
jacobdrj
08-03-2009, 03:59 PM
is this a fucking joke???

yeah Steve Kerr could shoot, but come on. THis is ridiculous. Fisher is an NBA level player. Kerr was nothing but a great shooting scrub

+1

Kerr has done some great things, like a single-handed takeover of a Spurs game late in his career, clutch shots, consistent shooting.

But Fisher has been shown to, in the right situation, be a major contributor to contending teams, like Utah...
jack sommerset
08-03-2009, 04:36 PM
I can't believe this is even close. Fisher by far. Not even worth adding to a already crazy question. I put my money on Fisher in the GM department as well.