PDA

View Full Version : In Their Quest To Repeat, Lakers Have A Tough Road - Literally



duncan228
08-06-2009, 02:21 PM
In their quest to repeat, Lakers have a tough road - literally (http://probasketballnews.com/story/?storyid=686)
By Chris Bernucca
Pro Basketball News

We've already had a little fun (http://probasketballnews.com/story/?storyid=683) with the NBA schedule (http://probasketballnews.com/story/?storyid=684). Now it's time to get serious.

Much was made over the last couple of days about marquee matchups and national TV appearances. Instead of following the herd, we decided to take a closer look at some of the facts and figures of the 1,230-game slate and what they really mean.

We did most of our own research, although we must thank TrueHoop (http://myespn.go.com/nba/truehoop) for saving us an incredible amount of time and postponing a visit to the eye doctor by publishing a nice, tidy list (http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-43-9/Lessons-from-the-Schedule.html) of each team's total sets of back-to-back games.

This is where the schedule takes on significance. It's not about the teams playing on a certain day on a certain network as much as it is about where those teams were the previous night or the previous week.

For example, the San Antonio Spurs have their usual "Rodeo Road Trip," a monstrous eight-game swing in February. But it carries across the All-Star break, which means most of the team gets a four-day break in their own beds. And the Spurs only have 17 sets of back-to-back games, the second-fewest in the league. That's significant for a team with players who are getting a little long in the tooth and constantly nursing injuries.

Do multiple national TV appearances impact a team? A little bit. When a team plays on ABC, it always has the previous day off so the network can get the camera time it wants from players and coaches. But that is not the case when playing on ESPN or TNT, which is why a potentially hot matchup turns into a blowout: because one of the teams is tired.

Before examining the handy tables below, here's a few notable items from the 2009-10 schedule:

* ESPN is televising the most games, even though it is not airing a single NBA game from December 26-January 6 due to its commitment to bowl games. It also skipping three Fridays and two Sundays in March due to its commitment to Selection Sunday, the NIT and the overwhelming presence of the NCAA Tournament (such as it is).

* TNT is taking the opposite tact, airing a doubleheader on March 25, the first night of the regional semifinals of the NCAA Tournament. In past years, TNT has moved its doubleheader for that Thursday to Tuesday or not aired one altogether.

* However, ESPN is making up some ground with Sunday night doubleheaders once the NFL season ends. It did this once last season but has four this season on February 21 and 28 and March 7 and 21.

* ABC is televising just 15 regular season games and just two between February 28 and April 4, a five-week stretch after the All-Star break when overall interest in the NBA usually increases as the season winds down. Furthermore, ABC's games involve just eight teams - Boston, Cleveland, Denver, the Los Angeles Lakers, Orlando, Phoenix, Portland and San Antonio.

* It's been well-documented that five teams will not appear on national TV - Charlotte, Houston, Milwaukee, New Jersey and Sacramento. In addition, Milwaukee and Sacramento are making just one appearance each on NBA TV, so if Brandon Jennings or Tyreke Evans plan on winning Rookie of the Year, they will have to put up phenomenal numbers that force voters to read the boxscores and game stories every day. Winning more than expected also would help.

* Picking teams for national TV appearances is never an exact science; look what happened to the Washington Wizards and Detroit Pistons last season. But eight games for the Clippers? That's one more than the Hawks, who won a playoff series last season, and twice as many as the Pistons, who still look like a playoff team. When did Blake Griffin become Wilt Chamberlain?

* In other reaches by the networks, the Suns make 18 appearances, even though their best player is coming off a serious eye injury, wants an extension and has a history of grumbling; the Warriors make eight, despite the fact that they could implode in the front office or on the court at any time; and the Wizards also make eight, with their success again hinging on the troublesome knee of Gilbert Arenas.

* Teams that may have gotten the short shrift include the Mavericks, who are good and intriguing and should have more than 13 TV games, and the Thunder, who have the league's hottest young star, a great atmosphere in their arena and should have gotten more than one lousy home game.

* Besides the All-Star break, the only days with no games are December 24 (Christmas Eve) and April 5 (NCAA championship). There are no 15-game days like on January 2 of last season, and the only 14-game day is April 14, the last day of the season. There are nine days with 13 games, all Wednesdays and Fridays.

* To limit the length of your road trips, it helps to be in the middle of the country. While every team's longest road trip is at least four games, the Thunder have just one trip that long, while the Rockets, Pistons, Raptors, Timberwolves and Wizards have two.

* On the long end, the Spurs, Lakers and Clippers all have eight-game trips. The Clippers also go out for six games in December and five games in March. The Lakers have five-game trips in December and March.

* The Eastern Conference team with the longest trip is the Bulls - not their six-game "Circus Trip" in November but a seven-game jaunt in January. Only four other East teams have one trip of six games.

* Don't be fooled by a team's longest trip. Portland's longest trip is five games - one in November and one in February, with three four-game trips for good measure. Golden State has a five-game trip and three four-game treks.

* The Hornets have a league-low 16 sets of back-to-back games, while the Bobcats, Bulls and Pistons all have a league-high 23. Among elite teams, the Nuggets have the most with 22 and the Spurs have the least with 17.

* In our opinion, the team with the softest schedule is the Thunder, who have just one four-game road trip and play 18 sets of back-to-backs. Of course, given their comparative talent, it may not seem that way. The Hornets also have it a bit easier with 16 back-to-backs and long trips of five and four games.

* The teams with the hardest schedules are the Clippers (22 back-to-backs, three long trips) and the Bulls (23 back-to-backs, two long trips).

* Among the elite teams, the defending champion Lakers look to have been hit hardest with 20 back-to-backs and three long trips. The Spurs seem to have it the easiest.

Below are tables, breaking down each team's schedule by division:

http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x282/duncan228/temp/atlantic.jpg

http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x282/duncan228/temp/central.jpg

http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x282/duncan228/temp/southeast.jpg

http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x282/duncan228/temp/southwest.jpg

http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x282/duncan228/temp/northwest.jpg

http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x282/duncan228/temp/pacific.jpg

The_Game
08-06-2009, 02:25 PM
wont matter too much as lakers were great on back to backs last season. starting 17 out of the first 21 at home will get L.A off to a great start.

nkdlunch
08-06-2009, 02:26 PM
let the excuses start

BadOdor
08-06-2009, 02:26 PM
Unlike the spurs, lakers can repeat.

Dynasty, here we come!

all_heart
08-06-2009, 02:46 PM
Unlike the spurs, lakers can repeat.

Dynasty, here we come!

not this year homey.. the only dynasty you will see are the re-runs! :lol

Texas_Ranger
08-06-2009, 02:53 PM
Why don't the Rockets have a TV game?

Culburn369
08-06-2009, 03:08 PM
wont matter too much as lakers were great on back to backs last season. starting 17 out of the first 21 at home will get L.A off to a great start.

And as 2009 NBA World Champions we deserve that cushy start. That'll get everybody back on their heels, in their place, subserviant per usual.

iggypop123
08-06-2009, 03:26 PM
damn espn is doing the most games. i cant stand hearing burke

djohn2oo8
08-06-2009, 03:28 PM
Why don't the Rockets have a TV game?

No Yao, No Tracy, No Artest

bostonguy
08-06-2009, 03:31 PM
ABC only doing 15 games? :lmao God they suck. I miss the NBC days. I remember right when football season ended, the double and triple headers would be happening every Sunday. Then the first 2 rounds had the triple headers and in the middle of the WCF all the way to the finals, NBC would get all the prime time games. Fuck ABC and Fuck ESPN for their shitty coverage.

23LeBronJames23
08-06-2009, 03:33 PM
Lakers and Cavs have the most TV games=25

Texas_Ranger
08-06-2009, 03:36 PM
No Yao, No Tracy, No Artest

Still it sucks... That team played great against the Lakers without T-Mac and Yao. I still don't think they are worse than Sacramento,who also's got 0 TV games.

Why the fuck Phoenix haves 18 TV games. That's just bullshit!:ihit

And :lmao @ LA Clippers!

ambchang
08-06-2009, 03:37 PM
When will the Spurs are old BS die? Duncan isn't that old, Ginobili isn't that old, Parker is downright young, a set of young players are here to replace the older role players, what the hell man?

Texas_Ranger
08-06-2009, 03:38 PM
When will the Spurs are old BS die? Duncan isn't that old, Ginobili isn't that old, Parker is downright young, a set of young players are here to replace the older role players, what the hell man?

we are about the same age as Boston... And our big 3 is much younger than theirs.

ChumpDumper
08-06-2009, 03:38 PM
Wouldn't a literally tough road be an actual road with potholes or something?

Ryvin1
08-06-2009, 04:48 PM
Does this count the 2 extra home games they get?

spursfaninla
08-06-2009, 05:00 PM
difference between 20 and 17 back to backs is not a big one...this is WAY overblown. Plus, spurs have the same length time on the road trip as lakers...this is much ado about nothing.

TheMACHINE
08-06-2009, 06:10 PM
difference between 20 and 17 back to backs is not a big one...this is WAY overblown. Plus, spurs have the same length time on the road trip as lakers...this is much ado about nothing.

if you had 20 and LA had 17, id bet the house thats you spurs fans would be bitching.

BadOdor
08-06-2009, 06:13 PM
if you had 20 and LA had 17, id bet the house thats you spurs fans would be bitching.

It doesn't matter bro. We got this anyway.

#2!
08-06-2009, 07:01 PM
Wouldn't a literally tough road be an actual road with potholes or something?

yeah it would. it has become the most wrongly used word in the english language...just think it wouldn't happen if the person is writing for a fucking living

Ditty
08-06-2009, 07:57 PM
dont worry spurs will take care of LA easily this year

21_Blessings
08-06-2009, 10:15 PM
Seems the NBA doesn't want to see LA win 70 games. Funny thing though, it won't be enough. The Lakers were screwed like this last season and they still won 65 games with Bynum missing half the season. Now with Artest and healthy Bynum the league won't know what hit them.

cobbler
08-06-2009, 10:30 PM
What makes you think Bynum will be healthy? Or Artest will be better than Ariza?

What makes you think they wont?

21_Blessings
08-06-2009, 10:35 PM
What makes you think Bynum will be healthy? Or Artest will be better than Ariza?

Artest is better than Ariza. Pretty much an established fact to anyone who knows anything about basketball. Ron will also get more minutes per game compared to Ariza, that much is guaranteed.

21_Blessings
08-06-2009, 10:36 PM
The more obvious question is will he be worth what he's paid? Lamar showed to be far more productive.

Lamar was not more productive before Bynum's knee injury.

26, 14, 3 the 5 games before Kobe took out Bynum's knee. Against elite centers. Don't be jealous just because Blair will never, ever sniff numbers like that in his lifetime.

mytespurs
08-07-2009, 12:50 PM
Lamar was not more productive before Bynum's knee injury.

26, 14, 3 the 5 games before Kobe took out Bynum's knee. Against elite centers. Don't be jealous just because Blair will never, ever sniff numbers like that in his lifetime.


Spurs fans have no reason to be jealous. I'm certainly not.

lakers/spurs fans.....bluster,smacktalk all you want but no one knows how the season will go. No guarantees in life as they say. :hat

21_Blessings
08-07-2009, 06:29 PM
Spurs fans have no reason to be jealous. I'm certainly not.



Sure you do. Spurs fans would be jizzing their pants if they had a 21 year old 7 foot monster developing in their front court. Instead they have a couple of dinosaurs and a chubby rookie PF with no ACLs.

djohn2oo8
08-07-2009, 06:37 PM
Just sayin that Ron is not guaranteed to be on his best behavior.....We all thought that he was on his best behavior last year so that he would get a big contract.....Well, he didn't get a big contract, and alot was kept under wraps last year

Rodriguez
08-07-2009, 06:44 PM
Just sayin that Ron is not guaranteed to be on his best behavior.....We all thought that he was on his best behavior last year so that he would get a big contract.....Well, he didn't get a big contract, and alot was kept under wraps last year
The contract Ron's signed with the Lakers is exactly at mid level, which was the biggest Lakers could afford, but a champion ring is pretty much enough to make up for the money.

DxB
08-08-2009, 06:28 AM
Sure you do. Spurs fans would be jizzing their pants if they had a 21 year old 7 foot monster developing in their front court. Instead they have a couple of dinosaurs and a chubby rookie PF with no ACLs.


HAHAHAH! 21 year old 7 foot monster? Are you fucking blind? That is about as inaccurate a description of Andrew Bynum as possible!

How about overrated, overpaid, 7 foot homo who after god knows how long, hasnt learnt shit from Kareem?

Lakers fans gotta face reality, Bynum is NOT the next best thing for you guys by any stretch of the imagination, he just seems to be really slow and unable to concentrate for longer than 3 mins at a time.

Monster hahahah....

Btw no one expects Blair to be the next Shaq, and for the amount we're paying him whether or not he plays beyond the next 3 years is irrelevant we'll still get a good return on investment, cant say the same for Bynum though!

The_Game
08-08-2009, 07:10 AM
HAHAHAH! 21 year old 7 foot monster? Are you fucking blind? That is about as inaccurate a description of Andrew Bynum as possible!

How about overrated, overpaid, 7 foot homo who after god knows how long, hasnt learnt shit from Kareem?

Lakers fans gotta face reality, Bynum is NOT the next best thing for you guys by any stretch of the imagination, he just seems to be really slow and unable to concentrate for longer than 3 mins at a time.

Monster hahahah....

Btw no one expects Blair to be the next Shaq, and for the amount we're paying him whether or not he plays beyond the next 3 years is irrelevant we'll still get a good return on investment, cant say the same for Bynum though!

Bynum was a monster before he got hurt including outplaying tim duncan. If Bynum is healthly and back to his best teams will be in trouble.

eyeh8u
08-08-2009, 01:30 PM
ABC only doing 15 games? :lmao God they suck. I miss the NBC days. I remember right when football season ended, the double and triple headers would be happening every Sunday. Then the first 2 rounds had the triple headers and in the middle of the WCF all the way to the finals, NBC would get all the prime time games. Fuck ABC and Fuck ESPN for their shitty coverage.

the NBC TBS TNT days were the best

you get the Atlanta crew for at least 3 games a week and then i still remember hannah storm, peter ver-something, and smiling isiah talking about how great the bulls were

then hearing bob costas dick ride jordan in 96 97 and 98 during the games.

it was awesome

Banzai
08-08-2009, 02:18 PM
ABC only doing 15 games? :lmao God they suck. I miss the NBC days. I remember right when football season ended, the double and triple headers would be happening every Sunday. Then the first 2 rounds had the triple headers and in the middle of the WCF all the way to the finals, NBC would get all the prime time games. Fuck ABC and Fuck ESPN for their shitty coverage.

Damn right. :toast

Culburn369
08-08-2009, 04:15 PM
the NBC TBS TNT days were the best

you get the Atlanta crew for at least 3 games a week and then i still remember hannah storm, peter ver-something, and smiling isiah talking about how great the bulls were

then hearing bob costas dick ride jordan in 96 97 and 98 during the games.

it was awesome

eye\with the goods\comprehensive style.