TPark...Boston> Cards in batting

[Jimcs50]

Wednesday, September 8, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BATTING | PITCHING
AL | NL | MLB
YEAR: 2004 | 2003 | 2002
PAGE: PAGE 1 | PAGE 2 | PAGE 3 | PAGE 4
CLEAR
Select Split TotalLast 7 Daysvs. Leftvs. RightHomeAwayDayNightDomeOpenPre-All StarPost-All StarAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberNone OnRunners OnScoring PositionScoring Posn, 2 outBases LoadedAs ph (not dh)Close and LateBatting #1Batting #2Batting #3Batting #4Batting #5Batting #6Batting #7Batting #8Batting #9As pAs cAs 1bAs 2bAs 3bAs ssAs lfAs cfAs rfAs dh (not ph)Inning 1-6Inning 7+GrassTurfFinessePowervs. ANAvs. ARIvs. ATLvs. BALvs. BOSvs. CHCvs. CHWvs. CINvs. CLEvs. COLvs. DETvs. FLAvs. HOUvs. KANvs. LOSvs. MILvs. MINvs. MONvs. NYMvs. NYYvs. OAKvs. PHIvs. PITvs. STLvs. SDGvs. SFOvs. SEAvs. TAMvs. TEXvs. TOR
2004 Aggregate Stats
Rk Team G AB R H 2B 3B HR TB RBI BA OBP SLG OPS
1 Boston 137 4839 794 1381 319 22 190 2314 762 .285 .362 .478 .840
2 NY Yankees 138 4713 759 1261 245 15 209 2163 729 .268 .353 .459 .812
3 Cleveland 139 4879 753 1356 300 23 159 2179 718 .278 .352 .447 .799
4 San Francisco 140 4791 747 1295 275 29 159 2105 704 .270 .358 .439 .798
5 St. Louis 138 4732 737 1312 279 20 188 2195 710 .277 .344 .464 .808

TPark, as you can plainly see, Boston is a better hitting team than St Louis, so if they should happen to meet in the WS, the Sox will have a shot at winning.

Also Boston's Ramirez and Ortiz are the best hitting tandem in the AL. They are 1-2 in homeruns, slugging % and total bases. They are 1st and 3rd in RBIs, and 3rd and 9th in batting %.

I am soooo looking forward to the playoffs this year. Boston just activated Trot Nixon and Pokey Reese as a bonus, so they should be near 100& by October. I know the Yankees are not going to beat the Sox this year....no way no how...the curse is over. :)

[IcemanCometh]

just one problem, they are the red sox.

[Jimcs50]

These are not your father's Sox.

[DuffMcCartney]

No they are your Sox Jim...and as last year proves...they will collapse again.

[TastesLikeChicken]

No they are your Sox Jim...and as last year proves...they will collapse again.





If past failures limit future potential, I guess you will be a virgin for a long long time.

[Jimcs50]

I was a Spurs' fan for 23 yrs before they finally broke through to win in 99....and I remember everyone always pointing out the Spurs' failures every year, especially in 95 when they lost to Houston after having the #1 seed. So, that proves that you are not doomed to repeat past failures forever.

[Jimcs50]

TPark, your Cards got hammered by San Diego today....the Cards suck. :)

[Jimcs50]

Boston scores 3 on Tim Hudson in 1st inning with 4 walks and a single by Ortiz. Hudson has the best ERA in the majors, and has only walked 32 batters all year:shock , and he gives up 4 in the 1st....unbelievable.

[Jimcs50]

Boston is up 7-0 in 3rd inning.

Hudson gave up his 5th walk.:shock

[Mark in Austin]

Are you comparing The Curse to the Spurs not winning a championship for twenty-some years?


Seriously?


You might consider sobering up before posting.

:drunk

[Jimcs50]

Mark, 25 yrs without sniffing the Finals compares to the Curse, yes it does. Everyone called the Spurs chokers my whole life and that is the same thng that people say about Boston.

[T Park Num 9]

last I checked the Cardinals record was still waaayyyyy better than the Red Sox.

Last I checked the Cardinal's history, they have quite a bit more World Series rings.

BTW, rematch of 67 isnt out of the realm of possibility.

Same result of course.