PDA

View Full Version : The Natives Are Getting Restless



SnakeBoy
09-08-2009, 11:27 PM
Adviser losing patience with Obama

One of President Barack Obama’s former top campaign advisers is “losing patience” with the White House, he told POLITICO Tuesday morning, as frustrations among the president’s liberal allies crest over issues from health care legislation to gay rights.
“I am one of the millions of frustrated Americans who want to see Washington do more than it's doing right now,” said Steve Hildebrand, the deputy campaign manager who oversaw the Obama campaign’s field organization and was an architect of his early, crucial victories over Sen. Hillary Clinton in Iowa and South Carolina.
Obama, he said, “needs to be more bold in his leadership.”
“I’m not going to just sit by the curb and let these folks get away with a lack of performance for the American people,” he said, speaking of Washington’s Democratic leadership as a whole. “I want change just as much as a majority of Americans do, and I’m one of the many Americans who are losing patience.”
Hildebrand is by far the most senior member of Obama’s political team to express public doubts about the White House, though he had already begun to part ways with Obama’s other top aides as the 2008 presidential campaign wore on.
Hildebrand was a key player in the primary campaign but grew increasingly alienated from the organization over, a person close to him said, strategic differences. Other top campaign officials grew frustrated with what they saw as Hildebrand’s at times negative attitude and his candid comments to the press, rare in the intensely disciplined campaign.
Still, he remains close to some top Obama aides, and his blast from the left is a mark of the depth of dissent even within elements of the organization that elected the first black president. His public comments are “nothing I haven't directly said to folks in the White House,” Hildebrand told POLITICO in an interview from his native South Dakota, where he came to prominence running former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle’s political operation.
Responding to Hildebrand’s criticism, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said it’s true that Hildebrand had raised the same frustrations to him and others inside the White House. But he stopped short of directly addressing the his criticism that Obama hasn’t been bold enough.
“We all know and love Steve Hildebrand,” said Gibbs, who noted Hildebrand was involved in then-Sen. Obama’s decision whether to run for president. “There’s nothing in there we haven’t all heard from him. But, look, I think Steve's frustration is the frustration of people not only in this town but a lot of people outside of this town — and that is Washington's inability to address big problems and get something done.”
Asked to address Hildebrand’s comments that the president hasn’t been forceful enough, Gibbs said, “Well, I'll e-mail Steve and tell him what which affiliate in Sioux Falls will be covering the [health-care] speech so he can listen to the president.”
Hildebrand broke his long post-campaign silence in a speech to the San Diego Democratic Club on August 22, which was reported in the gay press but passed without national notice. Hildebrand, who is gay, confirmed the comments reported in Zenger’s Newsmagazine, though he said the article’s assertion that he’d made a “slashing attack” on Obama was “over the top.”
“The problem is, Obama isn’t listening enough,” Hildebrand said, according to the report. “I love him, I love Michelle, I want him to succeed, but all of us need to put pressure on him and Congress to do the right things. The American people put confidence in the Democrats because they thought we could get things done, and if we fail, they’re not going to give it back.”
“I gave up a lot to elect Democrats, and I expect them to give it up for me. I’m going to speak loudly. The Republicans don’t have power unless the moderates and the Blue Dogs give it to them — which is what they’re doing now,” he said in the speech.
Hildebrand also said, according to the Zenger’s report, that that 2009 is shaping up to be “1993 all over again.” He told POLITICO he blames moderate Democrats in the House and Senate for the party’s weakness.
“There's basically three different parties, and one of those parties tends to be the barrier to getting anything done — and that's the Blue Dogs in the House and the moderates in the Senate,” he said in the interview. “Change is not going to come by people in the Beltway deciding we should have change. It’s going to come because they’re feeling pressure from all over the country.”
“I know where Barack Obama is on these issues and I don't question his sincerity or his honesty towards trying to solve them,” he said. “I do question whether or not the Congress as it is constituted right now is going to have the capacity to ever deliver on some of the most critical issues facing our country right now.”
Hildebrand was a singular figure as Obama’s campaign bus rolled through the hills of Iowa, a goateed, soft-spoken, and sometimes mischievous gay man who lived in sleepy Sioux Falls, right across the state line. Along with running the field organization alongside his former business partner, State Director Paul Tewes, Hildebrand made Obama’s case in his black leather jacket and casual clothes to key local Iowa leaders, one by one.
He said in the San Diego speech that gay rights was among the issues that had spurred his disappointment, mourning that after his 22 years of working for Democratic candidates, “we haven’t come very far,” according to the report.
“The government still doesn’t treat Gay people equally. Should I continue doing what I’m doing, or should I be a strong voice from the outside?” he said.
Hildebrand said in San Diego that he had demanded that his own congresswoman, South Dakota Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, return his contribution after she voted for a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, and that he would vote for a Republican against her next year.
Hildebrand, who worked for a stretch for Rep. Kendrick Meek’s bid for a Florida Senate Seat, is no longer working on that campaign, and said he’d returned home to focus on issue campaigns, rather than candidates.
Hildebrand told POLITICO, however, that Obama may be getting back onto the right track.
“He needs to -- much like he did yesterday in that speech [to a union audience in Cincinnati], much like he'll do, I assume, [in an address to Congress] on Wednesday -- rally the American people to force change on Washington,” Hildebrand said. “Change is not going to come by people in the Beltway deciding we should have change -- it's going to come because they're feeling pressure from all over the country.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/26866_Page2.html


And a little something from Baghdad Bob...

8jUpHcs6gIY

Yonivore
09-08-2009, 11:32 PM
No, no...you've got it all wrong; it's the Republicans that are self-destructing.

Don't pay attention to the falling approval numbers or the vacation from the vacation; they mean nothing.

Nbadan
09-09-2009, 12:56 AM
what a phony...the GOP will learn like Democrats have that a movement is not a party, and guns, god and religion isn't a platform...

Cry Havoc
09-09-2009, 01:11 AM
No, no...you've got it all wrong; it's the Republicans that are self-destructing.

Don't pay attention to the falling approval numbers or the vacation from the vacation; they mean nothing.

Obama's approval ratings are inevitably going to stay relatively low until the economy starts to recover, at which point they will steadily rise. Many sensible individuals on the forum were very open about the fact that Obama was not/is not able to do much to prevent this economic disaster -- it's like trying to stop a tsunami that's 40 feet from the beach. I even said (repeatedly) before Obama took office that his first 18 months as president were going to be rough for him and for the administration.

However, the economy will recover, and when it does, Obama will likely be a very well-thought of president, despite the fact that he had less to do with it than most people of his party will end up giving him credit for, and probably much less than Clinton had to do with the boom of the 90s.

But what is it, exactly, that paints the Republicans as a bastion of political stability right now?

Because I assure you, any party that props a person like Rush Limbaugh up as one of it's party leaders has a lot more things to worry about than the latest poll numbers with Obama.

Winehole23
09-09-2009, 01:12 AM
I'm not so sure the recovery will come soon enough to revive Obama's electoral fortunes. Unemployment is a lagging indicator. Long after the "recovery" has begun, a lot of people will still be out of work, and will have been for quite some time. There also will not be enough jobs for people entering the job market in the period of technical recovery.

Winehole23
09-09-2009, 01:16 AM
The return of GDP growth will hardly be the whole story here.

SnakeBoy
09-09-2009, 02:33 AM
Because I assure you, any party that props a person like Rush Limbaugh up as one of it's party leaders has a lot more things to worry about than the latest poll numbers with Obama.

Rush has been doing his thing since 1988. It's Obama and the democrats that have anoited him the party leader in an attempt to polarize the republican party. It's a stupid tactic that's been tried before but I guess it was good enough to get you to repeat it.

The question isn't who's the republican leader, they have a couple of years to figure that out. The question is who is going to be in charge of the the democrat party? Hard to tell at the moment and Obama hasn't yet shown that he has the skills to control the party. If he can't, it can only end badly for him.


But what is it, exactly, that paints the Republicans as a bastion of political stability right now?

They don't have to be. That's the advantage of being the powerless opposition party. Their task is simple, just remain in a position to say "I told you so".

SnakeBoy
09-09-2009, 02:51 AM
I'm not so sure the recovery will come soon enough to revive Obama's electoral fortunes.

Not only does he have the economy to bring him down but he has also boxed himself in on Afghanistan.

Winehole23
09-09-2009, 02:57 AM
Not only does he have the economy to bring him down but he has also boxed himself in on Afghanistan.This will be a bigger albatross than people realize now. Operations will intensify, and so will disapproval at home and abroad. According to the latest polls, 57% of Americans declare themselves against the Afghan war.

George Gervin's Afro
09-09-2009, 06:22 AM
No, no...you've got it all wrong; it's the Republicans that are self-destructing.

Don't pay attention to the falling approval numbers or the vacation from the vacation; they mean nothing.

Don't pay attention to his poll numbers when they rise Yoni.... Not to worry at all when he rides the improving economy ito his second term. Go back to sleep and enjoy eating sh*t for thext 7 yrs.

jman3000
09-09-2009, 08:46 AM
I'll agree that he's thrown gays under the bus. He basically humped and dumped them.

I suppose it's better than having a party in power who would go so far as to change the damn Constitution in order to fuck you over.

Aggie Hoopsfan
09-09-2009, 12:18 PM
However, the economy will recover, and when it does, Obama will likely be a very well-thought of president, despite the fact that he had less to do with it than most people of his party will end up giving him credit for, and probably much less than Clinton had to do with the boom of the 90s.

You're a fool if you think the economy is going to recover should socialized health care and crap and trade pass. Those two pieces of legislation will finish off our economy for the foreseeable future.

SnakeBoy
09-09-2009, 12:32 PM
I suppose it's better than having a party in power who would go so far as to change the damn Constitution in order to fuck you over.

http://www.diablomag.com/images/archives/dj.jpg

Cry Havoc
09-09-2009, 12:49 PM
Rush has been doing his thing since 1988. It's Obama and the democrats that have anoited him the party leader in an attempt to polarize the republican party. It's a stupid tactic that's been tried before but I guess it was good enough to get you to repeat it.

So it's the democrats who had him speak as one of the party leaders at the Republican National Convention, then?

doobs
09-09-2009, 12:54 PM
So it's the democrats who had him speak as one of the party leaders at the Republican National Convention, then?

Do you mean CPAC?

sam1617
09-09-2009, 01:26 PM
Oh nooooooo, life in politics is the same as always!!!!

People should have had realistic goals for Obama's first (and hopefully last) term. Its stupid to complain that he hasn't achieved enough in his short time he has been in office, this is a government for 300 million people. It moves slowly. Expect less. Compromise more. Thats the only way things will happen unless you want to alienate half the country.

nuclearfm
09-09-2009, 01:40 PM
You're a fool if you think the economy is going to recover should socialized health care and crap and trade pass. Those two pieces of legislation will finish off our economy for the foreseeable future.

It'll fail anyway if we refuse to do anything. National health spending is expected to reach $2.5 trillion in 2009, accounting for 17.6 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP). That has more than doubled the past 5 years. Many studies also attribute medical debt as one of leading the cause of bankruptcies.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/american_journal_of_medicine_09.pdf