PDA

View Full Version : well I'm gonna go kill myself



monosylab1k
09-14-2009, 08:46 PM
no funeral

DUNCANownsKOBE2
09-14-2009, 08:51 PM
Count me in. This was the best football week ever, all of my fantasy football teams lost, and both of my teams lost games that were supposed to be blowouts (yeah hahaha everyone call me a bandwagon Patriots fan, my entire family is from Boston, so fuck you).

Ghazi
09-14-2009, 08:53 PM
lol pats

NoOptionB
09-14-2009, 08:53 PM
I'm sorry to hear that. :depressed












Can I have your stuff?

Ghazi
09-14-2009, 08:54 PM
Count me in. This was the best football week ever, all of my fantasy football teams lost, and both of my teams lost games that were supposed to be blowouts (yeah hahaha everyone call me a bandwagon Patriots fan, my entire family is from Boston, so fuck you).

lol bandwagon pats fan

DUNCANownsKOBE2
09-14-2009, 08:58 PM
Fumble!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

benefactor
09-14-2009, 09:01 PM
Whatever. Walk a mile in my shoes.

Ghazi
09-14-2009, 09:11 PM
lol ghazi premature ejac

Hank the Tank
09-14-2009, 09:12 PM
fuckin bills...kinda exciting lateral show though.

BlackSwordsMan
09-14-2009, 09:14 PM
too bad he killed himself before he saw what happened
lol emoangst

dimsah
09-14-2009, 09:15 PM
I swear to God the Pats have a horseshoes up their asses.

monosylab1k
09-14-2009, 09:16 PM
lol pats

lol you

monosylab1k
09-14-2009, 09:16 PM
reverse jinx works again :smokin

DUNCANownsKOBE2
09-14-2009, 09:16 PM
lol Ghazi
lol bandwagon LSU fan

dirk4mvp
09-14-2009, 09:17 PM
I want Watson gone.

monosylab1k
09-14-2009, 09:19 PM
I've always loved Ben Watson, ever since he ran down Champ Bailey. I never wanted him gone.

monosylab1k
09-14-2009, 09:19 PM
oh wait, you said pats fan, not Bandwagon CHEATriots (:lmao) fan

dirk4mvp
09-14-2009, 09:20 PM
I remember it being reported in the preseason that he was gonna be cut in favor of that Baker guy.

monosylab1k
09-14-2009, 09:21 PM
I remember it being reported in the preseason that he was gonna be cut in favor of that Baker guy.

Those were the reports, thankfully it didn't happen.

bostonguy
09-14-2009, 09:22 PM
Mono FTW

bostonguy
09-14-2009, 09:23 PM
Mono when do you see Brady getting back to his true self? Great last 2 drives so I hope that carries over to the Jets game.

LnGrrrR
09-14-2009, 09:23 PM
I swear to God the Pats have a horseshoes up their asses.

:lmao

LnGrrrR
09-14-2009, 09:23 PM
I've always loved Ben Watson, ever since he ran down Champ Bailey. I never wanted him gone.

That f'ing ball went out of bounds! That shouldn't have been a TD.

monosylab1k
09-14-2009, 09:33 PM
Mono when do you see Brady getting back to his true self? Great last 2 drives so I hope that carries over to the Jets game.

Last 2 drives for sure. Brady wasn't himself, but a bigger problem is that Welker wasn't himself for most of the game either. Welker was horrible. That's probably why Moss started getting involved in the short game. Also, we're gonna need a little more out of Joey Galloway. make that a lot more.

LnGrrrR
09-14-2009, 09:34 PM
Last 2 drives for sure. Brady wasn't himself, but a bigger problem is that Welker wasn't himself for most of the game either. Welker was horrible. That's probably why Moss started getting involved in the short game. Also, we're gonna need a little more out of Joey Galloway. make that a lot more.

Like... anything? :lol

DUNCANownsKOBE2
09-14-2009, 09:44 PM
CHEATriots (:lmao) fan


I see what you did there. How clever :lmao

slayermin
09-14-2009, 09:47 PM
How the fuck did the Bills blow that game?

Fucking Patriots.

Nathan Explosion
09-15-2009, 12:18 PM
How the fuck did the Bills blow that game?

Fucking Patriots.

Guy didn't kneel the ball for a touch back. That's why.

The one concern I'd have for the Pats is how little they got to the QB. They were playing the Bills who started 2 or 3 rookies on the line. Trent Edwards should have been staring at the sky all night.

Then you look at the next game, and against a good San Diego line, Seymour was in the backfield all day.

dirk4mvp
09-15-2009, 12:20 PM
The one concern I'd have for the Pats is how little they got to the QB. They were playing the Bills who started 2 or 3 rookies on the line. Trent Edwards should have been staring at the sky all night.



I think some of it had to do with no Seymour and that Wilfork is an out of shape fatass who got tired quickly due to the Bills running the no huddle.

Nathan Explosion
09-15-2009, 12:27 PM
I think some of it had to do with no Seymour and that Wilfork is an out of shape fatass who got tired quickly due to the Bills running the no huddle.

If the Pats don't develop a pass rush by Week 3, I'd start to think that the Pats got a little too smart for they're own good.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
09-15-2009, 12:36 PM
I think some of it had to do with no Seymour and that Wilfork is an out of shape fatass who got tired quickly due to the Bills running the no huddle.


The Wilfork part is the biggest reason IMO. The Patriots have been able to get the to QB when Seymour was injured before, it also could be the switch to the 4-3 and the coaching staff has less linebacker blitzing versatility.

If Carolina loses more games and begins to implode and New England still has a mediocre pass rush, it might finally be time they pull the trigger on Peppers.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
09-15-2009, 12:38 PM
If the Pats don't develop a pass rush by Week 3, I'd start to think that the Pats got a little too smart for they're own good.


I think they might have overrated their system and underrated how much Vrabel and Seymour made their system work.

Nathan Explosion
09-15-2009, 12:45 PM
I think they might have overrated their system and underrated how much Vrabel and Seymour made their system work.

Exactly. They've lost quite a few players this season and it might begin to show.

Seymour and Greg Ellis played like they had something to prove to the Raiders, Pats and Cowboys.

Like I said, if this continues to be the case by Week 3, I think the Pats are in trouble defensively.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
09-15-2009, 01:04 PM
Exactly. They've lost quite a few players this season and it might begin to show.

Seymour and Greg Ellis played like they had something to prove to the Raiders, Pats and Cowboys.

Like I said, if this continues to be the case by Week 3, I think the Pats are in trouble defensively.


If Jerod Mayo is out for any period of time, they're in trouble regardless. They won their superbowls because of how strong they were at linebacker, now outside of Mayo and Thomas, they've got nothing.

Ghazi
09-15-2009, 01:16 PM
If I'm not mistaken him running it out of the end zone got the clock past the 2 minute warning and thus essentially burned a timeout for the Pats, no? He can't be faulted for that, it was just a fluke fumble and a lucky win for the Pats.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
09-15-2009, 01:28 PM
If I'm not mistaken him running it out of the end zone got the clock past the 2 minute warning and thus essentially burned a timeout for the Pats, no? He can't be faulted for that, it was just a fluke fumble and a lucky win for the Pats.

It wasn't a fluke fumble, Brandon Meriweather went for the strip and repeatedly hacked at the ball, and he decided to keep fighting for yardage rather than fall down. It's not like someone's helmet happened to pop the ball out during a tackle. It was a player who is great at forcing fumbles forcing a fumble.

slayermin
09-15-2009, 02:54 PM
No secret I hate the Patriots but even I know Belichick is gonna get that defense right. They don't need a great defense, just a good, bend but don't break unit.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
09-15-2009, 03:06 PM
No secret I hate the Patriots but even I know Belichick is gonna get that defense right. They don't need a great defense, just a good, bend but don't break unit.


I hope so, but now that I think about it, the defense wasn't as bad as people are saying it was yesterday. Buffalo scored 24 points. 7 of those points were because of a Schobel pick 6. 7 more of those points were because of a bullshit roughing the passer call. 3 more points were cause of ANOTHER bullshit roughing the passer call. For hypothetical sake, lets say if not for those two calls, they score 3 points instead of 10, so the defense really only gave up 10 points. Not bad at all for a team that just switched to the 4-3, has several new starters to work in, and was missing its best player most of the game.

monosylab1k
09-15-2009, 03:32 PM
I really didn't have a problem with either roughing the passer calls. The Adalius Thomas one was obvious to me, the whistles were blowing for a few seconds and he still slammed Edwards to the ground excessively. Just a stupid decision.

The Wilfork one is more questionable, but by the letter of the law, it's the right call. After what happened to Brady last year, I'm happy with any rule that protects a QB's knees (even if it is promoting the wussification of the NFL).

Nathan Explosion
09-16-2009, 09:51 PM
I hope so, but now that I think about it, the defense wasn't as bad as people are saying it was yesterday. Buffalo scored 24 points. 7 of those points were because of a Schobel pick 6. 7 more of those points were because of a bullshit roughing the passer call. 3 more points were cause of ANOTHER bullshit roughing the passer call. For hypothetical sake, lets say if not for those two calls, they score 3 points instead of 10, so the defense really only gave up 10 points. Not bad at all for a team that just switched to the 4-3, has several new starters to work in, and was missing its best player most of the game.

Pats fans complaining about a rule named after their QB? Funny.

However, I saw a Pats defense that was gashed by the running game. And before you try the "only gave up 10 points" argument, remember, they were playing the Bills and won by one point despite being favored by 11.5.

The defense has problems. I'm not saying they're doomed, but they have problems.

The defense couldn't stop the run and couldn't get to the quarterback. And remember, IT WAS THE BUFFALO BILLS!!!

LnGrrrR
09-17-2009, 09:10 AM
Pats fans complaining about a rule named after their QB? Funny.

However, I saw a Pats defense that was gashed by the running game. And before you try the "only gave up 10 points" argument, remember, they were playing the Bills and won by one point despite being favored by 11.5.

The defense has problems. I'm not saying they're doomed, but they have problems.

The defense couldn't stop the run and couldn't get to the quarterback. And remember, IT WAS THE BUFFALO BILLS!!!

Yes, because they applied the rule incorrectly. Funny that we'd argue about a bad call. :p

And also, did you notice we lost Jerod Mayo? Defensive Rookie of the Year? That probably had something to do with the Bills running effectively. Sucks that he'll be out for the next six weeks, as the Pats LBs are all young with relatively little playing time, with the exception of Adalius and Banta-Cain.

And yes, the D really needs to step up and apply pressure. Our D-backs did good, but they won't be that good every game.

LnGrrrR
09-17-2009, 09:11 AM
I really didn't have a problem with either roughing the passer calls. The Adalius Thomas one was obvious to me, the whistles were blowing for a few seconds and he still slammed Edwards to the ground excessively. Just a stupid decision.

The Wilfork one is more questionable, but by the letter of the law, it's the right call. After what happened to Brady last year, I'm happy with any rule that protects a QB's knees (even if it is promoting the wussification of the NFL).

Except Wilfork was tackling him at his upper thighs. :p

DUNCANownsKOBE2
09-17-2009, 09:55 AM
The defense has problems. I'm not saying they're doomed, but they have problems.


I never said they didn't have problems, I said it's being blown outa proportion how horribly they played.

Nathan Explosion
09-17-2009, 11:10 AM
Anyone miss the part where I said, IT WAS THE BUFFALO BILLS!

And if losing one player takes an entire element of your defense away, then the Pats really are in trouble. The Pats were renowned for being able to plug practically anyone in their scheme and succeed.

Say what you want about the Cowboys, if they lost DeMarcus Ware, They'd still get to the QB. It just wouldn't be as easy, but they'd find a way to get pressure.

Mayo goes out and the Pats couldn't stop the run and couldn't get to the QB. The world's biggest Pats homer Bill Simmons says the same thing.

Again, I'm not saying they're doomed, I'd just worried that losing 1 player can damage that defensive front 7, with guys like Wilfork and Thomas also on the unit, that much.

Nathan Explosion
09-17-2009, 11:11 AM
Yes, because they applied the rule incorrectly. Funny that we'd argue about a bad call. :p

And also, did you notice we lost Jerod Mayo? Defensive Rookie of the Year? That probably had something to do with the Bills running effectively. Sucks that he'll be out for the next six weeks, as the Pats LBs are all young with relatively little playing time, with the exception of Adalius and Banta-Cain.

And yes, the D really needs to step up and apply pressure. Our D-backs did good, but they won't be that good every game.

I just find if funny that Pats fans are complaing about the refs when the league stepped up to protect their QB. I'll put it this way, don't complain too much about the refs protecting QBs when the LEAGUE stepped up to protect your QB.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
09-17-2009, 11:29 AM
Say what you want about the Cowboys, if they lost DeMarcus Ware, They'd still get to the QB.

:lmao:lmao:lmao

Nathan Explosion
09-17-2009, 06:29 PM
:lmao:lmao:lmao

THE BILLS. Remember that.

And I know Ratliff and Spencer were in the backfield way more than the Pats were.

Again, say what you will, the Pats couldn't get through the Bills line, which started 2 rookies.

THE BILLS.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
11-15-2009, 11:46 PM
Well, peace monos. Ima go do the same.