PDA

View Full Version : NBA Preview - All Eyes On The Lakers



duncan228
09-28-2009, 11:54 PM
NBA Preview - All Eyes on the Lakers (http://www.betus.com/sports-betting/nba-basketball/articles/nba-preview-all-eyes-on-the-lakers/)
by Charles Jay
betus.com

We’re about a month out before the NBA Season officially starts, but already NBA betting fans should be lining up to lay money down on which team they believe will take home the 2009 – 2010 NBA Championship.

The Los Angeles Lakers are a solid +225 favorite in the BetUS online sportsbook. Even though Lamar Odom is probably having fun with his new bride, Khloe Kardashian, the rest of the Lakers must be thinking hoops as a month really isn’t a long time and the rest of the NBA desperately tried to improve themselves during the off season.

How will things play out in 2009 – 2010? Let’s take a quick peak at some of the teams, with their basketball betting odds (http://www.betus.com/sports-betting/nba-basketball/odds-lines/), which have a shot to win the NBA Championship.

Los Angeles Lakers (http://www.betus.com/sports-betting/nba-basketball/teams/13/) +225 - - The Lakers are easily the best team, on paper, in the basketball championship. They are coming off of a championship, have the best player on the league in Kobe Bryant, resigned Lamar Odom, and added Ron Artest. It doesn’t get much better than that. If the Lakers show up to play, and there’s no reason that they won’t, the +225 on them might be a gift.

Then again, Artest may not be the role player that Trevor Ariza was in 2008 – 2009 and if Kobe got hurt, this team wouldn’t have a chance. But with the Black Mamba, Odom, Artest, Gasol and center Andrew Bynum all healthy, there’s just nobody really that can challenge this team.

Boston Celtics (http://www.betus.com/sports-betting/nba-basketball/teams/2/)+400 - - Look what the Celtics did in the off season and suddenly things become clear. Boston is looking to get back to the top. Yes, Rasheed Wallace, their prized pick-up during the off season, has been in the league for a while, but when ‘Sheed is on, he’s about as good as any player at his position in the NBA. Not only that, but ‘Sheed, Rajon Rondo, Ray Allen and Kevin Garnett make up a who’s who of basketball defenders.

Expect this team to play in a lot of high 60 to low 70 games where they just frustrate their opponents into making terrible shots. I wouldn’t want to play the Celtics if I were any team in the NBA, that includes the Lakers, because the Celtics get you out of your game patiently. Boston “meditates” you into shooting bad shots. How do you beat that? You don’t. What an interesting contrast in styles it would be if the Lakers faced their arch nemesis in the NBA Championship this season!

Cleveland Cavaliers (http://www.betus.com/sports-betting/nba-basketball/teams/5/) +300 - - I’m not sold on LeBron James. Yes, as a player I am sold on him. He can score, rebound, dish, defend and pretty much out play anyone on the court but as a leader I have my doubts. When it comes to go time and Shaquille O’Neal is trying to throw his weight around in the locker room or on the court, LeBron will either go into a corner or he will step up and tell Shaq that the Cavs are his team. Either way, neither egotistical giant will let the other one get away with it. Shaq is a pariah because he can’t play nice. I doubt he does it in Cleveland. We’ll see what happens, but at the odds, I’m much more inclined to put my basketball wagering money on the Lakers or Celtics. I’ll steer clear of this “experiment” until it proves to me that it will work.

Orlando Magic (http://www.betus.com/sports-betting/nba-basketball/teams/19/) +1000 - - The key with the Magic is Jameer Nelson is back and healthy and playing like he did before getting hurt last season. Vince Carter will help this team on the perimeter, but that’s not where they needed help. They need a guy to take charge and lead them and that was Nelson for most of the 2008 – 2009 season.

Dwight Howard cannot lead from the center position and Rashard Lewis prefers to be a background type player. That leaves Nelson to lead the charge. There’s no doubt that he could, but the Celtics got much better as well and Howard, as good as he is, will find the going more difficult in the center when facing up against Shaq and a healthy Kevin Garnett. A frustrated Howard will hurt this team big time. Beware putting money on this team to win the championship even though the basketball odds are pretty good on them.

San Antonio Spurs (http://www.betus.com/sports-betting/nba-basketball/teams/23/) +1000 - - If the Spurs stay healthy then they have a legitimate shot to wear the NBA crown after the 2009 – 2010 Basketball Season. Yes, the Lakers are younger and deeper, but San Antonio starting five is one of the best, if not the best, in the NBA. At point guard is Tony Parker who is easily one of the top three dish men in the league. At the forward spots are Antonio McDyess and Richard Jefferson. Jefferson can take over a game offensively if need be or shut down the teams best scorer.

It depends on what you want out of the guy. At center is the venerable Tim Duncan. Roger Mason as shooting guard appears to be the only weak link but he’s backed up by Manu Ginobili who should be healthy and ready in 2009. Forget the talk that this team is over the hill. If they stay healthy, they will be a force in the Western Conference.

Best Long Shot

Miami Heat (http://www.betus.com/sports-betting/nba-basketball/teams/14/) +4000 - - No shot, right? Big shot in my estimation! They have one of he top 3 players in the league in Dwayne Wade, an up and coming point guard in Mario Chalmers, and solid forwards in Udonis Haslem and James Jones. If center Jermaine O’Neal remembers that he’s a good player, then this team could go a long way.

Oh, yes, Michael Beasley has returned from rehab and will be looking to become the player that everyone envisioned him as being when he came out of college. If that happens, then look out. Beasley is a good player when his head is right. Miami could be the team to watch and bet in the 2009 – 2010 Basketball Season.

DPG21920
09-28-2009, 11:58 PM
I disagree that if Kobe goes down the Lakers are done. Ron Artest gives them a guy who is not on Kobe's level, but has the ability to step in and lead a team in the playoffs. The Lakers have a ton of talent and losing Kobe would be a crushing blow, but they would still be a team that is a serious threat.

EricB
09-29-2009, 12:18 AM
I disagree that if Kobe goes down the Lakers are done. Ron Artest gives them a guy who is not on Kobe's level, but has the ability to step in and lead a team in the playoffs. The Lakers have a ton of talent and losing Kobe would be a crushing blow, but they would still be a team that is a serious threat.

Ron Artest proved against the Lakers he's not made to be an offensive star.

His horrible shooting in key games were killer.

HarlemHeat37
09-29-2009, 12:30 AM
The Lakers would definitely be done without Kobe IMO..as much as people want to downplay him and elevate his supporting cast, they still run the majority of their stuff through him..

They would possibly make the 2nd round without him if they faced the #8 seed, but they would lose pretty easily to any of the other 6 teams, at least IMO..

I also disagree with the article about the Lakers depth..I don't see it..

The_Game
09-29-2009, 12:35 AM
I disagree that if Kobe goes down the Lakers are done. Ron Artest gives them a guy who is not on Kobe's level, but has the ability to step in and lead a team in the playoffs. The Lakers have a ton of talent and losing Kobe would be a crushing blow, but they would still be a team that is a serious threat.

you could say that about any contender

idiotic

Artest will be so much better offensively now he doesn't have to shoulder the offensive load. him as a 1st option? not great..but as a guy who could be 3rd or 4th option? very tough to defend.

Blackjack
09-29-2009, 01:03 AM
Not only that, but ‘Sheed, Rajon Rondo, Ray Allen and Kevin Garnett make up a who’s who of basketball defenders.

Really?

I hope he meant Pierce..

crc21209
09-29-2009, 01:16 AM
you could say that about any contender

idiotic

Artest will be so much better offensively now he doesn't have to shoulder the offensive load. him as a 1st option? not great..but as a guy who could be 3rd or 4th option? very tough to defend.

I don't think the Lakers could win jack shit without Kobe. The Spurs could still be very successful if one of the Big 3 goes down as well all saw last year...

wekko368
09-29-2009, 01:38 AM
Artest will be so much better offensively now he doesn't have to shoulder the offensive load. him as a 1st option? not great..but as a guy who could be 3rd or 4th option? very tough to defend.

Out of curiosity, did you watch any Rocket games last year?

K-State Spur
09-29-2009, 09:01 AM
you could say that about any contender

idiotic

Artest will be so much better offensively now he doesn't have to shoulder the offensive load. him as a 1st option? not great..but as a guy who could be 3rd or 4th option? very tough to defend.

...so long as he doesn't take the shots (volume or location) of a first option. which, while not a sure thing in LA, has always been his MO.

The_Game
09-29-2009, 09:39 AM
I don't think the Lakers could win jack shit without Kobe. The Spurs could still be very successful if one of the Big 3 goes down as well all saw last year...

you mean when the Spurs got their asses handed to them by dallas? lakers have a far better chance of doing better if Kobe went down compared to the Spurs. If Manu goes down the spurs are done...Lakers could get 50 wins and maybe get to the 2nd round...gasol, Artest, Odom, Bynum is still a nice core.

mosdef17
09-29-2009, 09:51 AM
Can't wait for the Lakers to see how Artest jacking shots could lose them games, possibly even crucial playoff games. This is not me saying this as a jealous spurs fan, I would think the same even if I didn't go for any team. He has lost his quickness in guarding two's and even the quicker 3's of the league. they lost a MAJOR part of their team in Ariza, he was perfect in that role.

CavsSuperFan
09-29-2009, 09:59 AM
DJ, Sasha, Luke, Adam, Shannon, Josh…Every one of those guys was cut from other NBA teams….That’s depth?



I trade sweat for strength… I trade doubt for belief… I trade cheerleading for nothing!"

NoOptionB
09-29-2009, 10:02 AM
Spurs are the deepest team in the league.

G. Hill and Blair will dominate.

Mel_13
09-29-2009, 10:02 AM
DJ, Sasha, Luke, Adam, Shannon, Josh…Every one of those guys was cut from other NBA teams….That’s depth?



I trade sweat for strength… I trade doubt for belief… I trade cheerleading for nothing!"

3 of 6

DPG21920
09-29-2009, 10:32 AM
Ron Artest proved against the Lakers he's not made to be an offensive star.

His horrible shooting in key games were killer.



The Lakers would definitely be done without Kobe IMO..as much as people want to downplay him and elevate his supporting cast, they still run the majority of their stuff through him..

They would possibly make the 2nd round without him if they faced the #8 seed, but they would lose pretty easily to any of the other 6 teams, at least IMO..

I also disagree with the article about the Lakers depth..I don't see it..

The Lakers would not be able to win a title, but they could still win the West if some things went their way imo.

This is the Ron Artest that helped beat the #5 seed Blazers with his next best players being Yao and Battier and Aaron Brooks. Gasol/Odom/Bynum/Fisher are an uprade in talent.

This is the Ron Artest that took the eventual champions Lakers to 7 games minus Yao (for the most part) and T-Mac. He does take some bad shots, but he still does many good things and he would have significant talent around him. 7 games was further than any other team pushed the Lakers.

If Houston last year could take out a 5th seed and push the #1 seed with Artest, then I fail to see how with more talent they would barely beat an 8th seed.

K-State Spur
09-29-2009, 01:23 PM
The Lakers would not be able to win a title, but they could still win the West if some things went their way imo.

This is the Ron Artest that helped beat the #5 seed Blazers with his next best players being Yao and Battier and Aaron Brooks. Gasol/Odom/Bynum/Fisher are an uprade in talent.

This is the Ron Artest that took the eventual champions Lakers to 7 games minus Yao (for the most part) and T-Mac. He does take some bad shots, but he still does many good things and he would have significant talent around him. 7 games was further than any other team pushed the Lakers.

If Houston last year could take out a 5th seed and push the #1 seed with Artest, then I fail to see how with more talent they would barely beat an 8th seed.

in any and all of those wins, artest got a lot of help...A LOT.

he is not capable of putting a team on his back to go far in the playoffs. that's not a slight, few players are.

picnroll
09-29-2009, 01:35 PM
Artest will be so much better offensively now he doesn't have to shoulder the offensive load. him as a 1st option? not great..but as a guy who could be 3rd or 4th option? very tough to defend.

Good luck with that Artest thinking he's the 3rd or 4th option thing. :lol

The_Game
09-29-2009, 01:45 PM
don't need luck as thats what he will be and he is fine with that. ron wants to win, which he will.

picnroll
09-29-2009, 01:51 PM
don't need luck as thats what he will be and he is fine with that. ron wants to win, which he will.

Of course he will. Just ask Pacer's, King's and Rocket's fans. :lmao

Doug Collins
09-29-2009, 01:55 PM
you mean when the Spurs got their asses handed to them by dallas? lakers have a far better chance of doing better if Kobe went down compared to the Spurs. If Manu goes down the spurs are done...Lakers could get 50 wins and maybe get to the 2nd round...gasol, Artest, Odom, Bynum is still a nice core.

Isn't that exactly what the Spurs did without Manu? :rolleyes

Neither team is winning a championship without their big guns, but I think the Spurs w/o Manu would do better than the Lakers w/o Kobe. Not that any of this matters.

The_Game
09-29-2009, 02:22 PM
Of course he will. Just ask Pacer's, King's and Rocket's fans. :lmao

please remind me how those pacer and kings team did after Artest left? ALOT worse.

rockets will be the same

DPG21920
09-29-2009, 02:25 PM
in any and all of those wins, artest got a lot of help...A LOT.

he is not capable of putting a team on his back to go far in the playoffs. that's not a slight, few players are.

Ok. He got to the second round with a lot of "help" last year with a depleted Rockets.

You don't think he would get more help from the Lakers than he did from the Rockets minus Kobe?

da_suns_fan
09-29-2009, 02:27 PM
I cant believe that people think Cleveland has a better chance than San Antonio.

WildcardManu
09-29-2009, 02:28 PM
please remind me how those pacer and kings team did after Artest left? ALOT worse.

rockets will be the same

You think artest will want to fall into the role of third or fourth option?

SpurNation
09-29-2009, 02:39 PM
you mean when the Spurs got their asses handed to them by dallas? lakers have a far better chance of doing better if Kobe went down compared to the Spurs. If Manu goes down the spurs are done...Lakers could get 50 wins and maybe get to the 2nd round...gasol, Artest, Odom, Bynum is still a nice core.

And Parker, Duncan, Jefferson and McDyess are fodder?

The_Game
09-29-2009, 03:35 PM
You think artest will want to fall into the role of third or fourth option?

he wouldn't of signed for L.A if he didn't.

lefty
09-29-2009, 03:38 PM
I disagree that if Kobe goes down the Lakers are done. Ron Artest gives them a guy who is not on Kobe's level, but has the ability to step in and lead a team in the playoffs. The Lakers have a ton of talent and losing Kobe would be a crushing blow, but they would still be a team that is a serious threat.
That swine flu virus is really powerful

widowmaker
09-29-2009, 03:38 PM
Kobe is due a season ending injury.

nuclearfm
09-29-2009, 03:42 PM
At the forward spots are Antonio McDyess and Richard Jefferson. Jefferson can take over a game offensively if need be or shut down the teams best scorer.



What the hell? The only thing Jefferson can stop is a wedding..and even that is shaky at best.

#2!
09-29-2009, 04:01 PM
The Lakers would not be able to win a title, but they could still win the West if some things went their way imo.

This is the Ron Artest that helped beat the #5 seed Blazers with his next best players being Yao and Battier and Aaron Brooks. Gasol/Odom/Bynum/Fisher are an uprade in talent.

This is the Ron Artest that took the eventual champions Lakers to 7 games minus Yao (for the most part) and T-Mac. He does take some bad shots, but he still does many good things and he would have significant talent around him. 7 games was further than any other team pushed the Lakers.

If Houston last year could take out a 5th seed and push the #1 seed with Artest, then I fail to see how with more talent they would barely beat an 8th seed.

I really hope you don't think that Ron is better than Yao. and also it wasn't "the ron artest" that took the lakers to seven it was the rockets, and if any one player actually dominated for the rockets it would be Aaron Brooks, which probably had as much to do with Derek Fisher's quickness as it did Brooks's blossoming game.

DPG21920
09-29-2009, 04:18 PM
I really hope you don't think that Ron is better than Yao. and also it wasn't "the ron artest" that took the lakers to seven it was the rockets, and if any one player actually dominated for the rockets it would be Aaron Brooks, which probably had as much to do with Derek Fisher's quickness as it did Brooks's blossoming game.

Ron is not better than Yao, but he was clearly the 2nd best player on the Rockets and when Yao got hurt, he was the first. They had not gotten out of the 1st round in a looooooong time and they had many of the same players. Yes, some of the role players played well, but they are no where near as talented as Pau/Bynum/Fisher/Odom and that was my point.

If Kobe goes down, the Lakers can still beat most teams.

K-State Spur
09-29-2009, 05:58 PM
Ok. He got to the second round with a lot of "help" last year with a depleted Rockets.

You don't think he would get more help from the Lakers than he did from the Rockets minus Kobe?

they were depleted from big names, but they got career playoffs out half their roster.

just because artest was the only name left doesn't mean that he was doing all (or even most) of the heavy lifting.

he won't get more help from the lakers...HE IS THE HELP.

DPG21920
09-29-2009, 06:00 PM
So, Pau/Bynum/Fisher/Odom are not help? Way to give Artest absolutely no credit for getting Houston out of the second round.

Artest was the help last year for the Rockets with Yao when T-Mac went down. Same scenario, more talent.

Bukefal
09-29-2009, 06:01 PM
The Lakers wont get the title again, for sure. I think it will be all about us Spurs and the Cavs. But, Spurs will be the champions of course, bring it on !!!
:flag:

crc21209
09-30-2009, 01:31 AM
you mean when the Spurs got their asses handed to them by dallas? lakers have a far better chance of doing better if Kobe went down compared to the Spurs. If Manu goes down the spurs are done...Lakers could get 50 wins and maybe get to the 2nd round...gasol, Artest, Odom, Bynum is still a nice core.

The Spurs still made the Playoffs didnt they? And even made it as a 3 seed. Without Kobe...the Lakers would be a 6-8 seed and suffer GREATLY.

mytespurs
09-30-2009, 08:20 PM
I cant believe that people think Cleveland has a better chance than San Antonio.

It's the LeBron factor and now they have what they hope is a motivated ShaQUILLE! :king And the Cavs play in the "meek" east. Their path to the finals would be much easier than the Spurs in the depth that is the West.

Also, Manu is coming off injuries as is Duncan. Plus the reconstituted Spurs team will need to gell so I can certainly understand why Cleveland is given a better chance to win than the Spurs at this time.

mytespurs
09-30-2009, 08:34 PM
So now the argument is now which team would fare better losing its superstar?
Does it matter? It's a negative either way.

Spurs had no Manu, a less than healthy Duncan and could do no better than the first round. I'd like to think had these guys been healthy, the Spurs would've gone deeper in the playoffs...not necessarily when a championship but at least get to the conference finals.

Lakers losing Kobe would be very significant; they have a lot of talent but that wouldn't make up for his loss. Perhaps they would make the playoffs and may make it to the first or second round.

mytespurs
09-30-2009, 09:10 PM
he wouldn't of signed for L.A if he didn't.

and the fact he has a chance to win a ring. :king