USC vs. Texas...futures [Archive] - SpursTalk.com Forums

View Full Version : USC vs. Texas...futures

johngateswhiteley

10-07-2009, 04:17 PM

http://espn.go.com/blog/pac10/post/_/id/3673/usc-and-texas-talking

considering USC's OOC scheduling pattern, this makes sense. i wonder if t.u. will agree...

johngateswhiteley

10-07-2009, 04:17 PM

i would fucking love this...

stretch

10-07-2009, 04:27 PM

why? to see usc get the shit kicked out of them again?

Kermit

10-07-2009, 04:28 PM

Sure, great idea. Wait...

/arkansas, utah

johngateswhiteley

10-13-2009, 04:03 PM

why? to see usc get the shit kicked out of them again?

you're an infant.

lebomb

10-13-2009, 04:06 PM

why? to see usc get the shit kicked out of them again?

STFU T-shirt fan!!!!!

vander

10-13-2009, 04:31 PM

neither of these clubs/conferences have anything to gain from this, their conferences are plenty strong, the Big 10 and Big East are the Conferences that need to schedule top teams for credibility.

what USC does to ohio st is about right, Texas, Oklahoma, OK St, etc. should schedule teams like Penn State, Michigan, West Va, Pitt, or even ACC teams.

beat up on the bottom BCS conferences, make their undeserved credibility work for you. :lol

stretch

10-13-2009, 05:02 PM

you're an infant.

lick my balls

stretch

10-13-2009, 05:02 PM

may i lick your balls?

tlongII

10-13-2009, 07:05 PM

It would be great, but no way Texas agrees to this. They're chicken.

Cant_Be_Faded

10-13-2009, 08:00 PM

Don't be too certain. UT loves to schedule OOC games that will earn them and austin a fuckton of money. That means teams with diehard fans that travel, in cities that draw a big crowd. I bet they agree.

Garrett Gilbert is going to eat that shit up...like kobiyashi!!! Arhghghghghhghg!

johngateswhiteley

10-13-2009, 08:04 PM

IronMexican

10-13-2009, 08:07 PM

Be awesome if it does happen. Doubtful, however.

Spursfan092120

10-13-2009, 08:07 PM

It would be great, but no way Texas agrees to this. They're chicken.
Yeah..I'm sure they're chicken to play the team they beat..that makes a lot of sense, ya freakin beaver...why don't you go read articles about your mediocre team now.

johngateswhiteley

10-13-2009, 08:09 PM

Yeah..I'm sure they're chicken to play the team they beat..

that doesn't make any sense.

J.T.

10-13-2009, 08:10 PM

may i lick your bunghole?

fify philip

stretch

10-13-2009, 08:19 PM

that doesn't make any sense.

like your previous 6,995 posts

Spursfan092120

10-13-2009, 08:30 PM

that doesn't make any sense.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/bowls05/bowls?game=rose

And yes..I know it was 4 years ago..but me bringing this up was about as ignorant as him saying Texas would be scared to play USC.

pkbpkb81

10-13-2009, 08:37 PM

I hope they do it, how ever wins would be in the driver’s seat for number one all year and the team that lost wouldn’t be out of it because it would not be like they got beat by the aggies

Cant_Be_Faded

10-13-2009, 09:12 PM

i do think t.u. would be a little nervous to schedule this...its almost a guaranteed loss (x2).

Yeah we're never up the caliber of the shitass teams USC has lost to the past three years.

People said the same thing about Ohio State.
And we split that series.

Besides, It's almost a given you are anything but a realist, so I wouldn't have expected you to say anything different (x2).

johngateswhiteley

10-13-2009, 09:15 PM

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/bowls05/bowls?game=rose

And yes..I know it was 4 years ago..but me bringing this up was about as ignorant as him saying Texas would be scared to play USC.

it didn't make sense on 2 accounts:

1) i could use the same argument, USC won the first 4 in the series

2) the Rose Bowl could have gone either way. you won't agree with this (i'm guessing), but t.u. was lucky to get that win...and it speaks nothing going forward...

Cant_Be_Faded

10-13-2009, 09:21 PM

Sounds like someone's vagina needs a little more vagisil and aloe vera

it's been almost four years JGW, try to recuperate already

DMX7

10-13-2009, 09:38 PM

why? to see usc get the shit kicked out of them again?

Is that what you call like a 3 point win?

TFloss32

10-16-2009, 09:40 AM

i do think t.u. would be a little nervous to schedule this...its almost a guaranteed loss (x2).

All trash talking and homerism aside, USC would be just as hesitant to make this deal as Texas would be (in reality, this is probably the last team they'd want to have a regular season game against). A home-and-home with USC would most definitely NOT be as good as a guaranteed loss for Texas. USC knows better than that...Texas has knocked off a lot of the historically great programs in the past couple of years alone (Michigan, USC, Oklahoma and Ohio State twice). It would be a coin flip as to who would win these matchups and, IMO, would be a great deal for both sides. The revenue and recruiting potential is through the roof and would bring even more notoriety to both of these schools.

2) the Rose Bowl could have gone either way. you won't agree with this (i'm guessing), but t.u. was lucky to get that win...and it speaks nothing going forward...

How was Texas lucky, exactly? They had the highest scoring offense of all time (along with, arguably, the greatest player ever) and the best defense they've ever had.

Garrett Gilbert is going to eat that shit up...like kobiyashi!!! Arhghghghghhghg!

Garrett Gilbert will be loooooong gone before this happens. Better hope Texas keeps up their awesome recruiting efforts.

LOL texans

10-16-2009, 10:53 AM

USCs suppsed "dynasty years" are DONE. They play in a shitty conference, and STILL cant go undefeated. At least teams like Texas and OU are well oiled machines who actually beat ranked opponents year in and year out.

At this point in their respective programs, Texas would handily dispach USC.

LOL texans

10-16-2009, 10:57 AM

Is that what you call like a 3 point win?

Yes.

Midway through the 4th,Texas said. "Fuck this, we are just going to lineup and take this shit from you guys, and you are NOT going to stop us you pansy ass, overrated Hollywood team." And took the game from Leinart, Bush and company. Not to mention USC had home field advantange an two supposed "heismen" winners on their team.

That was the sweetest victory in NCAA history, and Texas took it, beat that ass down in the 4th.

LOL texans

10-16-2009, 10:57 AM

:lmao at a USC AND A&M fan...

more like a guy who can't get off of U.T.s nutsack.

Spursfan092120

10-16-2009, 11:04 AM

it didn't make sense on 2 accounts:

1) i could use the same argument, USC won the first 4 in the series

2) the Rose Bowl could have gone either way. you won't agree with this (i'm guessing), but t.u. was lucky to get that win...and it speaks nothing going forward...
You must have missed the part where I said the fact that it was just as ignorant for me to say that as it was to say UT would be scared to play USC. But if you want me to go there, I can. It could have gone either way in the Rose Bowl, but it didn't...Texas won. And if you think that was lucky, that's just ignorant. You allowed a guy who had already gotten over 200 yards rushing to run another 9 yards on 4th down to win the game. There was no luck to it. Vince Young was one of the greatest players in NCAA history...and he was cementing his legacy. Yes, USC won the first 4 in the series...but Texas won the last one. My whole point is this..neither team would be "scared" to play the other, and to even say they would is fuckin stupid.

Spursfan092120

10-16-2009, 11:11 AM

Midway through the 4th,Texas said. "Fuck this, we are just going to lineup and take this shit from you guys, and you are NOT going to stop us you pansy ass, overrated Hollywood team." And took the game from Leinart, Bush and company. Not to mention USC had home field advantange an two supposed "heismen" winners on their team.

That was the sweetest victory in NCAA history, and Texas took it, beat that ass down in the 4th.
I couldn't agree with that part more. They took that game from USC...period...they were not going to allow USC to beat them.

johngateswhiteley

10-16-2009, 05:01 PM

I couldn't agree with that part more. They took that game from USC...period...they were not going to allow USC to beat them.

we gave it to t.u...the game could have easily been over long before the 4th. and should have.

johngateswhiteley

10-16-2009, 05:02 PM

All trash talking and homerism aside, USC would be just as hesitant to make this deal as Texas would be (in reality, this is probably the last team they'd want to have a regular season game against). A home-and-home with USC would most definitely NOT be as good as a guaranteed loss for Texas. USC knows better than that...Texas has knocked off a lot of the historically great programs in the past couple of years alone (Michigan, USC, Oklahoma and Ohio State twice). It would be a coin flip as to who would win these matchups and, IMO, would be a great deal for both sides. The revenue and recruiting potential is through the roof and would bring even more notoriety to both of these schools.

How was Texas lucky, exactly? They had the highest scoring offense of all time (along with, arguably, the greatest player ever) and the best defense they've ever had.

Garrett Gilbert will be loooooong gone before this happens. Better hope Texas keeps up their awesome recruiting efforts.

how is USC hesitant when they are the ones trying to schedule it?

Ghazi

10-16-2009, 06:51 PM

Big 12 fans calling the Pac 10 a shitty conference are hilarious. The Pac 10 is better than the Big 12 this year.

TFloss32

10-16-2009, 10:59 PM

how is USC hesitant when they are the ones trying to schedule it?

JGW, it doesn't say that USC is knocking down Texas' door to play them. It says that they're merely an option while looking for a "marquee BSC opponent." Even if they genuinely wanted to schedule Texas, it doesn't mean that they still wouldn't be hesitant to do so. Plus, Texas already has a home-and-home with Cal and UCLA. It would have to be after 2016.

Big 12 fans calling the Pac 10 a shitty conference are hilarious. The Pac 10 is better than the Big 12 this year.

Doubtful. The Pac-10 is pretty weak after Oregon and USC. Even with all of the key players the Big XII is missing due to injuries (especially the good teams), it's a toss up. It's too early to say who's the real deal anyway.

Spursfan092120

10-17-2009, 09:49 AM

we gave it to t.u...the game could have easily been over long before the 4th. and should have.
Yeah..I'm sure Reggie, Matt, and LenDale all sat back on the sidelines, huddled up and said "You know what guys..we've won a couple championships already..let's give this one to Texas..they've earned it." Fuck that...we took the ball down the field and punched them in the face, and punched it into the endzone. Vince owned them on that drive like he had owned them the rest of the game. If you think Texas didn't take that game, you must have completely forgotten about it.

Thunder Dan

10-17-2009, 11:37 AM

Nathan Explosion

10-17-2009, 01:35 PM

nobody beats Ohio State' OOC matchups

2010/11 Miami (FLA)
2012/13 Cal
2013/14 Virginia Tech
2015/16 Oklahoma
2017/18 Tennessee

not to mention Texas and USC the past couple years. Now that is how you schedule OOC games.

Except that they were 1-4 playing against Texas and USC in those regular season games. If you can't the Bowl game, that's 1-5. I can't remember if USC and Ohio State played a bowl game so it could be worse.

Arkansas dropped out of the matchup, hence the Wyoming game. But if you want to pin that on UT, go ahead.

johngateswhiteley

10-18-2009, 04:41 PM

Spursfan092120

10-18-2009, 04:46 PM

Arkansas dropped out of the matchup, hence the Wyoming game. But if you want to pin that on UT, go ahead.
yeah..I forgot about that...