PDA

View Full Version : Spurs Waive Jerrells



spursdotcom
10-22-2009, 02:56 PM
http://www.nba.com/spurs/news/spurs_waive_curtis_jerrells_091022.html

Mel_13
10-22-2009, 02:56 PM
And then there were 16.

ElNono
10-22-2009, 02:57 PM
Well, had to happen sooner than later... good luck to him...

Shifty
10-22-2009, 02:57 PM
I was about to post but I refreshed the forum and saw this.

Good luck Curtis. Toros maybe?

Mel_13
10-22-2009, 02:58 PM
Nice that they let him play in front of the hometown crowd on Tuesday. Hope to see him on the Toros.

CGD
10-22-2009, 02:58 PM
Good luck Curtis

portnoy1
10-22-2009, 02:58 PM
hopefully hairston will prevail. I like his game and the improvements he has made over the year. The best thing of all is i like his athleticism and age, considering the spurs love for VETS.

Spurs Brazil
10-22-2009, 03:00 PM
Good luck

I hope he'll end with the Toros

CGD
10-22-2009, 03:02 PM
Looks like a lot of teams cut players today. Should be a great shopping opportunity for the Toros...

superbigtime
10-22-2009, 03:23 PM
Damn! And he was so close too. What a shame. :rolleyes

benefactor
10-22-2009, 03:23 PM
Good luck

I hope he'll end with the Toros
:tu

portnoy1
10-22-2009, 03:27 PM
He was alright. But hairston I think is the one the spurs want. Especially since he worked on his game and is playing well. Williams has been alright, but Hairston is more consistent.

SpursNextRomanEmpire
10-22-2009, 03:35 PM
hairston is the one

Bruno
10-22-2009, 03:39 PM
I find interesting that Spurs haven't waived Williams even if he hasn't had a good preseason and got a DNP-CD Tuesday.

Unlike other training camp invite, he has signed with Spurs last year which mean they could trade him right now. So maybe Spurs are keeping just in case a trade pop up later this week.

barbacoataco
10-22-2009, 03:46 PM
I find interesting that Spurs haven't waived Williams even if he hasn't had a good preseason and got a DNP-CD Tuesday.

Unlike other training camp invite, he has signed with Spurs last year which mean they could trade him right now. So maybe Spurs are keeping just in case a trade pop up later this week.

Yeah it almost seems like they've made up their mind with Williams, after not playing him Tuesday. For all we know maybe he is the front runner ahead of Hairston. He is more versatile and he's been in the Spurs system longer.

Solid D
10-22-2009, 04:00 PM
Man, hotel rooms in Bloomington, Indiana must be expensive this time of year.

thispego
10-22-2009, 04:03 PM
Williams is tall as shit in person also

angelbelow
10-22-2009, 04:17 PM
gl to Jerrells.

SenorSpur
10-22-2009, 04:20 PM
Now the real drama unfolds.....

AussieFanKurt
10-22-2009, 04:35 PM
saw this coming
now keep hairston

lurker23
10-22-2009, 04:37 PM
Man, hotel rooms in Bloomington, Indiana must be expensive this time of year.

:lol


Good luck to Jerrells. Hopefully he'll be running point in Austin.

galvatron3000
10-22-2009, 04:38 PM
trading Bonner and Hairston for someone in the East, may include Ian. Keeping Williams and bringing in someone from the East.


Nah, just rambling.

portnoy1
10-22-2009, 04:43 PM
Bonner, Bogans,Ian, Finley yeah hairston i wouldnt wanna trade cause of his athleticism and age. He also has the ability to improve his game unlike Finley/Bonner/Bogans and Ian is lazy.

crc21209
10-22-2009, 04:45 PM
Well Jerrells is down, now Williams is next. He's gotta be. The Spurs could really use Hairston...

ooshmay
10-22-2009, 04:46 PM
hopefully hairston will prevail. I like his game and the improvements he has made over the year. The best thing of all is i like his athleticism and age, considering the spurs love for VETS.

didnt hairston get waived aswell?

TheProfessor
10-22-2009, 05:05 PM
Good kid, worked hard and played D. Hope to see him in Austin soon.

Solid D
10-22-2009, 05:13 PM
Good kid, worked hard and played D. Hope to see him in Austin soon.

I agree. In Austin Tuesday night, Curtis played very good D in his few minutes on the court. He created a steal and he stayed in front of his man with good aggression.

Spurs Brazil
10-22-2009, 05:19 PM
Spurs cut Jerrells; down to 16 players
By Mike Monroe on Oct 22, 09 03:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) Save & Share Yahoo! BuzzYahoo! Newsvine del.icio.us Facebook Google Reddit Fark
The Spurs trimmed their roster to 16 players after Thursday's practice, waiving guard Curtis Jerrells, the former Baylor University and Austin Del Valle High School star.

Jerrells appeared in five of the Spurs' six preseason games, averaging 3.6 points and 1.8 assists in 14.8 minutes. His downfall in a long-shot attempt to make the roster: 7 for 25 (28.0 percent) shooting. He was 0 for 4 from 3-point range.

Small consolation: Jerrells got to log some solid minutes in front of friends and family at University of Texas' Erwin Center in a Spurs victory over the Thunder on Tuesday night before the Spurs cut him.

Malik Hairston and Marcus Williams are the lone remaining Spurs who do not have fully guaranteed contracts. The Spurs are allowed to keep as many as 15 players. They must be down to 15 by Monday.

http://blogs.mysanantonio.com/weblogs/courtside/2009/10/spurs-cut-jerre.html

ceperez
10-22-2009, 05:37 PM
Yeah it almost seems like they've made up their mind with Williams, after not playing him Tuesday. For all we know maybe he is the front runner ahead of Hairston. He is more versatile and he's been in the Spurs system longer.

Mahinmi also didn't play. The Spurs are likely to keep Mahinmi.

Williams also didn't play. Therefore, they likely will also keep Williams!!

lennyalderette
10-22-2009, 05:50 PM
williams cant stay, i mean hes alright but considering the teaching thats already taken place, and how many projects we have, i would be shocked if the spurs kepthim

bigdog
10-22-2009, 06:39 PM
didnt hairston get waived aswell?

No. I don't know where you people are hearing this. You're the 2nd person I've seen on here that says Hairson is gone.

completely deck
10-22-2009, 07:16 PM
Mahinmi next! :downspin:

SpurNation
10-22-2009, 07:17 PM
So the Spurs go into the season with just 2 viable PG's.

The only thing I have to question about the offseason is the fact they could have had a player like Ramon Sessions for the same money they are guaranteeing to other players that won't see a minute of action in a position that is overloaded.

Parker and Hill as your only viable PG's could spell trouble if any one and heaven forbid both should get injured.

Mel_13
10-22-2009, 07:18 PM
So the Spurs go into the season with just 2 viable PG's.

The only thing I have to question about the offseason is the fact they could have had a player like Ramon Sessions for the same money they are guaranteeing to other players that won't see a minute of action in a position that is overloaded.

Parker and Hill as your only viable PG's could spell trouble if any one and heaven forbid both should get injured.

Sessions or McDyess? Can't have both.

mexpurs21
10-22-2009, 07:25 PM
So the Spurs go into the season with just 2 viable PG's.

The only thing I have to question about the offseason is the fact they could have had a player like Ramon Sessions for the same money they are guaranteeing to other players that won't see a minute of action in a position that is overloaded.

Parker and Hill as your only viable PG's could spell trouble if any one and heaven forbid both should get injured.

But if Parker or Hill get injured (hope not), there are still plenty of good PGs in the free agent pool

Like Stephon Marbury (just kidding...ignore my comment)

SpurNation
10-22-2009, 07:26 PM
Sessions or McDyess? Can't have both.

Yes they could have. From my understanding...Session's did not have Byrd rights.

lurker23
10-22-2009, 07:32 PM
Yes they could have. From my understanding...Session's did not have Byrd rights.

?

1. Whether or not Sessions had Bird rights or not has zero to do with what the Spurs can offer him.
2. Sessions was a restricted free agent. No matter what the Spurs offered him, the Bucks could have matched it.
3. Sessions ended up getting a contract from the Timberwolves starting at $3.6 million. McDyess signed for $4.5 million. 3.6 + 4.5 = 8.1, which is far more than the MLE that the Spurs had to spend.

HarlemHeat37
10-22-2009, 08:21 PM
Jerrells actually has some potential, I wouldn't mind him in Austin at all..

timtonymanu
10-22-2009, 08:42 PM
I like Jerrells but he shouldnt be on the team.

Hope he goes to the Toros. They could use him.

Riverwalkman
10-22-2009, 08:53 PM
I think we've got enough roster depth, but if Spurs want to trade Williams, they should make a package of Williams and someone, maybe Ian or Bonner, both can be expired contract.

HarlemHeat37
10-22-2009, 08:59 PM
I wouldn't even think about dumping Bonner for nothing..if we're going to dump players to save some $, Williams/Haislip would be fine with me, but I'm not a salary cap guy, so I don't know how much we'd save..

CGD
10-22-2009, 10:07 PM
I find interesting that Spurs haven't waived Williams even if he hasn't had a good preseason and got a DNP-CD Tuesday.

Unlike other training camp invite, he has signed with Spurs last year which mean they could trade him right now. So maybe Spurs are keeping just in case a trade pop up later this week.

Or the Spurs just need bodies for scrimmaging purposes.

DMX7
10-22-2009, 11:08 PM
THey're both getting cut.

Solid D
10-23-2009, 12:14 AM
THey're both getting cut.

That may happen but I believe that jettisoning Hairston, who has outperformed Bogans, Haislip and even Mason in pre-season, would be a slap to the face of their own company-owned development system (Toros). They need to win now, but sending Hairston away sends a message to their students and teacher Quinn Snyder, especially if they don't pick up Mahinmi's option. We like you, we own you, but we're just not that into you.

HarlemHeat37
10-23-2009, 12:27 AM
Great point..as some of us mentioned a few weeks ago, keeping Hairston is not only a good move from a production standpoint, but it also promotes the success of the Toros and the D-league in general, especially when it's a guy of Hairston's work ethic..

Solid D
10-23-2009, 12:36 AM
Stats-wise, Hairston has actually outperformed Ginobili in fewer minutes/game.

will_spurs
10-23-2009, 01:29 AM
He plays solid enough defense that he'll pick up. The sad part was that I went to the Spurs game in Austin Tuesday and I saw his parents and brother. All of them had Spurs jerseys number 5, Jerrells.

What is sad about that? They'll keep the jerseys and be proud of it some years from now.

ceperez
10-23-2009, 05:54 AM
So the Spurs go into the season with just 2 viable PG's.


Did you miss the Ginobili interview?

He was alluding to the fact that after Parker and Hill, we have Mason.

MaNu4Tres
10-23-2009, 06:00 AM
The waiving of Jerrells is not worth two pages. IMO He'll be in Austin.

K-State Spur
10-23-2009, 07:20 AM
Yes they could have. From my understanding...Session's did not have Byrd rights.

Sessions likes macaroni and cheese.

That is just as relevant as his bird rights to whether or not we could have fit him and mcdyess into this summer together. There simply was not enough money available to spend.

DaBears
10-23-2009, 09:39 AM
I think that most of us knew that the young kid was not going to make it... But at least he got a chance of a life time to play for a professional sports team. Who knows maybe we will see him again down the line somewhere.

PUPPETMASTER
10-23-2009, 06:32 PM
good idea, spurs