PDA

View Full Version : I never want to hear Whorn fans bitch about SEC refs.



Ignignokt
10-31-2009, 09:06 PM
LoL stretch, man who took his handle name from his mom's stripper nickname.

Spursfan092120
10-31-2009, 09:18 PM
Curious as to why you would say the refs are bad...

Spursfan092120
10-31-2009, 09:38 PM
This game is not about bad refereeing...you wanna say they should have reviewed that fumble? That's fine...we got the fucking ball back after the fumble, and picked it up past the first down marker...so we would have had the first down, instead of 2nd and 2. And you want to call the other fumble a fumble? Bullshit..the whistle had blown the play dead and he was already being brought backwards..it's called forward progress...wake up.

Cant_Be_Faded
10-31-2009, 09:58 PM
I agree with gtownspur. One thing CBF is not is a homer. Well, a Duncan homer, but nothing else.

That non-review on the Kirkendoll fumble was total bull shit. It was a clear obvious fumble that they did not review. Gundy even called a timeout and no review was made. It was bogus, and that is the reason lesser big12 teams talk shit about UT constantly. I really wish that had not happened. But oh well. I do acknowledge the bull shit though.

Spursfan092120
10-31-2009, 10:00 PM
I agree with gtownspur. One thing CBF is not is a homer. Well, a Duncan homer, but nothing else.

That non-review on the Kirkendoll fumble was total bull shit. It was a clear obvious fumble that they did not review. Gundy even called a timeout and no review was made. It was bogus, and that is the reason lesser big12 teams talk shit about UT constantly. I really wish that had not happened. But oh well. I do acknowledge the bull shit though.
I'm not sure which one was the Kirkendoll fumble..I remember two controversial ones..one was the one where he just took it away from the guy, and that one was blown dead before it happened..I remember hearing the whistle. The other one, we got the ball back anyway, so it wouldn't have mattered.

symple19
10-31-2009, 10:14 PM
Irrelevant in a beatdown, although I didn't see the play

You can borrow some SEC officials next week if you'd like

And other teams in the big 12 talk shit about UT cuz they're jealous, and lesser

Spursfan092120
10-31-2009, 10:20 PM
Irrelevant in a beatdown, although I didn't see the play

You can borrow some SEC officials next week if you'd like

And other teams in the big 12 talk shit about UT cuz they're jealous, and lesser
There was two fumbles...neither was reviewed...one of them wouldn't have mattered because Texas got the ball back anyway, and actually got two yards out of the fumble. The other one, about 5 Cowboys had him wrapped up, and forward progress had been called, and was being pushed back. The whistle had been blown, and then he fumbled.

Cant_Be_Faded
10-31-2009, 10:20 PM
I'm not sure which one was the Kirkendoll fumble..I remember two controversial ones..one was the one where he just took it away from the guy, and that one was blown dead before it happened..I remember hearing the whistle. The other one, we got the ball back anyway, so it wouldn't have mattered.

The goodwin review was not a fumble.

The Kirk one was sometime in the 3rd Q. We were close to the OSU endzone and we passed it short ball to Kirk, he struggled, was being tackled by two people, would not go down, then a third came in, the ball popped out, and he went down. There was no review, the announcers were like whawhawhaaaattt, then gundy calls a timeout, still no review, then we go downfield and end up scoring a TD that drive.

It was BS, i fully admit it.

Spursfan092120
10-31-2009, 10:26 PM
The goodwin review was not a fumble.

The Kirk one was sometime in the 3rd Q. We were close to the OSU endzone and we passed it short ball to Kirk, he struggled, was being tackled by two people, would not go down, then a third came in, the ball popped out, and he went down. There was no review, the announcers were like whawhawhaaaattt, then gundy calls a timeout, still no review, then we go downfield and end up scoring a TD that drive.

It was BS, i fully admit it.
No..that's the one I'm talking about...the ball was blown dead. Whistle was blown because of forward progress...that's why it wasn't reviewed.

Kermit
10-31-2009, 10:36 PM
Forward progress wasn't called until after the fumble occured. That shit was shady. It should've been reviewed.

Spursfan092120
10-31-2009, 10:45 PM
Forward progress wasn't called until after the fumble occured. That shit was shady. It should've been reviewed.
I disagree...I heard a whistle blow...could be wrong, but I'm standing by that..

Cant_Be_Faded
10-31-2009, 11:08 PM
Naw holmes I could be wrong too but i specifically remember the whistle and ref jumping in after the ball had popped out.

Haven't looked at it again, it's DVR'd so I will give it a look again.

But I remember freaking out because that fumble would have been H U G E.

Spursfan092120
10-31-2009, 11:13 PM
Naw holmes I could be wrong too but i specifically remember the whistle and ref jumping in after the ball had popped out.

Haven't looked at it again, it's DVR'd so I will give it a look again.

But I remember freaking out because that fumble would have been H U G E.
yeah..like I said, I could have been wrong...but I know for sure forward progress had been stopped, so if the refs hadn't blown the whistle, they should have.

leemajors
10-31-2009, 11:39 PM
conference officials really shouldn't exist.

samikeyp
10-31-2009, 11:44 PM
conference officials really shouldn't exist.

This.

If the NCAA had full time refs under their employ instead of having the conferences handle it....things would be better.

monosylab1k
11-01-2009, 11:35 AM
A couple bad calls that goes Texas' way in a blowout win doesn't even compare to the nonstop bad calls that go Florida's way in close games.

monosylab1k
11-01-2009, 11:39 AM
Oklahoma State got a mild prostate exam of a raping.

Meanwhile, Arkansas got raped by the dildo from Seven.

no comparison between the two.

Spursfan092120
11-01-2009, 03:47 PM
Oklahoma State got a mild prostate exam of a raping.

Meanwhile, Arkansas got raped by the dildo from Seven.

no comparison between the two.
your metaphors are phenomenal..

:lmao

stretch
11-01-2009, 04:01 PM
yeah it was a fumble

oh well. 1 call. like mono said, doesnt compare to the multiple weekly calls that florida gets

The Reckoning
11-01-2009, 04:36 PM
we take what we can get.

Ignignokt
11-01-2009, 05:27 PM
A couple bad calls that goes Texas' way in a blowout win doesn't even compare to the nonstop bad calls that go Florida's way in close games.

What?

That's idiotic.. if i remember correctly. THat fumble would have set up OKie st. for a touchdown inside the 20, with only two scores to make up. Plus Okie st needed that momentum because they had more yds, and T.O.P than UT.

THat play was a momentum killer and would have given okie st a great chance to pull the upset.

Ignignokt
11-01-2009, 05:34 PM
yeah it was a fumble

oh well. 1 call. like mono said, doesnt compare to the multiple weekly calls that florida gets

OU/UT/TCU/SMU/UNT/Rangers/Cowboys/Stars/Michael Phelps/Dallas Burn/Mavs/Whatever it doesn't matter. Dickless Mavfan will always have some team to root for whenever he's with his New Era single color baseball cap wearing scrote posse at the local Buffalo Wild Wings.

With so many mediocre teams to follow.. when it comes to sports, Mavfan is the jack of all trades and master of none.

Whisky Dog
11-01-2009, 05:56 PM
To me there were two horrible calls that went against okie st and none that I can think if that went against Texas. The 15 yrd unneccesary roughness call where the db threw his shoulder and not his head on Buckner I believe was bs. Looked like a clean hit. The 2nd was the fumble everyone here was already talking about - maybe it should have been blown dead but it wasn't and it was borderline whether it should be anyway. In a 41-14 raping though it might make the margins closer but Texas D owned Robinson and were way in his head. Doubt he has enough to get pts even with those two calls. Oh well, I'll take it.

monosylab1k
11-01-2009, 06:38 PM
THat fumble would have set up OKie st. for a touchdown inside the 20

So you're telling me the way Zac Robinson was playing that he would have definitely scored a TD there? Your assumption shows you're more retarded than any of the refs out there that night.

Spursfan092120
11-01-2009, 07:16 PM
What?

That's idiotic.. if i remember correctly. THat fumble would have set up OKie st. for a touchdown inside the 20, with only two scores to make up. Plus Okie st needed that momentum because they had more yds, and T.O.P than UT.

THat play was a momentum killer and would have given okie st a great chance to pull the upset.
You remember incorrectly..it was close to the end of the first half...it was not inside the 20, but yes..it was two scores to make up. They did not have more yards at that time, Texas did, because Texas started the drive and the yards were exactly even. And it still didn't matter, because whether or not the whistle was blown, forward progress had stopped. So if they did call it a fumble, Texas would have been screwed over by the referees because they didn't blow the whistle. And if you really think Oklahoma State was winning that game, after what happened to UT last year against Tech on that same night...wow...just wow. Texas' D was in Zac's head from the beginning of that game.

Spursfan092120
11-01-2009, 07:17 PM
So you're telling me the way Zac Robinson was playing that he would have definitely scored a TD there? Your assumption shows you're more retarded than any of the refs out there that night.
this....all those interceptions shows that Texas' D was definitely getting to Zac...

Ignignokt
11-01-2009, 09:18 PM
So you're telling me the way Zac Robinson was playing that he would have definitely scored a TD there? Your assumption shows you're more retarded than any of the refs out there that night.

I suppose when your inside the 20, you could just hand it out to the runningback or throw to a TE to get some yards. OK st did score a touchdown off a run inside the 20, whose to say they wouldn't that time.

I mean assuming that only quarterbacks can score td's is full on boo radley/simple jack w/ fajita and blue cheese crumbles Chilli's bimbo hostess retarded, cuz that's basically what you just said.

The Reckoning
11-01-2009, 09:30 PM
if big 12 refs werent so horrible, colorado would be first in the conference

monosylab1k
11-01-2009, 09:34 PM
OK st did score a touchdown off a run inside the 20, whose to say they wouldn't that time.

Who's to say they would?

not to be the grammar police, but gtown has been almost ducks-like in this thread.

monosylab1k
11-01-2009, 09:37 PM
Again, considering they got curbstomped for 55 of the 60 minutes of the game, why would two blown calls change anything besides the degree of curbstompage?

If this was a tight game all the way through (i.e. Arkansas-Florida) and two bad calls screwed over Okie State, that's another story. This wasn't it at all.

Of course an illiterate Buffaloes fan would try this bullshit.

chode_regulator
11-01-2009, 10:04 PM
if big 12 refs werent so horrible, colorado would be first in the conference
:lmao

Again, considering they got curbstomped for 55 of the 60 minutes of the game, why would two blown calls change anything besides the degree of curbstompage?

If this was a tight game all the way through (i.e. Arkansas-Florida) and two bad calls screwed over Okie State, that's another story. This wasn't it at all.

Of course an illiterate Buffaloes fan would try this bullshit.

Agree. That second fumble was definitely iffy at best. I actually felt kinda weird afterwards and thought to myself, 'so that's what it's like when calls go your way'. They say forward progress had been ruled so whatever, I highly doubt it would have changed the outcome but no one will ever know.
I was more mad bc those idiot announcers kept bringing up the goodwin fumble, I mean holy shit were the not watchign that we recovered the ball anyway. I don't think forward progress counts on fumble recovery's in college but either way we would have kept it so it didnt matter if it had been reviewed. After pondering the second fumble, I came to the conclusin that I like it better when my team doesnt get calls.

And to the OP, have you watched ANY SEC games this year? There is no way any of those calls yesterday compare to any of the bullshit calls that ahve been going on over there. I mean shit they suspended a WHOLE crew for 2 weeks I think it is. Plus several coaches are borderline suspension etc.
Plus UF won CLOSE games, not blowouts, due to those bullshit calls.

Really there couldnt be a more blatant example of apples to oranges. Maybe if CU coach wasnt a douch and hadnt been playing his son for the last 4 years they wouldnt suck so bad.

Ignignokt
11-01-2009, 11:30 PM
Again, considering they got curbstomped for 55 of the 60 minutes of the game, why would two blown calls change anything besides the degree of curbstompage?

If this was a tight game all the way through (i.e. Arkansas-Florida) and two bad calls screwed over Okie State, that's another story. This wasn't it at all.

Of course an illiterate Buffaloes fan would try this bullshit.


:lol, botched grammar does not equate to illiteracy. Nice for you to bring out the grammar smack.

And for once, if you would have actually watched the game, UT had a td off a B gideon fumble recovery. that's one td off of 24 pts, and Okie state was robbed of a fumble which at that point it could have been 24-14. That wouldn't have been a curbstomping.. UT then got all the momentum with that shady call and made a score on that drive deflating the momentum out of the Okies.

That was no curbstomping then.. that fumble could would have had them back in the game.. and at that point UT and Okie had the same ydg in the game.

Again, you weren't watching the game, you were too busy being DFW sports douche and probably watching the highlights instead of the actual game.

Ignignokt
11-01-2009, 11:31 PM
Michigan! LOL!

Colorado has the play of the 90's on those twats.

monosylab1k
11-02-2009, 12:14 AM
Michigan! LOL!

Colorado has the play of the 90's on those twats.

Michigan! LOL!

I haven't laughed that hard since I got to chode bload 4cc when Michigan beat Notre Dame!

monosylab1k
11-02-2009, 12:14 AM
Because I'm such a huge Michigan fan, and he roots for Notre Dame! It's true!

J.T.
11-02-2009, 04:10 AM
mono only reps michigan because of tom brady

move along folks, nothing to see here

pkbpkb81
11-02-2009, 11:34 AM
wow even when all other Texas fans are admitting that they got over on that one play 90210 won't let it go


what a jack off

monosylab1k
11-02-2009, 11:36 AM
I only rep Michigan as a gag. Everyone who's been in the college forum knows that I only root for the school that fathered our Lord & Savior, Devin Harris.

Kermit
11-02-2009, 02:32 PM
wow even when all other Texas fans are admitting that they got over on that one play 90210 won't let it go


what a jack off

Ohnoyoudidn't.

Spursfan092120
11-02-2009, 03:52 PM
wow even when all other Texas fans are admitting that they got over on that one play 90210 won't let it go


what a jack off
watch the play..and seriously...learn some more words besides jack off. It's blatantly obvious forward progress was stopped and he was being pushed backwards when the ball came out. Refs didn't blow the whistle, but they realized they should have and that's why the play wasn't reviewed...because it was forward progress...

Kermit
11-02-2009, 04:12 PM
Refs didn't blow the whistle, but they realized they should have

You defending it is making it worse.

Holmes_Fans
11-02-2009, 07:07 PM
Forward progress was called. FP is a judgment call. Can't be reviewed

/thread

Spursfan092120
11-02-2009, 07:11 PM
Forward progress was called. FP is a judgment call. Can't be reviewed

/thread
that's all I've been trying to say.