PDA

View Full Version : lol usc



Trainwreck2100
11-14-2009, 04:35 PM
stanford just scored on them and USC had 14 guys on the field

DMX7
11-14-2009, 05:13 PM
I didn't see this coming. Freshman QB is a disaster waiting to happen almost all the time.

chode_regulator
11-14-2009, 06:28 PM
Lol another pick. Cue USC homers talking about how tough the PAC 10 is.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
11-14-2009, 06:42 PM
Makes it easier for UA.

dirk4mvp
11-14-2009, 06:57 PM
lol usc

DUNCANownsKOBE2
11-14-2009, 07:00 PM
lol university of sissy cuckolds

samikeyp
11-14-2009, 07:19 PM
Half a hundred on USC at their place? wow.

Kyle Orton
11-14-2009, 07:25 PM
I bet if they had the Tings it wouldn't have happened!!

Ghazi
11-14-2009, 07:26 PM
USC has been so good for so long , they were due for a rebuilding year..

But damn... 20-47 and 21-55 in a 3 week span? Weird...

symple19
11-14-2009, 07:31 PM
That Stanford RB is something else. I'd put him top 3 in heisman voting right now. Gerhard shredded the Trojan D. Haven't seen a white dude carry the rock like that in a long time. Stanford had over 300 yards rushing total, WOW

LOL texans
11-14-2009, 07:38 PM
lol USC

lol JGW, bandwagoning fuck

lol a&m

chode_regulator
11-14-2009, 08:37 PM
That Stanford RB is something else. I'd put him top 3 in heisman voting right now. Gerhard shredded the Trojan D. Haven't seen a white dude carry the rock like that in a long time. Stanford had over 300 yards rushing total, WOW

Didn't Oregon put up over 300 yds also? Crazy how far they've dropped this year

symple19
11-14-2009, 08:43 PM
Didn't Oregon put up over 300 yds also? Crazy how far they've dropped this year

Pretty sure you're right, but Stanford did it @USC

I guess them having this kind of year was inevitable. Still very surprising to see.

All those guys they lost to the pros at the LB position is really hurting them. Lot's of guys running free into the secondary

IronMexican
11-14-2009, 09:25 PM
USC is bad this year. Oh well.

IronMexican
11-14-2009, 09:28 PM
Pretty bad to lose like that at the Coliseum, though.

redraiderinfiji
11-14-2009, 09:28 PM
where is jgw?

symple19
11-14-2009, 09:46 PM
USC is bad this year. Oh well.

Wouldn't call them bad, just not what we're used to seeing.

Vinnie_Johnson
11-14-2009, 09:52 PM
usc lmao/////////

Cant_Be_Faded
11-14-2009, 10:18 PM
Freshman QB??? I was unaware that having a freshman QB makes your defense give up 50 points to Oregon, and 50 points to Stanford :rollin

So Oregon puts 50 on USC
Stanford (ROFL!) puts 50 on Oregon
Stanford puts 50 on USC

Stanford the best team in the pac10?

(R O F L)
ROFL!!!
stanford


hahahahahahaha pac 10 is a bigger joke than the worst 3 teams in the big 12 north.

Cant_Be_Faded
11-14-2009, 10:19 PM
stanford!!!!!

DMX7
11-14-2009, 11:23 PM
PAC-10 Blows. This conference really sucks this year. LOL Boise State.

j-6
11-14-2009, 11:34 PM
That Stanford RB is something else. I'd put him top 3 in heisman voting right now. Gerhard shredded the Trojan D. Haven't seen a white dude carry the rock like that in a long time. Stanford had over 300 yards rushing total, WOW

That Gerhart (sp?) guy is a clear example of why I watch college football. He's going to be a folk hero at Stanford - with two years of NFL service - and a top ranked surgeon curing AIDS or something.

The bowl game fellation might not be too bad itself.

redraiderinfiji
11-14-2009, 11:46 PM
yeah he's white....dont see too much of his kind. He's a bruiser, and quite a stout rb too. He runs with force. Def. should be in the Heisman arena.

chode_regulator
11-15-2009, 01:07 AM
Pretty bad to lose like that at the Coliseum, though.
Yeah that sucks pretty hardcore man. It really is almost unbelievable for them to go down so bad.


Wouldn't call them bad, just not what we're used to seeing.

There's an understatemnt. Whatever happened to how everyone says no matter what USC has a tough defense. Apparently not.
I would call it pretty bad when not once but twice they've given up 50 pts and not once but twice they've given up 300+ yds rushing. That is a staggering stat in and of itself.


btw speaking of heisman, I think BSU is as overrated as the next guy does, but they flashed their qb's numbers today on one of the shows. The dude has like 31 td's to 3 picks. Should he be in the running?

tlongII
11-15-2009, 10:13 AM
The Pac-10 is by far the best conference in the country and this is just further proof of that. Wait until Bowl season and you'll see.

IronMexican
11-15-2009, 11:01 AM
Wouldn't call them bad, just not what we're used to seeing.

Yeah, but people are acting like this is a 500. season for SC or something. This should weed out all the fair weather fans, though.

mookie2001
11-15-2009, 01:04 PM
USCs still the most talented team in the nation, they just have so much talent, the most talented team in the nation. Theyre really a pro team, they dont rebuild, they reload

mookie2001
11-15-2009, 01:07 PM
now theyre going to drop to #10

TFloss32
11-15-2009, 07:49 PM
now theyre going to drop to #10

:lmao The BCS is changing their formula as we speak.

I never thought I'd see the day where USC fans boo the opposing team for running up the score.

In all seriousness though, these guys will be fine. They've got seven guys coming back on both sides of the ball.

Cant_Be_Faded
11-15-2009, 07:51 PM
stanford

johngateswhiteley
11-15-2009, 07:57 PM
well...that was unexpected. im actually not shocked. USC is missing a ton of people (injuries) and struggling on both sides of the ball. i'd be happy with winning out...but that will be tough.

Stanford looks like the real deal; two huge wins in a row and all kinds of momentum. won't be surprised if they win the pac-10, course oregon would have to stumble (not out of the question with oregon state). tough year for my boys no doubt...

johngateswhiteley
11-15-2009, 07:58 PM
stanford

yeah, they beat oregon.