View Full Version : Parker must go
SequSpur
11-18-2009, 09:21 PM
Trade his ass and his national team loyalty... I'm done with him.
:bang
Sausage
11-18-2009, 09:22 PM
Change the avatar then brah.
TIMMYD!
11-18-2009, 09:22 PM
Change the avatar then brah.
:lol:lol:lol
NuGGeTs-FaN
11-18-2009, 09:23 PM
Lawson for Parker? :smokin ........... nah i wouldn't do it :lol Parker can't be a bench player.
NuGGeTs-FaN
11-18-2009, 09:23 PM
oh, of course i am disregarding salaries :lol
djohn2oo8
11-18-2009, 09:23 PM
Brian Cook for Parker
lmao
djohn2oo8
11-18-2009, 09:24 PM
oh, of course i am disregarding salaries :lol
me 2:lol
Chieflion
11-18-2009, 09:25 PM
Brian Cook for Parker
lmao
We will take Cook if Hayes and Brooks are added. If you add Battier, maybe we will give you a 1st round pick.
Riverwalkman
11-18-2009, 09:25 PM
Lawson for Parker? :smokin ........... nah i wouldn't do it :lol Parker can't be a bench player.
Chauncey Billups and Nene for Parker and Dice. It's a Deal.
peskypesky
11-18-2009, 09:31 PM
Parker for a Center.
Spursfan092120
11-18-2009, 09:32 PM
Parker for a Center.
yeah, cause we don't have enough bigs
Bartleby
11-18-2009, 09:33 PM
yeah, cause we don't have enough bigs
And too many point guards
yeah! another trade parker thread.
parker + hill for cp3
parker for rondo + sheed
parker for calderon + bargnani
parker for harris + lopez
Chieflion
11-18-2009, 09:57 PM
yeah! another trade parker thread.
parker + hill for cp3
parker for rondo + sheed
parker for calderon + bargnani
parker for harris + lopez
I would say yes to the 1st and the 4th one.
kbrury
11-18-2009, 10:01 PM
I would say yes to the 1st and the 4th one.
but they would say no
RedsLakers24
11-18-2009, 10:17 PM
Farmar + Walton for Parker
redzero
11-18-2009, 10:19 PM
Farmar + Walton for Parker
Knowing the Lakers, that probably could happen.
SpurmzKilla
11-18-2009, 10:33 PM
Trade his ass and his national team loyalty... I'm done with him.
:bang
HAHAHAHAHA
Spurm fans are so lame. Sterile Spurm.
Proof of the true NBA dynasty, only champions have loyal fans.
Laker Nation
Chieflion
11-18-2009, 10:51 PM
but they would say no
Exactly my point. None of these are going to happen so I really hope they would just stfu with all the trade threads.
portnoy1
11-19-2009, 12:39 AM
The spurs played D and thats all that mattered. I still think an Athletic Center would be good but theres no place to find one. Duncan missed that putback off the hill miss. If he would have mad that I think we would have on the game.
SequSpur
11-19-2009, 12:49 AM
Spurs need 2 7 footers.....
Administration missed the boat in the offseason.
jrmp317
11-19-2009, 12:49 AM
Brian Cook for Parker
lmao
great av
portnoy1
11-19-2009, 12:52 AM
Spurs need 2 7 footers.....
Administration missed the boat in the offseason.
I have to ask everyone here. I just curious. Why does everyone want Parker gone again? Im asking cause he didnt play tonight. Im interested to see what spurred on this new "trade parker" thread. And yes administration did miss the boat on a bigman.
RGMCSE
11-19-2009, 01:17 AM
First off I'm a life long spurs fan and I love our players. But as a fan of the Spurs it's about the team not the players. I love parker and what he can do but I honestly think that Hill can take the point from here on out. Hill is younger, better defensively and cheaper. So with that opinion I would not object to trading Parker. My opinion is not a knee jerk reaction to the loss tonight. It's something I've been thinking about for while and honestly if we want to see the greatest Spur of all time reach 5 ships then we are going to need help on our interior defense. Just my 2 cents.
Rob
portnoy1
11-19-2009, 01:36 AM
I would trade him to get 2 possible allstars or 1 allstar and 2 solid roleplayers. What the spurs need is a PG who can find people in their spots. Heres a funny question for ya. In 04' we passed on JKIDD cause TP was on the rise. NOW because of the talent we have I ask you, If you had JKIDD running the Point with GHILL would you go for it? especially considering we have RJ. This isnt a trade idea, just a question regarding switched scenarios and only for this season.
rayray2k8
11-19-2009, 01:36 AM
Pipe down little man.
smeagol
11-19-2009, 02:22 AM
Trade his ass and his national team loyalty... I'm done with him.
:bang
Parker's the best player in the NBA . . . that is what I heard you say once upon a time . . .
So much for YOUR loyaty :lol
Rynospursfan
11-19-2009, 04:39 AM
Go where? The HOF?
eisfeld
11-19-2009, 05:09 AM
yeah! another trade parker thread.
parker + hill for cp3
parker for rondo + sheed
parker for calderon + bargnani
parker for harris + lopez
#1 only gonna happen if cp3 demands a trade
#2 rondo can't compensate the lack of scoring the spurs would have if they trade paker
#3 calderon is a legit pg,bargnani a decent C/PF but not the material I would expect to get for a player like parker
#4 very intriguing, a younger parker like player + a future star center... I'd do it in a heartbeat but the Nets won't give up a parker-like player + a nice prospect for just parker.
Rynospursfan
11-19-2009, 05:10 AM
There is no way in hell the Spurs trade Tony this season.
Bukefal
11-19-2009, 05:30 AM
There we go again. Drama, drama, drama. Some people in here are just crazy when the spurs lose a game.
Chieflion
11-19-2009, 05:36 AM
There we go again. Drama, drama, drama. Some people in here are just crazy when the spurs lose a game.
Thread was posted before the game.
sendman
11-19-2009, 06:19 AM
Trade his ass and his national team loyalty... I'm done with him.
:bang
Somebody please use a tranquilizer gun.
sonic21
11-19-2009, 06:21 AM
no.
he's the perfect backup for Hill.
peskypesky
11-19-2009, 01:38 PM
There we go again. Drama, drama, drama. Some people in here are just crazy when the spurs lose a game.
a game?
portnoy1
11-19-2009, 02:29 PM
#1 only gonna happen if cp3 demands a trade
#2 rondo can't compensate the lack of scoring the spurs would have if they trade paker
#3 calderon is a legit pg,bargnani a decent C/PF but not the material I would expect to get for a player like parker
#4 very intriguing, a younger parker like player + a future star center... I'd do it in a heartbeat but the Nets won't give up a parker-like player + a nice prospect for just parker.
I like option 3.:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol
portnoy1
11-19-2009, 03:24 PM
yeah! another trade parker thread.
parker + hill for cp3
parker for rondo + sheed
parker for calderon + bargnani
parker for harris + lopez
Most of those options are kinda out there.
1 - wont happen cause everyone knows CP3 is better than TP. If their trying to get better, then trading their best player wont help them. Especially trading him to a contender???( i use that word loosely)
2 - Rondo is a better floor general then Parker and knows how to get the most out of the talent on the floor. He cant shoot, but he can break the defense down like Parker also Rebound, pass and defend better than Parker. Rondo is a possible allstar that is an important role player on his team. Plus he is perfect for that team; A team loaded with solid players, KG/The Truth/ALLEN/SHEED. Sheed? I would love to have him. Oh and how many solid Centers do you have that can block shots and shoot the 3?
3 - Calderon as well knows what to do with talented players on the floor. He can shoot better than Parker. His defense sucks tho, Is that a triano thing? Probably. Calderon cant break a defense down consistently, but he has no need to. He simply looks for guys in there spots, which is what the spurs need. Bargnani aka Ill Mago. He gives you solid outside shooting(3pt shots included) and a little bit of an inside game. He can move his feet well, but doesnt get enough rebounds. He is 7feet tall and can block shots which is a plus. His Defense, another product of Jay Triano's system? Possibly.
4 - wont happen. PERIOD
Basically it comes down to option 2 and 3. Would Calderon's defense improve before Rondo finds a consistent jumpshot? thats basically what separates the 2.
PG - Rondo/Hill
SG - Bogans/Manu
SF - RJ/Finley
PF - Duncan/Blair
C - Perkins / Mcdyess
or
PG - Calderon/Hill or vice versa
SG - Bogans/Manu
SF - RJ/Finley
PF - Bargnani/Blair
C - Duncan/Mcdyess
Which would yall prefer? Which would the spurs do if things got really rough, as in no gelling by January?Would the other team do it?
SpursWench21
11-19-2009, 04:15 PM
when parker catches on fire this season...you guys who are seriously entertaining the idea of trading him will look like f***ing idiots...and will jump on the bandwagon as usual
its november...
portnoy1
11-19-2009, 04:21 PM
when parker catches on fire this season...you guys who are seriously entertaining the idea of trading him will look like f***ing idiots...and will jump on the bandwagon as usual
its november...
I never jump on Parkers bandwagon. Its either one or the other. Trade Parker for a pass first PG and solid C. Or trade RJ for a cheaper SF and a solid C.
Chieflion
11-19-2009, 07:43 PM
when parker catches on fire this season...you guys who are seriously entertaining the idea of trading him will look like f***ing idiots...and will jump on the bandwagon as usual
its november...
I don't care if he catches fire. I would support him if he widens his tunnel vision. His eyes see only two things on the court. The hoop and Tim Duncan. Other times, he is just looking to be bailed out.
EmptyMan
11-19-2009, 07:54 PM
Parker delivers in the playoffs. He gets a free pass.
Manu...you are starting to lose your Rocky aura brother :( I used to think you were invincible :depressed
SequSpur
11-19-2009, 09:09 PM
Parker doesn't give a shit about the Spurs.
Lawson for Parker? :smokin ........... nah i wouldn't do it :lol Parker can't be a bench player.
I want that kid.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.