PDA

View Full Version : Saints win 33-30 in OT



BRHornet45
12-06-2009, 04:54 PM
sons wow ... what a crazy game. 12-0!

kamikazi_player
12-06-2009, 05:00 PM
Redskins choked, but lol saints running on 1st down and kicking a fg on 2nd down when they were at the Redskins 1/2 yard line.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-06-2009, 05:00 PM
Sons good win for the Saints, but Jonathan Vilma was extremely dumb on that interception, he had no reason to run out of bounds. Look forward to them stomping the Vikings in the playoffs.

Demure
12-06-2009, 05:03 PM
Washington should have won that game, he missed a 20 yard field goal which would have made it a two possession game with two minutes to go. Huge loss for the Redskins.

dirk4mvp
12-06-2009, 05:05 PM
Sons good win for the Saints, but Jonathan Vilma was extremely dumb on that interception, he had no reason to run out of bounds. Look forward to them stomping the Vikings in the playoffs.

The White Trash duo of Favre and Jared Allen is gonna style all over the Saints.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-06-2009, 05:10 PM
The White Trash duo of Favre and Jared Allen is gonna style all over the Saints.


The white trash duo of Favre and Allen has been beating up on crappy teams all year. Going into today, 6 of their 10 wins are against teams that are 4-7 or worse, their only two wins against teams 7-4 or better are the two wins against Green Bay, and they're only 7-4 cause of a soft NFC North schedule like Minnesota has.

Spursfan092120
12-06-2009, 05:11 PM
They pull it off against the Chokeskins...great game...

HarlemHeat37
12-06-2009, 05:20 PM
Redskins choked, but this is the 2nd game that the refs have handed to the Saints..

Spurs rock
12-06-2009, 05:27 PM
The white trash duo of Favre and Allen has been beating up on crappy teams all year. Going into today, 6 of their 10 wins are against teams that are 4-7 or worse, their only two wins against teams 7-4 or better are the two wins against Green Bay, and they're only 7-4 cause of a soft NFC North schedule like Minnesota has.

And who have the Saints beaten???

NFC North > NFC South

Warlord23
12-06-2009, 05:29 PM
Either way Saints vs Vikings seems to be unavoidable. Saints are Jekyll and Hyde though, and have the weaker D

kamikazi_player
12-06-2009, 05:29 PM
And who have the Saints beaten???

NFC North > NFC South
Patriots, seriously, people thought they were going to win. Add the Giants and Eagles to that list too.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-06-2009, 05:34 PM
And who have the Saints beaten???

NFC North > NFC South


The Patriots and the Eagles two teams way better than anything the Vikings have beaten.

You realize every team in the NFC North gets to play the Rams, Browns and Bucs right? It goes beyond how weak the Bears and Lions are, it's also how weak their outside of division schedule is.

SpursFanFirst
12-06-2009, 05:39 PM
Redskins choked, but this is the 2nd game that the refs have handed to the Saints..

How did the refs hand the game to the Saints?
I couldn't watch.

Spurs rock
12-06-2009, 05:41 PM
Patriots, seriously, people thought they were going to win. Add the Giants and Eagles to that list too.

Dolphins and Jets beat the Patriots too, so thats not a big accomplishment. Eagles didnt have Mcnabb. LOL Giants.

Ghazi
12-06-2009, 05:42 PM
The Patriots and the Eagles two teams way better than anything the Vikings have beaten.

You realize every team in the NFC North gets to play the Rams, Browns and Bucs right? It goes beyond how weak the Bears and Lions are, it's also how weak their outside of division schedule is.

Eagles without McNabb though

Vikes can't be faulted for their weak schedule... no reason not to believe they're a top 5 team in the NFL and a contender for the SuperBowl.

Vikes 2010 SB Champs.

Spurs rock
12-06-2009, 05:44 PM
The Patriots and the Eagles two teams way better than anything the Vikings have beaten.

You realize every team in the NFC North gets to play the Rams, Browns and Bucs right? It goes beyond how weak the Bears and Lions are, it's also how weak their outside of division schedule is.

Green Bay > Any team the Saints have beaten

Bucs? Only Green Bay played them. And the Saints play them twice so don't even talk.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-06-2009, 05:53 PM
Eagles without McNabb though


I'm sure McNabb would have prevented the Saints from scoring 48 points.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-06-2009, 05:56 PM
Green Bay > Any team the Saints have beaten


:lmao yeah, the Packers are better than the Patriots. Only one win over an above .500 team the entire season.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-06-2009, 06:02 PM
Vikes can't be faulted for their weak schedule... no reason not to believe they're a top 5 team in the NFL and a contender for the SuperBowl.


Yeah they're top 5 but still unproven.

kamikazi_player
12-06-2009, 06:05 PM
Ghazi, are you a Saints fan?

Spurs rock
12-06-2009, 06:10 PM
:lmao yeah, the Packers are better than the Patriots. Only one win over an above .500 team the entire season.

Patriots have only one win over an above .500 team also, so whats your point??

Spurs rock
12-06-2009, 06:11 PM
Yeah they're top 5 but still unproven.

Yeah like the Saints are proven.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-06-2009, 06:31 PM
Patriots have only one win over an above .500 team also, so whats your point??


You're right about New England, but regardless, I still don't understand how the Packers are better than the Patriots.

redzero
12-06-2009, 06:35 PM
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/596/thissucks.jpg

LakerHater
12-06-2009, 07:01 PM
hey relly need to fire the kicker, its 2 games he shoulda had!

J.T.
12-06-2009, 07:04 PM
Colts didn't need the lucky horseshoe this week so they let the Saints borrow it.

SpursFanFirst
12-06-2009, 07:05 PM
Colts didn't need the lucky horseshoe this week so they let the Saints borrow it.

According to Harlem, the refs handed the game to the Saints.
I'm still trying to figure out what happened.

Spurs rock
12-06-2009, 07:07 PM
You're right about New England, but regardless, I still don't understand how the Packers are better than the Patriots.

Well you can't really say that the Patriots are better than the Packers either.

J.T.
12-06-2009, 07:12 PM
According to Harlem, the refs handed the game to the Saints.
I'm still trying to figure out what happened.

No, the Redskins choked pretty badly. Even before the Sellers fumble, they missed a chip shot FG and had that whole INT-fumble bullshit before halftime.

SpursFanFirst
12-06-2009, 07:14 PM
No, the Redskins choked pretty badly. Even before the Sellers fumble, they missed a chip shot FG and had that whole INT-fumble bullshit before halftime.

I couldn't believe the Skins fell apart at the end like that.

J.T.
12-06-2009, 07:15 PM
BTW the Colts lucky horseshoe didn't necessarily give them good luck. Mainly it made their opponents do stupid shit like commit bad pass interference penalties, throw the ball to Colts DBs and in general just make shitty decisions or play badly. Things that come to mind... 4th and 2, Kris Brown wide left, Flacco to Brackett, Schaub doing his best crunch time Rosenfels imitation, etc.

So yeah, I'd say they lent it to the Saints today.

HarlemHeat37
12-06-2009, 07:38 PM
That INT-Fumble clearly went in the Saints favor, that was absolute bullshit..

SpursFanFirst
12-06-2009, 07:39 PM
That INT-Fumble clearly went in the Saints favor, that was absolute bullshit..

Ah. I didn't get to watch the game. I could only follow it through ESPN gamecast.

vander
12-06-2009, 07:59 PM
I can't think that the karmic unbalance created in this game will come back to haunt the Saints in the playoffs, which is too bad cause I really like Brees and If the Chargers don't win it all I hope he does.