Youtube-Beck: Felon created healthcare plan

[spursncowboys]

AvTk8XCf7IY

2:30- Explains a convicted felon at white house dinner.

3:30- Explains who Robert Creemer is and shows a clip of his wife (Dem from IL) and explains his liberal leadership positions and why he went to prison.

4:50- Talks about his book he wrote in prison.

5:40- Starts explaining Creemer's 10 point plan.

[ChumpDumper]

In other words, posted without comment.

[mookie2001]

beck is a pro talker right? i still never figured out what he does

[spursncowboys]

In other words, posted without comment.
How many of your 47,000+ are longer than a sentence, and worth a damn?
3,4?

[ChumpDumper]

How many of your 47,000+ are longer than a sentence, and worth a damn?
3,4?Still no comment from you on the video you posted.

[spursncowboys]

Still no comment from you on the video you posted.

Still trolling.

[ChumpDumper]

Still trolling.Still no comment from you about the subject you brought up.

[spursncowboys]

Still no comment from you about the subject you brought up.

Still you trolling. Did you even watch the video?

[ChumpDumper]

Still you trolling. Did you even watch the video?Why should anyone? You won't even bother commenting on it.

[MiamiHeat]

spursncowboys

I put that doofus troll ChumpDumper on ignore a million years ago

he's a huge troll in the politics forums, you should know that already with the amount of posting u do here

[ChumpDumper]

Yeah, MiamiHeat is all about intelligent, well-researched political discourse in this forum.

[mookie2001]

rofl chumpdumper is hit or miss but when hes on, hes on

[spursncowboys]

Yeah, MiamiHeat is all about intelligent, well-researched political discourse in this forum.

All the trolling you are doing in this post really doesn't disprove him.

[ChumpDumper]

All the trolling you are doing in this post really doesn't disprove him.I am definitely trolling this thread since you can't even comment on the video you posted yourself.

It's funny that MiamiHeat has me on ignore -- he showed himself to be pretty ignorant in his tribunal rant. If he read my posts there, he might learn something.

[MiamiHeat]

All the trolling you are doing in this post really doesn't disprove him.

Lmao

You will spend 10 pages worth of posts, and you will get nowhere.

He will go back and forth like an asshole over and over, and when you corner him, he won't admit any mistake and just change the subject and rinse and repeat.

He's easily the least talented troll on this forum. at least mouse tries hard. Chumpy just goes "NO U FIRST"

[ChumpDumper]

Yes, MiamiHeat corners people all this time with his intelligent, well-researched posts.

[spursncowboys]

Lmao

You will spend 10 pages worth of posts, and you will get nowhere.

He will go back and forth like an asshole over and over, and when you corner him, he won't admit any mistake and just change the subject and rinse and repeat.

He's easily the least talented troll on this forum. at least mouse tries hard. Chumpy just goes "NO U FIRST"

:lol Yeah what I hate is when he asks you if you know some common known definition, and he just keeps asking if you know it or not.

[ChumpDumper]

So now it's a thread about me. Well, it was bound to happen since you refused to comment on the video you posted.

[clambake]

another 10 minute glen beck video.

how about "go fuck yourself", again.

[mookie2001]

well if we all watched the glen beck hour everyday we wouldnt need threads like these!

[MiamiHeat]

Why does Beck remind me of Prothero from V for Vendetta?

pzKqeG-KTEU

Iu_30-8ZlmQ

[spursncowboys]

well if we all watched the glen beck hour everyday we wouldnt need threads like these!

You trolls are in a win-win. You get your post count higher and you don't watch the video.

[mookie2001]

do you know what a troll is?

[spursncowboys]

do you know what a troll is?

Is coming on here and not commenting on the op not trolling? Hijacking a topic from the get-go to make it about yourself not trolling? Is your first post of an op a personal attack not trolling?
Do you really mean it or are you trying to sound stupid?

[jman3000]

You didn't comment on your original post. Are you trolling your own thread?

[spursncowboys]

You didn't comment on your original post. Are you trolling your own thread?

So you coming in here, not trolling? My OP was a comment asshole. can two dumbfucks not come up with these arguments, you have to come in trolling? I can see how you three wouldn't understand trolling since that is your MO. Try commenting on the video or GTFO and make a post about how Glenn Beck videos are a waste of your time. You lemmings do this all the time. Dueches like yall are why we shouldn't have a post count. There would be less of you three.

[jman3000]

wtf? Jesus Christ you're retarded. Either that or you're old and can't keep up with the modern lexicon. Calling everyone a troll just for fucks sake doesn't make it so.

Who the fuck cares about their post count?

and lol at you calling anyone a lemming. Can you not see that you are exactly what you claim others to be?

[ChumpDumper]

lol @ SnC trolling his own thread.

[Cry Havoc]

So you coming in here, not trolling? My OP was a comment asshole. can two dumbfucks not come up with these arguments, you have to come in trolling? I can see how you three wouldn't understand trolling since that is your MO. Try commenting on the video or GTFO and make a post about how Glenn Beck videos are a waste of your time. You lemmings do this all the time. Dueches like yall are why we shouldn't have a post count. There would be less of you three.

Way to show those damn liberal hippies what rational, well thought-out, educated discourse sounds like!

You should change your user title to, "Spursncowboys: Rising above the fray." :lmao Fail.

[sabar]

Threads with no initial comments suck. Its just pure political propaganda instead of slightly diluted propaganda.

Thing is, no one is going to watch an 11 minute video without some insight. It isn't some conspiracy against the right-wing either. Pretty sure no one watched all those 2-hour long 9/11 conspiracy vids without a comment either (though at that length those better be convincing comments).

[spursncowboys]

<p>
Threads with no initial comments suck. Its just pure political propaganda instead of slightly diluted propaganda.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Thing is, no one is going to watch an 11 minute video without some insight. It isn't some conspiracy against the right-wing either. Pretty sure no one watched all those 2-hour long 9/11 conspiracy vids without a comment either (though at that length those better be convincing comments).</p>
I gave a breakdown with the times of what was on the video. why come on here and comment if u r not going to watch the video? how is that not trolling??
<p>&nbsp;</p>

[spursncowboys]

Way to show those damn liberal hippies what rational, well thought-out, educated discourse sounds like!

You should change your user title to, "Spursncowboys: Rising above the fray." Fail.
I like it.
way to join a discussion and add nothing to it. good job keeping your streak alive.

[George Gervin's Afro]

I like it.
way to join a discussion and add nothing to it. good job keeping your streak alive.

why do you get so butt hurt when someone calls you out?

[Winehole23]

why do you get so butt hurt when someone calls you out?On the contrary, I believe he enjoys it. SnC will ignore direct replies to go after so-called trolls. He routinely abandons his own threads to go round and round with hecklers, then he whines about getting hijacked, just like he did here.

[Cry Havoc]

I like it.
way to join a discussion and add nothing to it. good job keeping your streak alive.

What discussion will that be? The one you didn't start? Please show me where the discussion about this thread is after you ignored your own initial post.

[spursncowboys]

On the contrary, I believe he enjoys it. SnC will ignore direct replies to go after so-called trolls. He routinely abandons his own threads to go round and round with hecklers, then he whines about getting hijacked, just like he did here.

what direct reply have i ignored?

[spursncowboys]

What discussion will that be? The one you didn't start? Please show me where the discussion about this thread is after you ignored your own initial post.

How can I ignore my own initial post dumbfuck? The fact is I posted a video with a outline of what he was talking about. It was an opinion about what kind of personn obama keeps around him. Then the trolls showed up. I don't have to put a response towards my own op.

[George Gervin's Afro]

How can I ignore my own initial post dumbfuck? The fact is I posted a video with a outline of what he was talking about. It was an opinion about what kind of personn obama keeps around him. Then the trolls showed up. I don't have to put a response towards my own op.

lighten up Francis


Beck's opinion only matters to people like you so stop acting surprised when people mock you when he is used a source.

[Cry Havoc]

How can I ignore my own initial post dumbfuck? The fact is I posted a video with a outline of what he was talking about. It was an opinion about what kind of personn obama keeps around him. Then the trolls showed up. I don't have to put a response towards my own op.

Continue to show off how classy you are, snc. It really showcases why you should be listened to as a voice of reason.

And you still haven't commented on the video you posted. :lol This is great.

[George Gervin's Afro]

Continue to show off how classy you are, snc. It really showcases why you should be listened to as a voice of reason.

And you still haven't commented on the video you posted. :lol This is great.

he did comment....sort of..


2:30- Explains a convicted felon at white house dinner.

3:30- Explains who Robert Creemer is and shows a clip of his wife (Dem from IL) and explains his liberal leadership positions and why he went to prison.

4:50- Talks about his book he wrote in prison.

5:40- Starts explaining Creemer's 10 point plan.

[spursncowboys]

Continue to show off how classy you are, snc. It really showcases why you should be listened to as a voice of reason.

And you still haven't commented on the video you posted. :lol This is great.

Two pages now and I am the only one who posted something about the OP. :lol
SnC - rule1. is to not comment on a op I started after one post pertaining toward that topic is created. The op should stand on it's own. An OP I created should be interpreted by someone else before I include mine. Blocked posters and trolls do not count.
rule2.
rule3. profits

[Cry Havoc]

Two pages now and I am the only one who posted something about the OP. :lol
SnC - rule1. is to not comment on a op I started after one post pertaining toward that topic is created. The op should stand on it's own. An OP I created should be interpreted by someone else before I include mine. Blocked posters and trolls do not count.
rule2.
rule3. profits

You forgot rule2. Whine and swear at people and call them idiots to provoke rational discourse and thoughtful discussion of the topic.

[Ignignokt]

Shoot, is Cry Havoc pretending he's all about elevating the dialogue here?

THat's funny how Sabar mentions that he hates posts with no initial comments. WHat do you want?

After a video or article that goes into the subject matter do you want us to add, "Heh heh! Right on Bro! +1!!!!!"?

[Ignignokt]

So now it's a thread about me. Well, it was bound to happen since you refused to comment on the video you posted.

No surprise since you always make the thread about yourself.

It's the "me me me" divaesque schtick that gets kudos from the "nuanced" crowd around here.

[Ignignokt]

What discussion will that be? The one you didn't start? Please show me where the discussion about this thread is after you ignored your own initial post.

WHat a weak premise.

It's as if you've never been in a classroom where the teacher has showed a documentary with out adding input, and then ask the students to discuss the material.

C'mon you're now just arguing Sabar's weak premise that one must comment on a video so that there can be legit discussion.

Me and you both know you don't believe that. It's idiotic.

[ChumpDumper]

No surprise since you always make the thread about yourself.

It's the "me me me" divaesque schtick that gets kudos from the "nuanced" crowd around here.Actually, I made it about the video and the fact no one has commented on it.

Including you, of course.

I noticed you completely ran away from the thread where you expressed your belief that federal courts are "reserved" only for American citizens. I was actually discussing the thread subject. Why don't you want to discuss that anymore?

[spursncowboys]

Actually, I made it about the video and the fact no one has commented on it.

Including you, of course.

I noticed you completely ran away from the thread where you expressed your belief that federal courts are "reserved" only for American citizens. I was actually discussing the thread subject. Why don't you want to discuss that anymore?
You didn't comment once on the video, Barry.
:lol actually

[Cry Havoc]

lots of blah

In case you haven't noticed, I've long since stopped responding to your tired, humorless schtick.

[ChumpDumper]

You didn't comment once on the video, Barry.
:lol actuallyNeither did you.

Not once.

That was my comment on the video -- that you didn't comment on it, so why should anyone else?

You still haven't commented on the video.

Not once.

One full day later.

Actually.

[Ignignokt]

In case you haven't noticed, I've long since stopped responding to your tired, humorless schtick.

Progress!

[spursncowboys]

This has been discussed already chumpdumper.
lol @ actually

[spursncowboys]

Progress!

I have a goal in life now.

[Ignignokt]

Actually, I made it about the video and the fact no one has commented on it.

Including you, of course.

I noticed you completely ran away from the thread where you expressed your belief that federal courts are "reserved" only for American citizens. I was actually discussing the thread subject. Why don't you want to discuss that anymore?

You know for you trying to paint me as a stalker, you make it seem like i avoid confrontation with you.:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

This has been discussed already chumpdumper.
lol @ actuallyRight.

Your lack of comment on your own subject has been discussed.

The funny thing is, you still refuse to comment on it. You would rather complain about people pointing out the fact that you still haven't commented on the video than actually comment on the video.

lol @ you.

[Ignignokt]

Right.

Your lack of comment on your own subject has been discussed.

The funny thing is, you still refuse to comment on it. You would rather complain about people pointing out the fact that you still haven't commented on the video than actually comment on the video.

lol @ you.

I guess because the thread is asking for your input, or lack thereof.

[ChumpDumper]

You know for you trying to paint me as a stalker, you make it seem like i avoid confrontation with you.:lmaoYou certainly are avoiding that real discussion of federal trials for terrorists like the plague.

Why is that?

[ChumpDumper]

I guess because the thread is asking for your input, or lack thereof.Is it? The thread has repeatedly asked for your input, and you refuse to do anything except complain about being asked.

[Ignignokt]

You certainly are avoiding that real discussion of federal trials for terrorists like the plague.

Why is that?

Link?

Show me what i avoided. Nobody started arguing with me.

[Ignignokt]

Is it? The thread has repeatedly asked for your input, and you refuse to do anything except complain about being asked.

I'm not S&C.

So you don't want to provide input about a felon who laid out plans to deceive the public about bringing in nationalized healthcare?

[Ignignokt]

WHy are you running away from this question Chump?

[ChumpDumper]

I'm not S&C.

So you don't want to provide input about a felon who laid out plans to deceive the public about bringing in nationalized healthcare?No one else has.

You haven't.

[ChumpDumper]

Link?

Show me what i avoided. Nobody started arguing with me.http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3900067&postcount=18

[Ignignokt]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3900067&postcount=18

OMG!:lol


You posted that challenge two days later, and it was you challenging my assertion.

Did you expect me to wait 2 whole days for a response from you to a post i didn't intend towards you?

SO you post 2 days later, i don't keep up. ANd you claim i'm running away. Then.. you don't bother to post the entire thread, but just your post that qouted mine so that you could seem like you accomplished something. What a dishonest lying piece of excrement you are.

You have no shame.

[ChumpDumper]

OMG!:lol


You posted that challenge two days later, and it was you challenging my assertion.

Did you expect me to wait 2 whole days for a response from you to a post i didn't intend towards you?

SO you post 2 days later, i don't keep up. ANd you claim i'm running away. Then.. you don't bother to post the entire thread, but just your post that qouted mine so that you could seem like you accomplished something. What a dishonest lying piece of excrement you are.

You have no shame.Sorry, I didn't know there was a time limit on these things. The thread was still on the first page.

Would you care to discuss that subject now, or is it to difficult for you to do anything but whine about me? It's right there -- let's discuss federal trials of terrorists.

[Ignignokt]

Sorry, I didn't know there was a time limit on these things. The thread was still on the first page.

Would you care to discuss that subject now, or is it to difficult for you to do anything but whine about me? It's right there -- let's discuss federal trials of terrorists.

You claimed i was running away from you dipshit without any proof.

That's the subject here, i'm discussing that other topic now in the other thread.

We can discuss how much of a shameless sewer rat you are whose desperate to declare a win no matter how shitty the lie since you refuse to discuss the GB video.

[ChumpDumper]

OMG!:lol


You posted that challenge two days later, and it was you challenging my assertion.The bolded part is a lie. My post was less than 10 hours after yours.

Why did you lie about this?

[Ignignokt]

The bolded part is a lie. My post was less than 10 hours after yours.

Why did you lie about this?

Man you got me there, i suck at dates. But you wrote that post in the morning and peabody's post procedded it.

at 3:11 am.

You wanted me to wake up in the middle of my REM cycle to address your need. Classic.

False Victory for Chump!

[ChumpDumper]

Man you got me there, i suck at dates. But you wrote that post in the morning and peabody's post procedded it.

at 3:11 am.

You wanted me to wake up in the middle of my REM cycle to address your need. Classic.

False Victory for Chump!So you lied.

OK.

Another failure for you.

[Ignignokt]

At least we now know that chump has no job.

classic!

[Ignignokt]

So you lied.

OK.

Another failure for you.

Nope.

Made a mistake.

Another victory snickerdoodle for you.

[Ignignokt]

Chump has yet to address the original subject of this thread.

[spursncowboys]

I'm not S&C.

So you don't want to provide input about a felon who laid out plans to deceive the public about bringing in nationalized healthcare?

Thank you for someone finally commenting about the op. This guys from prison makes a ten point plan that the president of the us uses.

“We must create a national consensus that health care is a right, not a commodity; and that government must guarantee that right.”
“We must create a national consensus that the health care system is in crisis.”
“Our messaging program over the next two years should focus heavily on reducing the credibility of the health insurance industry and focusing on the failure of private health insurance.”
“We need to systematically forge relationships with large sectors of the business/employer community.”
“We need to convince political leaders that they owe their elections, at least in part, to the groundswell of support of [sic] universal health care, and that they face political peril if they fail to deliver on universal health care in 2009.”
“We need not agree in advance on the components of a plan, but we must foster a process that can ultimately yield consensus.”
“Over the next two years, we must design and organize a massive national field program.”
“We must focus especially on the mobilization of the labor movement and the faith community.”
“We must systematically leverage the connections and resources of a massive array of institutions and organizations of all types.”
“To be successful, we must put in place commitments for hundreds of millions of dollars to be used to finance paid communications and mobilization once the battle is joined.”
the Felon “To win we must not just generate understanding, but emotion—fear, revulsion, anger, disgust.”


How many white collar criminals are in bho's circle of influence. WHere is the hope and change?

[spursncowboys]

The fact that breitbart found this and not anyone from the media is perfectly logical seeing as how the msm doesn't even hide their partisanship.

[ChumpDumper]

Chump has yet to address the original subject of this thread.You haven't either.

All that has been proved is this guy was at a White House dinner. If Beck thinks convicted felons are excluded from White House functions, he's very wrong.

[ChumpDumper]

http://www.economist.com/images/mt_blog/democracyinamerica/colsosndd.jpg
Convicted felon receives medal in White House.
Board Republicans outraged.

[Ignignokt]

http://www.economist.com/images/mt_blog/democracyinamerica/colsosndd.jpg
Convicted felon receives medal in White House.
Board Republicans outraged.




How is awarding a Convicted felon for starting an outreach program in prison the same as having a convicted felon having influence in shaping policy.


Take that weak stuff back to Media Matters where you pulled it from.

[Ignignokt]

You haven't either.

All that has been proved is this guy was at a White House dinner. If Beck thinks convicted felons are excluded from White House functions, he's very wrong.

You didn't watch the video, and you only read the media matters talking point.

That wasn't Beck's point in the video.

You suck, but why so hard?

[ChumpDumper]

Nah, I knew about Colson from his Born Again days.

All that has been proved is that Creamer was at the White House, which is where Colson was. as far as that is concerned, Beck was wrong -- as he was wrong when he said Van Jones was a convicted felon.

Regardless, I'm quite sure other felons have shaped policy in the past for both parties. Do you want to pass a law prohibiting it?

Take that weak phony outrage back to Glenn Beck where you pulled it from.

[ChumpDumper]

You didn't watch the video, and you only read the media matters talking point.

That wasn't Beck's point in the video.

You suck, but why so hard?I said if. I won't see his video, because he lies about as often as you do.

Which is a lot.

Why do you suck so hard at understanding anything?

[Ignignokt]

Nah, .

So you didn't watch the video, and instead got a synopsis from a partisan website.

And about fake outrage, tax evasion(geithner), and felons (Creemer) influencing policy decisions is an issue.

Fake outrage.. ha ha. I guess employers are "outraged" too when they are hesitant in hiring criminals.

Like i said, take your talking points and your troll job to Media Matters.


Thanx for not watching the video.

[ChumpDumper]

So you didn't watch the video, and instead got a synopsis from a partisan website.Glenn Beck's video is also partisan, so what is the difference?


And about fake outrage, tax evasion, and felons influencing policy decisions is an issue.Is it? Do you want a law passed?

Are you going to write your representative and senator?


Fake outrage.. ha ha. I guess employers are "outraged" too when they are hesitant in hiring criminals.Yeah, fake because you aren't really outraged.


Like i said, take your talking points and your troll job to Media Matters.


Thanx for not watching the video.Your welcome. Like i said, take your talking points and lies and fake outrage back to Glenn Beck.

[Ignignokt]

Glenn Beck's video is also partisan, so what is the difference?


The difference is that Glenn Beck has an argument, weak or strong. Media Matters just has a superficial red herring that is pretty weak.

You also had ample time to give your own oppinion on the subject matter, but instead waited out until Media Matters did the talking for you.

Glenn Beck point is that the Administration has a streak of being around shady people with criminal pasts, and that we should be cautious about their intentions.

You have yet to address that point, but instead brought a "well Bush... ".

THanks for proving the Op's description about you.

[Ignignokt]

Plus this is typical Chump tactics.

Because someone doesn't feel comfortable with a convicted felon influencing policy or a tax evader being in charge of monetary policy. That means that their solution is that we must have a law passed against it.

Also, being against something must mean we are outraged.

It's a wasted endeavour arguing with this idiot known as CHumpadumpadummper.

[ChumpDumper]

The difference is that Glenn Beck has an argument, weak or strong. Media Matters just has a superficial red herring that is pretty weak. So both have arguments that are weak.

Nice.


You also had ample time to give your own oppinion on the subject matter, but instead waited out until Media Matters did the talking for you.Actually, I have made my opinion on Glenn Beck known, as well as my opinion on this issue overall, if you are too dumb to pick up on it, that's your problem.


Glenn Beck point is that the Administration has a streak of being around shady people with criminal pasts, and that we should be cautious about their intentions.What do you think their intentions are.

Spell it out.

Give us all your learned opinioin.


You have yet to address that point, but instead brought a "well Bush... ".

THanks for proving the Op's description about you.As I said, my opinion has already been recorded.

As has your inability to understand that it's there.

Thank you for that.

[Allan Rowe vs Wade]

I would just put all my money in gold.

[ChumpDumper]

Plus this is typical Chump tactics.

Because someone doesn't feel comfortable with a convicted felon influencing policy or a tax evader being in charge of monetary policy. That means that their solution is that we must have a law passed against it.

Also, being against something must mean we are outraged.

It's a wasted endeavour arguing with this idiot known as CHumpadumpadummper.So you aren't really outraged to the point of doing anything beyond posting a few messages on the internets.

Wow, you are a cauldron of outrage!

You'll do nothing about this whatsoever.

[Allan Rowe vs Wade]

ohhhh what a dey...

[Ignignokt]

So you aren't really outraged to the point of doing anything beyond posting a few messages on the internets.

Wow, you are a cauldron of outrage!

You'll do nothing about this whatsoever.

So what did you do when you were outraged about Dick cheney sending us to war?

Did you pass a law against dick cheney being vice president, or did you just piss if off on the internets... I think history pwns you on that one.

Again, when did i say i was outraged?

Don't put words in people's mouth, i know you have no shame, but atleast for once try to hold back on your instincts.

[Ignignokt]

When Chumpdumper was outraged about Cheney, he purchased a bob woodward book, stalked yoni, and passive aggressively bitched on the series of tubes.

That's quite an example there.

[Heath Ledger]

Wow look at Spurstalk's #1 troll calling someone else a troll. Miami just shoot yourself please.

[ChumpDumper]

When Chumpdumper was outraged about Cheney, he purchased a bob woodward book, stalked yoni, and passive aggressively bitched on the series of tubes.

That's quite an example there.How do you know that's all I did?

Are you going to do any more than you have here?

[ChumpDumper]

So what did you do when you were outraged about Dick cheney sending us to war?

Did you pass a law against dick cheney being vice president, or did you just piss if off on the internets... I think history pwns you on that one.

Again, when did i say i was outraged?

Don't put words in people's mouth, i know you have no shame, but atleast for once try to hold back on your instincts.So what are your feelings here?

Tell us exactly what your feelings are and what you are going to do about it.

Use your words. Not Glenn Beck's.

[mookie2001]

uhh ohh now you might have flipped ol chump if he lastwords you more than 10 times in the same thread

[Spursmania]

What a surprise. Another thread with no discussion, just insults.:rolleyes

[spursncowboys]

What a surprise. Another thread with no discussion, just insults.:rolleyes

+1. It's ridiculous how these trolls do this to the topics they dislike. I might be wrong but don't know that conservatives doing this kind of thing stuff.

[clambake]

+1. It's ridiculous how these trolls do this to the topics they dislike. I might be wrong but don't know that conservatives doing this kind of thing stuff.

see what happens when you overdose on glen?

[mookie2001]

What a surprise. Another thread with no discussion, just insults.:rolleyes
jerk

[Cry Havoc]

+1. It's ridiculous how these trolls do this to the topics they dislike. I might be wrong but don't know that conservatives doing this kind of thing stuff.

Are you seriously agreeing with someone who just talked about how a thread was full of insults and attempted to shirk the blame onto others? Really?

[spursncowboys]

Are you seriously agreeing with someone who just talked about how a thread was full of insults and attempted to shirk the blame onto others? Really?

Seriously cryhavoc, read my replies. All you trolls came in defending one another like middle school girls. Every post from you trolls was another attempt to keep it off the op. I put this video think there would be some legitimate discussion about what beck was saying and insinuating. None!!! Like I said, when you trolls don't have an argument, you do this nonsense. You aren't this shitty of one usually butyou came in here trolling none the less. Thanks alot asshole. Still no comment about the op, and how many post have you made here so far?

[mookie2001]

dude if you had put in any time on this bitch you would know cry havoc and I and chumpdumper and I dont really like each other at all

we just all happen to not be neocons ROFL

[Cant_Be_Faded]

Does anyone listen to Glenn Beck on the radio?

He uses some sort of vintage radio mike to make his voice sound really deep...like if you heard his voice only you'd think he was 6'3" 220 pounds with <10% body fat

but you look at him on tv and he has a piggy face, piggy nose, piggy ears, piggy cheeks

His radio show is funny though.

[mookie2001]

i listened back almost 5 or 6 years ago.

I agree with the dude on a lot of key shit, our borders, our nations sovereignty, government tyranny, wasteful spending. but the dude is just the smuggest motherfucker ive ever heard

basically he blames everything on liberalism and the war on family, war on christmas, war on christanity. the guy has a hilariously irrational fear of a black planet, fear of a gay planet, fear of a muslim planet. this man is the most scared cunt in america and his crying "my fathers country" bullshit is just so contrived and transparent i cant believe people buy it.

but his chickenhawkness is just UNMATCHED in todays america, god this man is a chickenhawk beyond chicken or hawks.

[ChumpDumper]

dude if you had put in any time on this bitch you would know cry havoc and I and chumpdumper and I dont really like each other at all

we just all happen to not be neocons ROFLI like both of you.

I'm just a jerk.