PDA

View Full Version : 70+ Million..............



SequSpur
12-08-2009, 03:56 PM
to watch Pop develop Matt Bonner and make him comfortable in the Spurs offense.

Go Spurs Go!

draft87
12-08-2009, 04:01 PM
to watch pop develop matt bonner and make him comfortable in the spurs offense.

Go spurs go!


fart

DesignatedT
12-08-2009, 04:31 PM
matt bonner. lmfao....

yeah great game last night red rocket... lets see how far the spurs get riding his back.


fucking joke.

dbestpro
12-08-2009, 04:33 PM
Move over TP. This is now Bonner's team.

easy7
12-08-2009, 04:42 PM
"I don't care too much for money, for money can't buy me love.."
Signed: Peter Holt

EmptyMan
12-08-2009, 05:08 PM
Bonner earned his role in last night's game.

Dex
12-08-2009, 05:09 PM
I am starting to get the feeling that you are less than pleased with the way the Spurs conduct business.

DynastySpurs210
12-08-2009, 05:11 PM
WOW! so im guessing were relying on Bonner to help us contend for a title.

NICE LOL

mexicanjunior
12-08-2009, 05:29 PM
http://www.randomdestination.com/members/mj/pics/alliswell.JPG

rayray2k8
12-08-2009, 05:35 PM
We're fucked.....

SpurCharger
12-08-2009, 05:45 PM
Lol, Its Not Lookin Good.... But we Still have Time..

greyforest
12-08-2009, 05:58 PM
yeah uts certainly looking that way atm

z0sa
12-08-2009, 06:00 PM
yeah uts certainly looking that way atm

Are you actually from grey forest?

TinTin
12-08-2009, 06:40 PM
I keep thinking SequSpur is Culburn

vander
12-08-2009, 07:13 PM
It's pretty obvious at this point that any chance we have at a title rests in the yet-to-be-unleashed ability of Matt Bonner. the rest of this team, except for maybe Blair and Hill, have not lived up to their hype, and do not look able to deliver a championship.

It's all up to Bonner now... (and Blair and Hill)

SequSpur
12-08-2009, 11:50 PM
and Bogans..... I forgot to mention him.

VivaPopovich
12-09-2009, 02:12 AM
to watch Pop develop Matt Bonner and make him comfortable in the Spurs offense.

Go Spurs Go!

You don't need $70M, Pop will do it for free.

Here is the problem: Bonner's success comes at the expense of the Spurs success. ST loves it when he hits 3's and all of a sudden the past is forgotten and Matt Bonner was the solution to all of our problems all along. The thing is, his 3's comes at a heavy expense.

He is too weak to play power forward as he falls over most instances of contact. When he is not blowing defensive assignments by himself, he does it inadvertently for other players when he fails to switch over on screens (which happened many times last night) and when his confusion blocks other players and causes general confusion.

He is doing a better job at grabbing offensive rebounds but we would all be disillusioned to believe we will get past the 1st round with Bonner playing 30 minutes a game.

And this goes back to Pop's deeper problem of being so dependent on his X's and O's to an extreme extent instead of letting the best talent play.

Matt Bonner driving to the basket for the game winning shot? Pathetic.

VivaPopovich
12-09-2009, 02:15 AM
Pop is genius....................... for winning 4 titles with the greatest PF to ever play the game

He'll be a genius if he actually wins a title playing Matt Bonner 30 minutes a game.

And a stupid idiot for even trying.

duhoh
12-09-2009, 04:11 AM
He'll be a genius if he actually wins a title playing Matt Bonner 30 minutes a game.

And a stupid idiot for even trying.

:lol

Ice009
12-09-2009, 06:05 AM
You don't need $70M, Pop will do it for free.

Here is the problem: Bonner's success comes at the expense of the Spurs success. ST loves it when he hits 3's and all of a sudden the past is forgotten and Matt Bonner was the solution to all of our problems all along. The thing is, his 3's comes at a heavy expense.

He is too weak to play power forward as he falls over most instances of contact. When he is not blowing defensive assignments by himself, he does it inadvertently for other players when he fails to switch over on screens (which happened many times last night) and when his confusion blocks other players and causes general confusion.

He is doing a better job at grabbing offensive rebounds but we would all be disillusioned to believe we will get past the 1st round with Bonner playing 30 minutes a game.

And this goes back to Pop's deeper problem of being so dependent on his X's and O's to an extreme extent instead of letting the best talent play.

Matt Bonner driving to the basket for the game winning shot? Pathetic.

Pretty good post.

I've been saying for weeks that as good as Matt Bonner plays offensively when he can hit some shots it still can't make up for what we lose on the other end, or the confidence other teams get with him on the court.

TDMVPDPOY
12-09-2009, 06:27 AM
bonner has been pretty good for the last few games

he aint afraid to put up the shots if you look at every time he receives the ball from the outlet extra pass....

but at leasts his turnin up unlike the rest of the team

SequSpur
12-09-2009, 07:06 PM
You don't need $70M, Pop will do it for free.

Here is the problem: Bonner's success comes at the expense of the Spurs success. ST loves it when he hits 3's and all of a sudden the past is forgotten and Matt Bonner was the solution to all of our problems all along. The thing is, his 3's comes at a heavy expense.

He is too weak to play power forward as he falls over most instances of contact. When he is not blowing defensive assignments by himself, he does it inadvertently for other players when he fails to switch over on screens (which happened many times last night) and when his confusion blocks other players and causes general confusion.

He is doing a better job at grabbing offensive rebounds but we would all be disillusioned to believe we will get past the 1st round with Bonner playing 30 minutes a game.

And this goes back to Pop's deeper problem of being so dependent on his X's and O's to an extreme extent instead of letting the best talent play.

Matt Bonner driving to the basket for the game winning shot? Pathetic.

exactly.

LOL@MavsFan
12-09-2009, 07:27 PM
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3046/3039006965_93dc60c3a7.jpg

Steel
12-09-2009, 07:43 PM
Bonner is da shit! I saw offense and defense from him the other day. He was leading in points and was on fire. You all are surprised that Pops let him take that shot. For christ sakes he barely missed it. It bounced out of the rim, it's not like he air balled it or took a final shot affter missing shots all night. It's still early in the season and I'm sure if any other player was having that kind of night coach would draw up a play for them. He might not be the best player we have, but gawd damn he is a hustler and a big man that spreads the floor.

I have some faith in this ginger. . . HA!


SPUUUUUUUURS! ! !

Steel
12-09-2009, 07:43 PM
Bonner is da shit! I saw offense and defense from him the other day. He was leading in points and was on fire. You all are surprised that Pops let him take that shot. For christ sakes he barely missed it. It bounced out of the rim, it's not like he air balled it or took a final shot affter missing shots all night. It's still early in the season and I'm sure if any other player was having that kind of night coach would draw up a play for them. He might not be the best player we have, but gawd damn he is a hustler and a big man that spreads the floor.

I have some faith in this ginger. . . HA!


SPUUUUUUUURS! ! !

draft87
12-09-2009, 08:53 PM
As a loser?:toast


fart

SequSpur
02-08-2010, 10:11 PM
just sayin...

superjames1992
02-08-2010, 10:22 PM
This hasn't been proven wrong yet.
What did this thread prove in the first place?