PDA

View Full Version : Which one of these Non-Title Franchises has been more successful?


An Unbiased Fan
12-10-2009, 05:55 PM
How would you rank these tortured Championship-less Franchises?

Suns,Mavs,Clippers,Magic,Bobcats,Raptors,Pacers,Ne ts,Jazz,Hornets,Kings,Grizzlies,Wolves.

My rankings:
1) Jazz
2) Suns
3) Pacers
4) Cavs
5) Allas
6) Magic
7) Nets
8) Kings
9) Hornets
10) Clippers
11) Raptors
12) Grizzlies
13) Bobcats
14) Pups
Xylus
12-10-2009, 05:58 PM
The Suns are the most successful non-title team, not that that's anything to brag about.

Two trips to the Finals ('76 Celtics, '93 Bulls), 4th most winningest franchise in the NBA, multiple MVP's, consistent Playoff presence, and one mayor of Sacramento.
mavs>spurs2
12-10-2009, 05:58 PM
sup A Biased Fag
Findog
12-10-2009, 06:00 PM
But has Jerry Colangelo or Robert Sarver ever been thrown through a table on Monday Night RAW? Dallas Mavericks FTW.
Xylus
12-10-2009, 06:00 PM
But has Jerry Colangelo or Robert Sarver ever been thrown through a table on Monday Night RAW? Dallas Mavericks FTW.

No, but I can dream.
Venti Quattro
12-10-2009, 06:01 PM
No, but I can dream.

I figure that a lot of Suns fans would surely pay good money to see that.
Jacob1983
12-10-2009, 06:05 PM
If you go by overall success, I would probably say the Jazz. They went to the Finals two years in a row and probably would have won the Finals both times if they had played against a different team. They had bad luck with playing Jordan and the Bulls in the Finals twice. From 1984 to 2003, they went to the playoffs. That's a pretty impressive streak.
AussieFanKurt
12-10-2009, 06:10 PM
Yeah definitely the Suns or Jazz
An Unbiased Fan
12-10-2009, 06:10 PM
If you go by overall success, I would probably say the Jazz. They went to the Finals two years in a row and probably would have won the Finals both times if they had played against a different team. They had bad luck with playing Jordan and the Bulls in the Finals twice. From 1984 to 2003, they went to the playoffs. That's a pretty impressive streak.
I agree with all of this.
pauls931
12-10-2009, 06:11 PM
Close between Suns and Jazz, but I'll give it to the Jazz for consistency and 2 consecutive finals appearances against the bulls.

However Bulls won one finals game 96–54... :p:
baseline bum
12-10-2009, 07:36 PM
The Pacers have three championships and the Nets two, so take them off the list.
IronMexican
12-10-2009, 07:39 PM
Kings did win as the Rochester Royals. That's up for debate if they should be on it. And o way should the Pups be last. They've done more than 13 through 9.
Darrin
12-10-2009, 08:02 PM
How would you rank these tortured Championship-less Franchises?

Suns,Mavs,Clippers,Magic,Bobcats,Raptors,Pacers,Ne ts,Jazz,Hornets,Kings,Grizzlies,Wolves.

I'm eliminating the Sacramento Kings because they won a title in 1950-51 as the Cincinnati Royals.

1. Jazz
2. Suns
3. Mavericks
4. Pacers
5. Magic
6. Nets
7. Cavaliers
8. Wolves
9. Hornets
10. Raptors
11. Grizzlies
12. Bobcats
13. Clippers
Darrin
12-10-2009, 08:02 PM
The Pacers have three championships and the Nets two, so take them off the list.

ABA doesn't count.
lil boosie
12-10-2009, 08:06 PM
This unbiased fan faggot is gay.
KSeal
12-10-2009, 08:09 PM
This unbiased fan faggot is gay.

Well put lil boosie :toast
dirk4mvp
12-10-2009, 08:09 PM
Who's the smartest of the retarded kids? Hooray.
An Unbiased Fan
12-10-2009, 10:47 PM
This unbiased fan faggot is gay.
Says the guy with a known gay rapper as his screenname. GTFO
Killakobe81
12-10-2009, 11:29 PM
I say Jazz but it's close ...
Suns can argue they would of won except MJ...
Jazz can also say they could of won in '87 EXCEPT lakers same for 80's Mavs ...