PDA

View Full Version : interesting read. our own Champions- Alabama



mookie2001
12-13-2009, 11:30 AM
Debunking the Alabama National Championship myths
Filed under: AlabamaCrimsonTideCF (http://www.sportingnews.com/tag/AlabamaCrimsonTideCF) AuburnTigersCF (http://www.sportingnews.com/tag/AuburnTigersCF) CollegeFootball (http://www.sportingnews.com/tag/CollegeFootball) MLB (http://www.sportingnews.com/tag/MLB) NFL (http://www.sportingnews.com/tag/NFL)
Links:
From College Football Data Warehouse (http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/national_championships/index.php)
Past Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (Division I FBS) National Champions (http://www.ncaa.org/champadmin/ia_football_past_champs.html#HOULGATE)

The Associated Press Poll has been active since 1936. The AP took their final poll prior to bowl games from 1936 - 1964 and in 1966 and 1967. They took their final poll after the bowl games in 1965 and from 1968 - Current.

Debunking the Alabama National Championship myths:

1925 National Championship- Alabama claims they share this one with Dartmouth. Who awarded the NC? Houlgate and Helms. Houlgate started his system in 1927. So Bama won their 1925 NC using a formula that didn't exist until 1927? Helms Athletic Foundation started in 1941. Another incredible retroactive NC.

1926 National Championship- Alabama claims they share this one with 3 other teams with equal or better records! Once again it is the Helms Athletic Foundation in 1941 that awards it!

1930 National Championship- The Davis poll says that Bama tied Notre Dame for NC this year. This was the only one to award it to Bama. Notre Dame was named NC in 6 polls! Parke Davis is another retroactive system! He (an individual, not an organization) did his in 1933!

1934 National Championship- Alabama says they share this with two other teams. The awarders are Dunkel, Williamson, and Football Thesaurus. Dunkel was an individual who came up with his own system. Williamson was a geologist who came up with his own system. Football Thesaurus first appeared in 1946!

1941 National Championship- This is a complete joke. The AP ranked Alabama 20th in the nation with 14 teams with better records in the top 20. Once again it is the Football Thesaurus that retroactively awards it. Alabama finished 3rd in the SEC that year.

1961 National Championship- Finally a legitimate NC. One poll didn't give it to Bama though.

1964 National Championship- While the AP did award the NC to Bama (10-1-0), Arkansas had the better record, 11-0. Alabama played Texas in their bowl and LOST. The AP final poll was before the bowl.

1965 National Championship- The AP gave this to Bama. That year there were three teams with better records than Bama. Bama 9-1-1, Michigan St 10-1-0, Arkansas 10-1-0, Nebraska 10-1-0.

1973 National Championship- AP puts Bama 4th after their bowl game loss. Bama claims a NC from the UPI poll that was taken before they met Notre Dame in the bowl game and lost. There were 3 teams with better records than Bama that year. The embarrassment of naming Alabama number one caused the UPI to name champions after bowl games.

1978 National Championship- AP gives this to Alabama(11-1-0) even though USC (12-1-0) had the better record Guess who Alabama lost to that year? USC!!!!!!!!!. UPI gave the NC to USC.

1979 National Championship- Their second legitimate NC. Their first Unanimous NC.

1992 National Championship- Their third legitimate NC. Their second Unanimous NC.

You can see why people ridicule Bama fans when they talk about 12 NCs. The early ones were awarded by individuals years after the games were played. These weren't consensus polls but NCs awarded by people that had their own formula for determining champions. Some NCs where given before bowl games that Bama lost. Using Alabama logic, Auburn could claim four national championships. But when Bammers brag they like to say they have twelve and Auburn has one. How silly. The NCAA recognizes 6 NCs for Bama and there are only two NCs that Bama has unanimously. You can't find an Auburn site claiming four national championships but there are plenty Bama sites claiming twelve.



http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/AU505/96371

johngateswhiteley
12-13-2009, 02:35 PM
i'm sure other schools do this, but it does make the claim of 12 outrageous...if this is all true.

timvp
12-13-2009, 03:21 PM
ultimate crownage

symple19
12-13-2009, 04:10 PM
Funny, ain't it?

mookie2001
12-13-2009, 04:15 PM
sad really

theyre hurting their cause

symple19
12-13-2009, 04:29 PM
sad really

theyre hurting their cause

This is one of the things that Bammers get maligned for. I, for one, don't care how many actual championships they have, I care that they're arrogant enough to try to claim so many. It's the rich trying to get richer. IMO, they have 7 for sure, arguably 8 legit championships.

pkbpkb81
12-14-2009, 08:50 PM
usc dose the same thing

Ghazi
12-14-2009, 11:22 PM
Won't be any quarrels about the title they're winning this year, though.

tee, hee.

Trainwreck2100
12-15-2009, 01:39 AM
maybe from cincy and tcu

not from Cincy, co coach=ownage bwnage by FLA