PDA

View Full Version : Top 5 QB's in the NFL right now



monoslyab1k
12-27-2009, 12:30 AM
1. Vince Young
2. Peyton Manning
3. Tom Brady
4. Vince Young
5. Drew Brees

JMarkJohns
12-27-2009, 01:10 AM
Vince Young, the QB so nice you listed him twice? Significance of this?

Currently
1. Peyton Manning
2. Drew Brees
3. Philip Rivers
4. Vince Young
5. Tom Brady

badfish22
12-27-2009, 01:36 AM
1. Manning
2. Brees
3. Rivers
4. Brady
5. Romo
6. Rapelisraper

Spursfan092120
12-27-2009, 01:38 AM
1. Peyton Manning
2. Drew Brees
3. Tom Brady
4. Philip Rivers
5. Tony Romo

bresilhac
12-27-2009, 02:40 AM
1) Peyton Manning
2) Phillip Rivers
3) Drew Brees
4) Tom Brady
5) Ben Roethlisberger

Homo doesn't count. He's an overhyped cowpig. And look for Mr. Clutch to revert to his old December ways tonight at FedEx. Hail.

jag
12-27-2009, 03:06 AM
:lmao

HarlemHeat37
12-27-2009, 03:32 AM
the top 4 are easy..

#5 is tough because they're all inconsistent..Rothlisberger is an option, so is Aaron Rodgers IMO..Romo too, but it's tough to put him in for obvious reasons..it's kind of funny that so many are jumping back on the Romo bandwagon after they were all shitting on him just a little while ago..

Da Boys Da Best
12-27-2009, 11:35 AM
Tony Romo should be on top of everyone's list!

BUMP
12-27-2009, 11:54 AM
1) Peyton Manning
2) Phillip Rivers
3) Drew Brees
4) Tom Brady
5) Ben Roethlisberger

Homo doesn't count. He's an overhyped cowpig. And look for Mr. Clutch to revert to his old December ways tonight at FedEx. Hail.

The only team that will "revert" back to their old December ways is the Redskins by putting on another embarassing performance.

Oh wait, thats every month :lmao

BUMP
12-27-2009, 11:54 AM
Tony Romo should be on top of everyone's list!

:tu

I like this guy, troll or not, ever since he came along he's been a good luck charm

Whisky Dog
12-27-2009, 01:25 PM
Right now Romo is playing better than Brady. Was better than Brees last two weeks. Only ones definitely better right now are PManning and Rivers.

kamikazi_player
12-27-2009, 03:29 PM
the top 4 are easy..

#5 is tough because they're all inconsistent..Rothlisberger is an option, so is Aaron Rodgers IMO..Romo too, but it's tough to put him in for obvious reasons..it's kind of funny that so many are jumping back on the Romo bandwagon after they were all shitting on him just a little while ago..
I didn't shit on Romo, the only thing i shitted on was Roy Williams, their secondary, and kicker.

Spursfan092120
12-27-2009, 04:31 PM
I like Romo..always has...just needs to get his head out of his ass sometimes..I've been standing up for him all year...stats don't lie...dude's a great QB.

Dr. Gonzo
12-27-2009, 04:36 PM
I like Romo..always has...just needs to get his head out of his ass sometimes..I've been standing up for him all year...stats don't lie...dude's a great QB.

So now stats matter.

Rummpd
12-27-2009, 05:18 PM
When the Eagles absolutely cream the Boys again next week, and McNabb outplays Romo again as he chokes revise the rankings. Romo is an intensely talented athlete but win a DAMM playoff game first before appearing on any top 5 list!


By the way Aaron Rodgers has a far better arm and upside than Romo and among the younger quarterbacks is by far the best in the NFC.

IronMexican
12-27-2009, 05:26 PM
McNabb is better than Romo. I'd place him at #5.

monosylab1k
12-27-2009, 05:31 PM
By the way Aaron Rodgers has a far better arm and upside than Romo and among the younger quarterbacks is by far the best in the NFC.

If Aaron Rodgers had any semblance of a competent offensive line, he'd be putting up Marino numbers.

BUMP
12-27-2009, 05:32 PM
When the Eagles absolutely cream the Boys again next week, and McNabb outplays Romo again as he chokes revise the rankings. Romo is an intensely talented athlete but win a DAMM playoff game first before appearing on any top 5 list!


By the way Aaron Rodgers has a far better arm and upside than Romo and among the younger quarterbacks is by far the best in the NFC.

Tell how you really feel about Romo

DAF86
12-27-2009, 05:36 PM
McNabb is better than Romo. I'd place him at #5.

I agree that McNabb is better than Romo but he isn't the 5th best QB in the league right now, Manning, Brady, Brees, Roethlisberger and Rivers are the top 5 IMO.

IronMexican
12-27-2009, 05:36 PM
227 yards for McNabb in the first half so far.

Whisky Dog
12-27-2009, 05:44 PM
It doesn't matter if you like Romo or McNabb better - they're gonna play two games in a row to settle this with the second game being the winner take all game.

Rummpd
12-27-2009, 07:59 PM
I agree that McNabb is better than Romo but he isn't the 5th best QB in the league right now, Manning, Brady, Brees, Roethlisberger and Rivers are the top 5 IMO.

Fair assessment and I would put McNabb and Rodgers as the next two.

Phillip
12-28-2009, 01:23 PM
at this moment in time...

Manning
Rivers
Brees
Brady
McNabb

Phillip
12-28-2009, 01:23 PM
but if Brady gets back in form and stays consistent with it, he regains his rightful spot at #2 behind Manning

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-28-2009, 01:24 PM
Good list stretch, I agree for the most part.

IronMexican
12-28-2009, 01:25 PM
at this moment in time...

Manning
Rivers
Brees
Brady
McNabb

:tu

IronMexican
12-28-2009, 01:25 PM
Good list stretch, I agree for the most part.

Told you the Eagles are contenders, brah. It's about time that dumbass front office got McNabb some real weapons.

Phillip
12-28-2009, 01:30 PM
i know some will disagree with me putting Rivers ahead of Brees, but I like Rivers' heart when he plays. that guy has some serious balls, especially when he went out there and still gave the Pats a good fight despite that totally fucked up ankle. and to me, he seems to be a better playmaker when things break down, than Brees is. Brees has just been fortunate this year that nothing too bad has happened, but once they face a team that can get physical, slow the tempo down, and control the clock better (which I think the Eagles and Vikings can and will do if they face them in the playoffs), then i think hes gonna have some serious issues.

IronMexican
12-28-2009, 01:31 PM
i know some will disagree with me putting Rivers ahead of Brees, but I like Rivers' heart when he plays. that guy has some serious balls, especially when he went out there and still gave the Pats a good fight despite that totally fucked up ankle. and to me, he seems to be a better playmaker when things break down, than Brees is. Brees has just been fortunate this year that nothing too bad has happened, but once they face a team that can get physical, slow the tempo down, and control the clock better (which I think the Eagles and Vikings can and will do if they face them in the playoffs), then i think hes gonna have some serious issues.

No, no, no. Rivers is mentally weak:rollin

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-28-2009, 01:35 PM
Told you the Eagles are contenders, brah. It's about time that dumbass front office got McNabb some real weapons.


I don't think I ever said they weren't a contender, I think I just mistakenly thought the Cardinals were better, which was dead wrong. IMO, the Cardinals and Eagles are the two most dangerous teams in the NFC right now.

The thing about McNabb is his weapons are better this year but not GREAT by any means. DeSean Jackson is good largely cause McNabb throws the best deep ball in the NFL. If he had the Cardinals receivers it'd be something.

IronMexican
12-28-2009, 01:41 PM
And Aaron Rodgers is probably my #6. I just worry at how much he doesn't have fun out there. What's wrong with him? He never looks like some kid just slinging the ball around. It worries me.

JMarkJohns
12-28-2009, 01:44 PM
I don't think I ever said they weren't a contender, I think I just mistakenly thought the Cardinals were better, which was dead wrong. IMO, the Cardinals and Eagles are the two most dangerous teams in the NFC right now.

The thing about McNabb is his weapons are better this year but not GREAT by any means. DeSean Jackson is good largely cause McNabb throws the best deep ball in the NFL. If he had the Cardinals receivers it'd be something.

That's why I didn't understand Philly balking at the 1st/3rd demands for Boldin. Macklin is a quality WR, with solid potential to be a #2 receiver, but Boldin is a #1 and gives you everything a receiver should, save for the break-away speed (but his toughness makes up for that).

If Philly had Boldin's move-the-chains, possession receiver ability to complement Jackson's vertical game, they'd be the favorites in the NFC, and be right their as favorites for the NFL.

Philly wasted yet another of McNabb's prime seasons by doing the best for its longterm while sacrificing the immediate (where they are built to win).

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-28-2009, 01:47 PM
That's why I didn't understand Philly balking at the 1st/3rd demands for Boldin. Macklin is a quality WR, with solid potential to be a #2 receiver, but Boldin is a #1 and gives you everything a receiver should, save for the break-away speed (but his toughness makes up for that).

If Philly had Boldin's move-the-chains, possession receiver ability to complement Jackson's vertical game, they'd be the favorites in the NFC, and be right their as favorites for the NFL.

Philly wasted yet another of McNabb's prime seasons by doing the best for its longterm while sacrificing the immediate (where they are built to win).


I wouldn't say they wasted another year, they're right in the thick of things and at their best are as good as anyone. If they make it this far, I'd much rather AZ see the Saints or Vikings in the NFC 'ship than the Eagles.

IronMexican
12-28-2009, 01:59 PM
Jackson can be a solid #2 and Maclin a great slot. They really do have enough weapons now. Jason Peters has been a [pretty big bust from all the games I've watched though. They'd probably be better with Boldin rather than Peters. Although, when Peters got hurt vs the Raiders, the line was real bad.

The Eagles are already the NFC favorites. Hottest team in the NFC right now.

Spurs rock
12-28-2009, 02:02 PM
Brett Favre

JMarkJohns
12-28-2009, 02:02 PM
They have looked great, but when push comes to shove, do they have the over-the-middle options at wideout, or the toughness to get the needed yards-after-catch?

They are based around a good running game and the big play. In the playoffs the big play might be defended better. If such happens, will they be able to move the chains enough to get within FG range 4/5 times to offset the loss of the big play?

DisgruntledLionFan#54,927
12-28-2009, 02:10 PM
Boldin would have been an ideal fit for either Dallas or Philly. The RW trade was just a poor evaluation by the Dallas FO.

As for the Eagles, Celek is one of the most underrated TEs in the game. He's going to be a major factor in the playoffs and he's one tough SOB.

NFC is wide open and every team that's in has a legitimate chance to get to the SB.

IronMexican
12-28-2009, 02:12 PM
I don think the Packers are contenders. It's a good thing that they wont have to play in Lambeau after the Wild Card round(assuming they make it out), cause playing in that weather will really hurt their chances.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-28-2009, 02:46 PM
He's going to be a major factor in the playoffs and he's one tough SOB.

+1

He should have been a major factor in last year's playoffs. The Cardinals lose the NFC championship game if McNabb throws to Celek before his team is down by 18 points.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-28-2009, 02:58 PM
Jackson can be a solid #2 and Maclin a great slot. They really do have enough weapons now. Jason Peters has been a [pretty big bust from all the games I've watched though. They'd probably be better with Boldin rather than Peters. Although, when Peters got hurt vs the Raiders, the line was real bad.

The Eagles are already the NFC favorites. Hottest team in the NFC right now.


I haven't seen any Eagles games recently but I figured Peters and the rest of their line is playing better given how on fire their offense has been, could be wrong though. I saw one play where on 3rd and 15 the line defended a blitz extremely well and gave Jackson tons of time to develop a deep route.

JMarkJohns
12-28-2009, 04:02 PM
Here's the thing, the Eagles could have both Peters and Boldin. All it costs them is Maclin (or the 1st that was used on Maclin) and the tight end they drafted with the 3rd round pick (not needed nearly as much with Celek.

McNabb with McCoy/Westbrook in the backfield, Boldin, Jackson and Celek upfield and Peters anchoring their O-line? Disgusting... Instead they have Maclin and a backup TE, two good players for the future, but not great impact players for now.

That's the difference between making the Super Bowl and winning the Super Bowl.

DUNCANownsKOBE2
12-28-2009, 04:54 PM
Jackson can be a solid #2 and Maclin a great slot. They really do have enough weapons now. Jason Peters has been a [pretty big bust from all the games I've watched though. They'd probably be better with Boldin rather than Peters. Although, when Peters got hurt vs the Raiders, the line was real bad.


Their line is undoubtedly a question mark now that Jamaal Jackson is on IR.